Activities of Nadja HIRSCH related to 2012/2323(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on Follow-up on the delegation of legislative powers and the control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers
Amendments (4)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. StressesIs critical of the fact that the delegation of legislative powers to the Commission involves significant political and strategic questions; stresses that it is important for European Parliament committees to adopt a coherent approach in this context; points out, with regard to the MFF legislative proposals, that, when not included in the basic act, ‘elements such as objectives and priorities, financial allocations in broad terms (...) should be adopted by delegated acts’1;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Criticises the Council and the Commission for systematically trying to avoidgive implementing powers precedence over delegated acts in legislative proposals; calls on those institutions to respect Articles 290 and 291 TFEU regarding the distinct nature of delegated acts compared to implementing acts; recalls that in the field of employment and social affairs, Parliament has challenged the validity of the EURES decision2 before the Court of Justice in order to defend its prerogatives;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Council and Commission to attempt to keep to a minimum the overall use of delegated acts pursuant to Article 290 TFEU and implementing powers pursuant to Article 291 TFEU;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to inform the rapporteur with responsibility for a basic act about the preliminary work on a delegated act no later than during the preparatory stage of work on the delegated act;