7 Amendments of Cornelia ERNST related to 2014/2256(INI)
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that copyright and related rights constitute the legal framework for the European cultural and creative industries and form the basis for their ability to generate economic activity and employmenbut in their current form have become an obstacle to creativity and innovation, in particular with respect to transformative uses of works of art;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the need to review Directive 2001/29/EC in order to ensure appropriate remuneration for copyright holdauthors and performers and appropriate protection of these rights in a changing and constantly evolving technological environmentworld, which brings both opportunities and challenges;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the multi-territorial licensing of rights under Directive 2014/26/EUConsiders a single European Copyright Title as an example and a way of overcoming the fragmented internal market; encourages the development of balanced and flexible and as a balanced solutions that would help overcome the existing barriers to cross-border access and availability of products and services;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that protection of copyright and related rights must respect technological neutrality; furthermore stresses that all rights and limitations in the digital environment should be equal to those granted in the analogue world;
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines the need for a broad and mandatory exception for research purposes, text and data mining, which should cover any kind of research activity.
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Calls for a flexible interpretation of exceptions and limitations to exclusive rights, allowing to apply exceptions and limitations to uses that are similar to the ones in the original legal provisions, thereby ensuring that exceptions and limitations can be adapted to new forms of usage emerging due to technological change;
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Urges the Commission to take into account the rapidly growing user-created content on the internet when reviewing copyright rules; any new proposal should aim to find a fair balance between protecting IPRcopyright and fostering a dynamic and creative internet by making limitations and exceptions mandatory, thereby achieving greater harmonisation.