7 Amendments of Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA related to 2021/2075(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recognises the key role of urban mobility, in particular public transport, in local economy and in environmentally sustainable post-COVID-19 recovery. It also emphasises the need to decrease significant external costs of transport in urban areas linked to the current model of mobility.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need for local authorities to adapt and reengineer public transport and infrastructure in order to ensure safe, healthymart, user-friendly, affordable and environmentally sustainable commuting options and to complement public transport with. Increasing the share of clean vehicles in the public transport fleets is key for reducing carbon emissions as well as improving air quality in cities. Public transport needs to be further complement by safe, competitive and affordable on-demand and shared transport services and smart parking;
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasizes that Cohesion Policy can provide decisive support to urban areas that aim to develop inclusive and fair smart-city initiatives. It can help them fulfil the stringent conditions necessary to seize the potential of both AI and the smart-city model (for instance, by improving administrative capacity and digital skills); Cohesion Policy should also encourage a shift from experimentation to scaling-up smart-city initiatives with funding and related support;
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the Commission to provide Member States with all the necessary guiding materials, differentiating between cities/regions based on their level of digitalisation and to facilitate access to funds for making alternative and sustainable mobility more attractive both for public authorities and the citizens;
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Stresses the need to properly coordinate the different EU initiatives and the different visions and strategies of smart cities within the Urban Agenda; believes that in order to increase the coherence and visibility of the objectives of these strategies, the European Parliament could collaborate closely with the Committee of the Regions;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls on the Member States to mobilise Digital Innovation Hubs, as these have a key role to play in supporting urban authorities in rolling out effective smart-city strategies, in particular, the AI should address the specific needs of public authorities in designing the new mobility and transportation models;
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6 c. Believes that all future measures must be science-based, technologically neutral and they should follow comprehensive impact assessments that take into account the economic, environmental and social consequences;