BETA

13 Amendments of Ashley FOX related to 2016/0208(COD)

Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) A fair balance should be sought in particular between the general public interest in corporate transparency and, law enforcement duties in the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing and the data subjects' fundamental rights. The set of data to be made available to the public should be limited, clearly and exhaustively defined, and should be of a general nature, so as to minimize the potential prejudice to the beneficial owners. At the same time, information made accessible to the public should not significantly differ from the data currently collected. In order to limit the interference with the right to respect for their private life in general and to protection of their personal data in particular, that that information should relate essentially to the status of beneficial owners of businesses and trusts, and should strictly concern the sphere of economic activity in which the beneficial owners operaMember States should be allowed to identify any person, who requests information from the register.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) The personal data of beneficial owners of companies should be publicly disclosed in order to enable third parties and civil society at large to know who the beneficial owners are. The enhanced public scrutiny will contribute preventing the misuse of legal entities and legal arrangements, including tax avoidance. Therefore, it is essential that this information remains publicly available through the national registers and through the system of interconnection of registers for 10 years after the company has been struck off from the register. However, Member States should be able to provide by law for the processing of the information on beneficial ownership, including personal data for other purposes if such processing meets an objective of public interest and constitutes a necessary and proportionate measure in a democratic society to the legitimate aim pursued.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Currently, companies and similar legal entities active trusts with tax consequences in the Union are under an obligation to register their beneficial ownership information, whereas the same obligation does not apply to allother types of trusts and other legal arrangements which present similar characteristics such as Treuhand, fiducies or fideicomiso set up in the Union. With a view to ensure that the beneficial owners of all legal entities and. The Commission should work with Member States, industry and relevant international bodies, including the Financial Action Task Force and the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, to analyse which legal arrangements operating , including the Union are properly identified and monitored under a corusts, Treuhand, fiducies and fideicomiso, present risks of money laundering or terrorist financing and whether there is a need for minimum harmonisation within the EU on the rent and equivalent set of conditions, rgistration requirements for these legal arrangements. Rules regarding the registration of the beneficial ownership information of trusts by their trustees should be consistent with those in place in respect of the registration of beneficial ownership information of companiesimilar legal arrangements.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) It is essential to take into account the particularities of trusts and similar legal arrangements, as far as publicly available information on their beneficial owner is concerned. Irrespective of their qualification under national law, a distinction should be drawn between, on the one hand, trusts which consist of any property held by or on behalf of a person carrying on a business which consists of or includes the management of trusts, and acting as trustee of a trust in and other legal arrangements similar to trusts that have qualifying ownership or control over another course of that business with a view to gain profrporate or other entit,y and, on the other hand, any other trusts or other legal arrangements similar to trusts. Given the nature of the first category of trusts, information on their beneficial owners and other legal arrangements similar to trusts, information on their trustees, or any individuals holding a similar position of direct or indirect control of a corporate or other legal entity should be made publicly available through compulsory disclosure. Access should be given to the same limited set of data on the beneficial owner as in the case of companrporate and other legal entities.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) In order to ensure proportionality, the beneficial ownership information in respect of any other trusts than those which consist of any property held by, or on behalf of, a person carrying on a business which consists of or includes the management of trusts, and acting as trustee of a trust in the course of that business with a view to gain profit should only be available to parties holding a legitimate interest. The legitimate interest with respect to money laundering, terrorist financing and the associated predicate offences should be justified by readily available means, such as statutes or mission statement of non-governmental organisations, or on the basis of demonstrated previous activities relevant to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing or associated predicate offences, or a proven track record of surveys or actions in that field.deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) In order to ensure proportionality, the beneficial ownership information in respect of any other trusts than those which consist of any property held by, or on behalf of, a person carrying on a business which consists of or includes the management of trusts, and acting as trustee of a trust in the course of that business with a view to gain profit should only be available to parties holding a legitimate interest. The legitimate interest with respect to money laundering, terrorist financing and the associated predicate offences should be justified by readily available means, such as statutes or mission statement of non-governmental organisations, or on the basis of demonstrated previous activities relevant to the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing or associated predicate offences, or a proven track record of surveys or actions in that field.deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point e
(-1) in point (3) of Article 2(1), point (e) is replaced by the following: ‘(e) other persons trading in goods to the extent that payments are made or received in cash in an amount of EUR 10 000 or more, whether the transaction is carried out in a single operation or in several operations which appear to be linked;'
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point a
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 31 – paragraph 1 –subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that this Article applies to trusts and other types of legal arrangements having a structure or functions similar to trusts, such as, inter alia, fTreuhand, Stiftung, Privatstiftung, Usufruct Fiduciea, Treuhand or fideicomisoor Fideicomiso, and all other similar in terms of structure or function, existing or future legal arrangements.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point c
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 31 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that the information held in the register referred to in paragraph 3a is accessible in a timely and unrestricted manner by competent authorities and FIUs, without alerting the parties to the trust concerned. They shallmay also ensure thatprovide obliged entities are allowed timely access to that information, pursuant to the provisions on customer due diligence laid down in Chapter II. Member States shall notify to the Commission the characteristics of those mechanisms.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point d
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 31 – paragraphs 4 a and 4 b
(d) the following paragraphs 4a and 4b are inserted: ‘4a.The information held in the register referred to in paragraph 3a of this Article with respect to any other trusts than those referred to in Article 7b (b) of Directive (EC) 2009/101 shall be accessible to any person or organisation that can demonstrate a legitimate interest. The information accessible to persons and organisations that can demonstrate a legitimate interest shall consist of the name, the month and year of birth, the nationality and the country of residence of the beneficial owner as defined in Article 3(6)(b). 4b. Whenever entering into a new customer relationship with a trust or other legal arrangement subject to registration of beneficial ownership information pursuant to paragraph 3a, the obliged entities shall collect proof of registration whenever applicable.’;deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 – point e
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 31 – paragraph 7 a
(e) the following paragraph 7a is inserted: ‘7a. In exceptional circumstances laid down in national law, where the access referred to in paragraphs 4 and 4a would expose the beneficial owner to the risk of fraud, kidnapping, blackmail, violence or intimidation, or where the beneficial owner is a minor or otherwise incapable, Member States may provide for an exemption from such access to all or part of the information on the beneficial ownership on a case-by-case basis. Exemptions granted pursuant to the first subparagraph shall not apply to the credit institutions and financial institutions, and to obliged entities referred to in point (3)(b) of Article 2(1) that are public officials. Where a Member State decides to establish an exemption in accordance with the first subparagraph, it shall not restrict access to information by competent authorities and FIUs’;deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 32 a – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall put in place automated centralised mechanisms, such as central registries or central electronic data retrieval systems, which allow the identification, in a timely manner, of any natural or legal persons holding or controlling payment accounts as defined in Directive 2007/64/EC and bank accounts held by a credit institution within their territory. Member States shall notify the Commission of the characteristics of those national mechanisms.
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14
Directive 2015/849/EU
Article 39 – paragraph 3
(14) in Article 39, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3. The prohibition laid down in paragraph 1 shall not prevent disclosure between the credit institutions and financial institutions from the Member States provided that they belong to the same group, or between these entities and their branches and majority owned subsidiaries established in third countries, provided that these branches and majority-owned subsidiaries fully comply with the group-wide policies and procedures, including procedures for sharing information within the group, in accordance with Article 42 and that the group-wide policies and procedures comply with the requirements set out in this Directive.’;deleted
2016/12/19
Committee: ECONLIBE