6 Amendments of Andrea COZZOLINO related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stressed that all AI-systems in defence must have a concrete and well- defined domain of use and must be endowed with the ability to detect and disengage or diseactivate deployed systems should they move from their domain of use or engage in any escalatory or unintended action; Is of the opinion that advanced weaponised AI systems and technology should be prohibited from taking any lethal actions using advanced data stemming from prediction of potential hostile behaviour, without human oversight and confirmation;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Highlights the importance of ensuring that AI-enabled systems, weapons, products and technology that are produced in the Union have advanced software security provisions in accordance with the "safety by design approach" which would render it difficult to hack or interfere with by foreign stakeholders or malicious groups, and allow for specific human oversight before operating such systems compromised by unknown sources;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines that the entire responsibility for the decision to design, develop, deploy and use AI-systems must rest on human operators and the human-in- the-loop principle must also be applied to the command and control of AI-enabled systems; stresses that AI-enabled systems must allow the military leadership to assume its full responsibility and exercise the necessary level of judgment for taking lethal or large-scale destructive action be means of such systems; emphasises the need for humans to always retain the final control in the execution of any decision of AI empowered weapons that might have lethal consequences; stresses the need to establish clear and traceable authorisation and accountability frameworks for the deployment of smart weapons and other AI-enabled systems, using unique user characteristics like biometric specifications to enable deployment exclusively by authorised personnel;
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Suggests that special attention should be paid to the technological advancement, development and deployment of drones in military operations; urges the Commission to create a code of conduct on using drone for military operations considering the potential damage they can inflict on critical infrastructures and civilians; stresses that the aforementioned code of conduct should be respected by all third countries which have economic and diplomatic ties with the Union;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Stresses the need for a coordinated and cautious framework on the exporting of security and defence-related AI- enabled systems, products and technology to third countries; highlights the potential risks pertaining to the exporting of AI- enabled systems, products and technology to countries with authoritarian regimes or otherwise opaque systems of governance which may lead to the uncontrollable or unintended use of such applications against citizens and/or the Union; calls on the Commission to create an EU body or agency on AI tasked with the oversight, evaluation and coordination of Member States’ export activities of AI-enabled systems, products and technology in the field on security and defence to third countries;
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)