14 Amendments of Ashley FOX related to 2016/0379(COD)
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 9
Article 5 – paragraph 9
9. The procurement of upward balancing capacity and downward balancing capacity shall be carried out separately. The contracting shall be performed for not longer than one day before the provision of the balancing capacity and the contracting period shall have a maximum of one day.
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Article 7 – paragraph 4
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point 1 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point 1 (new)
(1) By 1 January 2025, the imbalance settlement period shall be 15 minutes in all control areas.
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point 2 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point 2 (new)
(2) The TSOs of a synchronous area may jointly request an exemption from the requirement laid down in paragraph 1.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point 3 (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – point 3 (new)
(3) Where the relevant regulatory authorities of a synchronous area grant an exemption from the requirement laid down in paragraph 1 upon a joint request of the TSOs in the concerned synchronous area or at their own initiative, they shall perform, in cooperation with the Agency and at least every three years, a cost-benefit analysis concerning the harmonisation of the imbalance settlement period within and between synchronous areas.
Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 17 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In Member States or third countries which use interconnector revenues as income to be taken into account when calculating network tariffs as part of a policy explicitly designed to attract new investment into interconnection capacity, any revenues resulting from the allocation of capacity on interconnectors that are owned and operated by a separate legal entity from the main transmission system may be used, subject to approval by the regulatory authorities of the Member States concerned, up to a maximum amount to be determined by those regulatory authorities, as income to be taken into account by the regulatory authorities when approving the methodology for calculating network tariffs and/or fixing network tariffs.
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall monitor resource adequacy within their territory based on the European resource adequacy assessment pursuant to Article 19national resource adequacy assessment, which shall consider the European resource adequacy assessment pursuant to Article 19. The methodology for a national resource adequacy assessment shall be determined by a Member State and shall take into account the methodology referred to in Article 19(4).
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall monitor resource adequacy within their territory based on the European resource adequacy assessment pursuant to Article 19, which shall complement national resource adequacy assessments.
Amendment 852 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Where national assessments or the European resource adequacy assessment identifies a resource adequacy concern Member States shall identify any regulatory distortions that caused or contributed to the emergence of the concern.
Amendment 945 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2
Article 20 – paragraph 2
2. The reliability standard shall be set by the national regulatory authority based on thean agreed methodology, such as that pursuant to Article 19(5).
Amendment 948 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4
Article 20 – paragraph 4
4. The parameters determining the amount of capacity procured in the capacity mechanism shall be approved by the national regulatorycompetent authority.
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 8
Article 21 – paragraph 8
Amendment 1268 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. Regional operational centres shall adopt binding decisions addressed to the transmission system operators in respect of the functions referred to in points (a), (b), (g) and (q) of Article 34(1). TIf a transmission system operators shall implement the binding decides not to implement any decisions issued by thea regional operational centres except in cases when the safety of the system will be negatively affected, the transmission system operator shall provide a reasoned justification based on system security and efficiency in writing to the regional operational centre and copied to the Commission, the Agency and the ENTSO for Electricity.
Amendment 1280 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 4
Article 38 – paragraph 4
4. The regulatory authorities of a system operation region may jointly decide to grant binding decision-making powers to the regional operational centre for one or more of the functions provided for in points (c) to (f) and (h) to (l) of Article 34(1).