44 Amendments of Paul NUTTALL
Amendment 286 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Amendment 356 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Amendment 357 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Article 3 – paragraph 2
Amendment 375 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Amendment 395 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 399 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 401 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Article 4 – paragraph 3
Amendment 407 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Article 4 – paragraph 4
Amendment 417 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 423 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 428 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Amendment 435 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Amendment 443 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Amendment 592 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. In order to ensure their graphic integrity and visibility, health warnings shall be irremovably printed, indelible and in no way hidden or interrupted, including by tax stamps, price marks, tracking and tracing marks, security features or by any type of wrapper, pouch, jacket, box or other device or by the opening of the unit packet.
Amendment 657 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cover 7540 % of the external area of both the front and back surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging;
Amendment 834 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Amendment 849 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Prohibited elements and features may include but are not limited to texts, symbols, names, trade marks, figurative or other signs, misleading colours, inserts or other additional material such as adhesive labels, stickers, onserts, scratch-offs and sleeves or relate to the shape of the tobacco product itself. Cigarettes with a diameter of less than 7.5 mm shall be deemed to be misleading.
Amendment 862 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13
Article 13
Amendment 866 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Amendment 867 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Article 13 – paragraph 1
Amendment 887 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Amendment 931 #
Amendment 1299 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 23
Article 23
Amendment 1324 #
2012/0366(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 26
Article 26
Amendment 7 #
2011/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is aware that CO2 emissions, as well as emissions of CO, NOx, VOCcarbon monoxide, NOx, volatile organic compounds, and SO4, have a strong influence on air quality, first and foremost in urban areas, and hence on human health in the form of lung diseases and different forms of cancer;
Amendment 32 #
2011/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 46 #
2011/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the Single European Sky and SESAR, if left to the guidance of industry and the free market, and be not interfered with by political governance, show how fuel consumption can be reduced by +/- 10%, in addition to the launch of new, fuel efficient and relatively silenquiet aircraft;
Amendment 58 #
2011/2096(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 18 #
2011/2087(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 21 #
2011/2087(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 44 #
2011/2087(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 215 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
Amendment 288 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 330 #
2011/2087(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
Amendment 1 #
2011/2020(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 9 #
2011/2020(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 22 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
Amendment 28 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
Amendment 34 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 35 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
Amendment 38 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In its Resolution on the enforcement of intellectual property rights in the internal market of 1 March 2010, the Council invited the Commission, the Member States and industry to provide the Observatory with available reliable and comparable data on counterfeiting and piracy and to jointly develop and agree, in the context of the Observatory, on plans to collect further information. The Council also invited the Observatory to publish each year a comprehensive annual report covering the scope, scale and principal characteristics of counterfeiting and piracy as well as its impact on the internal market. That annual report should not be prepared with the information provided by the authorities of the Member States, the Commission and the private sector, within the limits of data protection law, on the scope, scale and principal characteristics of counterfeiting and piracy as well as its impact on the internal market, as this would involve an onerous and unnecessary burden of expensive red tape and a duplication of existing functions, for example between local authority tradings standards offices.
Amendment 54 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) With regard to representatives of the private sector, the Office should involve, when assembling the Observatory in the context of its activities, a representative selection of the economic sectors most concerned by and most experienced in the fight against infringements of intellectual property rights, in particular representatives of right holders and Internet service providers. Also, a proper representation of cConsumers and of small and medium sized enterprises should be ensuredxempted from these processes.
Amendment 111 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Consumer organisations and small and medium sized enterprises shall be properly representedexempted from these processes.
Amendment 123 #
2011/0135(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) recommendations on the future policies in the area of the protection of intellectual property rights, including on how to enhance an effective cooperation between Member Statesthe principle of subsidiarity with regard to Member States and how to encourage independence, self-reliance and the free market.