17 Amendments of Izaskun BILBAO BARANDICA related to 2015/2092(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas, since 2009, legislative proposals regarding technical measures and multiannual plans have made littleno headway, partly on account of tensions arising between the European institutions concerning their respective decision- making powers under Article 43 TFEU with regard to Commission proposals in the case offor the multinational plans and partlythe subsequent deadlock in Council, and because of difficulties in bringing legislation into line with the Lisbon Treaty regarding the technical measures;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the reform of the common fisheries policy (CFP) included among its objectives the achievement of maximum sustainable yield (MSY), using an ecosystem-based approach; whereas technical measures and multiannual plans, which are concerned with conservation, are the main tools to achieve these objectives;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the main changes introduced underof the 2013 CFP reform also include discard elimination and regionalisation;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas technical measures are currently so complex, diverse and, disorganised, as to be frequently inconsistent or even, contradictory, not to mention being difficult for those in the fisheries sector to comprehendincomprehensible and complex that they have produced no positive results or incentives for the sector and have made the sector mistrustful;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas regionalisation canwill help make the rules for the sector simpler and more comprehensible, and will ensure that rules are adapted to the specific requirements of each fishery and each basin, ensuring flexibility and facilitating a rapid response to any emergencies arising and should also avoid any temptation towards renationalisation;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
Recital N
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital S
Recital S
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital V
Recital V
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital W
Recital W
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital X
Recital X
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that, as far as possible, technical measures should be adapted to the specific needs of each fishery and each region, thus helping to improve compliance by the industry concerned;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that, in order to makeeet CFP rules more acceptable to the fisheries sector and ensure compliance therewith,objectives fishermen must be more involved in decision making, given incentives such as morewith the inclusion of incentives and increased aid for innovation, and encouraged to use more selective fishing gear;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that there is an urgent need to establish a coherent set of technical operational procedures for each of the three main basins, taking account of the specific nature of each, especially that of the Mediterranean, where Community decisions may have a significant impact on competition between European and third-country fishing fleets;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that multi-annual plans are being called on to play an increasingly significant role in the conservation of fisheries resources under the CFP, being the most suitable vehicle for the adoption and implementation of specific technical measures at regional level;