12 Amendments of Sylvie GUILLAUME related to 2017/2052(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the structure of the new multiannual financial framework (MFF) mustshould better correspond to the top five political priorities of the EU; calls for more coherence between the funding of the EU budget and its objectives, if needed by breaking the 1 % glass ceiling of Member State GDP contributions and/or by adapting and reducing the EU’s objectives;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of the different EU funds and highlights that actions in the field of security and migration should not only be covered by dedicated, yet limited, instruments, such as the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) or the Internal Security Fund (ISF), but should alsowith sufficient resources from the outset for the entire duration of the next multiannual financial framework. It should not be inexcluded by design inthat other more generic future instruments such as the European Social Fund (ESF), the Cohesion Fund or Security Union Fund (corresponding to the European Agenda on Security); recommends that all Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies should have access to these funds to strengthen their operational capabili may fund actions which are also relevant in the context of the integration of migrants and refugees into host societies; considers it necessary that all ESI Funds be continued post-2020, and stresses that certain funds, such as the ESF, should significantly address the issue of programmes for combating radicalisation, marginalisation, hate crime and xenophobia;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
It is necessary to anticipate the financial needs for migration policies. Indeed, the migration issue will be even more significant after 2020, particularly because of climate change and demographic challenges. It would be advisable not to repeat past mistakes in this area and to avoid being in the same situation as in 2015. Therefore, the whole area of migration needs significant additional resourcing.
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the possible extension of the use of EU trust funds for financing humanitarian support actions inside the Union1 should require that 100 % of these funds be included in the EUuse of EU trust funds remains controversial and that their use should be limited to what is strictly necessary; reiterates that they should not become a standard financing instrument and should not be allowed to threaten the unity of the Union budget ; recalls that Parliament should be able to exercise its powers of scrutiny not only over the creation of such EU trust funds, but also over their entire disbursement; _________________ 1 As proposed by the Commission during the mid-term revision of the current MFF.
Amendment 26 #
6. Stresses the importance played by theall JHA agencies and newly created Union bodies as part of the Security Union Agenda, as well as the significant role they play in countering trans-border crime, fraud and money laundering; calls for the allocation of appropriate resources for their operations and activities:, whether responsible for providing support on asylum matters, judicial cooperation, police cooperation, border management, data protection, large-scale IT projects or fundamental rights; calls for the allocation of appropriate resources for their operations and activities; regrets that the funding provided for many of those agencies has not kept pace with the increased expectations placed upon in terms of their tasks;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – point a
Paragraph 6 – point a
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – point b
Paragraph 6 – point b
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – point c
Paragraph 6 – point c
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – point d
Paragraph 6 – point d
d. calls for adequate resources for the consolidation of the new mandate of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (FRONTEX) and underlines that its new tasks, competences and activities will require ongoing funding in the post-2020 financial framework;eleted
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 – point e
Paragraph 6 – point e
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to propose clear and strict rules for financially sanctioning Member States failing to comply with ‘the rule of law’invoke article 7 of the Treaty on European Union for Member States failing to comply with ‘the rule of law’ and calls the Council to assume its responsibilities in that regard.