4 Amendments of Artur ZASADA related to 2011/0177(APP)
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Takes the view that a lack of balance between the CAP budget’s size and breakdown and tighter uniform requirements for farmers would make it impossible to achieve the EU’s strategic goals and would undermine the Community nature of that policy;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls, therefore, on the Council to increase Heading 2 and the subheading for direct payments and market related expenditure to EUR 420 682 million and EUR 336 685 million respectivelyto EUR 420 682 million, corresponding to a freeze in real terms, as requested in its earlier resolutions; calls on the Council also to increase funding for the second pillar of the CAP;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. UnderlinesTakes the view that maintaining the existing breakdown between pillars would be a bad idea, since it would limit the imopportance of granting flexibility to Member States to move funds between the two pillars of the CAP, in order to address the challenges of rural areas in the most appropriate wayunities for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the CAP that increasing second-pillar funding would provide; believes, furthermore, that the proposal to transfer funds between CAP pillars, including from the second to the first pillar, is contrary to the approach adopted to previous CAP reforms and will in practice serve to perpetuate the current breakdown of first-pillar funding among the Member States;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Believes the introduction of a crisis- response mechanism to be an appropriate way of addressing changes in agricultural market circumstances;