[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3

(3) The Treaty also establishes citizenship of the Union, which complements national citizenship of the respective Member States, and which is an important element in safeguarding and strengthening the process of European integration. For citizens to give their full support to European integration, greater emphasis should be placed on their common values, history and culture as key elements of their membership of a society founded on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights, cultural and linguistic diversity, tolerance and solidarity.

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marco SCURRIA, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 2

For the purposes of this Decision, ‘sites’ shall mean monuments, natural or urban sites, cultural landscapes, places of remembrance, cultural goods and objects, cultural routes and intangible heritage attached to a place, including contemporary heritage.

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 4

The action shall be open to the participation of the Member States of the European Union~~. This participation shall b~~ and third countries taking part in the EU Culture Programme on a voluntary basis.

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marco SCURRIA, Santiago FISAS AYXELÀ, Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 6 a (new)

6a. In the event that the panel of experts decides that neither of the two sites proposed by a Member State are eligible, the possibility will be assessed of awarding the label to one of the second sites proposed by the other Member States. However, no more than twenty-seven sites may be proposed for the European label each year.

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)

4a. The Commission shall forward to the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions a complete list of the sites proposed by the Member States.

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

~~A n~~New application ~~shall be submitted for these sites on the basis of~~s for these sites shall be subject to the new criteria and procedures laid down in Articles 6 to 9 and shall be transmitted to the Commission by the relevant Member States at the latest on 31 January [of the year in question].

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 7

The European Heritage Label shall be awarded to the sites covered by this paragraph in principle on a permanent basis under the conditions laid down in Articles 14 and 15 and subject to the continuation of the action.deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 8

~~Candidates which were not retained in the final list may submit a new application for the pre-selection at national level in the following years.~~deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

2. Member States which did not participate in the intergovernmental European Heritage Label shall have the possibility to propose up to a maximum of four sites for the attribution of the European Heritage Label in [the second year following the entry into force of the present Decision].deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2

An application shall be submitted for these sites on the basis of the criteria and procedures laid down in Articles 6 to 9 and shall be transmitted to the Commission by the relevant Member States at the latest on 31 January [of the year in question].deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3

The new applications shall be assessed by the European panel. If one of the sites proposed by a specific Member State does not fulfil the criteria or if further information is needed, the European panel shall initiate a dialogue with the Member State via the Commission in order to examine whether the application can be improved before a final decision is taken. Visits to the site may be organised if necessary.deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4

The European panel shall deliver a report on sites with a recommendation for the attribution of the European Heritage Label by the end of [the year in question] unless further clarifications are necessary from the Member State.deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5

~~The Commission shall then officially designate the sites.~~deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6

The European Heritage Label shall be awarded to the sites covered by this paragraph in principle on a permanent basis under the conditions laid down in Articles 14 and 15 and subject to the continuation of the action.deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 7

~~Candidates which were not retained in the final list may submit a new application for the pre-selection at national level in the following years.~~deleted

2010/10/04
Committee: CULT

Activities of Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID related to 2010/0044(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

Shadow reports (1)

Amendments (15)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024