BETA

Activities of Michèle STRIFFLER related to 2010/2101(INI)

Plenary speeches (1)

European Consensus on humanitarian aid (short presentation)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2010/2101(INI)

Reports (1)

REPORT on implementation of the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid: the mid-term review of its action plan and the way forward PDF (187 KB) DOC (109 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: DEVE
Dossiers: 2010/2101(INI)
Documents: PDF(187 KB) DOC(109 KB)

Amendments (11)

Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas, in the common vision of humanitarian aid enshrined in the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid, particular emphasis is placed on the Union’s will to cooperate closely in this field in order to optimise its effectiveness, to defend and promote the basic humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence and actively to advocate the observance of international humanitarian law,
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the commitments derived from the Consensus apply both to the Member States and to the Commission, and whereas the actions listed in the action plan must, in most cases, be implemented by the Commission and Member States acting in concert,
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the provision of aid is becoming increasingly difficult and dangerous, whereas the insecurity of humanitarian aid staff is increasing and whereas, in 2008, 122 humanitarian aid workers were killed,
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas more specific attention ought to be directed at the most vulnerable groups of people, such as women, children and forcibly displaced persons, and whereas the worsening incidence of gender-related violence and sexual violence is a major problem in humanitarian contexts, with systematic rape being used in some cases as a weapon of war,
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the recent tragedies in Haiti and Pakistan demonstrated once again that the tools available to the EU for responding to disasters (humanitarian aid and the Community Civil Protection Mechanism) need to be improved in terms of effectiveness, speed, coordination and visibility and whereas these disasters have highlighted once again the need to create a European rapid reaction capacity,
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers it regrettable that the Member States are not more involved in implementing the cConsensus and considers that the role of the Council’s Working Party on Humanitarian Aid and Food Aid (COHAFA) should be reinforced with a view to better monitoring of how the cConsensus is implemented – for example by organising specific sessions on integrating the Consensus into national humanitarian strategies or submitting an annual activity report – and more active pursuit of the remit to argue the case for humanitarian aid with other Council wWorking gGroups and with the Political and Security Committee (PSC);
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Supports the essential role played by NOHA (the first network of universities offering humanitarian aid training at European level) in promoting greater awareness of the world humanitarian context and particularly European policy in response to the needs of the most vulnerable groups by means of education and training of young Europeans;
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that the external action of the European Union, provided for in the Lisbon Treaty, must respect the principles espoused and commitments given in the Consensus on Humanitarian Aid, and considers that the EU should, in the light of its political weight and its influence as the main international donor, promote humanitarian principles unstintingly;
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the December 2009 review of the EU Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) and considers that the Commission and the Member States have a major political role to play in their implementation; hopes, also, that specific training in international humanitarian law will be provided at the EEAS;
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that the principles and good practices in the field of humanitarian aid adopted in June 2003 emphasise the need to encourage the rendering of accounts and the regular assessment of international responses to humanitarian crises, including examinations of the performance of donors, and stresses that these assessments must be the subject of wider consultation, particularly with humanitarian actors;
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Considers that the European civil protection force could comprise a commitment by certain Member States to voluntarily make available predetermined essential civil protection modules, which would be ready to intervene immediately for EU operations coordinated by the MIC, and also considers that most of these modules, which are already available at national level, would remain under their control and that the deployment of these modules on a standby basis would form the nucleus of the EU’s civil protection to respond to disasters outside and inside the EU;
2010/11/19
Committee: DEVE