9 Amendments of Reinhard BÜTIKOFER related to 2016/2274(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that voluntary, inclusive and consensus-oriented standardisation processes have been effective; underlines that in areas like social, health, environment and safety there is still need for regulatory guidance
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises the strategic importance of ICT standardisation and calls on the Commission to support an EU well-coordinated European presence in international ICT fora, facilitating an increase in the international take-up of European standards;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Recognises the importance of ICT standards for interoperability of systems and applications; Underlines the role open standards have played in achieving interoperability, increasing innovation, societal and economic benefits, especially in the SME sector;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Asks the Commission to help Member States in rationaliseing the number of platforms and coordination mechanisms and increase their transparency and inclusiveness;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Encourages the European adoption of theMember States to develop a common reference architecture model based on Reference Architecture Model for Industry 4.0;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recognises the importance of Commission's concerns in the cybersecurity and encourages further steps to set the basis for a resilient and secure IoT ecosystem that can function without increasing the risks for other network based applications, infrastructure or connected devices.
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines the importance of agile standardisation processes, with appropriate involvement of manufacturing industries, SMEs and NGOs as well as standardisation organisations representing societal concerns at all;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the fact that timely delivery is crucial, considers that improvements have been made but the process of speeding up the elaboration and publication of standards should continue;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the fact that the FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) system of licensing strikes an important balance between innovators and technology users; underlines the concerns that a lack of legal clarity can undermine the fairness of the system; Points out that SME are especially disadvantaged in the licencing process and suggests that more transparency and guidance for the licencing conditions and guidance would increase the use of standards;