7 Amendments of Cornelia ERNST related to 2018/2645(RSP)
Amendment 25 #
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the recent designation of two additional Members coupled with the nomination of the Chairman of the PCLOB and calls on the Senate to ratify the names so as toscrutinise their profiles in order to ratify the designation and start works without furtherdelay;
Amendment 63 #
Paragraph 15
15. Regrets that the U.S. did not seize the opportunity of the recent reauthorization of FISA Section 702 to include the safeguards provided in PPD-28; calls for evidence ensuring that data collection under FISA Section 702 is not indiscriminate and access is not conducted on a generalised basis (bulk collection) in contrast with the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights; calls for an updated report from the PCLOB on the definition of ´targets´, on the ´tasking of selectors´ and on the concrete process of applying selectors in the context of the UPSTREAM programme;
Amendment 70 #
Paragraph 18
18. Expresses its strong concerns regarding the recent adoption of the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act or CLOUD Act (H.R. 4943), which, running counter to the principle enshrined in Article 48 of Regulation EU 2016/679 (GDPR), expands the abilities of American and foreign law enforcement to target and access people’s data across international borders without making use of the instrument of Mutual legal Assistance (MLAT) instruments, which provide for appropriate safeguards and respect the judicial competences of the countries where the information is located;
Amendment 73 #
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that a more balanced solutionthe best solution compatible with EU law would have been to strengthen the existing international system of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) in view of encouraging international and judicial cooperation;
Amendment 81 #
Paragraph 23
23. Calls uponUrges the Commission and the U.S. competent authorities to restart discussions on the Privacy Shield arrangement and to set up an action plan in order to address as soon as possible the deficiencies identified by the Commission report on the joint review and in the WP29 report on the joint review;
Amendment 85 #
Paragraph 24
24. Is concerned as to whetherConsiders that the current Privacy Shield arrangement does not provides the adequate level of protection required by Union data protection law and the EU Charter as interpreted by the European Court of Justice.
Amendment 88 #
Paragraph 25
25. Instructs its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to continue to monitor developments in this field, including on cases brought before the Court of Justice, and the follow up to the recommendations made in the resolution;