8 Amendments of Marietje SCHAAKE related to 2010/0273(COD)
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Attacks against information systems, in particular as a result of the threat from organised crime, are a growing menace, and tThere is increasing concern about the potential for terrorist or politically motivated attacks against information systems which form part of the critical infrastructure of Member States and the Union. This constitutes a threat to the achievement of a safer information society and an area of freedom, security and justice, and therefore requires a response at the level of the European Union.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) A thorough, reliable and independent assessment of the overall level of threat of attacks against information systems should be carried out. The Union institutions should adjust their level of information security accordingly.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) There is a need to assess the real level of threat of attacks against information systems by a reliable, independent authority and to discuss coordination at the level of the Union to help integrate different initiatives, programmes and activities.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) There is a need to collect data on offences under this Directive, in order to gain a more complete picture of the problem at Union level and thereby contribute to formulating more effective responses. The data will moreover help specialised agencies such as Europol and the European Network and Information Security Agency to better assess the extent and impact of cybercrime and the state of network and information security in Europe.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) The Commission should examine the feasibility of providing frameworks or instruments to help public private partnerships (PPP) cooperate with each other at national level and Union level, to implement information quality standards for interoperability, and to ensure respect for fundamental rights, the separation of powers and democratic supervision.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) This Directive and any practical application thereof respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including the protection of personal data, freedom of expression and information, the right to a fair trial, presumption of innocence and the rights of the defence, as well as the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties. In particular, this Directive seeks to ensure full respect for these rights and principles and must be implemented accordingly. The free and open nature of the internet is not adversely affected by this Directive.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall take the necessary measure to ensure that the production, sale, procurement for use, import, possession, distribution or otherwise making available of the following iscan be punishabled as a criminal offence when committed intentionally and without right for the purpose of committing any of the offences referred to in Articles 3 to 6, as determined in a fair trial:
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall review the application of this Directive and, in particular, the need to appoint a Union Cybersecurity Coordinator in order to assess the level of threat and facilitate the integration and coordination of the Union institutions’ initiatives, programmes and activities.