Activities of Karin KADENBACH related to 2018/2201(DEC)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) for the financial year 2017 PDF (186 KB) DOC (63 KB)
Amendments (4)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets the gender imbalance within the Institute’s management board members, with 26 out of 32 members being of the same genderfemale, 6 being male; asks in this regard the Commission and the Member States and other concerned parties to take into account the importance of ensuring gender balance when presenting their nominations for members of the Board;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the suggestion of the Court to also publish vacancy notices on the website of the European Personnel Selection Office in order to increase publicity; understands the high translation costs triggered by such publication; notes from the Institute’s reply that, in addition to the financial constraints, it is of the opinion that the channels it currently uses ensure proper transparency and publicity;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes with concern that, according to the Court’s report, the Institute was brought to court by unsuccessful tenders, claiming a total of EUR 700 000 in damages (amounting to up to 9 % of the Institute’s annual budget) and the annulment of the award decision; observes that the Institute is already preparing to financially address the potential losses; notes from the Institute’s reply that it will adjust the procurement procedures regardless of the final decision of the Courtjudicial decision; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on developments in that regard;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes the Institute’s existing measures and ongoing efforts to secure transparency, prevention and management of conflicts of interests, and whistle-blower protection; points out with concern, however, that the Institute publishes only the CV of its director but not the CVs of its senior management on its website; calls on the Institute to report to the discharge authority on the measures taken in this regard;