6 Amendments of Jarosław WAŁĘSA related to 2013/2119(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that the right to petition the European Parliament is one of the fundamental pillars of European citizenship, arising from the Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, providing the tools for increasing public participation in the European Union’s decision-making process and emphasises, in light of this, the Committee on Petitions’ crucial role as the effective juncture between the citizen, Parliament and the Commission;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that, in light of the current economic situation, the EU legislation, needs to be even more effective, clear and efficient, bringing benefits for the citizens of the EU at minimum costs and paying full attention to the principles of subsidiary and proportionality;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines that due to the poor management of a public sector, the burden on the citizens is constantly rising; therefore urges the Commission and Member States to put more efforts in this sphere in order to improve theeffectiveness and efficiency of management and staff of this sector and reduce costs;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that citizens, businesses and other stakeholders expect a simple, clear and predictable regulatory framework; indicates that excessive regulation disrupts competitiveness and retards the growth of economy; points, therefore, to the need of a reduction in bureaucracy and administrative burdens and calls on the Commission to identify the pieces of legislation where regulatory costs can be reduced. In that case it is necessary to force good legislative practices in the EU;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges Member States to avoid unnecessary administrative requirements and burdens for enterprises which could delay growth of the economy; Member States therefore should clearly identify mandatory provisions of EU law and measures for their implementation proposed by parliaments on the national level, together with clarifications regarding the establishment of additional (not that indicated in the EU law) provisions ;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Urges the Commission to help competitive national institutions to ensure appropriate transposition and application of EU rules and to deterdetermine and eliminate the main risk factors to timely and appropriate implementation of new (or partly amended) pieces of legislation, as well as to recommend, what risk reduction factors have to be foreseen in the implementation plans; also, to pay more attention to the development of communication of bilateral national administrations and the Commission as well as to other forms of support to Member States;