BETA

14 Amendments of Ágnes HANKISS related to 2012/2096(INI)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication on critical infrastructure protection in the fight against terrorism (COM(2004)0702 final),
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 22 May 2012 on the European Union's Internal Security Strategy 4, __________________ 4 Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2012)0207
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9
– having regard to its resolution of 12 June 2012 on critical information infrastructure protection – achievements and next steps: towards global cyber-security45 , __________________ 45 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0237.
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 – footnote 4
4. Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0237.deleted
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the EU has not yet developed coherent policies of its own regarding critical information and infrastructure protection which requires a multidisciplinary approach that needs to cover the important aspects of civil liberties, justice and home affairs such as internal security, data protection and the right to confidentiality, thus enhancing security while respecting fundamental rights;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses that coordination within the EU should be strengthened and enhanced first and foremost between civilian and military actors and also the judicial and other competent authorities in preventing, combating and penalising attacks against information systems;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises that ‘Cyber Europe 2010’, the first pan-European exercise on critical information infrastructure protection, which was carried out with the involvement of various Member States and led by ENISA, proved to be a helpful action and an example of good practices; stresses also the need to create the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network at European level as soon as possible;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Emphasises the importance of pan- European exercises in preparation for large-scale network security incidents, and the definition of a single set of standards for threat assessment;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to explore the necessity and feasibility of an EU Cyber Coordination post considering that the vast number of ongoing activities performed by various international and EU institutions, bodies, agencies and Member States requires coordination in order to avoid duplication;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Encourages the EDA to deepen its cooperation with NATO, national and international centres of excellence, the European Cybercrime Centre at Europol contributing to faster reactions in the event of cyber attacks and especially with the Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE), and to concentrate on capacity building, training as well as on exchange of information and practices;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on all Member States to develop and complete their respective national cyber security and defence strategies with no further delay and ensure a solid policy- making and regulatory environment, comprehensive risk management procedures and appropriate preparatory measures and mechanisms; calls on ENISA to assist the Member States; expresses its support to ENISA in developing a Good Practice Guide on good practices and recommendations on how to develop, implement and maintain a cyber security strategy;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Highlights that the protection of critical information infrastructure is included in the EU Internal Security Strategy in the context of raising levels of security for citizens as well as businesses in cyberspace;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Is of the view that Member States, EU institutions and the private sector, in cooperation with ENISA, should take steps to increase the security and integrity of information systems, to prevent attacks and to minimise the impact of attacks; Supports the Commission in its efforts to come forward with minimum cyber security standards for companies; calls on the Commission to establish the European Public-Private Partnership for Resilience, which would be integrated with the work of ENISA and the European Government CERTs Group;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39 a. Underlines the importance of a structured dialogue between the main players and legislators in the EU and the USA involved in cyber defence for a common understanding and common interpretations and positions regarding legal and governance frameworks;
2012/09/11
Committee: AFET