27 Amendments of Sabine VERHEYEN related to 2012/2300(INI)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the long-awaited technical media convergence has now become a reality, particularly for broadcasting and the Internet, and European media, culture and network policy must adapt the regulatory framework to the new conditions and ensure that a uniform level of regulation can be established and enforced, also with a view to new entrants to the market from the European Union and third countries;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the advent of connected TV has shaken up the traditional value chain and necessitates drawing up a new strategy;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the advancement of technological developments leads inevitably to increase of user autonomy, there is a growing necessity to ensure protection of exclusive rights and the integrity of the content;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas consumers’ interest in hybrid receiving systems is constantly growing, so that the opportunities for dissemination of (interactive) on-line services, which take their starting point as traditional TV services as regards their content or conception or are related to them in terms of scope, are constantly and significantly increasing100% broadband coverage is crucial for increasing consumer interest in hybrid receiving systems;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the attention of each user is finite and, as the number of services on offer rises, it becomes more difficult to reach users, which means thatand access to and the findability, listing and recommendation of services will be decisive fordetermine their success;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the current provisions of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) do not yet take into account these newreflect this technological developments and whereas in particular graduaconvergence and instead regulation, which differentiates between television programmes (including webcasting and live streaming) and aucontinue to focus on the diovisual media services on demand, will become less important in its existing form, although differently regulated information and communications services are available on one and the same device, including services which do not fall within the scope of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, which may result in unequal competitive conditions and unacceptable discrepancies in the protection of usersding lines between content and network and the multiple competent regulatory and supervisory authorities at European, national and regional level;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the key regulatory objective of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive should be to preserve the high- quality diversity of supply and suppliers, which raises fresh questions of access, dissemination method and findability (e.g. in the case of platforms and app portals), regardless of the type of media;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly ensuring and promoting diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting human dignity and competition and protecting children, as well as quality- and content-based regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle, but at the same time the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use which have been made possible by hybrid receiving systems;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive – particularly ensuring and promoting diversity of opinion and of the media, protecting human dignity and protecting children, and encouraging media service providers to guarantee accessibility to visually and hearing impaired as well as regulation of advertising – retain their importance to society and their regulatory justification as a matter of principle, but at the same time the limits of the effectiveness and enforceability of these protective provisions are becoming increasingly apparent because of the methods of use which have been made possible by hybrid receiving systems;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas guaranteeing fair competition in the context of linear and non-linear services on hybrid platforms is of utmost importance, there is a need to ensure that European works do not find themselves underprivileged to obtain access to this new environment;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the mere chance fact of the existence of numerous services does not automatically result in the aforementioned regulatory objectives being attained, but their attainment needs to be safeguarded in advance, as undesirable developments can only be reversed to a limited extent and with considerable difficulties andand it is therefore appropriate to evaluate whether there will therefore remain a need for a specific regulatory framework for the use of services on demand in hybrid receiving systems;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission, in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and, insofar as necessary, in a supplementary manner in additional EU legal acts, to lay down provisions regulating services which will control the availability of, and access to, audiovisual media services and other communications services or their representation on hybrid receiving devices, so as to prevent producers of such receiving devices or suppliers of the services in question from exploiting their gatekeeper position in a way which discriminates against to evaluate to what extent it is necessary to revise the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other current requirements laid down in network and media regulations (e.g. the telecommunications package) with respect to the rules on findability and non- discriminatory access to platforms, expanding the concept of platforms and developing legislation on media concentration in order to adapt the existing instruments to new constent providerllations;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Takes the view that, in the case of regulatory measures for platform operators, care must be taken to ensure non-discriminatory access to platforms so that broadcasters, start-ups and SMEs can participate in the market on an equal basis;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to consider, bearing in mind the difference in remit between media services for which editorial responsibility is taken and other content, whether stricter regulation of TV platforms by comparison with Internet platforms or VOD portals is still appropriate and necessary, or whether a general ban on discrimination is sufficient;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission, by means of the prompt further development of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and other EU legis to consider which regulatory mechanisms are still necessary and useful against the background of convergence and which should perhaps be newly implemented, whereby the objective of convergent regulation should be to remove existing overregulation, to and create a level playing field for all content and service providers, taking account of the following minimum requirements, so as to ensure fair competition among content providers and guarantee users the chance to choose among a wide range of high-quality services on a footing of equal opportunity and without discrimination;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to review the provisions of the Audiovisual Media Services Directivehave an eye to future challenges of Connected TV, in ter alia with reference toms of the competitiveness in the industry, and particularly to fully exploit the opportunities afforded by liberalisation orby accessing greater flexibility of quantitative rules on advertising;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that the introduction of new or the extension of existing advertising bans or other measures which have an impact on advertising as a source of funding should be prevented so that new, internationally established business models which are already standard in the area of internet services can also be employed in the digital TV sector;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to ensure in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive that Member States are given the opportunity to grantxamine whether and how those content providers can be granted an appropriately privileged status with regard to findability on hybrid platforms (including portals, home pages and EPGs) to which the Member States assign a public broadcasting remit or which help to promote objectives in the public interest, particularly tosuch as ensureing media pluralism and cultural diversity, or which lastingly and demonstrably undertake to carry out duties in the public interest which maintain the quality and independence of reporting and promote diversity of opinion, in which connection service providers with the highest aspirations to comply with such obligations should also be assigned the most prominent position on platforms;.
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and Member States, in addition to such ‘must be found’ rules, to consider to what extent a reform of media regulation so as to move towards incentive and certification schemes and strengthen self- regulatory approaches can enable the aforesaid regulatory objectives of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, in particular as regards the protection of young people and human dignity, to be attained in a lasting fashion;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to ensure that these platforms are operated on the basis of an open, non-proprietaryinteroperable standard, in a way which accords with market conditions entailing fair competition and accords with consumer demand;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to advance media literacy of all EU citizens, in particular, through initiatives and coordinated actions aimed at increasing understanding of linear and non-linear media services;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that measures are taken, in particular, by device manufacturers and service providers to improve accessibility to linear and non-linear media services for elderly people and people with a disability such as the hard of hearing and the visually impaired;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to ensureTakes the view that platform services and portal services arshould be interoperable, so that, if possible, content need only be prepared once, irrespective of the particular device manufacturer or service provider,in order to givinge third parties equalthe opportunitiesy, without discrimination, to produce and market their own applications, irrespective of the medium of transmission;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recommends that all the European audiovisual services provided by these new players in the shape of distributors, aggregators or publishers should be more visible and better referenced on their platforms;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to ensure, in a legally binding manner, compliance with the principles of internet neutrality, which is vital where media convergence is concerned;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the anonymous use of TV and on-line services by means of hybrid receiving devices is guaranteed and that monitoring and exploitation of the user’s behaviour by manufacturers of devices or by third parties is not normally allowed, being permitted only with the witting and unambiguous consent of the userconsistent with the data protection rules in force;