18 Amendments of Giovanni LA VIA related to 2009/2155(INI)
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that the principle of cross- compliance should be maintained as one of the key concepts of CAP direct payments, but that strong simplification is recommended, without reducing their effectiveness;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need for the CAP to be simpler, more transparent and more equitable; in this respect a single flat rate payment would be preferable;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that the basic aim of inspections is to give advice to farmers and put them on the right track in order to better comply with the legislative requirements; inspections should, therefore, continue to be carried out by the public authorities to ensure they are independent and impartial;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Considers that cross-compliance requirements should be laid down and should also take farm size into account so as to reduce the burden on small farms, where the risk is lower;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Believes that yearly CC controls for statutory management requirements (SMR) should be reduced, or even and estabolished, if there have only been a few infringements in recent years on the basis of an assessment of their effectiveness and beneficial impact;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Considers that the controls carried out - or due to be carried out - at farms by the various parties whose job or statutory duty it is to conduct them should be coordinated with a view to reducing the number of farm inspection visits;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Considers that a communication plan on cross-compliance should be drawn up in order to provide as much information as possible, for both farmers and consumers, about cross-compliance requirements and the benefits arising from the public goods and services delivered by farmers whose activities comply with those requirements;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (nouveau)
Paragraph 15 a (nouveau)
15a. Considers that a single legislative text should be drawn up on cross- compliance;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Considers that the positive externalities generated by farms, in terms of public goods and services, should be fairly remunerated;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that the provision of information should be reduced, as the information needed can be found in the Board of Agriculture registerregister of holdings;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that the identification of animals should be done using the producerfarmer's number instead of the holding number;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Stresses that electronic identification of bovine animals should be voluntary and not compulsory;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Considers that for sheep and goats, as for pigs, herd identification is sufficient;