4 Amendments of Rafał TRZASKOWSKI related to 2011/0817(NLE)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. on the basis of academic evidence and case-law, Protocol No 30 does not exempt Poland and the United Kingdom from the binding provisions of the Charter, it is not an 'opt-out', it does not amend the Charter and it does not alter the legal position which would prevail if it were not to exist*. The only effect it has is to create legal uncertainty not only in Poland and the United Kingdom but also in other Member States1,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. an important function of the Charter is to increase the prominence of fundamental rights and to make them more visible, but Protocol No 30 gives rise to legal uncertainty and political confusion, thereby undermining the efforts of the Union to reach and maintain a uniformly high level of rights protectionand according to the Commission opinion of 4 May 20121 the purpose of Protocol No 30 is to clarify the application of the Charter in relation to the laws and administrative action of Poland and the United Kingdom and of its justiciability within those Member States,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Recital Q
Q. major doubts exist as to whether there is a majority in the Czech Parliament to ensure ratification of the new protocol aimed at extending the application of Protocol No 30 to the Czech Republic; hence, it would be appropriate to wait until these doubts are resolved,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the European Council to decide not to examine the proposed amendment of the Treaties, in order to annex to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union a Protocol on the application of the Charter of Fundament of the Treaties; al Rights of the European Union to the Czech Republic;