BETA

12 Amendments of Gabriel MATO related to 2017/2120(INI)

Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas it is important to understand the difference between recreational fisheries and semi-subsistence fishing, because the two should be evaluated and regulated separately and it should be made clear that recreational fishing is not semi-subsistence fishing;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, according to a recent study commissioned by the European Parliament, the impact of recreational fisheries may vary between fish stocks, representing 2-72% of total catch;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas recreational fisheries could represent a significant source of fishing mortality, have impact on ecosystems, and interact with commercial fisheries and other users of the marine environment;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls upon the Commission to include and improve the existing provisions for recreational fishing in the new control regulation;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls upon the Commission to conduct an impact assessment on the recreational fishing in the EU; the assessment of the management plans which include recreational fishing provisions should also be embedded in the Commission’s final report on the impact assessment;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all the necessary data on recreational fisheries are collected in order to provide a complete evaluation of fish stocks, namely with the view to setting TACs; cautions that without such a comprehensive evaluation, the multiannual planfisheries management and technical measures might not achieve the objectives of the CFP;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recreational fisheries should be included as an integral part in the ecosystem, social and economic considerations of fisheries management;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Management and technical measures for fisheries shall apply also to recreational fisheries, where relevant;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to propose a comprehensive regulation on maritime recreational fisheries, as well as a definition for the activity at EU level, to be included in the future CFP, so that both types of maritime fishing – commercial and recreational – can be managed in a balanced, fair and sustainable manner with a view to achieving the desired objectidefinition for recreational fishing at EU levesl;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 119 #
7a. Based on the data and the impact assessment report, the Commission should evaluate the role of recreational fisheries in the future CFP, so that both types of maritime fishing – commercial and recreational – could be managed in a balanced, fair and sustainable manner with a view to achieving the desired objectives;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reminds that the EMFF provides funds for data collection, including recreational fisheries; calls upon the Commission to widen the future scope of the EMFF in order to provide financial support for research and analysis of the data collected;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Reminds that traceability is the best tool in determining and controlling when recreational fishing becomes semi- subsistence fishing;
2018/03/01
Committee: PECH