BETA

Activities of Marta ANDREASEN related to 2012/2000(BUD)

Plenary speeches (1)

General guidelines for the 2013 budget: Section III - Commission (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2012/2000(BUD)

Amendments (15)

Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. RecallNotes that the European Union’s budget is one of the most important instruments of solidarity between Member States and between generations, and that it provides a clear added value, given its extraordinaryhas little impact on the real economy and daily lives of European citizens; recallnotes that if the Union’s policies were to be financed solely by Member States, their costs would skyrocket and that, seen in this light, the European budget intrinsically represents a clear common saving for the wellbeing of allmany would be eliminated as unnecessary and expensive;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, in times of crisis more than ever, the collective efforts taken at EU level must be strengthened in order to ensure that our actions deliver results; underlines the fact that the annual budget, as well as all other European instruments, needs to be aligned with the Europe 2020 Strategy for Growth and Jobs and that this is essential for the Strategy’s credibility and in order to preserve confidence in EU policies, especially amongst its citizens; stresses that, given its role as a catalyst for investment, lowering the level of the EU budget would haveexamined carefully to ensure that they are not wasteful and that they increase productivity; underlines the fact that the annual budget is seen by the taxpayer as another burden in a time of crisis and adverse impact on the creation of growth and jobs of the Unionusterity;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the promotion of growth and jobs require specific actions and enhanced budgetary effortss a less burdensome regulatory environment to support competitiveness, innovation and small and medium enterprises (SMEs), since most of the EU economic potential lies in SMEs, which, according to latest studies, created 85 % of net new jobs in the EU between 2002 and 2010 and are the backbone of our economic growth;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that such supportlighter regulation would be instrumental in preventing SMEs from cutting down their investments, in particular on research and development, while at the same time promoting employment and ensuring that skills are conserved, thus helping to unleash SMEs’ innovation potential, which is essential to the EU’s prosperity and to the creation of a knowledge-based society;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the fact that all the measures taken so far to combat the crisis should assist a return to the path of growth; stresses, in this regard, that the tailor-made austerity measures already taken need to be accompanied by targeted investments; points out that the EU budget has a determining role to play in this context as a tool to ensure prompt and well coordinated action in all fields to mitigate the effects of the crisis on the real economy and to act as a catalyst to boost investment, growth and jobs in Europe;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that the EU budget represents an investment solely directed towards policies and actions demonstrating EU added value; draws attention to the fact that the EU budget – which cannot run into deficit – has a leverage effect on growth and employment much higher than that of national spending, as does its capacity to gear up investment, deliver stability in Europe and help the EU out of the current economic and financial crisis; underlines the fact, moreover, that new financial instruments further enhance the leverage effect of EU spending’s contribution to growth;deleted
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Will pay specific attention, in the context of the 2013 budgetary procedure, to the implementation of the EP’s previous years’ budgetary priorities and will, in particular, follow closely the funding and implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy, which is fully endorsed by Member States, in terms of promoting competitiveness and employment, as well as of its other sectoral priorities;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Recalls that the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013 was designed to improve the prosperity and quality of life of our citizens and to exploit all the potential of enlargement, yet since 2008 the EU has experienced an unprecedented crisis, which has also impacted on each of the annual budgets; underlines against this background the fact that the 2007-2013 financial framework was not revised to accommodate additional financing needs stemming from the economic and financial crisis and that, to that extent, all the annual budgets have been contained and austere; stresses that the corresponding payments should therefore at least be disbursed according to the normal budget cycle; recalls that payments are dissociated from commitment appropriations only because of the time lag, in the case of multiannual programmes, before the actual disbursement of the funds;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that, 2013 being the last year of the current programming period, catching up will be necessary in terms of payments, as has always been the case at the end of financial perspectives, owing to the start of the completion process of 2007- 2013 programmes, and, in terms of commitments, in order to respect the financial programming amounts; repeats that any artificial cut made to the level of payments will delay meeting both contractual obligations and past EU commitments, and could also result in late interest being due and loss of confidence in European policies; underlines, therefore, that contractual debts should be paid as soon as possible as a matter of budgetary discipline;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Underlines the fact that a pure ‘net contributor/net beneficiary’ approach does not take due account of the great positive spill-over effects the EU budget produces between EU countries to the benefit of common EU policy goals; is deeply concerned at the very moderate increases in payments in the two last budgets, which in the case of the 2012 budget were even below the level of inflation, at a crucial time when all the investment programmes should be unfolding their full potential and running at full speed;deleted
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Stresses that undover-budgeting should be avoided as a matter of sound financial management, and that appropriations need to be aligned to realistic estimates of absorption capacity; points out the fact that artificially lowering the level of appropriations as against the Commission’s realistic estimates may, conversely, prevent the final level of budgetary implementation to reach its full potential;
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets the fact that, while the Council refused in December 2011 to finance identified additional needs, some payment claims amounting to more than EUR 10 billion could not be honoured in late 2011, which is now impacting directly on available 2012 payments; is concerned at the fact that this resulted from the Council’s questioning the Commission’s implementation data and assessments of need without providing any alternative data or source;deleted
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Is therefore extremely worried about the situation of payments in 2012 and calls for a solution to be found as early as possible this year, so as not to postpone the problem once again, to 2013; takes the view, moreover, that such use of the upcoming year’s appropriations to fund current needs is bad financial management and infringes the principle of budget annuality;deleted
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates its call to the Council to refrain from making artificial cuts in payments during the budgetary procedure, and stresses that this seems to be leading to an unsustainable level of payments; requests, in the event of such proposals being made, that the Council clearly and publicly identify and justify which of the EU’s political priorities or projects it believes could be delayed or dropped altogether;deleted
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. In this context, asks the Council to align its position to realistic and responsible budgeting, and undertakes to continue to monitor constantly the implementation of the 2012 appropriations and, in particular, payments; calls on the Council to follow suit, so that the budgetary authority can work on the basis of common, updated implementation data and make reliable estimates of expenditure; to this end, invites the Council and the Commission to an interinstitutional meeting to be held during the first semester of 2012 at appropriate political level with a view to clarifying and settling any possible misunderstanding as to implementation figures and estimated payment needs and to jointly taking stock of the situation of payments for the budget years 2012 and 2013;deleted
2012/02/16
Committee: BUDG