4 Amendments of Bas EICKHOUT related to 2016/2018(INI)
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recalls that, as laid down in its recital 7, the new inter-institutional agreement should facilitate the negotiations in the framework of the ordinary legislative procedure and improve the application of Articles 290 and 291 TFEU, but deplores that this has not yet materialised; expresses strong dissatisfaction at the fact that the Council is still very reluctant to accept delegated acts when the criteria under Article 290 TFEU are met; stresses that this puts a substantial strain on negotiations;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Is very concerned that the Council is trying almost systematically to replace delegated acts with either implementing acts or with the ordinary legislative procedure; finds it particularly unacceptable when Council is trying to use the post-Lisbon alignment to replace the regulatory procedure with scrutiny with implementing acts or with the ordinary legislative procedure instead of delegated acts;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Stresses that the conferral of implementing powers under Article 291 TFEU for decisions that fall under Article 290 TFEU violates the Treaty and as a result unduly deprives Parliament of its control rights; points out that using the ordinary legislative procedure for amendments of non-essential elements of general scope in the basic act instead of delegated acts establishes a far higher threshold for such amendments; considers that such a higher threshold as well as full control by both sides of the co- legislator may indeed be politically desirable in certain sensitive matters, that it is however counter-productive in other matters (e.g. of more technical nature), insofar as it makes it far more difficult if not unlikely that necessary adaptations are made;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Expresses disappointment at the fact that the Commission did not always defend its own original proposals with regard to the use of delegated acts;