11 Amendments of Birgit SIPPEL related to 2016/0409(COD)
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point x
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point x
(x) relevant DNA profiles subject to Article 22(1)(b) of this Regulationwhere permitted in accordance with Article 22(1)(b) and Article 32(2)(a) and (c), relevant DNA profiles;
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Photographs, facial images, and dactylographic data and DNA profiles shall only be entered following a quality check to ascertain the fulfilment of a minimum data quality standard.
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2
2. Where available, allnd provided that the conditions for entering such data have been met, the other data listed in Article 20(3) shall also be entered.
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where there is a clear indicationevidence that a person intends to commit or is committing a serious crime, in particular then offences referred to in Article 2(2) of the Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA where that offence is punishable, in the issuing Member State, by a judicial decisions executing a custodial sentence or detention order for maximum period of at least three years;
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 3
Article 36 – paragraph 3
3. In addition, an alert may be issued in accordance with national law, at the request of the authorities responsible for national security, where there is a concrete indicationclear evidence that the information referred to in Article 37(1) is necessary in order to prevent a serious threat by the person concerned or other serious threats to internal or external national security. The Member State issuing the alert pursuant to this paragraph shall inform the other Member States thereof. Each Member State shall determine to which authorities this information shall be transmitted.
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 4
Article 36 – paragraph 4
4. Where there is a clear indicationevidence that vehicles, boats, aircraft and containers are connected with the serious crimes referred to in paragraph 2 or the serious threats referred to in paragraph 3, alerts on those vehicles, boats, aircraft and containers may be issued.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 5
Article 36 – paragraph 5
5. Where there is a clear indicationevidence that blank official documents or issued identity documents are connected with the serious crimes referred to in paragraph 2 or the serious threats referred to in paragraph 3, alerts on those documents, regardless of the identity of the original holder of the identity document, if any, may be issued. The technical rules necessary for entering, updating, deleting and searching the data referred to in this paragraph shall be laid down and developed by means of implementing measures in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 72(2).
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 4
Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. Depending on the operational circumstances and in accordance with national law, and without prejudice to the rights of suspects and accused persons to have access to a lawyer in accordance with Directive2013/48/EU1a, an inquiry check shall comprise a more in-depth check and a questioning of the person. Where inquiry checks are not authorised by the law of a Member State, they shall be replaced by discreet checks in that Member State. _________________ 1a Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 1
1. PWhere such data is contained within an alert in the SIS, either photographs, facial images, dactylographic data andor DNA profiles shall be retrieved from SIS to verify the identity of a person who has been located as a result of an alphanumeric search made in SIS.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 2
Article 51 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State issuing an alert shall, within fivthree years of its entry into SIS, review the need to retain it. Alerts issued for the purposes of Article 36 of this Regulation shall be kept for a maximum period of one year.
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 5
Article 51 – paragraph 5
5. IAs soon cases where it becomes clear to staff in the SIRENE Bureau, who are responsible for coordinating and verifying of data quality, that an alert on a person or an object has achieved its purpose and should be deleted from SIS, the staff shall notify the authority which created the alert to bring this issue to the attention of the authority. The authority shall have 30seven calendar days from the receipt of thisat notification to indicate that the alert has been or shall be deleted or shall state reasons for the retention of the alert. If the 30seven-day period expires without such a reply, the alert shall be deleted by the staff of the SIRENE Bureau. SIRENE Bureaux shall report any recurring issues in this area to their national supervisory authority.