4 Amendments of Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA related to 2011/0177(APP)
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas both beneficiaries and net contributors benefit from EU cohesion policy, and whereas over the period 2007- 2013 every euro in cohesion funding for Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia will have generated an average of EUR 0.61 in direct and indirect benefits for the EU-15 Member States;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Point i a (new)
Point i a (new)
ia. whereas experience with the current financial framework shows that absorption of funding needs to be maintained at 4% of GDP the capping rates for cohesion allocations;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Point i b (new)
Point i b (new)
ib. Given that cohesion policy provides support for measures to align economic and social conditions in all EU regions and in particular to reduce development disparities affecting the least favoured regions, is opposed to attempts to set up, to the detriment of cohesion policy, thematic funds that will undermine national financial envelopes;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that EU cohesion policy is a strategic tool for investment, growth and competitiveness, with an undisputed EU added value; insists that, in order to effectively reduce macroeconomic imbalances within the EU and contribute to economic, social and territorial cohesion, it should be able to rely on a stable, solid and sustainable financial framework; reaffirms its position that cohesion policy funding should be maintained at least at the level of the 2007-2013 period; stresses that any thematic funds should not undermine national financial envelopes, which could hinder the drive towards a results – orientated Cohesion policy in individual Member States;