42 Amendments of Tamás DEUTSCH related to 2017/2136(DEC)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that as indicated in the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors, the estimated level of error in spending on ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ decreased from 5,2 % in 2015 to 4,8 % in 2016; notes the sustained improvement over the past three years; welcomes the fact that the Court issued a qualified opinion on the regularity of the transactions underlying the 2016 accounts; acknowledges that the error rate for the 2007-2013 programming period remains significantly below the rates reported for the previous period, which proves the overall positive impact of the corrective actions taken; underlines that further simplification of rules and reduction of the administrative burden could help decreasing even more the error rate;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reminds that irregularities are not necessarily all fraud and a distinction should be made between fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities; it is in part for this reason that the suspension of payments in case of irregularities should only be used as a last resort;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Draws attention to the role administrative capacities play in the regular use of the European Structural and Investment Funds and considers that an exchange of good practices could effectively contribute to enhancing Member States' capacities in this field;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to align policy objectives, financial cycles, the legislative period of the Parliament and the mandate of the Commission; Acknowledges, however, that the timing of the next Parliament elections in spring 2019, given that the current MFF runs until December 2020, does not allow for solution to be implemented immediately; takes the view, therefore, that the next MFF should be set for a period of seven years (2021- 2027);
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the average disbursement rate for financial instruments was only 75 % at the end of 2015, which shows that the potential of those instruments is not fully exploited, while emphasising that grants are the main form of cohesion policy support due to the fact that not all investments are bankable or have quantifiable results in the short term; points out that the revision of the Financial Regulation which is due to enter into force in 2018 will significantly contribute to the simplification, improvement and optimisation of their use during current programming period;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to speed up the delivery of cohesion policy programmes and related payments with a view to reducing the length of the implementation period, initially, to year n+2;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
Paragraph 44
44. Points out that the delays in the implementation of programmes in the first three years of the current MFF led to the transfer of commitment appropriations from 2014, mainly to 2015 and 2016, and to low payments in 2016; however points out that 2017 was the first year when the implementation of ESIF programmes accelerated, expects that this trend will continue in 2018 and 2019;believesthat sufficient levels of payment and appropriations for commitments should be provided in order for implementation to proceed smoothly;
Amendment 108 #
48. Recalls that the Union is making increasing use of financial instruments and that the establishment of EFSI creates new governance arrangements with limited public scrutiny; highlights that any legislative proposal should improve significantly the geographical coverage of the EFSI; recalls that the EFSI should remain an additional tool for boosting investments as cohesion policy should remain the investment policy of the Union;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50
Paragraph 50
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 138 – point e
Paragraph 138 – point e
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 22
Subheading 22
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 156
Paragraph 156
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 156
Paragraph 156
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157
Paragraph 157
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157 – point a
Paragraph 157 – point a
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157 – point b
Paragraph 157 – point b
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157 – point c
Paragraph 157 – point c
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 157 – point d
Paragraph 157 – point d
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158
Paragraph 158
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158 – point a
Paragraph 158 – point a
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158 – point b
Paragraph 158 – point b
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158 – point c
Paragraph 158 – point c
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 160
Paragraph 160
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 159
Paragraph 159
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 160
Paragraph 160
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 161
Paragraph 161
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 162
Paragraph 162
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 165
Paragraph 165
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 163
Paragraph 163
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 163 – point a
Paragraph 163 – point a
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 163 – point b
Paragraph 163 – point b
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 163 – point c
Paragraph 163 – point c
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 163 – point d
Paragraph 163 – point d
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 163 – point e
Paragraph 163 – point e
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 167
Paragraph 167
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 164
Paragraph 164
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 165
Paragraph 165
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 166
Paragraph 166
Amendment 283 #
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 167
Paragraph 167
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 168
Paragraph 168
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 261 – point c
Paragraph 261 – point c
(c) the hotspot approach further requires that migrants be channelled into appropriate follow-up procedures, i.e. a national asylum application, relocation to another Member State or return to the country of origin and the implementation of these follow-up procedures is often slow and subject to various bottlenecks, which can have repercussions on the functioning of the hotspots;