6 Amendments of Nadja HIRSCH related to 2012/2030(INI)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that micropayments are becoming increasingly used toimportant in paying for media and cultural content online, but that there is still scope to further optimise ease of use;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that new and expanding internet technologies and online services have increased demand for audiovisual and other cultural and creative digital content; notes, however, that there is currently insufficient supply to meet this demand and that availability is being hampered by rights holders;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the proposals for increasing availability and developing legal online content services, but highlights that this is inhibited by the EU’s fragmented copyright systemoften made difficult by the variations in the way copyright regulations are transposed;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Emphasises that all measures that restrict access to Internet sites containing or distributing illegal content must be defined in transparent processes and must offer sufficient security provisions to ensure that restrictions are proportionate and do not exceed the bounds of necessity and that users are informed of the reason for the restriction; these security provisions also include the possibility of legal appeal;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets the Commission’s proposals for cooperative measures with payment services to combat unauthorised or illegal content; acknowledges that analysing the use of payment services can help identify individuals providing such content; reiteratcognises that analysing the use of payment services can help identify individuals providing unauthorised or illegal content; emphasises that the first step must be the fast and effective implementation of ‘notice and take down’ measures; clarifies that the universal and fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal established by law must be unequivocally ensured both for infringers of IPR and for injured parties;