5 Amendments of Artur ZASADA related to 2011/0398(COD)
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall, when taking ensure that, when noise- related action, consider is taken, the following combination of available measures is considered, with a view to determining the most cost-effective measure or combination of measures:
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsto apply operating restrictions as a first resort, but only after consideration of the other measures of the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member StatThe measures may, within the Balanced Approach, be differentiate noise mitigating measuresd according to aircraft type, runway use and/or timeframe covered.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. When the assessment of the noise situation reveals that new measures are necessary to achieve If this assessment indicates that new operating restriction measures may be required to address a noise problem at an airport, the competent authorities shall ensure that: (a) the method, indicators and information in Annex I are applied to take due account of the contribution of each type of measure under the Balanced Approach, before introducing operating restrictions. (b) At the appropriate level, technical cooperation is established between the airport operators, aircraft operators and air navigation service providers to examine measures to mitigate noise The competent authorities shall also ensure that local residents, or their representatives, and relevant local authorities are consulted, and that technical infor maintain the level of noise abatement objectives, the competent authorities shall take due account of the contion on noise mitigating measures is provided to them. (c) The cost-effectiveness of any new operating restriction is assessed, in accordance with Annex II. Minor technical amendments to existing measures without substantive implications on capacity or operations are not considered as new operating restrictions. (d) The consultation process with interested parties is organised in a timely and substantive manner, ensuring openness and transparency as regards data and computation methodology. Interested parties shall have at least three months prior to the adoption of the new operating restribuction of each type of measure under the Balanced Approach, in accordance with Annex I. s to provide comments. The interested parties shall at least include: (i) local residents, living in the vicinity of the airports, affected by air traffic noise or their representatives and the relevant local authorities; (ii) relevant airport operators; (iii) representatives of aircraft operators which may be affected by noise-related actions; (iv) relevant air navigation service providers; (v) the Network Manager, as defined in Commission Regulation No 677/2011; (vi) where applicable, the designated slots coordinator.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth dayin twenty-four months following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.