Activities of Philippe JUVIN related to 2014/2256(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights (A8-0209/2015 - Julia Reda) FR
Amendments (5)
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that Directive 2001/29/EC (Infosoc Directive) was adopted in 2001 and that the digital usesupply of material subject to copyrightin accordance with copyright and the use thereof has changed and dramatically increased since then, with new operators emerging, resulting in an imbalance with regard to value sharing;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that the value generated in the digital economy by copyrighted works should be shared fairly with the rights holders; calls on the Commission to assess the extent and impact of this value transfer in favour of digital technical intermediaries;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fact that Member States’ provisions on copyright and related rights vary considerably, and that the exclusivity which copyright grants its owner is, in principle, limited to the territorial boundaries of the Member State where the right has been granted, which leads to market fragmentation across the EU; recalls that the European market is not homogeneous and that national markets evolve at different rates; recalls also that consumption patterns, and hence content also, correspond to specific expectations in each Member State;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. StressNotes that territorial fragmentation may require users aspiring to offer content-related services across the EU to secure multiple licenses; emphasises the fact that differences in limitations and exceptions create additional legal costs and legal uncertainty; recalls that consumers may be denied access to certain content servioday it is possible to grant contractual multi-territorial licences subject to market conditions; notes, however, that in view of the specific nature of the audiovisual and film sectors with their high production costs, different distribution and financing methods may be justified, depending on the places on geographical groundsf consumption;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Highlights the importance of promoting greater interoperability for software and terminals, as lack of interoperability hampers innovation and reduces competition in the EU and slows down innovation; the resulting lack of interoperability is hampering the development of new content services at the expense of artists seeking a broader public throughout Europe; believes that lack of interoperability may lead to market dominance of one particular product, which in turn stifles competition and limits consumer choice in the EU.