8 Amendments of Monica MACOVEI related to 2012/2196(DEC)
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Conflict of interest and Transparency
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets that according to the findings of the Court of Auditors, at the time of completion of the field work (October 2011), the Authority did not adequately manage conflict of interest situations; notes, however, that in the meantime the Authority had already developed advanced policies for managing conflicts of interest;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Acknowledges the Authority's efforts to improve its prevention and management of conflict of interests; notes however that the independence and competence of its external experts remain questioned by watchdog NGOs or even fellow food safety experts as for instance in the case of the working group on endocrine disruptors experts; underlines that as a consequence the Authority's work is challenged such as during the Joint JRC-NIEHS Workshop on Low Dose Effects of Endocrine Active Chemicals in Berlin in December 2012;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9 b. Is of the opinion that watchdog NGOs can provide additional valuable inputs to the Authority in order to assess its expert's independence; encourages therefore the Authority to engage in a constructive dialogue with these NGOs;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9 c. Notes that the Management Board elected its Chair in a publicly-held meeting; recalls however that in the 2010 discharge procedure the Parliament called for an open ballot for electing the Management Board's Chair and expects its request to be implemented;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Underlines the Authority's commitment to launch in October2012 its first evaluation of a random sample of declarations of interest to verify their coherence with its newly adopted independence policy and implementing rules; notes however that protocols still needed to be completed, which led to the postponement of the evaluation; calls on the Authority to inform the discharge authority on the reasons behind this delay and on the calendar foreseen for the organisation of the evaluation;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)