13 Amendments of Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ related to 2011/0398(COD)
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) For the airports where a noise problem has been identified, Member States shall ensure that the Balanced Approach in regard to aircraft noise management is adopted,
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) evaluate the likely cost-effectiveness of the available measuresnoise mitigation measures is evaluated;
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall, when taking ensure that, when noise- related action, consider is taken, the following combination of available measures is considered, with a view to determining the most cost-effective measure or combination of measures:
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsto apply operating restrictions as a first resort, but only after consideration of the other measures of the Balanced Approach.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The available measures may include the withdrawal of marginally compliant aircraft, if so deemed will cause necessary action.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. Member StatThe measures may, within the Balanced Approach, be differentiate noise mitigating measuresd according to aircraft type, runway use and/or timeframe covered.
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. WhenIf theis assessment of the noise situindicates that new operationg reveals that new measures are necessary to achieve or maintain the level of noise abatement objectives, the competent authorities shall take due account of the contribution of each type of measure under the Balanced Approach, in accordance with Annex I.striction measures may be required to address a noise problem at an airport, the competent authorities shall ensure that:
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a (new)
(a) the method, indicators and information in Annex I are applied to take due account of the contribution of each type of measure under the Balanced Approach, before introducing operating restrictions.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b (new)
(b) At the appropriate level, technical cooperation is established between the airport operators, aircraft operators and air navigation service providers to examine measures to mitigate noise The competent authorities shall also ensure that local residents, or their representatives, and relevant local authorities are consulted, and that technical information on noise mitigating measures is provided to them.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point c (new)
(c) The cost-effectiveness of any new operating restriction is assessed, in accordance with Annex II. A Minor technical amendments to an existing measures without substantive implications on capacity or operations is are not considered as a new operating restrictions.
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point d (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point d (new)
(d) The consultation process with interested parties is organised in a timely and substantive manner, ensuring openness and transparency as regards data and computation methodology. Interested parties shall have at least three months prior to the adoption of the new operating restrictions to provide comments. The interested parties shall at least include: (i) local residents, living in the vicinity of the airports, affected by air traffic noise or their representatives and the relevant local authorities; (ii) relevant airport operators; (iii) representatives of aircraft operators which may be affected by noise-related actions; (iv) relevant air navigation service providers; (v) the Network Manager, as defined in Commission Regulation No 677/2011; (vi) where applicable, the designated slots coordinator.
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. The competent authorities shall assess the cost-effectiveness of the new measures, as referred ton in paragraph 3 in accordance with Annex II. A minor technical amendment to an existing measure without substantive implications on capacity or operations is not considered as a new operating restfollow up and monitor the implementation of the operating restrictions and take action as appropriate. They shall ensure that relevant information is provided on a regular basis to the local residents living in the vicinity of the airports and to the relevant local authorictiones.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth daywenty four months following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.