BETA

8 Amendments of Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA related to 2009/0143(COD)

Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) In order to ensure efficient and effective supervision and a balanced consideration of the positions of the national supervisory authorities in different Member States, the Authority should be able to settle disagreements between those authorities with binding effect, including within colleges of supervisors. A conciliation phase should be provided for, during which the national supervisory authorities may reach an agreement. The Authority's competence should cover disagreements on procedural obligations in the cooperation process as well as on the intin that respect should be specified in the sectoral legislation referpretation and application of Community law in supervisory decisionsd to in Article 1(2). Existing conciliation mechanisms provided for in sectoral legislation have to be respected. In the event of inaction by the national supervisory authorities concerned, the Authority should be empowered to adopt, as a last resort, decisions directly addressed to financial institutions in areas of CommunityUnion law directly applicable to them.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Within three months of receipt of the draft standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse the draft standards. The Commission may extend that period by one month. The Commission may endorse the draft standards only in part or with amendments where the Community interest so requires.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4
Where the Commission does not endorse the standards or endorses them in part or with amendments, it shall inform the Authority of its reasons, it shall propose justified amendments and send the draft standards back to the Authority. The Authority may amend the draft standards on the basis of the Commission’s proposed amendments and may resubmit the draft standards to the Commission for endorsement.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4 a (new)
Within one month of receipt of the amended standards, the Commission shall decide whether to endorse or reject them and shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of its decision, stating the reason.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the Authority maintains its decision, the Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 205 of the Treaty, shall, within two months, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Where the Council decides to maintain the Authority's decision, or where it does not take a decision within two months, the suspension of that decision shall be immediately terminated.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6 a (new)
Where the Council does not take a decision within two months, the decision shall be terminated.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The Council, acting by qualified majority as defined in Article 20516 of the Treaty on European Union, shall, within ten working days, decide whether the Authority's decision is maintained or revoked.
2010/03/23
Committee: ECON