8 Amendments of João FERREIRA related to 2019/2158(INI)
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas there is increasing competition between different uses of maritime space which often causes historical uses of evident historical, cultural, social and economic value, such as fishing, to be overlooked;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Takes the view that the installation of marine renewable energy production units shall be incorporated into and respond to the development strategies and energy sovereignty of each state;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Takes the view that decisions to install offshore renewable energy production infrastructure (wind, tidal or wave power) should be informed by the best scientific assessments of the associated impacts and involve all stakeholders in the exploitation of the areas to be occupied, in particular the associated fishing communities and their organisations;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Notes that the small-scale, coastal and artisanal fishing sector may bear the brunt of the impact of the installation of these offshore renewable energy production units, given their relative proximity to the coast;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that any restriction on access to traditional fishing grounds directly affects the livelihoods of EU fishers from the different EU Member States and dependent jobs ashore, and that it undermines the responsible and sustainable provision of food security;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to carry out an impact assessment to examine the expected economic, social and environmental consequences of constructing OWF facilities where they are likely to come into conflict with both the fishing sector and the sustainability of marine life;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that further EU legislation might be required in caseit is imperative that Member States’' maritime spatial planning does not guarantees the fair inclusion and preservation of fisheries;