BETA

1474 Amendments of Oreste ROSSI

Amendment 31 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the EU coulda greater degree of recycling would help the EU to benefit in terms of job creation and growth from a robust efforts to move toforwards a balanced, cradle- to- cradle circular economy, based on the concept of waste as a resource;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's Green Paper and recognises the need for specific EU legislation on plastic waste, as well as more uniform, consistent and rigorous implementation of the existing legislation concerning waste;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses that the existing Packaging Directive should be more widely and consistently implemented and enforced; emphasises that the internal market principles in the Packaging Directive have not stood in the way of the environmental objectives when the goals of the proposals were genuinely aimed at seeking higher environmental standards; strongly believes that the Packaging Directive provides a solid basis to deal with waste; calls for waste stream specific harmonised recycling targets in the Directive, which would further stimulate plastic waste recycling, and create a level playing field in line with the waste hierarchy;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 71 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the EU legislation on plastic waste should define: specific targets for collection and sorting and mandatory criteriabe adapted to ensure: better and more efficient collection systems, specific targets for recyclabilitying (clarifying the distinctions between mechanical/organic recycling and recovery/incineration; the aim should be a target of at least 75 % of recycled plastic by 2020); specific labelling of materials in order to inform consumers concerning their mechanical or organic recyclabilitit is advisable to introduce separate collection of materials and the harmonisation of collection, separation and general waste management across the EU to create a level playing field in line with the waste hierarchy; and, finally, criteria for the replacement of single-use and short-lived plastic products by reusable and more durable materials;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for the introduction of a landfill tax to be imposed in order to divert plastic waste from landfills and to incentivise recycling to end the export of post- consumer plastic waste to Asia and to encourage the further processing of waste in Europe;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the most dangerous plastics, those that are the most disruptive to humare should be a separate collection of materials with an emphasis on certain separations within thealth and the environment (such as micro- and oxo-biodegrad plastics waste stream (such as degradable plastics, oxo-fragmentable plastics) ands thoese whichmaterials contamin heavy metals that can also make recycling processes more difficultate the recycling waste stream; highlights, should be phased out of the market or banned outright, as soon as possible before 2020; also believes that, as demanded by a majority of European citizens (and consumers), it is finally time to phase out or ban single- use, non-biodegradable and non- compostable plastic products, also before 2020wever, that the most effective way to address the waste burden is to establish an infrastructure for waste management;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Emphasises to inform correctly the consumers that bio-based plastics should not to be confused with biodegradable plastics, and as consequence should be encouraged since their composition does not alter the durability and recyclability of the products; and finally, notes that the bio-based plastics are an eco-friendlier alternative than biodegradable plastics and should be promoted;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 133 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Believes that the use of oxo-additives in plastics should be discouraged and the use of biodegradable plastic, in particular in carrier bags, should not be promoted; Notes that in the sector of plastic bags manufacturing, so far studies have shown that only 15-35% of a biodegradable plastic bag is made from renewable resources; refers to impartial scientific research, which shows that biodegradable bags need to be up to twice as thick as normal plastic carrier bags to meet the same criteria and they are 3 times more expensive than normal plastic carrier bags and still twice more expensive than bio-based plastic bags;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 134 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Highlights that biodegradable plastics only decompose very slowly even in industrial composting plants, whereas they do not degrade in water at all, thus failing to solve the issue of maritime or nature littering; notes that they worsen the littering situation because consumers falsely think they decompose; and finally underlines that they damage the entire recycling process since even 2% of biodegradable content has a significant impact on the quality of the recycled material.
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 135 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for more investment in research and technologies aimed at obtaining more sustainable plastics and a better integration of various types in production processes and reprocessing activities, without affecting the quality of materials; considers that new technologies are also needed for enhanced plastic biodegradation processes, waste sorting methods, mechanical recycling, eco-design and smart packaging; believes that to this end, Horizon 2020 could offer opportunities to respond to this important societal need and that the advantages would be far-reaching, for both the environment and citizens, from the creation of new economic activities to the reduction of marine litter and health-related risks; underlines that recycling plastic is the best alternative to deal with plastic waste as it gives plastic waste a strong market value, fulfils environmental targets and provides considerable economic opportunities;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 144 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Underlines that the recycling of plastics provides the most effective solution to marine litter and it reduces greenhouse gas emissions and the consumption of non-renewable resources, and recalls that recycling is well received by consumers and presents the added benefit of job creation; therefore, urges for measures that encourage plastic recycling as the best option to meet environmental targets;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 166 #

2013/2113(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. CBelieves that more attention needs to be given to concrete actions and awareness raising campaigns; to this end calls for the establishment of a European Day for plastic waste, on which citizens could return any volume of plastic waste to predetermined points in return for appropriate monetary compensation, as a means of ensuring the supply of recyclable plastic and increasing public awareness of recycling; considers that this event could also include community beach cleaning activities, as a symbolic contribution to the containment of coastal pollution caused by plastic waste; and as supportive of an even larger initiative such as “Clean-up Europe Week” tackling litter in all environments;
2013/10/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 137 #

2013/2062(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Calls on the Member States, in the absence of an agreed solution at EU level, to take appropriate measures to implement the provisions of paragraph 7 of the supplementary guidelines on vertical restraints in agreements for the sale and repair of motor vehicles and for the distribution of spare parts for motor vehicles contained in Commission Notice 2010/C 138/05, so as to ensure contractual relations between dealers and automobile manufacturers based on fairness, transparency and compliance with the principles of good faith;
2013/09/27
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0000/2013),deleted
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 3 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
– having regard to Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross- border healthcare,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 4 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 d (new)
– having regard to the report of the European Parliament on the proposal for a Council recommendation on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare associated infections (COM(2008)0837 – C6-0032/2009 – 2009/0003(CNS)),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 f (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2011 on antibiotic resistance,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 c (new)
– having regard to the Commission recommendation of 27 October 2011 on the research Joint Programming Initiative ‘The Microbial Challenge – An Emerging Threat to Human Health’ (C(2011)7660),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 7 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 e (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 27 October 2011 on the public health threat of antimicrobial resistance,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 8 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 i (new)
– having regard to its report of 15 November 2012 on ‘The Microbial Challenge – Rising threats from Antimicrobial Resistance’ (2012/2041),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 g (new)
– having regard to the Staff working paper of the services of the Commission on antimicrobial resistance of 18 November 2009 (SANCO/6876/2009r6),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 15 November 2011 on an action plan against antimicrobial resistance (COM(2011)0748),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 17 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 h (new)
– having regard to the Joint Technical Report by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of 17 September 2009 on ‘The bacterial challenge: time to react – A call to narrow the gap between multidrug- resistant bacteria in the EU and the development of new antibacterial agents’,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 19 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 o (new)
– having regard to Special Eurobarometer 338 on Antimicrobial Resistance, published in April 2010,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 j (new)
– having regard to the 2008 and 2012 annual epidemiological reports by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 21 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 k (new)
– having regard to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) technical document entitled ‘Core competencies for infection control and hospital hygiene professionals in the European Union’ published on 26 March 2013,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 22 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 l (new)
– having regard to the communication of 15 December 2008 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare- associated infections (COM(2008) 837 final),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 23 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 m (new)
– having regard to the Commission’s Impact Assessment of December 2008,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 n (new)
– having regard to the Special Eurobarometer survey on ‘Patient Safety and Quality of Healthcare’, published in April 2010,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 p (new)
– having regard to the Special Eurobarometer survey on ‘Patient involvement’ published in May 2012,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 26 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 q (new)
– having regard to the Council Conclusions on common values and principles in European Health Systems (OJ C 146, 22.06.2006, p.1),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 r (new)
– having regard to the WHO report entitled ‘Core components for infection prevention and control programmes’,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 28 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 s (new)
– having regard to the Report of the second meeting of the Informal Network on Infection Prevention and Control in Health Care (June 2008),
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 t (new)
- having regard to World Health Assembly Resolution WHA55.18 on ‘Quality of care: patient safety’ of 18 May 2002,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 30 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 u (new)
– having regard to the Commission's White Paper entitled ‘Together for Health: A Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013’ of 23 October 2007.
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 v (new)
- having regard to the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-13) which seeks to improve citizens’ health security, and to promote measures aimed at optimising patient safety by means of high-quality, safe health care, including in the area of microbial resistance to antibiotics and nosocomial infections,
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas high-quality healthcare is the cornerstone of any high-quality health system and whereas access to high-quality healthcare is recognised as a fundamental right by the EU, the European institutions and European citizens;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 35 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the issue of patient safety is becoming a growing concern in health systems throughout the world, including in Europe;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 41 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Kb. whereas it is essential to uphold citizens’ confidence in the health systems of the European Union;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas, however, it is estimated that between 30% and 40% of adverse events in both hospital and out-of-hospital (ambulatory) care appear to be caused by systemic factors and are thus avoidable;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas, furthermore, elderly patients and patients with immunodeficiencies or chronic diseases, in particular degenerative diseases, are especially vulnerable to healthcare-related adverse events, such as: diagnostic errors; lack of follow-up on medical examinations; the prescription, dispensing or administration of an inappropriate (e.g. off-label) medicine, of an incorrect dose or of two medicines which should not be combined; the failure or poor disinfection of medical equipment; or the infection of surgical scars;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 51 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas, therefore, the European Union’s action in the field of patient safety consists in helping Member States to coordinate their efforts in this area and supporting their actions in fields where its intervention can provide an added value;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 52 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas international studies estimate that between 13% and 16% of hospital costs (one euro in every seven) are incurred as a result of healthcare related incidents;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 53 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G b (new)
Gb. whereas a lack of financial, technical and human resources is particularly associated with an increased risk of healthcare related adverse events;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G c (new)
Gc. whereas the economic crisis has slowed the implementation of measures adopted by the Member States in 2009, as a result of changed priorities in public health;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas HAIs are among the most common – and often the most dangerous – causes of involuntary harm to patients;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas HAIs, which, on average, are acquired by 5% of patients admitted to hospital, some 4.1 million patients each year, in the European Union and have a high impact in terms of morbidity, mortality (with 37 000 people dying directly of such infections in the European Union) and cost (estimated at over EUR 5.5 billion per year in Europe), constitute a major public health problem in the countries of the European Union;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K c (new)
Kc. whereas, since the micro-organisms responsible for HAIs are capable of colonising the human body for long periods, patients can spread them not only during their hospital stay but also afterwards, and whereas HAIs can thus affect all care premises, medium- and long-term care establishments and even the patient’s home;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas a HAI contracted during a hospital stay may not display symptoms until after the patient has been discharged;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 66 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the average length of a hospital stay in the Member States of the European Union is falling;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 67 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J b (new)
Jb. whereas the percentage of patients affected by infections following home care is unknown, and whereas home care is often provided to patients with chronic or degenerative diseases who have not been admitted to hospital;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 68 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J d (new)
Jd. whereas patients with chronic or degenerative diseases often receive home care instead of being admitted to hospital;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J e (new)
Je. whereas the condition of some people with chronic or degenerative diseases often requires permanent and continuous medical assistance, very frequently necessitating, in particular, the use of medical devices (cardiac stimulators, respiratory devices, catheters, urinary catheters, etc.);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J f (new)
Jf. whereas the use of such medical devices requires strict application of the procedures for use, in accordance with guidelines and established good practice;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 71 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J g (new)
Jg. whereas the use of such medical devices carries a risk of infection;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J c (new)
Jc. whereas simple and cost-effective action to prevent HAIs, such as sanitation education (in particular, the promotion of hospital hygiene), already exists or is currently being tested on an experimental basis, with promising results, and whereas potential alternative, cost-effective ways of combating HAIs could usefully be explored;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas, furthermore, people’s increasing mobility within and between national healthcare systems inside the EU and their, the increasingly cross-border nature of healthcare in Europe and people’s freedom to seek medical treatment outside their countries of residence are making it easier for resistant micro-organisms to spread rapidly from one Member State to another;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 76 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the results of the Eurobarometer survey on ‘Patient Safety and Quality of Healthcare’ indicate both that European public opinion is highly aware of this issue and also that there is a marked lack of information on patient safety;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K d (new)
Kd. whereas HAIs are often difficult to treat, as the micro-organisms responsible for them are frequently resistant to antimicrobial agents;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 79 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H d (new)
Hd. whereas antibiotic resistance in Europe is continuing to increase, and for certain bacteria may be 25%, or even more, in several Member States;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 80 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas in the EU, Iceland and Norway alone antimicrobial resistant bacteria cause some 400 000 infections and 25 000 deaths annually, with at least EUR 1.5 billion spent on extra healthcare costs and productivity losses;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 82 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K e (new)
Ke. whereas the development of resistance to antimicrobial agents can be accelerated, in particular, by the inordinate and indiscriminate use of these products in human medicine, which, combined with insufficient hygiene and infection control, can compromise the effective use of an already limited number of existing antimicrobial agents;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 84 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H e (new)
He. whereas the latest available data indicate that antibiotic resistance markers for the bacteria involved in HAIs highlight an increasing global trend towards multi-resistance, and, in particular, an increase in the percentage of Enterobacteriaceae resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporins and of methicillin resistant S. aureus;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H f (new)
Hf. whereas there is a growing gap between increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents and the development of new antimicrobial agents;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 86 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H g (new)
Hg. whereas the development of resistance to antimicrobial agents is a natural and unavoidable consequence of their use, but whereas it can be limited through their prudent and rational use;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H h (new)
Hh. whereas the development of resistance to antimicrobial agents can be accelerated, in particular, by the inordinate and indiscriminate use of these products in human medicine, which, combined with insufficient hygiene and infection control, can compromise the effective use of an already limited number of existing antimicrobial agents;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H i (new)
Hi. whereas, in view of the lack of development of new antibiotics/antimicrobial agents, it is vital for current antimicrobial agents to be used effectively for as long as possible;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K f (new)
Kf. whereas, according to the results of the Eurobarometer survey on ‘Antimicrobial Resistance’, 53% of people questioned still believed in 2010 that antibiotics were effective against viruses, 20% took antibiotics to tackle influenza and 14% to combat colds, and 5% of people took antibiotics obtained without a medical check-up;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K g (new)
Kg. whereas consumption of antibiotics is higher among people who are objectively least well informed and whereas better objective knowledge of antibiotics is associated with more responsible behaviour in terms of their use;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 93 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K h (new)
Kh. whereas certain Member States do not have a solid regulatory and legal framework to support and make compulsory the rational use of medicines, and whereas there are strong disparities in Europe in terms of consumption of antibiotics, in the context of both community and hospital care;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K i (new)
Ki. whereas there is a need to educate and raise awareness among those involved in antimicrobial use, including policy- makers, health professionals and the general public, in order to encourage necessary changes in the behaviour of prescribers, dispensers and citizens;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 95 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K j (new)
Kj. whereas, since the adoption in 2009 of Council Recommendation 2009/C 151/01, substantial effort has been invested in adopting and implementing strategies (national and regional) for the prevention and control of HAIs in the Member States, particularly through the adoption of guidelines on the prevention and control of HAIs and by setting up active HAI surveillance systems (or strengthening those that already exist);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 96 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K ja (new)
Kja. whereas, on the other hand, some of the action recommended by the Council in its Recommendation 2009/C 151/01 on how to improve patient safety in the Member States has thus far been implemented by only a limited number of Member States, and whereas there is room for improvement – in both hospital and non-hospital care – particularly in respect of patient empowerment and the overall training of health professionals and carers, as well as in the implementation of European classifications on patient safety and the development of European guidelines on patient safety standards;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 97 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K k (new)
Kk. whereas, since the adoption in 2009 of Council Recommendation 2009/C 151/01, substantial effort has been invested in improving patient safety in the Member States, particularly by embedding patient safety as a priority in public health policies in all Member States, by designating a competent authority responsible for patient safety (in 19 Member States) and encouraging training on patient safety in healthcare establishments (in 23 Member States);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K l (new)
Kl. whereas, since the adoption in 2009 of Council Recommendation 2009/C 151/01, substantial effort has been invested in adopting and implementing strategies (national and regional) for the prevention and control of HAIs in the Member States, particularly through the adoption of guidelines on the prevention and control of HAIs and by setting up active HAI surveillance systems (or strengthening those that already exist);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K m (new)
Km. whereas, on the other hand, some of the action recommended by the Council in its Recommendation 2009/C 151/01 on how to improve patient safety in the Member States has thus far been implemented by only a limited number of Member States, and whereas there is room for improvement – in both hospital and non-hospital care – particularly in respect of patient empowerment and the overall training of health professionals and carers, as well as in the implementation of European classifications on patient safety and the development of European guidelines on patient safety standards;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K n (new)
Kn. whereas, on the other hand, some of the specific measures the Council recommended for preventing and combating HAIs in the Member States have been implemented in only a limited number of Member States, and whereas progress is still possible, particularly in respect of provision of information to patients by healthcare establishments and support for research into the prevention and control of HAIs;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the measures put in place by Member States with the principal aim of improving general patient safety and reducing the incidence of HAIs; , and in particular by; – all Member States drawing up patient safety policies, and the fact that many Member States have made these policies a priority of their healthcare policy; – the designation of a competent authority responsible for patient safety in most Member States; – the gradual establishment of mechanisms for reporting adverse events and learning lessons from such failings; – the widespread introduction of patient safety training campaigns in healthcare establishments; – the implementation, in France, Slovakia and the Netherlands, of cross-border patient-safety strategies (in addition to the national strategy); – collaboration between countries and between regions with a view to carrying out the action recommended by the Council and implemented by 21 Member States (plus Norway), frequently in the context of projects cofinanced by the European Union;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 104 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the steps taken by the Commission to improve general patient safety by promoting mutual learning between Member States and putting forward common definitions and terminology for patient safety; and in particular: – the Commission fostering the exchange of information on initiatives concerned with patient safety and quality of care in the context of the Working Group on Patient Safety and Quality of Care; – the Commission’s cofinancing of the OECD-led project on healthcare quality indicators, which has made it possible to collect comparable indicators of patient safety in 11 countries; – the European Union’s cofinancing, under the seventh framework programme for research, of six research projects on general patient safety; – the adoption of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, which seeks not only to clarify the rights of patients when accessing care in another EU Member State, but also to ensure that such care is safe and of good quality;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 110 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 1 a (new)
- have integrated patient safety into the education and training of health professionals;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 113 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the Commission’s action in the area of preventing and combating HAIs, which is closely linked to its action in the area of resistance to antimicrobial agents, in particular the financing provided by the Commission for research projects on HAIs and antimicrobial resistance, especially those projects having a European dimension, such as IPSE (Improving Patient Safety in Europe), IMPLEMENT (Implementing Strategic Bundles for Infection Prevention and Management) and PROHIBIT (Prevention of Hospital Infections by Intervention and Training), which seeks to analyse existing practical guidelines on prevention of HAIs in European hospitals and test a strategy for preventing bloodstream infections linked to central venous catheters (infections which are particularly worrying in that they are associated with significant morbidity and a high level of directly related mortality);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the coordination and monitoring work of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), in particular: – its activities in coordinating the European network for surveillance of HAIs, particularly surgical site infections, HAIs acquired in intensive care units and antimicrobial use in long-term care facilities (HALT-2), as well as its support for the European project to support capacity building for surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections (ECDIS- Net); – the coordination of a European study on HAI prevalence and antimicrobial use in acute care hospitals; – the ECDC’s development of guidance for the prevention and control of Clostridium difficile infections; – the publication of recommendations to prevent the spread of carbapenemase- producing Enterobacteriaceae; - the ECDC’s support for the development of guidelines and indicators (on structure and method) for preventing HAIs.
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 116 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Member States to continue their efforts to improve patient safety by taking, if they have not already done so, newadditional measures in order to fall fully into line with the Council’s recommendations;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 – indent 2
– education and training measures for healthcare workers in the area of patient safety, to include the introduction of compulsory patient safety training modules (covering various areas including medical devices and good use of medicines) in one or more types of study or training for healthcare professionals and carers;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 128 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Urges the Member States to introduce, or strengthen iWhile acknowledging that the EU may not interfere with the Member States’ powers in the field of they already exist, arrangements for reporting adverse events which make it possible to identify those responsible in the event of a breakdown in the chain of care and learn lessons from such breakdownalth, urges Member States not to cut the budgets allocated to patient safety, a key issue for European healthcare systems at a time of global spending reviews;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 129 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Urges the Member States to introduce, or strengthen if they already exist, arrangements for reporting adverse events which make it possible to identify those responsible in the event of a breakdown in the chain of care and learn lessons from such breakdowns;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 134 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Urges the Commission and the Member States to make the public more aware of initiatives in the area of patient safety and empower patients in this area;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 144 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Member States to apply, wherever possible, hospital patient safety strategies and programmes in non- hospital care environments (in long- and medium-stay facilities, but also in the home);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. CWhile acknowledging that the EU may not interfere with the Member States’ powers in the field of health, calls on the Member States to make sufficient human, financial and technological resources available to ensure that care provided in the home or in hospital is of the highest possible quality, and urges them, in particular, not to cut the budgets allocated to patient safety, a key issue for European healthcare systems at a time of global spending reviews;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 163 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Member States and the Commission to foster, including by means of awareness-raising campaigns, good practices in all areas, in particular all those linked to hygiene (hand hygiene, sterilisation of instruments, etc.) both in and outside hospital (in particular vis-à- vis patients and their families)take action (involving both public awareness-raising campaigns and measures targeted at healthcare professionals) at national, local and European level to promote rational use of antibiotics, both in community care and in hospitals;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 173 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Member States to use the most advanced technological means available to guarantee optimum patient safety, and, in particular, to introduce across the board electronic health passports containing all relevant information about the patient, including his or her antecedents; points out that the confidentiality of the personal data provided in connection with the issue of such passports must be guaranteed;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – indent -1a (new)
– the state of health of patients (particularly elderly persons and persons with reduced mobility) returning home after a period of hospitalisation must be assessed thoroughly when they leave hospital, with a view, in particular, to evaluating and countering the risk of falls;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – indent 2
– patients and their carers must be properly informed, in particular about hand hygiene matters,and the need to disinfect reusable medical instruments and devices, as well as the need to comply with procedures and prescriptions;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – indent 2 a (new)
– the taking of basic precautions should be encouraged, in particular as regards the storage and use of medicines, and patients should, in particular, be made aware of the risks involved in using medicines that have no marketing authorisation;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 183 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – indent 2 b (new)
– the use of throwaway medical equipment must be encouraged as far as possible;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 190 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Calls on the Member States to do what they can to ensure that patients trust their health systems and, in particular, to involve patients closely in patient safety;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 195 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Calls on the Member States to conduct specific information and training campaigns to raise awareness among patients and healthcare professionals of the issue of antimicrobial resistance;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for theWhile acknowledging that the EU may not interfere with the Member States’ powers in the field of health, calls for the Member States to work together to introduction ofe compensation systems (in particular if adverse events in healthcare occur) which are harmonised at EU level;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 204 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Calls, in particular, on the Member States to set up a mediation service to improve dialogue between healthcare system users and healthcare professionals and to analyse and respond to all requests for information and all complaints concerning healthcare system quality and healthcare safety;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 205 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Urges the Commission to continue to maintain contacts with patients’ associations, in particular the European Patients’ Forum;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 211 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Urges the Member States to introduce checklists, with a view to making surgical operations safer;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 217 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Recommends that a list of HAIs which should be screened for in all hospitals and healthcare establishments in the EU be drawn up in cooperation with the EMA and the ECDC;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Member States to share, where they exist, good practice benchmarks in the area of generalfor international guidelines drawn up by the WHO on patient safety, and, in particular, to share, where they exist, good practice benchmarks in the area of the on preventiong and control of HAIs and the transmission of multi- resistant bacteriambating HAIs to be implemented within the EU;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Calls on the Member States to share, where they exist, good practice benchmarks in the area of HAI prevention and control and the transmission of multi-resistant bacteria (e.g. measures to prevent the spread of legionella bacteria in hospital hot-water systems);
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 234 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35a. Urges the Member States to give a further boost to nosocomial infection surveillance programmes by encouraging hospitals to play a full and active part in the European nosocomial infection surveillance network;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 237 #

2013/2022(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 b (new)
35b. Believes that, under the eighth framework programme for research, which is to commence in 2014, the EU should cofinance research into general patient safety, HAIs and resistance to antimicrobial agents;
2013/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #

2013/0371(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 3 – point 2a
'"lightweight plastic carrier bags'" shall mean bags made of plastic materials as defined in Article 3(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011*, with a lower threshold wall thickness belowof at least 50 microns and which are supplied to consumers at the point of sale of goods or products.
2014/01/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2013/0371(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 94/62/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 1b (new)
(2a) In Article 4, the following paragraph 1b is inserted: '1 b. Member States that have set up organic recycling for bio-waste may exempt lightweight plastic carrier bags complying with standard EN 13432 from the scope of this Directive, provided that all of the following conditions are met: i) they are not provided free of charge; ii) they are allowed by the competent authorities responsible for waste management as part of bio-waste organic recycling schemes; iii) they are clearly labelled with information for the consumer on their further use for organic recycling of bio- waste; iv) they are capable of undergoing biological decomposition such that all of the material decomposes into carbon dioxide, biomass and water under natural conditions within two years, as required by the relevant CEN standard.'
2014/01/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 147 #

2013/0307(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) they are, having regard to scientific evidence available, found to be capable of establishing a viable population and endangering plant health as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) [Regulation of the European parliament and of the Council on protective measures against pests of plants] and agriculture as a whole, with a direct and unacceptable economic impact for that territory;
2014/01/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 172 #

2013/0307(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) a description of the negative impact on plant health as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EU) [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on protective measures against pests of plants] and agriculture as a whole, including an assessment of the magnitude of future impact;
2014/01/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 176 #

2013/0307(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) a quantified forecast of the damage costs at Union level demonstrating the significance for the Union, so as to further justify action because the overall damagecost arising from damages caused by the species would outweigh the cost of mitigation;
2014/01/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2013/0307(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 23 to further specify the type of admissible scientific evidence referred to in Article 4(2)(b) and to provide a detailed description of the application of the elements set out in paragraph 1(a) to (h) of this Article, including the methodology to be applied in the assessment of such elements, taking into account relevant national and international standards and the need to prioritise action against species associated with or that have the potential to cause significant economic damage, including that deriving fromcost for the economy and to cause damages due to biodiversity loss.
2014/01/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 263 #

2013/0307(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. When applying eradication measures for invasive alien species fulfilling the criteria of point (ba) of Article 4(2), Member States shall ensure compensation of professional operators for the value of plants, plant products and other objects, subject to destruction, if any, in accordance with Article 19, paragraph 1, of Regulation (EU) [Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material].
2014/01/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #

2013/0141(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall amend the implementingdelegated act referred to in paragraph 2, where an assessment shows that a pest not listed in that act fulfils the conditions referred to in Article 3(b), (c) and (d) in respect of the Union territory, or a pest listed in that act no longer fulfils one or more of those conditions. In the first case it shall add the pest concerned to the list referred to in paragraph 2, in the second case it shall delete the pest concerned from that list.
2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 110 #

2013/0141(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Where Member States compensate professional operators, pursuant to point (ca) of Article 19(1) of [Office of Publications, please insert number of Regulation (EU) No [.…]/201323h laying down provisions for the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health and animal welfare, and relating to plant health and plant reproductive material], for the value of plants, plant products or other objects destroyed as part of the measures referred to in paragraph 1 and implemented in a cross-border area, they shall ensure that adequate compensation is coordinated between the Member States concerned so as to avoid, wherever possible, undue market distortion. __________________ 23h OJ L …, …., p….
2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #

2013/0141(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 98 – paragraph 2
2. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 1(2), 5(2), 6(2), 7(1) and (2), 8(6), 11(3), 20, 22(3), 25(4), 27, 30, 32(4), 34(1), 37(2), 38, 44(2), 45(3), 46(6), 48, 61(3), 67(4), 71(4), 76, 78(4), 82(4), 84(2), 86(3), 91(2), 92(1) and (3), 93(1), 94(4), 95(5) and 96(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the entry into force of this Regulation period of 5 years from the entry into force of this Regulation. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the 5-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
2013/11/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 265 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not prevent the competent authorities from publishing or making otherwise available to the public information about the outcome of official controls regarding individual operators, provided that the following conditions are met: (a) the operator concerned is given the opportunity to comment on the information that the competent authority intends to publish or make otherwise available to the public, prior to the publication or release; (b) the information which is published or made otherwise available to the public takes into account the comments expressed by the operator concerned or is published or released together with such comments.deleted
2013/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 298 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Competent authorities shall perform official controls on a regular basis and with appropriate frequency to identify possible intentional violations of the rules referred to in Article 1(2), taking into account, in addition to the criteria referred to in paragraph 1, information regarding such possible intentional violations shared through the mechanisms of administrative assistance provided for in Title IV and any other information pointing to the possibility of such violations. The Commission, by means of an implementing act, details uniform minimum frequency of official controls, having regard, to the specific hazards and risks which exist in relation to each product and the different processes it undergoes. The implementing act shall be adopted within one year from the entry into force of the present Regulation.
2013/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 347 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. Competent authorities shall be entitled to publish or make otherwise available to the public information about the rating of individual operators based on the outcome of official controls, provided that the following conditions are met: (a) the rating criteria are objective, transparent and publicly available; (b) appropriate arrangements are in place to ensure the consistency and transparency of the rating process.deleted
2013/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 701 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 76 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that adequate financial resources are available through public means to provide the staff and other resources necessary for the competent authorities to perform official controls and other official activities. Fees or charges should be established only if the official control is performed exclusively in the interest of the food business operator.
2013/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 728 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. For the purpose of ensuring that competent authorities are provided with adequate resources for the performance of official controls, the competent authorities shall collectuse public means fees to recover the costs they incur in relation to:
2013/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 740 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, the official controls referred to in point (a) of that paragraph shall include official controls performed to verify compliance with measures adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article 137 of this Regulation, Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, Articles 27(1), 29(1), 40(2), 41(2), 47(1), 49(2) and 50(2) of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXXX [Office of Publications, please insert number of the Regulation on protective measures against pests of plants], Articles 41 and 144 of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXXX [Office of Publications, please insert number of the Regulation on the production and making availableensuring that competent authorities are provided with adequate resources for the performance of official controls, the competent authorities shall collect fees for: (a) The official controls performed in the interest of the food business operator in view onf the market of plant reproductive material] and Part VI of Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXXX [Office of Publications, please insert number of the Regulation on animal health], unless the decision establishing the measures requires otherwiseissuance of official certificates or to supervise the issuance of official attestations.
2013/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 747 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 77 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. fees collected as regards specific activities mentioned in Annex (to be defined) shall not be lower than the minimum rates specified in Annex (to be defined).
2013/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 768 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The competent authorities shall disclose the details of the calculation of fees
2013/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 801 #

2013/0140(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 1
Where fees are established in accordance with point (a) of Article 79(1), the rate of the fee to be applied to each operator shall be determined taking into account the operators' record of compliance with the rules referred to in Article 1(2) as ascertained through official controls, so that fees applied to consistently compliant operators are lower than those applied to other operators. The Commission, by means of an implementing act, details the meaning of "consistently compliant operators" and "lower". The implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 141(2).
2013/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 111 #

2012/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 d (new)
14d. Stresses that the removal of architectural barriers for people with disabilities also has a positive effect on the mobility of the elderly, helping them to live independent and active lives for longer; considers it important, therefore, that these barriers be removed in small towns, too, where a large number of older people live;
2012/11/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 114 #

2012/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Welcomes the Commission’s approach in regard to funding instruments, standardisation processes, repository development and, cooperation facilitation and the sharing of best practices among Member States; however, emphasises that it is prerequisite to link these objectives to the actual needs and demands (ie, to ensure that policies, programs and services are evidence-based and thus backed up by representative assessment and regular monitoring, so as to facilitate and speed up the creation of an age-friendly EU);
2012/11/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 67 #

2012/2137(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. wWhereas the vasTibet aAutonomous provinces of Tibet and Xinjiang are vital for the PRC from the viewpoint of ‘unity of the countRegion and other Tibetan autonomous areas, and the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region have become important territories for China's regional, military and because of their great strategic, military and economic importanceonomic ambitions and therefore are seen as core issues of 'territorial integrity' by the current Chinese Government;
2012/11/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 73 #

2012/2137(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I e (new)
Ie. whereas as of 6 September 2012, 51 Tibetans have self-immolated in Tibetan populated areas of the People's Republic of China, including the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR) and Tibetan Autonomous Areas within the Gansu, Sichuan and Qinghai provinces;
2012/11/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 202 #

2012/2137(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Admires the courage and the social responsibility of numerous Chinese citizens for defending precious social rights in their country, but denounces the tragic state of affairs whereby several of them are being officially persecuted and punished for their efforts toactivism of those Chinese citizens acting in socially responsible ways to promote and defend universally recognized human rights, and to challenge and correct well- known social dangers/criminal acts by Chinese officials, such as corruption, abuse of office, environmental damage, AIDS infection, food poisoning, construction fraud concerning schools, and illegal land and property expropriation, often committed by local party authorities; urges the Chinese leadership to encourage civil responsibility for observing social human rights and to rehabilitate officially persecuted and punished defenders of these right; denounces all incidences of official retaliation against these Chinese citizens; alsond expects a responsible Chinese leadership to comply strictly with individudomestic and international human rights law;
2012/11/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 235 #

2012/2137(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recognises the enormoussignificant efforts made by the Chinese Government to develop Tibet and Xinjiang economically; urges the Chinese Government to act in a politically responsible way by respecting and protecting Tibetan and Uighur traditional cultures and lifestyles; believes that Beijing cannot win the hearts and minds of the and the impact of such efforts on nomad communities and traditional livelihoods; urges the Chinese Government to act in a politically responsible way by meaningfully engaging the Tibetan and Uighur peoples in governance issues, including resource management and economic development priorities, and respecting rather than diluting cultural elements such as language and religion; strongly asserts that the Chinese Government will not achieve lasting stability in Tibet or Xinjiang or comity among Chinese, Tibetan and Uighur peoples by way of through forcible assimillations of surveillance cameras, cultural destruction or repressive police and security methods;
2012/11/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 250 #

2012/2137(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Stresses that, notwithstanding a harsh policy of repression, a religious revival is taking place in China which is demonstrated by the reopening or reconstruction of countless places of worship; urges the Chinese authorities to replace their ineffective policy of controlling religion with one offering realpull back on policies and practices that curtail any citizen's fundamental right to freedom of religion and belief;
2012/11/07
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
-having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Towards a 7th Environment Action Programme: better implementation of EU environment law’ __________________ 1 CdR 1119/2012
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas non-compliance, non- harmonised standards and the absence of legal milestones inevitably lead to the following problems in relation to the implementation of European environment law: - failure to transpose directives properly, or at all; - lack of compliance with fundamental secondary obligations under directives; - structural problems arising from a lack of information about environmental legislation; - lack of coordination between administrative structures; - inadequate implementation due to insufficient or delayed investment in the infrastructure required to safeguard the environment;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas, in order to ensure compliance with the Community principles which guarantee access to information, citizens’ participation and access to justice in environmental matters, the Commission intends to make good the deficiencies in those areas;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas tangible implementation inevitably raises problems; in 2008 alone, 23.5% (481) of all infringements of EU legislation related to the environment, indicating increasing damage to the environment and distortion of competition;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 28 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C d (new)
Cd. whereas, against this background, better implementation of European environment law specifically requires the introduction of corrective and preventive measures in key sectors on the basis of greater inter-institutional cooperation;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, in addition to unsatisfactory implementation, there is a lack of precise information about environmental matters (which is also connected with other factors such as lack of resources or political will or unsatisfactory transposition into national law);
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 36 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas inter-institutional cooperation and dialogue must be improved, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 37 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas interinstitutional cooperation and dialogue go hand-in-hand with the urgent need for policies to be more consistent in terms of environmental impact in the context of post-2013 EU budget reform and all EU funding in the areas of social cohesion and agriculture;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 38 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F c (new)
Fc. whereas the need to consult regional and local authorities whenever European legislation is revised is a key factor in ensuring that environmental legislation is implemented in practice;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F d (new)
Fd. whereas effective implementation must be ensured by: - information: greater efforts to share best practices and regulatory experience, including the statistical monitoring of environmental legislation and infringements thereof, can lead to significant mutual benefits; - dissemination: thereby enhancing the impact and visibility of Community environmental programmes; - reorganisation of administrative structures: with a view to improving the collection of data, communication, and access to information at all levels of governance and every stage of the policy- making process, including investment in telematic equipment;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 45 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Deplores the fact that, although regional and local authorities have clear tasks in environmental protection, EU environmental legislation addresses Member States ‘only’, requests the designation of a ‘competent authority’ only (seldom ‘authorities’) and mentions cooperation only exceptionally;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the need for coordination, complementarity and the elimination of gaps in the coverage of the various items of legislation which comprise European environment law;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 47 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Considers that, when EU environmental policies are formulated, regional and local authorities can strengthen the sense of cooperation and ensure the legislation is implemented more effectively;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 59 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Points to the importance of providing regional and local authorities with financial support and technical guidance where environmental matters are concerned and also of adopting supplementary measures at EU level which are based on national best practices;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Endorses the opinion of the Committee of the Regions, which calls for the concept of multilevel governance to be applied to environmental matters; stresses that pilot activities involving tripartite contracts between the EU, the Member States and regional and local authorities should be stepped up;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that a more interinstitutional approach would make it possible for political and legal responsibilities in relation to environmental matters to be fully shared between the EU, the Member States and the local and regional authorities;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recognises that, by introducing simpler rules which are easier for the stakeholders involved to understand, and hence ensuring greater legal certainty, simplification could also help to reduce the incidence of errors and increase the safeguards provided by national implementing systems;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. With that end in view, deplores the Commission’s failure to ensure the completion of an exhaustive impact assessment of the administrative and regulatory burdens which would be imposed by any new EU initiative arising from the communication in question; urges the Commission, therefore, to do so;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 71 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls on the Commission, consequently, to extend the global assessment of the impact of implementing environmental legislation properly and more effectively to include local and regional authorities; an additional means of ensuring the legislation was consistent and proportionate would be to require an impact assessment of any proposals for transposition which might place a strain on undertakings investing in the environmental sector;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 84 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Points to the need to relax the market distortion rules where these act as a disincentive to environment-related investment and hence impede the implementation of European regulations; considers, therefore, that ways must be found to lower administrative costs directly, including for example: - the exchange of best practices; - avoiding ‘gold-plating’, in other words, the imposition of unnecessary burdens and obligations on SMEs; - e-government and digital solutions; - simplified and increasingly automated reporting procedures, generally involving web tools which enable beneficiaries to submit programmes to the authorities, keep all information in an electronic format and use the data which is held in public registers; this would reduce the problems connected with retaining information, the errors made when entering data and the effort involved in having to submit documents more than once;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need for European legislation to aim to tackle the causes of environmental damage by establishing rules concerning legal responsibility for environmental damage as well as corporate social responsibility; with that end in view, considers that it is essential to carry into effect all the initiatives designed to encourage and propagate greater corporate social responsibility in relation to environmental matters, which reflects the requirement for businesses to be receptive to the sustainable development strategy;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 90 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 1
the concept of ‘environmental information’ should be defined in both qualitative and quantitative terms;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that, nowadays, environmental disputes (in other words any disputes or public demonstrations relating to actions by public- or private-sector stakeholders which could cause damage to the environment, public health or places where people live) have a significant impact on environmental protection and a wide range of social and economic implications; considers, therefore, that it would be useful to identify the most appropriate models of environmental justice so as to ensure that all the various issues are covered by the law;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Recommends, therefore, the pooling of knowledge between the respective judicial systems of the Member States which deal with infringements of, or failure to comply with, EU environmental legislation;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 112 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reiterates its recommendation that the best practices of regional and local environmental protection systems should be extended to all the Member States, since this would encourage the development of national networks and robust administrative structures capable of widely disseminating the results achieved;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 113 #

2012/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Considers that any prospective harmonisation of legal acts should be complementary to an alternative approach based on negotiation or non-judicial dispute resolution, which should include all the institutional negotiating channels and all possibilities of professional mediation;
2012/12/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the EU’s unilateral commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in order to realise the 2°C goal;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 9 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the reduction in CO2 emissions has been essentially the result of the economic crisis in recent years, thereby confirming the continued existence of a close link between CO2 emissions and economic growth rates;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Notes on the contrary that the decarbonisation scenarios being envisaged by the Commission presuppose a severing of the link between economic growth and CO2 emissions –implying a revolutionary breakthrough in economic efficiency unheard of over any sustained period in the history of mankind – or, as a more tangible alternative, the beginning of an organised world economic decline;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 2
2. Finds it regrettablelogical that the Commission has based all decarbonisation scenarios on the assumption of global climate action; and has not carried out any analysis to identify the EU’s ambitions ccordingly urges the Commission to suspend the 2009 EU climate and energy package (excluding the energy efficiency clause) and all subsequent climate legislation pending the event that global action is delayedsignature of a climate agreement by the main CO2- emitting nations (China, the United States and India;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 21 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 3
3. Supports the conclusion that decarbonisation of the EU by 2050 is feasible and will require high levels of investmentsTakes the view that the Commission should reconsider scenarios based on adaptation to climate change, which is likely to incur minimal financial losses, as opposed to measures to combat it; calls on the Commission to create stability for investors by reducing over-regulation and by setting a clear, achievable technology- neutral goal;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to propose a clear 2030 goal by setting a single target for CO2 reduction; reiterates the need to meet the milestones for emission reduction stated in the low-carbon roadmap and to put forward all needed measures promptly;deleted
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to develop sound ways of financing the energy transition, including a strengthened ETS, based on innovation initiatives such as Horizon 2020, and market-based mechanisms;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 60 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to step up the development and deployment of low- carbon technologies, to strengthen the role of renewable energy sources – including by increasing their commercialisation,create favourable conditions to step up the efficient use of energy sources, and to phase out fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption;
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 72 #

2012/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the overall decarbonisation goal necessitates a substantial reduction in transport emissions, which implies a substantial rise in electricity use and thus high levels of investments in electricity infrastructure; notes that quick action is needed to avoid being locked into a higher emission path on account of the long lifecycle of infrastructure.deleted
2012/09/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 16 #

2012/2092(BUD)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 11
11. Stresses that the successful implementation and monitoring of legislation needs sufficient and skilled administrative support; reminds that the Public Health Programme is implemented by the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC); is concerned that the freeze or even reduction of administrative expenditure will have a negative impact on the quality of Commission's activities;
2012/07/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #

2012/2092(BUD)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 12
12. Recalls that decentralised agencies deliver diverse tasks, inter alia adopting individual decisions which are legally binding to third parties, providing direct assistance to the Commission and, where necessary, to Member States and gathering and analysing objective, reliable information and data; reiterates that decentralised agencies need adequate funding and staffing in order to fulfil their existing and newly assigned tasks; is concerned in general about the reduction of more than 1% in real terms of expenditure for EU agencies, despite the extension of tasks and some ongoing start-up phases;
2012/07/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2012/2092(BUD)

Draft opinion
Section 1 – paragraph 15
15. Notes that the Draft Budget foresees a reduction of the ECDC establishment plan by two and for the EFSA by four posts; recognises at the same time that the EEA receives two additional posts which need to be budgetary neutral achieved by a reduction of two national experts and two contract agents; is aware that 36 additional posts are foreseen for ECHA of which 16 posts will be financed from additional fees as well as 21 posts for EMA; is in this context concerned that the recruitment of staff needs to be postponed when the fee income is lower than estimated for 2013; will not accept unjustified deletion of AD grades in any establishment plan.
2012/07/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 3 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1272/20081 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 199/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, __________________ 1 OJ L 353, 31.12.08, p.1.
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 4 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 ter (new)
- having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1107/20091 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC, __________________ 1 OJ L 309, 24.11.09, p.1.
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D – indent 6 a (new)
- whereas many chemical or synthesised substances trigger a reaction in the endocrine system, but this does not mean these are adverse effects or that all substances need be classified as endocrine disruptors;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers it necessary, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, thatfor the precautionary principle requires us as legislators to takeadopt measures to reducehat allow human exposure to endocrine disruptors to a minimumbe reduced to below thresholds at which, according to scientific evidence, they could pose a health risk, in order to avert the serious effects feared;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 44 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers, on the basis of an overall assessment of the state of knowledge, that the precautionary principle requires us as legislators to take measures to reduce human exposure to the adverse effects of endocrine disruptors to a minimum;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 50 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that the feared effects of endocrine disruptors are so serious that the absence of precise knowledge, including exact knowledge of causal links, should not prevent us from taking measures to protect humans and animals;deleted
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Calls, therefore, on the Commission to submit as soon as possible proposals for overarching criteria together with testing and information requirements for chemicals on the commercial market, and for EU legislation to make clear what is regarded as a substance with endocrine- disrupting properties; advocates considering the introduction of ‘endocrine disruptor’ as a regulatory hazard class;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that the criteria determining what constitutes an endocrine disruptor should be based on scientifically based and that the precautionary principle should be appli evidence and provide a regulatory response proportionate to the risk assessed; considers that a socio-economic assessment should then be carried out in accordance with the relevant legislation;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 83 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that the definition of the criteria must be harmonised at UN level, and conceivably implemented under the GHS (Globally Harmonised System) and consequently in the European System of Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP);
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 89 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to introduce in all relevant EU legislation appropriate testing requirements for the identification of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties; considers that the validated and internationally recognised testing methods based on WHO definitions of ‘endocrine disruptor’ and ‘adverse effect’ that have been developed in (for example) the OECD must be implemented; notes that the OECD programme of testing methods covers sex hormones and thyroid hormones as well as steroidogenesis; points out, on the other hand, that there are no tests for other areas of the endocrine system, e.g. insulin and growth hormones; considers that testing methods and guidance documents should be developed so as to take better account of endocrine disruptors, possible low-dose effects and non- monotonic dose-response relationships;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 96 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that it should be possible for decision-making bodies to deal with substances having similar chemical structures on a group basis if the manufacturer or importer cannot demonstrate that the chemical is safe in spite of its structural similarity,use procedures already laid down in existing regulations, such as those on REACH, biocides and plant protection products with a view to providing the public as quickly as possible with protection from the adverse effects of exposure to endocrine disruptors and restricting the number of experiments on animals;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission, in its review of EU strategy on endocrine disruptors, to place greater emphasis on the precautionary principle and work towards reducing human exposure to endocrine disruptors to below thresholds which, according to scientific evidence, pose a health risk;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 118 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic examination of all relevant current legislation and, where necessary, to propose new legislation so as to reduce the exposure of human beings, particularly foetuses, babies, children and teenagers, to the adverse effects of hormone disruptors; calls on the Commission to submit legislative proposals for chemicals in textiles and building materials, and stresses in particular the importance of reviewing legislation on materials and products intended to come into contact with food, so as to reduce human exposure to the adverse effects of endocrine disruptors;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 123 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Takes the view that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as Substances of Very High Concern within the meaning of the Reach Regulation; considers, therefore, that endocrine disruptors should be subject to authorisation or restriction with a view to substitution; deleted Or. it (see amendment to Paragraph 9)
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 129 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that endocrine disruptors should be regarded as substances for which it is not possible to set a limit value at which effects may occur (‘non- threshold’ substances) and that any exposure to such substances may entail a riska ‘dose-response’ curve must be calculated for each endocrine disruptor, from which to obtain the ‘no observed adverse effect level' (NOAEL);
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 146 #

2012/2066(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to include all relevant stakeholders in cooperation seeking to adopt the necessary legislative changes to improve protection of human health from the adverse effects of hormone-disrupting chemicals;
2012/11/27
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 7 #

2012/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Draws attention to the recent studies showing that many different types of cancer can develop as a result of not only the inhalation of airborne fibres but also the ingestion of water containing such fibres (for example, from asbestos pipes);
2012/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 8 #

2012/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Points out that the ballast used on railway tracks often contains large quantities of asbestos, which breaks up as a result of vibration caused by trains and is released into the surrounding air;
2012/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2012/2065(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to carry out action research into the scale and severity of clinically measurable psychological impacts in communities around the EU that have been hit by diseases solely attributable to exposure to asbestos; (For both victims and their families, mesothelioma is extremely difficult to cope with, not least from a psychological point of view. Research carried out in Casale Monferrato by the University of Turin (Professor A. Granieri) has found that mesothelioma sufferers and their families show various psychological symptoms that come within the scientifically accepted definition of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)).
2012/10/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2012/2043(INI)

Draft opinion
Indent 2 a (new)
- the introduction of rules for informing consumers, on labels, about animal slaughtering methods;
2012/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 54 #

2012/2043(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to introduce rules for an eight-hour daily limit for the transport of live animals for slaughter;
2012/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In accordance with Article 114(3) of the Treaty ofn the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: “Treaty”), a high level of health protection should be taken as a basis, regard being had, in particular, to any new developments based on scientific facts. Tobacco products are not ordinary commodities and in view of the particularly harmful effects of tobacco, health protection should be given high importance, in particular to reduce smoking prevalence among young people. To that end, it is also essential to continue to provide education, information and prevention campaigns and programmes to help citizens who wish to give up smoking.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 109 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) The prohibition of tobacco products with characterising flavours does not prohibit the use of individual additives altogether, but obliges the manufactures to reduce the additive or the combination of additives to such an extent that the additives no longer result in a characterising flavour. The use of additives necessarywhich are essential for the manufacturinge of tobacco products should be allowed, as long as they do not result in a characterising flavour. The Commission should ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the provision on characterising flavour. Independent panels should be used by the Member States and by the Commission to assist in such decision -making. The application of this Directive should not discriminate between different tobacco varieties.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 126 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Considering the Directive’s focus on young people, tobacco products other than cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, water- pipe tobacco, and smokeless tobacco, which are mainly consumed by older consumers, should be granted an exemption from certain ingredients requirements as long as there is no substantial change of circumstances in terms of sales volumes or consumption patterns in relation to young people. Or. it (See amendment to Article 6(10))
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 136 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22
(22) The labelling provisions also need to be adapted to new scientific evidence. For example the indication of the yields for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide on cigarette packets haves proven to be misleading as it makes consumers believe that certain cigarettes are less harmful than others. Evidence also suggests that large combined health warnings are more effective than text-only warnings. In this light combined health warnings should become mandatory throughout the Union and, in order to be effective, cover significant and visible parts of the packet surface. A minimum size should be set for all health warnings to ensure their visibility and effectiveness.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 138 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) Furthermore, several scientific studies show that verbal encouragement to stop smoking is effective when it is aimed at smokers’ egos, indirectly hurting their pride and eliciting an emotional response. Text warnings of this kind, for example: ‘Smoking damages the skin and speeds up wrinkles’, ‘Smoking makes you less attractive’, ‘Nobody likes a cigarette- flavoured kiss’, ‘Quitting won’t make you fat: it will improve your life’, or ‘Think about it: stopping for a cigarette does more harm than the stress you are trying to relieve’, could therefore be combined with the text warnings currently in use.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 152 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
(23) In order to ensure the integrity and the visibility of health warnings and maximise their efficacy, provisions should be made regarding the dimensionesign characteristics of the warnings as well as regarding certain aspects of the appearance of the tobacco package, including the opening mechanism. The package and the products may mislead consumers, in particular young people, suggesting that products are less harmful. For instance, this is the case with certain texts or features, such as ‘low- tar’, ‘light’, ‘ultra-light’, ‘mild’, ‘natural’, ‘organic’, ‘without additives’, ‘without flavours’, ‘slim’, names, pictures, and figurative or other signs. Likewise, the size and appearance of individual cigarettes can mislead consumers by creating the impression that they are less harmful. A recent study has also shown that smokers of slim cigarettes were more likely to believe that their own brand might be less harmful. This should be addressed.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 176 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
(30) Cross-border distance sales of tobacco, and practices such as the free distribution or swapping of tobacco products in public places for promotional purposes, facilitate access to tobacco products ofby young people and risk to undermineing compliance with the requirements provided for by tobacco control legislation and in particular by this Directive. Common rules on a notification system are necessary to ensure that this Directive achieves its full potential. The provision on notification of cross-border distance sales of tobacco in this Directive should apply notwithstanding the notification procedure set out in Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services. Business to consumer distance sale of tobacco products is further regulated by Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts, which will be replaced by Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, as of 13 June 2014. They should therefore be abolished. Or. it (See amendments to Article 16.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 194 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
(33) Non-tobacco nicotine-containing products are sold on the Union market. The different regulatory approaches taken by Member States to address health and safety concerns associated with these products have a negative impact on the functioning of the internal market, in particular considering that these products are subject to significant cross-border distance sales including via the internet.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 201 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use provides a legal framework to assess the quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products including nicotine -containing products. A significant number of nicotine-containing products were already authorised under this regulatory regime. The authorisation takes into account the nicotine content of the product in question. Subjecting all nicotine- containing products, whose nicotine content equals or exceeds the content of aExcluding non- tobacco nicotine -containing product previouslys authorised under Directive 2001/83/EC, to from the same legal frameworkcope of this Directive clarifies the legal situation, levels out differences between national legislations, ensures equal treatment of all nicotine -containing products usable for smoking -cessation purposes and creates incentives for research and innovation in smoking cessation. This should be without prejudice to the application of Directive 2001/83/EC to other products covered by this Directive if the conditions set by Directive 2001/83/EC are fulfilled. Or. it (See amendments to Article 18.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 208 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
(35) Labelling provisProvisions on ingredients, labelling, and descriptions should be introduced for non-tobacco nicotine -containing products below the threshold set out incovered by this Directive in order to drawing the attention of consumers to potential health risks. Or. it (See amendments to Article 18.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 214 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, in particular concerning the format of ingredients reporting, and the determination of products with characterising flavours or with increased levels of toxicity and addictiveness and the methodology for determining whether a tobacco product has characterising flavour, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Or. it (See amendment to Article 6(2), subparagraph 2.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 226 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
(38) In order to make this Directive fully operational and to keep up with technical, scientific and international developments in tobacco manufacture, consumption and regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission, in particular in respect of adopting and adapting maximum yields for emissions and their measurement methods, setting maximum levels for ingredients that increase toxicity, addictiveness or attractiveness, the methodology for determining whether a tobacco product has characterising flavour, the use of health warnings, unique identifiers and security features in the labelling and packaging, defining key elements for contracts on data storage with independent third parties, and reviewing certain exemptions granted to tobacco products other than cigarettes, roll-your- own tobacco and smokeless tobacco products and reviewing the nicotine levels for nicotine containing products. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and the Council. (See amendments to Article 3, Article 6(2), second subparagraph, and Article 18.)Or. it
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 255 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) the prohibition of cross-border distance sales of tobacco products; Or. it See amendments to Article 16.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 267 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) ‘age verification system’ means a computing system that unambiguously confirms the consumer's age in electronic form according to national requirements; deleted Or. it See amendments to Article 16.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 293 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – introductory part
(11) ‘cross-border distance sales’ means a distance sales service where, at the time the consumer orders the product, the consumer is located in a Member State other than the Member State or the third country where the retail outlet is established; a retail outlet is deemed to be established in a Member State: Or. it See amendments to Article 16.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 294 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
(a) in the case of a natural person - if he/she has his/her place of business in that Member State; deleted Or. it See amendments to Article 16.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 295 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
(b) in other cases - if it has its statutory seat, central administration or place of business, including a branch, agency or any other establishment in that Member State; deleted Or. it See amendments to Article 16.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 307 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18
(18) ‘ingredient’ means an additive, tobacco (leaves and other natural, processed or unprocessed parts of tobacco plants including expanded and reconstituted tobacco), as well as any substance present in a finished tobacco product including paper, filter, inks, capsules and adhesives;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 310 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18 c (new)
(18c) ‘natural constituent’ means tobacco (leaves and other natural, processed or unprocessed parts of tobacco plants including expanded and reconstituted tobacco); Or. it (See amendment to Article 2(18).)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 317 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19
(19) ‘maximum level’ or ‘maximum yield’ means the maximum content or emission, including 0, of a substance in a tobacco product measured in grams;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 321 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23
(23) ‘novel tobacco product’ means a tobacco product other than a cigarette, roll- your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco, water- pipe tobacco, cigar, cigarillo, chewing tobacco, nasal tobacco or tobacco for oral use placed on the market after entry into force of this Directive;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 326 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 25
(25) ‘place on the market’ means to make products available to consumers located in the Union, with or without payment, including by means of distance sale; in case of cross-border distance sales the product is deemed to be placed on the market in the Member State where the consumer is located; ; Or. it See amendments to Article 16.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 343 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 30
(30) ‘substantial change of circumstances’ means an increase of the sales volumes by product category, (such as pipe tobacco, cigar, cigarillo,) by at least 10% in at least 10 Member States25% throughout the Union based on sales data transmitted in accordance with Article 5(4); or an increase of the prevalence level in the consumer group under 25 years of age by at least 5 percentage points in at least 10 Member Statesthroughout the Union for the respective product category based on ____ [this date will be set at the moment of adoption of the Directive] Eurobarometer report or equivalent prevalence studies;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 373 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the maximum yields laid down in paragraph 1, taking into account scientific development ando internationally agreed standards.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 389 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall notify the Commission of the maximum yields that they set for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Taking into account internationally agreed standards, where available, and based on scientific evidence and on the yields notified by Member States, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adopt and adapt maximum yields for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes that increase in an appreciable manner the toxic or addictive effect of tobacco products beyond the threshold of toxicity and addictiveness stemming from the yields of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide fixed in paragraph 1.(Text split between paragraph 3 and a new paragraph 3a for greater clarity.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 394 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the yields set out in paragraph 3. a) to internationally agreed standards, where available, or b) where scientific evidence demonstrates that they can increase in an appreciable manner the toxic or addictive effect of tobacco products beyond the threshold of toxicity and addictiveness stemming from the yields of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide fixed in paragraph 1.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 413 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall notify the Commission of the methods of measurement that they use for other emissions of cigarettes and for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Based on these methods, and taking into account scientific and technical developments as well as internationally agreed standards the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adopt and adapt methods of measurement.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 416 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Member States shall notify the Commission of any methods of measurement that they use for emissions of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Based on these methods, and taking into account scientific and technical developments as well as internationally agreed standards, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adopt EU methods of measurement. Or. it (See Directive 2001/37/EC, Recital 31.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 441 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. This article shall not apply to tobacco products other than cigarettes until such time as the EU methods of measurement referred to in Article 4(4a) are adopted. Or. it (See Directive 2001/37/EC, Recital 31.)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 501 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall adopt by means of implementing actsbe empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 22, to lay down uniform rules on the procedures for determining whether a tobacco product falls within the scope of paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 538 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Paragraph 5 shall not apply to technical measures intended to decrease specific harmful components of smoke or enhance the biodegradability of tobacco products.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 582 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 10
10. Tobacco products other than cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, water-pipe tobacco and smokeless tobacco products shall be exempted from the prohibitions laid down in paragraphs 1 and 5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to withdraw this exemption if there is a substantial change of circumstances as established in a Commission report.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 611 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. For cigarette packets the general warning and the information message shall be printed on the lateral sides of the unit packets. These warnings shall have a width of not less than 20 mm and a height of not less than 43 mm, in black Helvetica bold type on a white or coloured background. For roll- your-own tobacco the information message shall be printed on the surface that becomes visible when opening the unit packet. Both the general warning and the information message shall cover 50% of the surface on which they are printed.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 634 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) to define the position, format, layout and design of the health warnings laid down in this Article, including their font typsize and background colour, with due regard for the linguistic constraints obtaining in each Member State.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 670 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) cover 750 % of the external area of both the front and back surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging;
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 698 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) be reproduced in accordance with the format, layout, design and proportions specified by the Commission pursuant to paragraph 3; Or. it (See amendment to Article 9(3)(c).)
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 712 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) for unit packets of cigarettes, respect the following dimensions: (i) height: not less than 64 mm; (ii) width: not less than 55 mm.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 746 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) define the position, format, layout, designlayout, design (including font type and size), rotation and proportions of the health warnings, with due regard for the linguistic constraints obtaining in each Member State;
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 767 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The general warning referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover 30 % of the external area of the corresponding surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging. That proportion shall be increased to 32 % for Member States with two official languages and 35 % for Member States with threemore than two official languages.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 772 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The text warning referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover 40 % of the external area of the corresponding surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging. That proportion shall be increased to 45 % for Member States with two official languages and 50 % for Member States with threemore than two official languages.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 806 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) cover 30 % of the external area of the corresponding surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging. That proportion shall be increased to 32 % for Member States with two official languages and 35 % for Member States with threemore than two official languages.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 861 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The variety of tobacco used to manufacture the product and/or its country of origin may be indicated on the unit packet.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 910 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to define more detailed rules for the shape and size of unit packets in so far as these rules are necessary to ensure the full visibility and integrity of the health warnings before the first opening, during the opening and after reclosing of the unit packet.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 928 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to make either cuboid or cylindric shape mandatory for unit packets of tobacco products other than cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco if there is a substantial change of circumstances as established in a Commission report.
2013/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1014 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 10
10. Tobacco products other than cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco shall be exempted from the application of paragraph 1 to 8 during a period of 510 years following the date referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 25.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1042 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall oblige retail outlets intending to engage in cross-border distance sales to consumers located in the Union to register with the competent authorities in the Member State where theprohibit retail outlet is established and in the Member State where the actual or potential consumer is located. Retail outlets established outside the Union have to register with the competent authorities in the Member State where the actual or potential consumer is located. All retail outlets intending toon their territory from engageing in cross-border distance sales shall submit at least the following information to the competent authorities:.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1047 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall prohibit on their territory the distribution of free or discounted tobacco products and the swapping of new, sealed packets of tobacco products for packets that have already been opened, irrespective of the channels used.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1055 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) name or corporate name and permanent address of the place of activity from where the tobacco products are supplied;deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1063 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the starting date of the activity of offering tobacco products for cross-border distance sales to the public by means of information society services;deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1071 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) the address of the website/-s used for that purpose and all relevant information necessary to identify the website.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1080 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. The competent authorities of the Member States shall publish the complete list of all retail outlets registered with them in accordance with the rules and safeguards laid down in Directive 95/46/EC Retail outlets may only start placing tobacco products on the market in form of distance sales as of the moment the name of the retail outlet is published in the relevant Member States.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1090 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. If it is necessary in order to ensure compliance and facilitate enforcement, Member States of destination may require that the retail outlet nominates a natural person who is responsible for verifying the tobacco products before reaching the consumer comply with the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive in the Member State of destination.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1098 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Retail outlets engaged in distance sales shall be equipped with an age verification system, which verifies at the time of sale, that the purchasing consumer respects the minimum age foreseen under the national legislation of the Member State of destination. The retailer or nominated natural person shall report to the competent authorities a description of the details and functioning of the age verification system.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1107 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Personal data of the consumer shall only be processed in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC and not be disclosed to the manufacturer of tobacco products or companies forming part of the same group of companies or to any other third parties. Personal data shall not be used or transferred beyond the purpose of this actual purchase. This also applies if the retail outlet forms part of a manufacturer of tobacco products.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1151 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The following nicotine-containing products may only be placed on the market if they were authorised pursuant to Directive 2001/83/EC:Articles 6(1) to (9), 10, 12(1) and (2) and 16 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to nicotine-containing products other than tobacco products.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1165 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Nicotine-containing products other than tobacco products in respect of which marketing authorisations are granted under Directive 2011/83/EC shall not be covered by this Directive.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1178 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) products with a nicotine level exceeding 2 mg per unit, ordeleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1191 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) products with a nicotine concentration exceeding 4 mg per ml ordeleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1205 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) products whose intended use results in a mean maximum peak plasma concentration exceeding 4 ng of nicotine per ml.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1216 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to update the nicotine quantities set out in paragraph 1 taking into account scientific developments and marketing authorisations granted to nicotine- containing products pursuant to Directive 2001/83/EC.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1224 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Each unit packet and any outside packaging of nicotine-containing products below the thresholds set out in paragraph 1 shall carry the following health warning: This product contains nicotine and can damage your health.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1237 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. The health warning referred to in paragraph 3 shall comply with the requirements specified in Article 10(4). In addition, it shall: a) be printed on the two largest surfaces of the unit packet and any outside packaging; b) cover 30 % of the external area of the corresponding surface of the unit packet and any outside packaging. That proportion shall be increased to 32 % for Member States with two official languages and 35 % for Member States with three official languages.deleted
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1246 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 22 to adapt the requirements in paragraphs 3 and 4 taking into account scientific and market developments and to adopt and adapt the position, format, layout, design and rotation of the health warnings.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1261 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. The health warning shall comply with the requirements laid down in Article 10(4). It shall cover not less than 30 % of the area of the corresponding surface of the unit packet and of any outside packaging. That proportion shall be increased to 32 % for Member States with two official languages and 35 % for Member States with threemore than two official languages.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1272 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(2), 3(3a), 4(3), 4(4), and 4(4a), 6(2),6(3), 6(9), 6(10), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(54(9) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of timefive years from [Office of Publications: please insert the date of the entry into force of this Directive]..
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1284 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of powers referred to in Articles 3(2), 3(3a), 4(3), 4(4), 4(4a), 6(2), 6(3), 6(9), 6(10), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(54(9) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1294 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act pursuant to Articles 3(2), 3(3a), 4(3), 4(4), 4(4a), 6(2), 6(3), 6(9), 6(10), 8(4), 9(3), 10(5), 11(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14(9), 18(2) and 18(54(9) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1353 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 14 a (new)
(14 a) This product contains nicotine and is damaging to your health. (Amendment linked to the amendment on Title 1a (new) of Annex I.) Or. it See amendments to Article 18.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1356 #

2012/0366(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – heading 1 a (new)
List of the text warnings referred to in Article 18 Or. it See amendments to Article 18.
2013/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 237 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. The use of fluorinated greenhouse gases, or of mixtures that contain fluorinated greenhouse gases, with a global warming potential of 2500 or more, to service or maintain refrigeration equipment with a charge size equivalent to 540 tonnes of CO2 or more, shall be prohibited from 1 January 2020[...]1. This clause shall not apply to the use of recovered or reclaimed fluorinated greenhouse gases or to equipment intended for use at operating temperatures of below -50 °C. __________________ 1 Please insert the date: three years after the entry into force of this Regulation.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. From [dd/mm/yyyy] [insert date 3 years after entry into force of this regulation], refrigeration, air-conditioning and heat pump equipment shall not be charged with hydrofluorocarbons before it is placed on the market or before it is made available to the end-user for its first installationequipment and products whose operation relies on hydrofluorocarbons shall not be imported into the European Union charged with hydrofluorocarbons unless the importer is registered on the quota registry as referred to in Article 15.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 256 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The equipment shall be charged where it is intended to be used, by persons certified in accordance with Article 8.deleted
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 261 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to hermetically sealed equipment or to equipment that contains a quantity of hydrofluorocarbons corresponding to less than 2 % of the equipment’s foreseen maximum capacity.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 264 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall ensure that the quantity of hydrofluorocarbons that producers and importeras listed in Annexes I and II that producers and importers of hydrofluorocarbons or products containing hydrofluorocarbons are entitled to place on the market in the Union each year does not exceed the maximum quantity for the year in question calculated in accordance with Annex V. Each producer and importer of hydrofluorocarbons or products containing hydrofluorocarbons shall ensure that the quantity of hydrofluorocarbons calculated in accordance with Annex V that it places on the market does not exceed the quota allocated to it pursuant to Article 14(5) or transferred to it pursuant to Article 16.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 278 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
2. Producers and importers that have not reported production or imports under Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 for the reference period referred to in paragraph 1 may declare their intention, as well as importers of equipment containing hydrofluorocarbons, shall declare whether or not they intend to produce or import hydrofluorocarbons in the following year.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 279 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Exporters of equipment containing hydrofluorocarbons shall declare whether they intend to apply for quota credits on the basis of the quantities exported in the previous year.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 281 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall allocate quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market for each producer and importer and for each importer of equipment containing hydrofluorocarbons for each year beginning with the year 2015, applying the allocation mechanism laid down in Annex VI.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 286 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) importers of products or equipment containing hydrofluorocarbons who declare they have opted for the quota allocation mechanism and submit a declaration within the meaning of Article 14(2);
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 287 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) exporters of products or equipment containing hydrofluorocarbons who declare they have opted for the quota allocation mechanism and submit a declaration within the meaning of Article 14(2);
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 289 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Each exporter of products containing fluorinated greenhouse gases entered in the registry referred to in Article 15(1) may be credited the quantities it has exported from the Union during the previous year, from the quota allocated to another undertaking operating in the Union, provided it is also registered.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 290 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall monitor the transfers made under paragraph 1a and shall publish an annual report on the functioning of the transfer system and present this to the Parliament and the Council.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 291 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 March 2014 and every year after that, each producer, importer and exporterundertaking that produced, imported or exported more than one metric tonne or 1 000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent of fluorinated greenhouse gases and gases listed in Annex II during the preceding calendar year shall report to the Commission the data specified in Annex VII on each of those substances for that calendar year.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 295 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3
3. By 31 March 2014 and every year after that, each undertaking that placroduced, imported or exported more than 10 000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent of fluorinated greenhouse gases and gases listed in Annex II contained in products or equipment on the market during the preceding calendar year shall report to the Commission the data specified in Annex VII on each of those substances for that calendar year.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 413 #

2012/0305(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – point 1 – paragraph 1
Each undertaking for which a reference value has been established receives a quota corresponding to 9580% of the reference value multiplied by the percentage indicated in Annex V for the respective year.
2013/04/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 23 a (new)
(23a) Under the existing Directive 2011/92/EU, the exploration and extraction of both conventional and non- conventional hydrocarbons is included in Annex II, regardless of the quantity explored or extracted. Such projects require monitoring on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the criteria set out in Annex III, with the aim of determining the significance of their environmental effects. In accordance with the 'Guidance note on the application of Directive 85/337/EEC to projects related to the exploration and exploitation of unconventional hydrocarbons'1 and as called for by the European Parliament resolution on the environmental impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction activities2, projects involving non- conventional hydrocarbons must be subject to this Directive, as conventional activities already are. Annex I to Directive 2011/92/EU should therefore be amended so that projects related to the exploration and extraction of non-conventional hydrocarbons that are likely to have significant effects on the environment are subject to mandatory environmental impact assessment. __________________ 1 Ares(2011)1339393. 2 P7_TA(2012)0443.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 24
(24) The new provisions should also apppply solely to projects for which the request for development consent is introduced before the time-limit for transposition but for which the environmental impact assessment has not been concluded before that datenvironmental impact assessment has not yet begun before the time-limit for transposition of this Directive.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 105 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1
(a) in point (a) of paragraph 2, after the first indent is replaced by the following is added: "— the execution of construction or demolition works, or of other installations or schemes,"demolition works that do not fall within the scope of Directives 2004/35/EC and 2010/75/EU,
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 135 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point c a (new)
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph 4a is added: "4a. This Directive shall not apply to schemes established in connection with a permit issued pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU or necessary for the implementation of measures to prevent or repair environmental damage pursuant to Directive 2004/35/EC."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 168 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 3 – point a
(a) population, human health, and biodiversityfauna and flora, with particular attention to species and habitats protected under Council Directive 92/43/EEC(*) and Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council(**);
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 3 – point b
(b) land, soil, water, air and climate change (in terms of greenhouse gas emissions);
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4 – point b
6. The competent authority shall make its decision pursuant to paragraph 2 within three monthninety days from the request for development consent and provided that the developer has submitted all the requisite information. Depending on the nature, complexity, location and size of the proposed project, the competent authority may extend that deadline by a further 3 months; in that case, the competent authority shall inform the developer of the reasons justifying the extension and of the date when its decision is expected.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 239 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Where an environmental impact assessment must be carried out in accordance with Articles 5 to 10, the developer shall prepare an environmental report. The environmental report shall be based on the determination pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and include the information that may reasonably be required for making informed decisions on the environmental impacts of the proposed project, taking into account current knowledge and methods of assessment, the characteristics, technical capacity and location of the project, the characteristics of the potential impact, a description of the reasonable alternatives, adapted to the proposed project and to its specific features, and the extent to which certain matters (including the evaluation of alternatives) are more appropriately assessed at different levels including the planning level, or on the basis of other assessment requirements. The detailed list of information to be provided in the environmental report is specified in Annex IV.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 252 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
2. TShould the developer so require, before submitting a request for development consent, the competent authority, after having consulted the authorities referred to in Article 6(1) and the developer, shall determine the scope and level of detail of, shall provide guidance on the information to be included by the developer in the environmental report, in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article. In particular, the competent authority shall determineconsider:
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 267 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) the individual stages of the procedure and binding time-frames with regard to their duration;
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 272 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) reasonable alternatives relevant to the proposed project and its specific characteristics;deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 283 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) the information to be submitted relevant to the specific characteristics of a particular project or type of project;deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 334 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point -a (new)
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 1
(-a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the authorities likely to be concerned by the project by reason of their specific environmental responsibilities or local jurisdiction are given an opportunity to express their opinion on the information supplied by the developer and on the request for development consent. To that end, Member States shall designate the authorities to be consulted, either in general terms or on a case-by-case basis. The information gathered pursuant to Article 5 shall be forwarded to those authorities. Detailed arrangements for consultation shall be laid down by the Member States."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 337 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point -a a (new)
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(-aa) in paragraph 3, the following subparagraph is added: "Requests for access to the information referred to in this paragraph shall be handled in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 5 of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 338 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point -a b (new)
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 4
(-ab) paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: "4. The public concerned shall be given early and effective opportunities to participate in the environmental decision-making procedures referred to in Article 2(2), through its relationship with the competent authority or authorities. The latter, during the decision-making process, are required to report the comments and opinions that the public is entitled to express when all options are open before the decision on the request for development consent is taken."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 342 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point a
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 6 – introductory part
ReasonableThe Member States shall set binding time- frames for the different phases shall be provided, allowing sufficient time:
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 346 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point b
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 6 – paragraph 7
7. The time-frames for consulting the public concerned on the environmental report referred to in Article 5(1) shall not be shorter than 30 days or longer than 60 days. In exceptional cases, where the nature, complexity, location or size of the proposed project so require, the competent authority may extend this time-frame by a further 30 days; in that case, the competent authority shall inform the developer of the reasons justifying the extension."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 380 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
If the competent authority decides to grant development consent, it shall ensure that the development consent includesconsider whether measures to monitor the significant adverse environmental effects should be included in that development consent, in order to assess the implementation and the expected effectiveness of mitigation and compensation measures, and to identify any unforeseeable adverse effects.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 385 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The type of parameters to be monitored and the duration of the monitoring shall be consistent with the requirements arising from other Union legislation and proportionate to the nature, location and size of the proposed project and the significance of its environmental effects.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 389 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Existing mMonitoring arrangements resulting from other Union legislation may shall be used if appropriate.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 397 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. When all necessary information gathered pursuant to Articles 5, 6 and 7 has been provided to the competent authority, including, where relevant, specific assessments required under other Union legislation, and the consultations referred to in Articles 6 and 7 have been completed, the competent authority shall conclude its environmental impact assessment of the project within three monthninety days.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 400 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 8
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Depending on the nature, complexity, location and size of the proposed project, the competent authority may extend that deadline by a further 3 months; in that case, the competent authority shall inform the developer of the reasons justifying the extension and of the date when its decision is expected.deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 416 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9 – point a
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) having examined the environmental report and, the concernmments and opinions expressed by the public concerned, and the main reasons andoutcome of the considerultations on which the decision is based, including information about the public participation processf that public and of the authorities referred to in Article 6(1), the main reasons and considerations on which the decision is based;
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 422 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9 – point b
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 3
(b) the following paragraph 3 is added: "3. Member States may also decide to make available to the public the information referred to in paragraph 1, when the competent authority concludes its environmental impact assessment of the project."deleted
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 425 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 9 a (new)
Directive 2011/92/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 3
(9a) Article 11, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. What constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right shall be determined by the Member States, consistently with the objective of giving the public concerned wide access to justice. To that end, the interest of any non-governmental organisation meeting the requirements referred to in Article 1(2), which: (a) has an office based in the territory affected by the decisions, acts or omissions subject to the provisions of Article 6, and (b) meets the requirements of national law, shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of point (a) of paragraph 1 of this Article. Such organisations shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purpose of point (b) of paragraph 1 of this Article."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 450 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3
Projects for which the request for development consent was introduced before the date referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 2(1) and for which the environmental impact assessment has not been concluded before that date shall not be subject to the obligations referred to in Articles 3 to 11 of Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by this Directive.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 460 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex – point -1 (new)
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex I – point 14
(-1) In Annex I, point 14 is replaced by the following: "14. Extraction of petroleum and natural gas for commercial purposes, also where extracted from gas-bearing strata of shale or in other sedimentary rock formations of equal or lesser permeability and porosity, where the amount extracted exceeds 500 tonnes/day in the case of petroleum and 500000 cubic metres/day in the case of gas."
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 509 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex III – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) impacts of the project on climate change (in terms of greenhouse gas emissions including from land use, land- use change and forestry), contribution of the project to an improved resilience, and the impacts of climate change on the project (e.g. if the project is coherent with a changing climate);
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 567 #

2012/0297(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 1 – point 2
Directive 2011/92/EU
Annex IV – paragraph 4
4. A description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected by the proposed project, including, in particular, population, human health, fauna, flora, biodiversity and the ecosystem services it provides, land (land take), soil (organic matter, erosion, compaction, sealing), water (quantity and quality), air, climatic factors, climate change (greenhouse gas emissions, including from land use, land use change and forestry, mitigation potential, impacts relevant to adaptation, if the project takes into account risks associated with climate change), material assets, cultural heritage, including architectural and archaeological ones, landscape; such a description should include the inter-relationship between the above factors, as well as the exposure, vulnerability and resilience of the above factors to natural and man-made disaster risks.
2013/05/29
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 79 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Article 3(4) of Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable energy sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/777/EC and 2003/30/EC requires Member States to ensure that the share of energy from renewable energy sources in all forms of transport in 2020 is at least 10% of their final energy consumption. The blending of biofuels is one of the methods available for Member States to meet this target, and is expected has hitherto been the main contributor.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 109 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) Based on forecasts of biofuel demand provided by the Member States and estimates of indirect land-use change emissions for different biofuel feedstocks it is likely that greenhouse gas emissions linked to indirect land use change are significant, and couldwill negate some or all of the greenhouse gas savings of individual biofuels. This is because almost the entire biofuel production in 2020 is expected to come from crops grown on land that could be used to satisfy food and feed markets. In order to reduce such emissions, it is appropriaFurthermore, increased use of biofuels produced from food crops contributes to distinguish between crop groups such as oil crops, cereals, sugars and other starchfood price volatility and could have negative impacts on for global food security. This has had significant negative social impacts on livelihoods and the ability to realise human rights including the right to food or access to land for local communities living in poverty in countaining crops accordinglyries outside the Union. In order to reduce such emissions and such negative social impacts, it is appropriate to in particular focus on reducing the projected use of biofuels grown on land.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) In view of the effects linked to indirect land use change, the current balance of CO2 emissions runs counter to the spirit and aim of existing legislation, thus requiring the repeal of the general binding 10% target set by Article 3(4) of Directive 2009/28/EC as a necessary strategy for achieving a genuine reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Or. en (See amendments to Article 3(4) of Directive 2009/28/EC)
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 124 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Liquid renewable fuels are likely to be required by the transport sector in order to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. Advanced biofuels, such as those made from wastes and algae, provide high greenhouse gas savings with low risk of causing indirect land use change and do not compete directly for agricultural land for the food and feed markets. It is appropriate, therefore, to encourage greater production ofHowever, such advanced biofuels as these are currently not available commercially available in large quantities, in part due to competition for public subsidies with established food crop based biofuel technologies. Further incentives should be provided by increasing the weighting of advanced biofuels towards 10% target for transport set in Directive 2009/28/EC compared to conventional biofuels. In this context, only advanced biofuels with, despite numerous research projects and initial experiments, and many studies agree that in the short and medium term it will be impossible to increase their production volumes. In this context, as part of the renewable energy policy framework, advanced biofuels should be supported and, where necessary, subsidised, only after a preliminary scientific assessment has been carried out as to their merits and their true sustainability, proving that they have a low estimated indirect land use change impacts and that they enable high overall greenhouse gas savings should be supported as part of the post 2020 renewable energy policy framework.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 127 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) Liquid renewable fuels are likely to be required by the transport sector in order to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. Advanced biofuels, such as those made from wastes and algae, provide high greenhouse gas savings with lowno risk of causing indirect land use change and do not compete directly for agricultural land for the food and feed markets. IAfter prior scientific assessment about their merits and their true sustainability, it is appropriate, therefore, to encourage greater production of such advanced biofuels as these are currently not commercially available in large quantities, in part due to competition for public subsidies with established food crop based biofuel technologies. Further incentives should be provided by increasing the weighting of advanced biofuels towards 10% target for transport set in Directive 2009/28/EC compared to conventional biofuels. In this context, only advanced biofuels with lowhich meet sustainability criteria, which do not compete with food for land, water or other resources and which have no estimated indirect land use change impacts and high overall greenhouse gas savings should be supported as part of the post 2020 renewable energy policy framework.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) In order to guarantee the efficiency of promotion measures, especially those targeted to further encourage biofuels giving additional benefits, it is appropriate that the support systems defined by Member States take into account the need to verify and cross-check biofuels volumes with the aim to avoid frauds regarding the real origin of the biofuels products or concerning untrustworthy multiple declarations of the same biofuels volumes under two or more national systems or international accreditation schemes. This should concern advanced biofuels as well as all conventional biofuels products, since frauds based on untrustworthy multiple declarations also concern voluntary and national biofuels sustainability schemes and not only specific measures for advanced biofuels.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 142 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure the long-term competitiveness of bio-based industrial sectors, and in line with the 2012 Communication "Innovating for Sustainable growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe" and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe12 ", promoting integrated and diversified biorefineries across Europe, enhanced incentives under Directive 2009/28/EC should be set in a way that gives preference to the use of biomass feedstocks that do not have a highindustrial or economic value for other uses than biofuels, that use waste materials for energy purposes only in accordance with the waste hierarchy, that do not compete for the use of land and water so to protect land and food rights.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 189 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The use of land for growing biofuel feedstocks should not result in the displacement of local and indigenous communities. To this end, only biofuels and bioliquids whose production does not impinge on the rights of local and indigenous communities should be considered as sustainable.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 214 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
(19) In order to permit adaptation to technical and scientific progress of Directive 2009/28/EC, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the list of biofuel feedstocks that are counted multiple times towards the target set in Article 3(4), the energy content of transport fuels, criteria and geographic ranges for determining highly biodiverse grassland, the methodology for the calculation of indirect land-use change emissions, and the methodological principles and values necessary for assessing whether sustainability criteria have been fulfilled in relation to biofuels and bioliquids.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
(20) The Commission should review the effectiveness of the measures introduced by this Directive, based on the best and latest available scientific evidence, in limiting indirect land-use change greenhouse gas emissions and addressing ways to further minimise that impact, which cshould include the introduction of estimated indirect land-use change emission factors in the sustainability scheme as of 1st January 2021sustainability criteria to be met for promoting advanced biofuels. The Commission should carry out an appropriate analysis in order to evaluate the impact of the implementation of this Directive on the forestry sector and related industries.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) It is of particular importance that the Commission in application of this Directive carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level from the forestry and forestry-based industries and agriculture. The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2013/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 234 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 1 – point -a (new)
Directive 98/70/EC
Article 7a – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
(-a) in paragraph 2, the following point (ca) is inserted: "(ca) Member States shall ensure that the maximum contribution of biofuels produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil crops or dedicated energy crops for the purpose of compliance with the target referred to in the first subparagraph shall not exceed an energy quantity corresponding to 5%, the estimated share at the end of 2011, of the final consumption of energy in transport in 2020."
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 307 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 1
-1. Article 1 is replaced by the following: This Directive establishes a common framework for the promotion of energy from renewable sources. It sets mandatory national targets for the overall share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy [...]. It lays down rules relating to statistical transfers between Member States, joint projects between Member States and with third countries, guarantees of origin, administrative procedures, information and training, and access to the electricity grid for energy from renewable sources. It establishes sustainability criteria for biofuels and bioliquids."
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 308 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point - 1 (new)
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 2 – point e
-1. In Article 2, point (e) is replaced by the following: "(e) "biomass" means the biodegradable fraction of products, waste and residues from biological origin from agriculture (including vegetal and animal substances), forestry and related industries including fisheries and aquaculture, as well as the biodegradable fraction of industrial and municipal waste, but excluding forestry and other wood fractions that are industrially or economically reusable or recyclable for further industrial use;"
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 310 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point -1 a (new)
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 2 – point k
-1a. In Article 2, point (k) is replaced by the following: "(k) "support scheme" means any instrument, scheme or mechanism applied by a Member State or a group of Member States, that promotes the use of energy from renewable sources by reducing the cost of that energy, increasing the price at which it can be sold, or increasing, by means of a renewable energy obligation or otherwise, the volume of such energy purchased. This includes, but is not restricted to, investment aid, tax exemptions or reductions, tax refunds, renewable energy obligation support schemes including those using green certificates, and direct price support schemes including feed-in tariffs and premium payments; support schemes shall not create market distortion on raw material price for other industrial sectors that are traditionally using the same raw materials;"
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 321 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
(b) in paragraph 1, the following second subparagraph is added: 'For the purpose of compliance with target referred to in the first subparagraph, the maximum joint contribution from biofuels and bioliquids produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil crops shall be no more than the energy quantity corresponding to the maximum contribution as set out in Article 3(4)d.'deleted
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 330 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 – point b
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of compliance with target referred to in the first subparagraph, the maximum joint contribution from biofuels and bioliquids produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil crops or dedicated energy crops shall be no more than the energy quantity corresponding to the maximum contribution as set out in Article 3(4)d.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 338 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 – point c
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 4
(c) paragraph 4 is amended as follows: (i) in point (b), the following phrase is added: "This indent shall be without prejudice to Articles 17(1)a and 3(4)d;" (ii) the following point (d) is added: "(d) for the calculation of biofuels in the numerator, the share of energy from biofuels produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil crops shall be no more than 5%, the estimated share at the end of 2011, of the final consumption of energy in transport in 2020. (iii) the following point (e) is added: The contribution made by: (i) biofuels produced from feedstocks listed in Part A of Annex IX shall be considered to be four times their energy content; (ii) biofuels produced from feedstocks listed in Part B of Annex IX shall be considered to be twice their energy content; (iii) renewable liquid and gaseous fuels of non-biological origin shall be considered to be four times their energy content. Member States shall ensure that no raw materials are intentionally modified to be covered by categories (i) to (iii). The list of feedstock set out in Annex IX may be adapted to scientific and technical progress, in order to ensure a correct implementation of the accounting rules set out in this Directive. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 25 (b) concerning the list of feedstock set out in Annex IX'deleted.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 358 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 – point c – point ii
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point d
(d) for the calculation of biofuels in the numerator, the share of energy from biofuels produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oilfood crops and dedicated energy crops shall be no more than 5%, the estimated share at the end of 2011, of the final consumption of energy in transport in 2020.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 393 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 2 – point c – point iii
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point e – subparagraph 2
Member States shall refer to an independent European-wide registration system for verifying the origin and the traceability of all biofuels and particularly of advanced biofuels listed under Annex IX or eligible for an extra-incentive or for a separate target at EU or national level: such register should consist in a single database certifying all biofuels volumes from their origin until their final consumption. The register shall be aimed to avoid untrustworthy multiple declarations of the same volumes under two or more national or European schemes, shall register biofuels as from their origination and shall ensure that no raw materials are intentionally modified to be covered by categories (i) to (iii).
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 410 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 5 – point -a (new)
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
(-a) the following subparagraph is added to paragraph 1: "Energy from biofuels and bioliquids produced from cereal and other starch rich crops, sugars and oil crops or dedicated energy crops taken into account for the purposes referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) shall be no more than 5%, the estimated share at the end of 2011, of the final consumption of energy in transport in 2020."
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 459 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 11
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 25b – paragraph 2
2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 3(4)(d), Article 5(5), the third subparagraph of Article 17(3)(c), Articles 19(5), 19(6) and 19(7) shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of timefive years from [the date of entry into force of this Directive].
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 464 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 11
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 25b – paragraph 3
3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 3(4)(d), Article 5(5), the third subparagraph of Article 17(3)(c), Articles 19 (5), 19 (6) and 19 (7) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 467 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 11
Directive 2009/28/EC
Article 25b – paragraph 5
5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 3(4)(d), Article 5(5), the third subparagraph of Article 17(3)(c), Articles 19 (5), 19 (6) and 19 (7) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 473 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3
The Commission shall, before 31 December 2017, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council reviewing, on the basis of the best latest available scientific evidence, the effectiveness of the measures introduced by this Directive in limiting indirect land- use change greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of biofuel and bioliquids. The report shall, if appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal based on the best available scientific evidence, for introducing estimated indirect land use change emissions factors into the appropriate sustainability criteria to be applied from 1st January 2021 and a review of the effectiveness of the incentives provided for include an impact assessment analysis of the biofuels production on the forestry-based industries and wood availability. The report shall, if appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal based on the best available scientific evidence, for introducing sustainability criteria to be applied for incentivising biofuels from non- land using feedstocks and non-food crops under Article 3(4)d of Directive 2009/28/EC.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 477 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3
The Commission shall, before 31 December 2017, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council reviewing, on the basis of the best latest available scientific evidence, the effectiveness of the measures introduced by this Directive in limiting indirect land- use change greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production of biofuel and bioliquids. The report shall, if appropriate, be accompanied by a legislative proposal based on the best available scientific evidence, for introducing estimated indirect land use change emissions factors into the appropriate sustainability criteria to be applied from 1st January 2021 and a review of the effectiveness of the incentives provided for biofuels from non- land using feedstocks and non-food crops under Article 3(4) of Directive 2009/28/EC.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 522 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 3
Directive 2009/28/CE
Annex IX
(3) The following Annex IX is added: 'Annex IX Part A. Feedstocks whose contribution towards the target referred to in Article 3(4) shall be considered to be four times their energy content (a) Algae. (b) Biomass fraction of mixed municipal waste, but not separated household waste subject to recycling targets under Article 11(2)(a) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. (c) Biomass fraction of industrial waste. (d) Straw. (e) Animal manure and sewage sludge. (f) Palm oil mill effluent and empty palm fruit bunches. (g) Tall oil pitch. (h) Crude glycerine. (i) Bagasse. (j) Grape marcs and wine lees. (k) Nut shells. (l) Husks. (m) Cobs (n) Bark, branches, leaves, saw dust and cutter shavings. Part B. Feedstocks whose contribution towards the target referred to in Article 3(4) shall be considered to be twice their energy content (o) Used cooking oil. (p) Animal fats classified as category I and II in accordance with EC/1774/2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption. (q) Non-food cellulosic material. (r) Ligno-cellulosic material except saw logs and veneer logs.'deleted
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 544 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 3
Directive 2009/28/EC
Annex IX – part A – point c
(c) Biomass fraction of industrial waste except if industrially or economically reusable for other industrial purposes.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 563 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 3
Directive 2009/28/EC
Annex IX – part A – point n
(n) Bark, branches, leaves, saw dust and cutter shavings.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 617 #

2012/0288(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – point 3
(d) Ligno-cellulosic material except saw logs and veneer logs that are industrially or economically reusable for any other industrial use, and any other ligno- cellulosic leftover reusable for other industrial purposes.
2013/06/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 23 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Title
DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amendrepealing Directive 2003/87/EC clarifying provisions on the timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital -1 a (new)
(-1a) A reduction in carbon dioxide emissions is being achieved in the Union, in line with the targets set in the EU’s ‘climate and energy’ package, principally owing to the economic crisis that Europe has been suffering since 2008.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 28 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) Article 10(4) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing aThere are clear structural shortcomings in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC does not specify how volumes of greenhouse gas emission allowances to be auctioned are to be distributed over the trading period(EU ETS) established by Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003: on the one hand, rather than preventing carbon leakage, it has actually encouraged this, while on the other hand it has added to energy costs in ETS sectors where there is no leakage.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 32 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The collapse in demand for emissions allowances triggered by the economic crisis and by leakage has resulted in a sharp fall in the market value of allowances. Paradoxically, it is only in this way that the EU ETS has shown itself apt to meet the target set in Article 1(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC, which is ‘to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner.’ It is easy to predict that when the EU economy starts to grow again, carbon dioxide emissions will also begin to increase, and with them the market value of allowances.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 36 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) The EU ETS has, by itself, therefore proved that it is not working, and for this reason it should be discontinued at the end of the current trading cycle in 2020, bearing in mind also that it is precisely in 2020 that a new global UNFCCC agreement will enter into force.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 37 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The CommissiShould exceptional circumstances require one shall, where appropriate, adapt the timetable for each period so as to ensure an orderly functioning of the marketingle intervention on the auctioning timetable over the whole third period of EU-ETS, Member States shall immediately adopt financial measures to offset the short and medium-term indirect costs on carbon leakage-sectors passed- through in electricity prices, derived from such an intervention. Such financial measures must be in accordance with state aid rules in this area.
2012/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 41 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 2
(2) For the purposes of legal certainty and market predictability, it should be clarified that, in order to ensure an orderly functioning of the market, the Commission is able in exceptional circumstances to adapt the auction timetable pursuant to Article 10(4) of Directive 2003/87/EC.deleted
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 54 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) Directive 2003/87/EC should therefore be amended accordinglyrepealed with effect from 1 January 2021,
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) More generally, the climate change policy based on market mechanisms, as provided for in the Kyoto Protocol, has shown itself to be ineffective, especially when those mechanisms are not applied at global level, and to be non-transparent. The EU should therefore consider adopting alternative policies in good time.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1
In the first subparagraph of Article 10(4) of Directive 2003/87/EC the following sentence is added: "The CommissionThe scheme for greenhouse gas emission trading established by Directive 2003/87/EC is to end on 31 December 2020. Directive 2003/87/EC shall, w there appropriate, adapt the timetable for each period so as to ensure an orderly functioning of the market."fore be repealed with effect from 1 January 2021.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 71 #

2012/0202(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 - paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. By 30 June 2015, the Commission shall forward to the European Parliament and to the Council a feasibility study and cost-benefit analysis of climate change policies based on instruments other than market mechanisms, including the introduction of a carbon tax at the EU’s borders.
2013/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 192 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. 3. Member States shall include in their accounts a particular activity referred to in paragraph 1 as of the onset of the activity or from 1 January 20134, whichever is the later.
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 231 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall reflect in their accounts pursuant to Article 3(1) emissions from harvested wood products containing carbon on 1 January 20134 even where such harvested wood products were harvested prior to this date.
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Where the conditions set out in paragraph 2 are met, Member States may exclude non-anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources resulting from natural disturbances from calculations relevant to their accounting obligations pursuant to points (a), (b), (d), (e) and (f) of Article 3(1). If Member States exclude such emissions they shall also exclude any subsequent removals on lands where those natural disturbances have occurred. However, non-anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources resulting from natural disturbances which have been included in the calculation of their reference level pursuant to Article 6(4), Article 6(5) or Article 6(6) shall not be excluded.
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 255 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Member States may exclude non- anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources in accordance with paragraph 1 from calculations relevant to their accounting obligations pursuant to points (a), (b) and (d) of Article 3(1) where those non-anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from such natural disturbances in a single year exceed 51 per cent of the total emissions of a Member State in its base year as submitted to the UNFCCC in that Member State’s reviewed initial report on base year emission data pursuant to the Annex of Decision 13/CMP.1 excluding emissions and removals from activities referred to in Article 3(1), provided that the following conditions are met:
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 257 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may also separately exclude non-anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources in accordance with paragraph 1 from calculations relevant to their accounting obligations pursuant to points (e) and (f) of Article 3(1) where those non-anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions from such natural disturbances in a single year exceed 51 per cent of the total emissions of a Member State in its base year as submitted to the UNFCCC in that Member State’s reviewed initial report on base year emission data pursuant to the Annex of Decision 13/CMP.1 excluding emissions and removals from activities referred to in Article 3(1), provided that conditions stipulated in Article 9(2) are met.
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 258 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall inmay also exclude infrom their accounts referred to in Article 3(1) emissions resulting from harvested wood products recovered by salvage logging in accordance with Article 7.
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 321 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 13 – paragraph 1
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 January 20134.
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 322 #

2012/0042(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I - table - row 2 - column 2
From 1 January 20134 to 31 December 2020;
2012/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 247 #

2012/0035(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Applications, dDecision-making procedures and decisions to regulate the prices of medicinal products in accordance with Article 3 or towhich determine their inclusion within the scope of public health insurance systems in accordance with Articles 7 and 9 shall be considered by Member States as administrative procedures which, as such, are independent from the enforcement of intellectual property rights.
2012/10/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 251 #

2012/0035(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
With a view to ensuring that the provisions of this article are properly applied, those provisions shall not prevent applications submitted to the competent authorities or decisions by competent authorities regarding the setting of the price of a given product or the inclusion of that product in public health insurance systems from being considered objective and reasonable factors that may be taken into account by the competent judicial authorities when determining whether an intellectual property right is being or will be infringed.
2012/10/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 252 #

2012/0035(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Paragraphs 1 and 2 may be waived in Member States in which the issue of a marketing authorisation or a reimbursement authorisation for a generic product results in a change in the price of and/or reimbursement terms for the relevant reference product.
2012/10/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2012/0035(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Member States may adopt specific measures and legal procedures to protect intellectual property rights in cases where the issue of a marketing authorisation or a reimbursement authorisation for a generic product results in a change in the price of and/or reimbursement terms for the relevant reference product.
2012/10/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 277 #

2012/0035(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. By [insert date - within three years after the date referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 18(1)], the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of this Directive. The report may be accompanied by any, where appropriate, by proposals for the amendment of this Directive.
2012/10/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2011/2297(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 bis (new)
11a. Emphasises the need for the Commission to call on the Member States to promote the reintroduction of environmentally friendly agricultural activities in mountain areas to combat hydrogeological instability and to promote water regulation by reintroducing the good practices of creating ditches, drains and embankments, which make it possible, in the event of excessive rain, to reduce the negative impact downstream and, in the event of drought, to guarantee stored water resources that can be used also to fight forest fires;
2012/05/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 113 #

2011/2297(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 bis (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission to fully apply the principle of subsidiarity, with the full involvement of local communities as they, to all intents and purposes, have the most knowledge of their own region, with specific biodiversity features that differ across the EU; this knowledge would encourage the overall improvement of action in the field of European water policy;
2012/05/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2011/2193(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the legal and ethical problems posed by the existence of websites permitting people to sell or purchase gametes online; calls on Member States to consider regulating this area to prevent the possible emergence of an online black market and, where one exists, to suppress it;
2012/05/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2011/2175(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to facilitate organisations which voluntarily collect foodstuffs that are within or just past their ‘best-by’ date, and distribute these to individuals or families in need;
2011/10/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
– having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage’ (COM(2010)0265) and the accompanying document (SEC(2010)0650),deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2011,
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 3 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 b (new)
– having regard to the proposals to recast and amend the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)1 and the Market Abuse Directive (MAD)2 with regard to emission allowances under the EU’s ETS, __________________ 1 COM(2011)0656 and COM(2011)0652. 2 COM(2011)0651.
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 9 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas, however, the UNFCCC COP negotiations have stalled because some of the large economies (such as Japan, Canada and Russia) have already stated that they do not intend to sign up for a second commitment period with a view to a ‘Kyoto II’ agreement, and the United States have not even ratified the first commitment period; whereas in response to this deadlock the Commission has stated that it would be a strategic error to attempt to push forward unilaterally;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the EU climate and energy package was adopted on the basis of an assurance that the other large emitters would make similar commitments, and whereas this has not happened and perhaps never will;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 14 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the European Union must agree specific targets for emission reductions to provide the basis and framework for the necessary legislative acts and other measures;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 21 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas industry must have clarity about Europe’s low carbonthe EU’s economic and industrial strategy in order to make long-term investments;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading -1 (new)
International dimension and strategic framework
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
International dimensiondeleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 35 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Stresses that the EU is now having to operate on what is no longer a level playing field and has placed itself in a position where it could be subjected to full-scale ‘climate dumping’ alongside the other forms of dumping from which it is already suffering;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 36 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises the benefits to Member States of developing a low carbon economyAgrees fully that it would be a strategic error to take any further steps forward on a unilateral basis; therefore does not endorses the Commission’s Roadmap to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, together with its trajectory, the specific milestones for domestic emission reductions of 40%, 60% and 80% for 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively, and the ranges for sector- specific milestones, as the basis for proposing legislative and other initiatives on economic and climate policybecause it considers it: (a) a dangerously hasty step which could put an end once and for all to the EU’s chances of being competitive on the global market; (b) not to be a suitable basis for proposing legislative and other initiatives on economic and climate policy, because it rests on an impact assessment that has not been updated to take account of the latest EU energy mix scenarios;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 52 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Invites the Commission not to bring forward within the nextfurther proposals for climate legislation, but to confine itself two years the measures necessary to achieve the 2030 objectives, taking intoimplementing the legislation already in force as part of the 20-20-20 target; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to ensure that ac count particular national capacities and potentials, as well as international progress on climate actionnsistent, stable legislative framework is maintained, so as to prevent the enormous long-term investments already made by industry from being wasted;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the worldwide development and application of low carbon technologies is increasing rapidly, and Europe’s future competitiveness will depend upon it increasing levels of investment that currently lag far behind countries such as China as a proportion of GDPand, above all, taking steps to protect its own climate- friendly production against that of countries such as China, which bear the largest responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises that the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) is currently the principal instrument for reducing industrial emissions and promoting investment in low carbon technologies, but acknowledges that the carbon price is very much lower than was originally envisaged and is failing to provide the necessary investment stimulus;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the huge surplus of allowances now held by companies, together with anticipated further improvements in energy efficiency, means that there will be no significant recovery in carbon prices unless reforms are made;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. CPoints out that the ETS is a flexibility instrument aimed at achieving specific policy targets which primarily concern operators in sectors covered by the scheme; calls on the Commission, therefore, to adopt measures to correct the failings of the ETS and to allow it tobefore the commencement of the third phase to ensure that it functions as originally envisaged, in particular by taking the following steps before the end of 2012:;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point a
(a) recalibrating the ETS before the commencement of the third phase by setting aside allowances so as to restore scarcity, thus allowing the original objective of providing incentives for investments in low carbon technologies and energy efficiency measures to be met, and thereafter proposing a legislative act to enable such allowances to be eliminated;deleted
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 110 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point b
(b) proposing legislation before the end of 2013 to modify from the earliest appropriate date the 1.74% annual linear reduction requirement to a value sufficient to meet the requirements of the 2050 CO2 reduction target;deleted
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point c
(c) proposing legislation to establish from the earliest possible date a reserve price for the auction of allowances;deleted
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 137 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Stresses, in this connection, that the reclassification of the EU ETS emission units as financial instruments, as contained in the MiFid review proposal, will entail new market surveillance requirements to avoid toxic instruments being generated by highly speculative derivative finance, along the same lines as in other market sectors; considers that all possible steps must be taken to prevent this from happening; calls on the Commission, therefore, to review this proposal to ensure that the ETS system is protected from the effects of purely financial speculation;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 148 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Notes that the current standards aimed at preventing carbon leakage are, on the whole, proving ineffective; points out, in this connection, that in the EU sectors most exposed to this problem companies are still closing down owing to the additional indirect costs introduced by the ETS system and not adequately offset;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 151 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Considers, in view of the ‘climate dumping’ currently suffered by the EU, that only a carbon tax at its borders could effectively prevent carbon leakage; calls also for the Member States to be allowed to offset up to 100% of the additional indirect costs incurred by the most exposed sectors;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 152 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 e (new)
18e. Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal for a directive on energy efficiency1 and to recast it so as not to affect a Member State's right to determine the conditions of use of its energy sources, its freedom to choose between the various energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply2; calls for this proposal not in any circumstances to lay down binding targets; __________________ 1 COM(2011)0370. 2 Article 192(2), subparagraph 2 TFEU.
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 156 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for acceleration, in the context of the work under the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC), for implementing measures to be set close to the level of the best performers, and for minimum requirements also to be set for non-electrical products, provided they are feasible;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Draws attention to the basic premise that it is not energy saving measures that ensure energy efficiency, but vice versa; calls for all energy efficiency legislation to take this into account;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 191 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6 a (new)
Technology
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 192 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 e (new)
11e. Calls on the Commission to guarantee impartiality in technological choice in order to ensure that the most appropriate emission reduction technologies for each sector and geographical are tested and applied;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7
Carbon capture and storagedeleted
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 194 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recognises the importance of applying CCS technology if the carbon emission reduction goals are to be achieved at the least possible cost, and acknowledges that procedural delays, financial shortfalls and lack of commitment by some Member States are likely to frustrate achievement of the European Council’s ambition of having up to 12 CCS demonstration projects in operation by 2015; calls on the Commission to publish a CCS Action Plan;deleted
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 204 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out that CCS technology is still at a fairly experimental stage and that its actual carbon emission reduction potential and its safety and environmental sustainability are far from proven;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 205 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Points out, however, that, with regard to the achievement of the goals laid down by the roadmap, the Commission places too much trust in this technology, treating it as a panacea, thus undermining the entire communication’s credibility;
2011/12/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the production of low carbon strategies by some EU Member States butand calls on all to produce them no later than July 2013; insists that the Commission should introduce legislative proposals to require their preparation if by the end of 2012 all Member States have not made such a commitmenthe other Member States to follow their example as soon as possible;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 218 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Considers, however, that some of the targets for sectors set in the roadmap (notably the de facto zeroing of emissions in the energy, residential and services sectors) are implausible; calls on the Commission therefore to reset them to more realistic levels;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Insists on the need to avoid the risk of massive carbon lock-in; calls on the Commission to propose legislation before the end of 2013 that will give a clear long- term signal to investors by requiring that, from 2015, new sources of electricity generation that emit more than 100g CO2/kWh shall not have a permit to operate for more than ten years unless intended solely as peaking plant with operating time limited to 10% of the total in any one year;deleted
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 234 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Urges the Commission to produce a new and detailed impact assessment that takes account of the EU’s latest energy mix scenarios in light of the nuclear- energy exit plans various Member States are adopting following the accident at Fukushima;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 245 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the progress exceeding expectations that has been made by vehicle manufacturers in reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars since 2007, and stresses the importance of accelerating further fuel efficiency improvements; affirms that in preparing its forthcoming review the Commission should be proposing ways of ensuring that average CO2 emissions by new cars meet the agreed 2020 target of not more than 95g/km by 2020, and do not exceed 70g/km by 2025improved fuel efficiency, tyres and aerodynamics; recommends, however, that any more stringent limits proposed by the Commission in the future for average CO2 emissions by new cars should be industrially feasible and economically sustainable, taking into account developments in technology and the market;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 279 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Asks the Commission and the Member States not to incentivise the designation of agricultural land for uses or commodities other than food production;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 309 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to bring forward before the end of 2012 ambitious proposals to reduce the emission of methane and F-gases;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 315 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 14 a (new)
Employment
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 316 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 d (new)
20d. Warns that it will be very difficult to offset entirely through ‘green jobs’ the continuing enormous losses in industrial fabric and employment related thereto occurring as a result of ‘climate dumping’, not in the short-term at least and nor will this happen automatically;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 317 #

2011/2095(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 e (new)
20e. Fears that Member States will no longer be able to sustain the social costs of ‘climate dumping’ if the strong market pressure being brought to bear on their budget stability at present continues; calls therefore on the Commission to adopt appropriate necessary anti-dumping measures;
2011/12/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2011/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to assign an important role to physical activity, from an extremely early age, in national education programmes; calls on the Council to draw up a recommendation along those lines;
2011/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2011/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to look into the appropriateness of a directive on foodstuffs intended for the expenditure of intense muscular effort, providing consumers with a satisfactory level of information , particularly in connection with anti-doping rules; calls on the Commission to draw up a preventive anti- doping strategy targeting young sportsmen and sportswomen;
2011/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2011/2087(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Calls for a European Agency for Sporting Integrity and Fairness to be established, with due regard for Articles 6, 83 and 165 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, whose remit would be to coordinate the combating of fraud and corruption in sport and to combat doping, without prejudice to the rules of the World Anti- Doping Agency or to how it operates.deleted
2011/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2011/2072(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Urges the Commission and the Members States to strengthen effective mutual cooperation and to establish an EU 'Control the controllers' system;
2011/05/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that recent Commission estimates suggest that the EU is on course to achieve only half of the 20 % objective and that current plans by Member States risk falling far short of the overall 20 % energy efficiency target set in the Europe 2020 strategy, which the Commission believes would lead to lost opportunities for growth across many sectors and regions and loss of employment-creation possibilities;
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that recent Commission estimates suggest that the EU is on course to achieve only half of the 20 % objective and that current plans by Member States risk falling far short of the overall 20 % energy efficiency target set in the Europe 2020 strategy, which would lead to lost opportunities for growth across many sectors and regions and loss of employment-creation possibilities;
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 14 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that there is significant potential for reducing consumption, especially in energy-intensive sectors such as construction/buildings, transport and industry, which should be exploited more effectively, while taking care not to undermine the competitiveness of Europe’s industrial fabric;
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges the existence of a new ‘Energy Efficiency Plan 2011’ (COM(2011)0109), adopted in March 2011 by the Commission, but suggests that further and more restrictive measures be taken;
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 19 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to propose legally binguiding national targets for energy efficiency now, taking into account the geography of the Member States, their individual starting points of the Member States, their economic performance and early action undertaken in the field;
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 22 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. StressBelieves that the European Semester of ex-ante economic policy coordination mustshould reflect promotion of the transition to an environmentally sustainable economy, without, however, losing sight of overall socio-economic equilibrium;
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2011/2071(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to consider whether to include in every Annual Growth Survey a progress report on the indicators of environmental economic accounting., based on the modules specified in Article 3 of the regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European environmental economic accounts. __________________ 1 OJ (...)
2011/06/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas intense resource use and dramatically increased global consumption in emerging economies, as well as financial speculation in raw materials markets are pushing up prices of rawthose materials, with real commodity prices having increased by 147% since the turn of the century; whereas the EU is likely to face severe challenges in securing access to, and the uninterrupted supply of, key resources;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas it is essential for the EU swiftly to come out of the recession or economic stagnation currently obtaining in various Member States, and whereas simpler, leaner legislation plays a decisive role in economic recovery;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the creation of Joint Task Forces for the three key areas of food, housing and mobility: these should consist of experts from the Commission, Member States, local authorities, industry and civil society and develop, within one year, European Resource Efficiency Action Plans with clear benchmarks within one yeartechnical and economic benchmarks, in order to enable a detailed cost-benefit analysis to be made;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 43 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and Member States to stimulate the secondary materials market and to foster the demand for recycled materials by developing end-of- waste criteria and economic incentives, such as reduced VAT rates for secondary materials, by 2013; calls also therefore for the creation of a ´Schengen area´ for waste in order to move waste for recycling more freely between the Member States;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 61 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission to boostpromote all possible action at EU and international level, first and foremost in the field of research and technological innovation, to speed up the transition to a green economyenable the EU to regain its competitiveness on world markets; underlines that the ‘Innovation Union’ is one of the engines for a resource-efficient Europe;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission, if it intends to propose to extend the scope of the eco- design directive to non- energy related products and to come forward with additional eco-design require, first to make a careful assessments onf the performanceimpact ofn products, including recycled content, durability and reusability, in order to improve their environmental impact and promote recycling markeion costs and end-user costs;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Endorses the Flagship Initiative on a Resource Efficient Europe and the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe and its 2050 vision, including its milestones; calls on the Commission to bring forward swiftly all legislative and other initiatives necessary to achieve the milestones and to ensure that all EU policies are aligned to them; recommends that the Commission should ensure that a stable legislative framework is maintained so as not to jeopardise long-term investment, and should propose that legislation that proves to be ineffective, superfluous or an obstacle to economic recovery and growth should be repealed;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop incentives that encourage companies to measure, benchmark and continuously improve their resource efficiency, as well as measures to extend the producer responsibility principle and to remove barriers that hold back resource efficiency;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 135 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Urges Member States to ensure full implementation of the EU waste acquis, including minimum targets, through their national waste prevention and management strategies;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 150 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive landfill banban on the landfill of recyclable waste, accompanied by appropriate transition measures;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 151 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to streamline the waste acquis and to introduce a progressive landfill banmeasures to achieve the largest possible reduction in landfill on a gradual basis, accompanied by appropriate transition measures;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges Member States to shift towards environmental taxation in public revenues accounting for an EU average of more than 10% by 2020, in line with the best performing Member States; emphasises that this will allow for cuts in other taxes such as on labour, increase competitiveness and create a level playing field;deleted
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, dietary changes to reduce animal protein intake and of diminishing imported land use;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, dietary changes to reduce animal protein intakeimprovements and diminishing imported land use;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 226 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Highlights the importance of sustainable agriculture, and of dietary changes to reduce animal protein intake and diminishing imported land use;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 242 #

2011/2068(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Reiterates the importance of a set of coherent, measurable and clear secto, clear and genuinely achievable general targets, including an overall target, in order to implement the vision and the milestones of the Roadmap; calls on the Commission to bring forward a concrete proposal for such targets for the EU by 2013 at the latest and to ensure that all EU policies are consistent with the targets set; considers that the milestones included in the Roadmap should be considered as targets until more detailed targets are setensure that all EU policies are consistent with those targets; calls on Member States to include corresponding targets in their own resource efficiency strategies;
2012/03/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 14 #

2011/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the growth of the world population, the rise in consumption and targets for EU economic growth, make the decoupling of growth from raw material use even more essential; insists therefore that reduction targets should be set to stabilise material use and proposes an annual material EU efficiency target of 3%;deleted
2011/05/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 52 #

2011/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EC to developexamine the feasibility of a system of chain of custody for all RM, which instructings producers to record the origin of RM through a transparent system, following existing examples (FSC and FLEGT for illegal RM), allowing for the future development of sustainability criteria for RM;
2011/05/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2011/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for proper and swift implementation of the Waste Framework Directive and a landfill ban on recyclable RM and strict and ambitious efficiency criteria for incineration with energy recovery, which should aim at reuse and recycling of RM instead ofand not only incineration;.
2011/05/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 81 #

2011/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for the active introduction and promotion of more sustainable economic models decoupled from material use, to ensure the future availability of RM in the EU; calls for the EC to develop legal instruments targeting more efficient use of resources, avoiding rebound effects, suggests that the EC undertake a comprehensive study on economic leasing models as alternatives to ownership of goods and their impact on material use and recovery;deleted
2011/05/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2011/2056(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. UrgesCalls on the EC to examine the effects of a tax on mineral resources, non-energy RM, water and land use, and in particular on any side effects, such as non sustainable substitution, tax evasion or a shift of economic activities to third countries; points out that a tax on resources would render resources more valuable, resulting in better use, re-use and recycling of RM and lower export of resources;
2011/05/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 28 #

2011/2051(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Requests that when CAP funding is allocated, other indicators, in addition to the cultivated area, should be used, such as the quality of production, the use of eco-compatible agricultural techniques, the location of farms in geographically disadvantaged areas and the presence of young people;
2011/03/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2011/2051(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Requests that when CAP funding is allocated, due account be taken of professional farmers, i.e. those who actually live on the farm, as opposed to those such as large business groups or investment funds which use agriculture merely as an alternative financial investment system;
2011/03/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2011/2051(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers that CAP funding should not be reduced but, rather, be modulated in order to boost the actual productivity of cultivated areas and to achieve the objectives of protecting the ecosystem, biodiversity, protecting the health of consumers and farmers and obtaining quality agricultural products;
2011/03/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses thatBelieves that a long-term saving might be possible to achieve by taking greater account of the environment in public procurement creates much potential for savings, since it means, also taking greater account of the life- cycle cost;
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the widespread desire of local, regional and national operators to award contracts that support sustainable development; notes that there is much evidence to show that the directive and its implementation are making this more difficult;(Does not affect English version.)
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 22 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the inclusion ofBelieves that environmental considerations in all, the integration of people with disabilities into the labour market, and safety at work should, wherever appropriate, be included in public procurement contracts; stresses that the Public Procurement Directive should be amended to make it clearer that it is both desirable and possible forthat public operators to, when awarding contracts, should - impose environmental conditions and take account of environmental impact when awarding contracts; ; - impose conditions to promote the integration of people with disabilities into the labour market; - impose conditions making for more advanced standards as regards safety at work; - stipulate that the above conditions must likewise apply to subcontracting;
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 32 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Prefers to encourage and facilitate sustainable procurement by public operators rather than setting mandatory quotas for it in smaller-scale contracts; considers, however, that mandatory quotas should apply to larger-scale contracts; still considers that the greatest obstacle to more environmentally friendly public procurement is not so much lack of willingness as unclear and inflexible legislation;
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Maintains that the directive should be amendedit would be appropriate to amend the directive in order to make it clearer that it is both possible and desirable to take account of the environmental impact of the subject of the contract throughout its entire life cycle, including the whole production process and its conditions;
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. NotStresses in particular the need to clarify that it is possible to imposMember States at all times have the power to impose conditions relating to the environmental and, animal protection conditions which are stricter than the common EU rules, the integration of people with disabilities, and safety at work which are stricter than the common EU rules or suited to the specific features of their national territory;
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 61 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Maintains that increased use of the negotiated procedure would promote both innovations and sustainable solutions;deleted
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. StressBelieves theat a link between environmentally friendly procurement and the promotion of innovations; stresses that this is even clearer when could be established if, for example, one combinesd environmental conditions in technical specifications with giving higher scores at the award stage to tenders which meet certain cutting-edge environmental conditions; considers that a reward system along similar lines could likewise be applied to tenders laying particular emphasis on the integration of people with disabilities into the labour market and on safety at work;
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that it may be hard to calculate the climate footprint of a product or service, e.g. in the case of food; considers that it should be expressly permitted to require that the transport of food to the purchaser must not give rise to more than a certain number of grams of CO2 emissions; considers that the requirement of using taxpayers’ money effectively, together with other requirements and rules which guide public procurement, will deter elected representatives from imposing such conditions when there is no justification for doing so.deleted
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2011/2048(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges that it may be hard to calculateing the climate footprint of a product or service, e.g. in the case of food; considers that it should be expressly permitted to require is done by deduction; considers, therefore, that to lay down a corresponding requirement, as has been suggested in some quarters, to the effect that the transport of foodproducts to the purchaser must not give rise to more than a certain number of grams of CO2 emissions; considers that the requirement of using taxpayers’ money effectively, together with other requirements and rules which guide public procurement, will deter elected representatives from imposing such conditions when there is no justification for doing so would undoubtedly translate into a immediate cost, whereas the environmental benefits would all have to be determined inductively over time.
2011/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #

2011/2020(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Requests from Member States to further improve their implementation of EU environmental legislation; encourages the Commission to strengthen consequently their infringement procedures either by extra support to the respective units and/or by defining case rates; requests corresponding data bases which should be made publicly available;
2011/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #

2011/2020(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines again that decentralised agencies need adequate funding and staffing in order to fulfil their old and newly assigned tasks by the EU legislator and the Commission; disapproves again the use of assigned revenue to reduce the EU Budget contribution to fee-dependent agencies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA);deleted
2011/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2011/2020(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines again that decentralised agencies need adequate funding and staffing in order to fulfil their old and newly assigned tasks by the EU legislator and the Commission; disaApproves again the use of assigned revenue to reduce the EU Budget contribution to fee- dependent agencies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA);
2011/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 16 #

2011/2020(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses further, that any revision of the financial statements of the Biocides legislation and export and import of dangerous chemicals must be based upon the final legislative agreement and if necessary additionalequate funds mustshould be made available to the Agency; requests, in this regard, the Commission to present fully the corresponding savings (budget and staff) in the respective Commission DGs when the above mentioned tasks are to be implemented within ECHA.
2011/07/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission Communication 'A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ (COM(2011)0112),
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
having regard to its previous resolutions regarding climate change, in particular its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the climate change conference in Cancun (COP16),
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the EU’s climate objective is to limit climate change to 2°C above the pre-industrial level; whereas the climate package adopted in December 2008 represents a first step towards ensuring EU action in line with this objective; whereas countries representing some 80% of global emissions have pledged to reduce emissions, although the Parties to the UNFCCC acknowledged in Cancun that current pledges are insufficient to meet the 2°C objective,deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 17 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas, in the context of the international negotiations, the Climate Change Conference in Cancun (COP16) last December failed to make tangible progress as regards binding short or medium-term commitments by all the industrialised and emerging economies;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 18 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas the International Energy Agency (IEA) has estimated that in the period 2008-2030 global demand for fossil fuels will increase by 40%, particularly in emerging and developing countries, where CO2 emissions will increase by around 45% by 2030;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 19 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A d (new)
Ad. whereas, furthermore, a recent study commissioned by the Federation of German Industries (BDI) maintains that a reduction in emissions at national level will increase abatement costs substantially and will prove ineffective if other countries which emit large quantities of CO2 massively increase their production;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas at negotiating level the EU has undertaken to increase its target for greenhouse gas emissions reduction to 30%, provided that a global international agreement can be reached under which all industrialised countries undertake to make equivalent commitments in terms of the effort required of their respective economies and the burdens imposed on their production sectors;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the global carbon budget that is likely to meet the 2°C objective is about 800 billion tonnes of CO2 between 2005 and 2050; whereas the EU’s share of the global population in 2050 is projected at 5.7%,deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas, due to the economic crisis, emissions from sectors in the EU emissions trading system (ETS) have been considerably lower than projected, and below the level of initial allocation,deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 41 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas, in this connection, the EU has expressed its desire to sign a ‘Kyoto- 2’, but the Commission has said that to give such an undertaking without the support of the major emitter countries would be a strategic error for Europe and would not bring benefits in environmental terms;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas emission trading schemes (ETS) are potentially effective in reducing global emissions, but are not the only available approach or model,
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 44 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the lower carbon price will have a significant impact on investment decisions and will reduce the revenues from auctioning allowances for financing climate action in the EU and in developing countries,deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 50 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the economic and financial crisis has drastically reduced the capacity of firms to invest in the low carbon technologies needed to transform energy production and use in Europe in the coming decades;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 53 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas, according to the Commission, stepping up effort to 30% while the other countries retain their low pledges would have a limited incremental impact on the EU’s energy intensive industry, as long as the special measures for industry stay in place,deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission Communication demonstrating that stepping up to a 30% target is technically feasible and economically affordable;deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesConsiders that the Commission Communication demonstrating that stepping up to a 30% target is technically feasible and economically affordable‘Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage’ (COM(2010)0265) should be updated, taking into account the recent communication ‘A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ (COM(2011)0112);
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 76 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomeRejects the Commission Communication demonstrating that stepping up to a 30% target is technically feasible and economically affordable‘Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage’ (COM(2010)0265);
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 83 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for the Commission to come forward with proposals to move to a 30% greenhouse gas reduction target for 2020 as soon as possible, and at the latest by the end of 2011;deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to give due consideration to the fact that the immediate effects of the current costs of the EU climate and energy package will be to increase the final electricity price to consumers, while the frequently vaunted benefits of innovation and efficiency all remain to be verified;
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 102 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Analysis of the 20 % target todaydeleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that, according to climate science, limiting climate change to an average of 2°C does not guarantee avoiding significant adverse climate impacts, but overshooting 2°C is likely to multiply adverse impacts and increase the likelihood of reaching tipping points where temperature levels begin to force the release of naturally trapped carbon from sinks such as forests and permafrost, and limit the ability of nature to absorb carbon in the oceans;deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 104 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that, according to IPCC 4AR, to have a 50% chance of limiting climate change to 2°C industrialised countries need to reduce their emissions by 25-40% by 2020; points out that the EU’s current target is not in line with its 2°C objective;deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 111 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the European Council has recognised that further reductions in the range of 80-95% by 2050 as compared to 1990 are necessary; points out that a linear trajectory between 2009 and 2050 would result in a 2020 target in the range of 34-38% as compared to 1990;deleted
2011/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system; notes that even with a pathway of 30% reductions in 2020, 55% in 2030, 75% in 2040 and 90% in 2050 the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its per capita share of the global 2°C compatible carbon budget, and that delaying emissions reductions increases the cumulative share significantly;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that delaying climate action would result in higher costs for achieving the 2050 target due to stranded investment in high-carbon capital stock and slower technological learning;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 140 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points out that, according to the Commission analysis, the surplus of allowances in the ETS will correspond to around 2.4 billion banked allowances and unused international credits in 2020;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 146 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises that investment in green technologies depends heavily on the price signal delivered by the carbon market and concludes therefore that, under the current 20% target, the ETS will have a very limited role in driving emission reductions and deployment of low- emission technologies in the sectors it covers;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 155 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that, due to the surplus and low carbon price, the auction of allowances will also not mobilise resources for climate investments as expecdeleted;
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 2
Options and tools to move beyond the 20% targetdeleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 170 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that, according to the Commission analysis, stepping up to the 30% reduction target with 25% domestic effort now represents an increase of EUR 11 billion as compared to 2008 projections for the absolute costs of the climate and energy package in 2020; notes the Commission assessment that this will raise the carbon price in the EU ETS to some EUR 30/tonne of CO2, i.e. similar to the level estimated necessary for the 20% reduction target in 2008;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Supports the Commission analysis that cost-effective sharing of the additional effort between ETS and non- ETS sectors remains the same as under the climate package;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 187 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Concurs with the Commission analysis that moving to a 30% reduction target with cost-efficient effort sharing between ETS and non-ETS, and a 25% domestic effort (the rest with offsets), would correspond to an ETS cap reduction of 1.4 billion allowances;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 190 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Notes the option of implementing the change in the ETS through cancelling allowances assigned for auctioning; considers however that all sectors should contribute;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 198 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recognises that some of the most cost- effective reduction potential is found in Member States that are currently below the EU average for GDP per capita, and that public intervention to facilitate financing of initial investments is likely to be necessary to achieve reductions in the non-ETS sectors; stresses the need for EU financial mechanisms to be revised to trigger cost-effective GHG reductions in the EU;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 210 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Deplores the lack of measures to capture the negative-cost greenhouse gas reduction potential in energy and resource efficiency; calls for strict application of the least lifecycle cost principle in implementing measures under the Eco-design Directive and for the Commission to review the methodology to consider alignment to a ‘top-runner’ approach;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for specific targets for EU land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), ensuring permanence and the environmental integrity of the sector’s contribution to emissions reductions as well as accurate monitoring and accounting;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 232 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Reiterates that EU reduction targets need to be primarily achieved within the EU; recalls that the use of international offsets replaces investment into the EU economy and delays domestic reductions in the EU;deleted
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 240 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Stresses that climate protection can be effective only if all the major national economies and industries take part in the effort through a binding international agreement establishing a fair distribution of the burdens, and ensuring the competitiveness of national economies so as to avert the real risk of European productive activities being relocated;
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 241 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 c (new)
18c. Notes that in general European firms have already taken measures to achieve emission reductions, not only in the EU but also at global level, through the creation of innovative products and solutions; calls for these measures to be properly supported by national and European policies designed to bring together measures to address climate change and energy challenges as part of a long-term strategy, with the direct involvement of both the public and private sectors, yet without placing additional burdens on undertakings or fuelling possible distortions of competition;
2011/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 242 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 d (new)
18d. Takes the view that in order to reduce emissions globally, the ETS will be a fully effective tool provided that it is adopted by all the major world economies and backed up by other tools (such as voluntary agreements, tax measures, etc.), to be considered on the basis of national priorities and capacities;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 250 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Reiterates that it is vital to bridge the gap between the voluntary nature of the international commitments undertaken by non-EU countries and the recognition of a legally binding international system;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 254 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3
Co-benefits and impactsdeleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 255 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Is convinced that the advantage of acting earlier contributes to significant long-term benefits for Europe’s competitiveness, by maintaining a strong position in a rapidly growing global market for clean technologies;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 258 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Reminds the EU and the Member States of their duty to support greater investment in R&D and to provide an appropriate long-term general political framework to ensure that the more economically efficient carbon reduction technologies are developed on a large scale and within a very short time frame;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 259 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Highlights the need for the EU and the Member States to incorporate policies on climate, energy, industry and technology into an organic, comprehensive framework; within that framework, all economic and social stakeholders will have to play their role and efforts should be required not only of the industrial sector (and ETS sectors in particular) but also of other sectors such as transport and construction, and of civil society as a whole;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 264 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that a move to a 30% climate target for 2020 would restore the incentives for innovation lost by the easing of the 20% target;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 274 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that European eco-industries employ approximately 3.4 million (FTE), which is ten times the figure for direct employment in the EU steel sector in 2007; points out that, according to recent studies, raising the EU climate target to 30% can fosb up to 6 million additional jobs in Europe;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 277 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Notes that European eco-industries employ approximately 3.4 million (FTE), which is ten times the figure for direct employment in the EU steel sector in 2007; points out that, according to recent studies, raising the EU climate target to 30% can, in the best-case scenario, foster up to 61.5 million additional jobs in Europe;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 287 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Considers that, while moving to a more ambitious climate target does have primarily a positive impact on job creation, measures should be taken to facilitate structural change and labour- force retraining in communities with a large-scale loss of high carbon employment and also to ensure new growth sectors have sufficient access to appropriately skilled labour;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 293 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Emphasises the size of co-benefits related to improved air quality, estimated by the Commission at between EUR 6.3 billion and EUR 22 billion per year in 2020 without taking into account co- benefits related to reduced costs from illnesses; notes that, according to additional analysis, the health and air pollution co-benefits of a move to a 30% target increase this to a range of EUR 6.3 to EUR 35.8 billion, with the higher end being achieved when reduction efforts are domestic;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 294 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Emphasises the size of co-benefits related to improved air quality, estimated by the Commission at between EUR 6.3 billion and EUR 22 billion per year in 2020 without taking into account co-Points out that there is no direct link between the benefits related to greduced costs from illnesses; notes that, according to addienhouse gas emission reductionals analysis, the health and air pollutiond the co- benefits of a move to a 30% target increase this to a range of EUR 6.3 to EUR 35.8 billion, with the higher end being achieved when reduction efforts are domesticrelated to improved air quality or reduced pollutants;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 296 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Notes the Commission analysis that achieving a 30% reduction target will reduce imports of oil and gas by some EUR 40 billion in 2020, assuming an oil price of USD 88 per barrel in 2020; considers that this oil price estimate is likely to be very conservative, as the Inbnational Energy Agency (2010) predicts an oil price of USD 108 by 2020, which would increase the estimated benefits of lower energy imports by more than 20%;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 299 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Reiterates that in order to improve energy efficiency, all the various energy options need to be pursued in order to promote a neutral, balanced and non- discriminatory mix that includes traditional, renewable and nuclear energy sources;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 300 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Emphasises that the co-benefits of emissions reductions only occur for emissions reductions achieved inside the EU and where there is a strong emphasis on increased energy efficiency investment;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 307 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Concludes that stepping up to a 30% target has more benefits than costs for EU citizens and a domestic achievement of the reduction targets would bring the highest overall benefit;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 320 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Assessing the risk of carbon leakagedeleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 321 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Notes that energy-intensive sectors are likely to end up with a very considerable number of unused freely allocated allowances at the end of the second ETS period in 2012, which can then be carried over to 2013-2020 phase, putting them into a comparatively betb position for inbnational competition compared with 2008;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 334 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Notes that installations representing a very large majority of the non-power sector emissions covered by the ETS have been granted free allocation up to a product specific benchmark on the basis of high pre-recession production levels for the entire period up to 2020;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 339 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Remains concerned about the large potential for windfall profits undermining public acceptance of the EU’s climate policy and points to lack of evidence of any delocalisation;deleted
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 351 #

2011/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Concurs with the Commission analysis thatthat it would be advisable to introduce border adjustment measures or includinge imports in the ETS would need to be combined with full auctioning to the sectors concerned; considers that such a system could be envisaged especially for some standardised commodities, such as steel or cement, and electricity;
2011/04/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 38 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) In view of the significant increase in the numbers and severity of natural and man-made disasters in recent years and in a situation where future disasters are likely to be more extreme and more complex with far -reaching and longer-term consequences, resulting, in particular, from climate change and potential interaction between several natural and technological hazards, an integrated approach to disaster management is increasingly important. The Union should support, coordinate and supcomplement actions of Member States’ action at national, regional, and local level in the field of civil protection with a view to improving the effectiveness of systems for preventing, preparing for and responding to natural andor man-made disasters. Or. it (See Article 196(1) TFEU.)
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 3
(3) The protection to be ensured under the Union Civil Protection Mechanism should cover primarily people, but also the environment and property, including cultural heritage, against all natural andor man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism and technological, radiological and environmental accidents, marine pollution and acute health emergencies, occurring inside or outside the Union. Civil protection and other emergency assistance may be required in all of these disasters to complement the response capabilities of the affected country.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 43 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 4
(4) The Civil Protection Mechanism constitutes a visible expression of European solidarity by ensuring a practical and timely contribution to prevention of and preparedness for disasters and the response to major disasters and imminence thereof. This Decision should therefore not affect the reciprocal rights and obligations of the Member States or their regions under bilateral or multilateral treaties, or agreements which relate to the matters covered by this Decision, nor Member States’ responsibility to protect people, the environment and property on their territory. That being the case, a Member State’s participation in the Mechanism should be on a voluntary basis.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 20 a (new)
(20a) To supplement the provisions of this Decision, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission for the purposes of laying down arrangements for countries joining, or withdrawing from, the Mechanism.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 66 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The Union Civil Protection Mechanism (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Mechanism’) shall aim to support, coordinate and supcomplement the actions of the Member States at national, regional, and local level in the field of civil protection in improving the effectiveness of systems for preventing, preparing for and responding toand protecting against, natural andor man-made disasters. Or. it (See Article 196(1) TFEU.)
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. The protection to be ensured by the Mechanism shall cover primarily people, but also the environment and property, including cultural heritage, against all natural andor man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism, technological, radiological or environmental accidents, marine pollution and acute health emergencies, occurring inside or outside the Union.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The Union interventionaction shall aim to enhances prevention, preparedness and response capacity of Member States at national, regional, and local level to face major disasters, minimising human and material loss. The objective of this Decision cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States operating alone and can be better achieved at Union level by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action. Or. it (See Article 196(1) TFEU.)
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 3
3. The Mechanism shall not affect obligations under the following: existing relevant legislation of the Union or the European Atomic Energy Community or under existing international agreement; existing international agreements, including agreements between Member States; or existing civil protection agreements between regions of more than one Member State or between regions of Member States and regions of third countries.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 79 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Participation in the Mechanism 1. Participation in the Mechanism by a Member State or by a third country referred to in Article 28(1) shall be on a voluntary basis. Every Member State or third country participating in the Mechanism shall be entitled to withdraw from it. 2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29a for the purposes of laying down the arrangements for participation in, and withdrawal from, the Mechanism.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 82 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Decision shall apply to actions to assist with the response to immediate adverse consequences of a major disaster regardless of its nature, inside or outside the Union, where a request is made or the countries referred to in Article 28(1), where a decision to intervene has been taken following a request for assistance in accordance with this Decision.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 86 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Mechanism shall support, coordinate or supplement reinforced cooperation between the Union and Member Stat and complement operational cooperation between national civil protection services in pursuit of the following specific objectives:
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to enhance the Union’s state of preparedness to respond to disasters; of civil protection personnel in Member States to respond to disasters; Or. it (See Article 196(1) TFEU.)
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 97 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point e
(e) progress in increasing the level of readiness for disasters measured by the number and the usability of response capacities available for emergency interventions under the Mechanism and the degree of their interoperability;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – point 1
1. “disaster” means any situation, which has orevent (including unforeseeable or unavoidable events) which has an adverse impact, or any situation which may have an adverse impact, on people, the environment or property;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – point 2
2. “major disaster” means any situation, which has orevent (including unforeseeable or unavoidable events) which has an adverse impact, or any situation which may have an adverse impact, on people, the environment or property and which may result in a call for assistance under the Mechanism;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 111 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – point 6 a (new)
6a. “participating country” means a Member State, or a third country referred to in Article 28(1), which has decided to participate in the Mechanism;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – point c
(c) establish and regularly update an overview of natural and man-made risks the UnionMember States may face, taking into account the future impact of climate change;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 125 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – point g
(g) undertake, where so requested by participating countries, additional prevention tasks necessary to achieve the objective specified in point (a) of Article 3(1).
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 128 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. In order to ensure anthe effective cooperation withinness of the Mechanism, Members States shall communicate to the Commission a summary of their risk management plans.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 134 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The risk management plans shall take into account the national risk assessments and other relevant risk assessment and shall be coherent with other relevant plans in force in that Member Statee State concerned.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 138 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. When drawing up their risk management plans, Member States and participating third countries shall provide as required by their national law for the involvement of the regional and local authorities concerned and of specialised institutions.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 141 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and participating third countries shall ensure by the end of 2016 at the latest that their risk management plans are ready and communicated to the Commission in their most up-to-date form.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 148 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point d – introductory part
(d) establish and maintain a capability to mobilise and dispatch, as quickly as possible, teams of experts responsible for:
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 150 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – point e
(e) establish and maintain a capability to provide logistical support and assistance for expert teams, modules and other response capacities deployed under the Mechanism, as well as other actors on the ground;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 160 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. Member StatParticipating countries shall work towards developing modules, in particular to meet priority intervention or support needs under the Mechanism.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The modules shall be made up of the resources of one or more Member Statparticipating countries.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 162 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – title
General preparedness actions of Member States (This amendment replaces ‘Member States’ with ‘participating countries’ in Article 9, Article 10(1), and Articles 11, 12, 18, and 29.)participating countries
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 163 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall identify in advance experts that can be dispatched as parts of expert teams, as specified in point (d) of Article 7, and, supported by the Commission, should they so request, shall manage the mobilisation and dispatch of such teams.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 164 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Participating countries, supported by the Commission, should they so request, shall administer the provision of logistical support and assistance as referred to in point (e) of Article 7.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 6
6. The capacities registered in the European Emergency Response Capacity shall be available for emergency response operations under the Mechanism at thewhen a request of the Commission through the ERC. Member Statesfor assistance has been addressed to the ERC and forwarded by the ERC to participating countries. Participating countries, through the ERC, shall inform the Commission as soon as possible of any compelling reasons that prevent them from making these capacities available in a specific emergency.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
If the request for assistance involves intervention outside the borders of the Union and participating third countries, the capacities registered in the European Emergency Response Capacity shall be available subject to the formal consent of the participating country managing them, which shall be communicated to the Commission without delay through the ERC.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph 8
8. Member States and the Commission shall ensure an appropriate visibility of the interventions of the European Emergency Response Capacity.deleted
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 189 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 4
4. These capacities shall be a part of the European Emergency Response Capacity. They shall be available for emergency response operations under the Mechanism at thewhen a request of the Commission through the ERCfor assistance has been addressed to the ERC and forwarded by the ERC to participating countries. When not in use under the Mechanism, these capacities shall be available for the national purposes of Member Statparticipating countries managing them.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 191 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. Member States and the Commission shall ensure appropriate visibility for the capacities developed in accordance with this Article.deleted
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. In the event of a major disaster within the Union, or of the imminence thereof, which causes or is capable of causing trans-boundary effects, the Member State in which the disaster has occurred or is likely to occur shall, without delay, notify the Commission, through the ERC, and potentially affected Member States.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 195 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. In the event of a major disaster within the Union, or of the imminence thereof, which may result in a call for assistance from one or more Member States, the Member State in which the emergency has occurred or is likely to occur shall, without delay, notify the Commission, when a possible request for assistance through the ERC can be anticipatedthrough the ERC, in order to enable the CommissionERC, as appropriate, to inform the other Member Statparticipating countries and activate its competent services.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 196 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. This Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to countries specified in Article 28(1) seeking to benefit from assistance under the Mechanism.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 200 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) forward the request to the contact points of other Member Statparticipating countries;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 201 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) collect validated information on the disaster and disseminate it to the Member Statparticipating countries;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) propose a response plan based on the needs on the ground and pre-developed contingency plans, and invite Member Stat, through the ERC, invite participating countries to deploy specific capacities from the European Emergency Response Capacity in accordance with the plan;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 207 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Any Member Stateparticipating country to which a request for assistance is addressed shall promptly determine whether it is in a position to render the assistance required and inform the requesting Member State thereof through the CECIS, indicating the scope and terms of assistance it might render. The ERC shall keep Member Statparticipating countries informed.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 208 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 5
5. The requesting Member State shall be responsible for directing assistance interventions. The authorities of the requesting Member State shall lay down guidelines and, if necessary, define the limits of the tasks entrusted to the intervention modules or other capacities. The details of the execution of those tasks shall be left to the person in charge appointed by the Member Stateparticipating country rendering assistance. The requesting Member State may also request the deployment of an expert team to support its assessment, facilitate coordination on site (between Member Statparticipating countries’ teams), provide technical advice, or support with performing any other task as needed.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 209 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. This Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to countries specified in Article 28(1) seeking to benefit from assistance under the Mechanism.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 210 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – title
Promoting consistency in the response to major disasters outside the Union (Does not affect English version.) Or. it (Does not affect English version.)
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission, through the ERC, shall support the consistency in the delivery of the assistance through the following actions:
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 214 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part
(a) maintaining a continuous dialogue with Member Statparticipating countries’ contact points in order to ensure an effective and coherent European emergency response contribution through the Mechanism to the overall relief effort, in particular by:
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 215 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1
– informing Member Statparticipating countries without delay of the full requests for assistance;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 216 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 4
– providing an overview of assistance being offered by Member Statparticipating countries and other actors;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 217 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) immediately proposing a response plan based on the needs on the ground and pre- developed contingency plans, and inviting Member Statparticipating countries to deploy specific capacities from the European Emergency Response Capacity in accordance with the plan;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 218 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 5
5. Any Member Stateparticipating country to which a request for assistance is addressed shall promptly determine whether it is in a position to render the assistance required and inform the ERC thereof through the CECIS, indicating the scope and terms of any assistance it might render. The ERC shall keep Member Statparticipating countries informed.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 220 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 10
10. The role of the Commission referred to in this Article shall not affect the Member Statparticipating countries’ competences and responsibility for their teams, modules and other support, including military capacities. In particular, the support for consistency offered by the Commission shall not entail giving orders to Member Statparticipating countries’ teams, modules and other support, which shall be deployed on a voluntary basis in accordance with the coordination at headquarters level and on site.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 12
12. Member StatParticipating countries providing emergency assistance as referred to in paragraph 1 shall keep the ERC fully informed of their activities.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 222 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 13
13. Member StatParticipating countries’ teams and modules on site participating in the intervention through the Mechanism shall liaise closely with the ERC and the expert teams on site, as referred to in the second indent of point (a) of paragraph 2.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission may select, appoint and dispatch an expert team composed of experts provided by the Member Statparticipating countries, the Commission and other services and agencies of the Union, the UNOCHA or other international organisations, depending on the specificity of the mission in the event of major disaster within the Union, in accordance with Article 15.(5) or upon a request for prevention and preparedness expertise, as referred to in Article 13(2).
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) Member Statparticipating countries shall nominate experts, under their responsibility, who can be deployed as part of expert teams.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 225 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 4
4. Where expert teams are dispatched, they shall facilitate coordination between Member Statparticipating countries’ intervention teams and liaise with the competent authorities of the requesting state. The ERC shall maintain close contact with the expert teams and provide them with guidance and logistical and other support.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 227 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 5
5. Where appropriate, the Commission may deploy the logistical support and assistance capability to support expert teams, modules of Member Statparticipating countries and other response capacities deployed in the framework of the Mechanism.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 247 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 22 – point b
(b) deploying the capacities referred to in points (g), (h) and (i) of Article 21 in the event of major disasters, at thewhen a request of the Commission through the ERCfor assistance has been addressed to the ERC and forwarded by the ERC to participating countries;
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 261 #

2011/0461(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Article 1a(2) shall be conferred on the Commission until 31 December 2020. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 1a(2) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or the Council. A revocation decision shall put an end to the delegation of the powers specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified in the text of the decision. It shall not affect the validity of the delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 1a(2) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. The above period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
2012/10/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) Public contracts should not be awarded to economic operators that have participated in a criminal organisation or have been found guilty of corruption, fraud to the detriment of the Union’s financial interests or money laundering. Non- payment of taxes or social security contributions should also be sanctioned by mandatory exclusion at the level of the Union. Furthermore, contracting authorities should be given the possibility to exclude candidates or tenderers for violations of environmental or social obligations, including rules onor those relating to workers' rights, including rules on working conditions, accessibility for disabled persons or other forms of grave professional misconduct, such as violations of competition rules or of intellectual property rights.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 89 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 41
(41) Furthermore, in technical specifications and in award criteria, contracting authorities should be allowed to refer to a specific production process, a specific mode of provision of services, or a specific process for any other stage of the life cycle of a product or service, provided that they are linked to the subject-matter of the public contract. In order to better integrate social considerations in public procurement, procurers may also be allowed to include, in the award criterion of the most economically advantageous tender, characteristics related to the working conditions of the persons directly participating in the process of production or provision in question. Those characteristics may only concern the protection of healthworking conditions of the staff involved in the production process or the favouring of social integration of disadvantaged persons or members of vulnerable groups amongst the persons assigned to performing the contract, including accessibility for persons with disabilities. Any award criteria which include those characteristics should in any event remain limited to characteristics that have immediate consequences on staff members in their working environmentconditions of staff members. They should be applied in accordance with Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and in a way that does not discriminate directly or indirectly against economic operators from other Member States or from third countries parties to the Agreement or to Free Trade Agreements to which the Union is party. For service contracts and for contracts involving the design of works, contracting authorities should also be allowed to use as an award criterion the organisation, qualification and experience of the staff assigned to performing the contract in question, as this may affect the quality of contract performance and, as a result, the economic value of the tender.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 93 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a
(a) they are established for or have the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character; for that purpose, a body which operates in normal market conditions, aims to make a profit, and bears the losses resulting from the exercise of its activitynd undertakes economic activity by supplying goods and services to the market does not have the purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character;
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 97 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) EUR 5 07 500 000 for public works contracts;
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) EUR 13095 000 for public supply and service contracts awarded by central government authorities and design contests organised by such authorities; where public supply contracts are awarded by contracting authorities operating in the field of defence, that threshold shall apply only to contracts concerning products covered by Annex III;
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) EUR 2300 000 for public supply and service contracts awarded by sub-central contracting authorities and design contests organised by such authorities.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) EUR 7500 000 for public contracts for social and other specific services listed in Annex XVI.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 102 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 9
9. Contracting authorities may award contracts for individual lots without applying the procedures provided for under this Directive, provided that the estimated value net of VAT of the lot concerned is less than EUR 8120 000 for supplies or services or EUR 1 million500 000 for works. However, the aggregate value of the lots thus awarded without applying this Directive shall not exceed 230 % of the aggregate value of all the lots into which the proposed work, the proposed acquisition of similar supplies or the proposed purchase of services has been divided.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
The term of a framework agreement shall not exceed four years, save in exceptional cases duly justified, in particular by the subject of the framework agreement.deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 118 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. Contracts based on a framework agreement shall be awarded in accordance with the procedures laid down in this paragraph and paragraphs 3 and 4. Those procedures may be applied only between those contracting authorities clearly identified for this purpose in the call for competition or the invitation to confirm interest and those economic operators originally party to the framework agreement. Contracts based on a framework agreement may under no circumstances make substantial modifications to the terms laid down in that framework agreement, in particular in the case referred to in paragraph 3. Contracting authorities shall not use framework agreements improperly or in such a way as to prevent, restrict or distort competition.deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 3
3. Where a framework agreement is concluded with a single economic operator, contracts based on that agreement shall be awarded within the limits of the terms laid down in the framework agreement. For the award of those contracts, contracting authorities may consult the operator party to the framework agreement in writing, requesting it to supplement its tender as necessary.deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 120 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 4
4. Where a framework agreement is concluded with more than one economic operator, it may be performed in one of the two following ways: (a) following the terms and conditions of the framework agreement, without reopening competition, where it sets out all the terms governing the provision of the works, services and supplies concerned and the objective conditions for determining which of the economic operators, party to the framework agreement, shall perform them; the latter conditions shall be indicated in the procurement documents; (b) where not all the terms governing the provision of the works, services and supplies are laid down in the framework agreement, through reopening competition amongst the economic operators parties to the framework agreement.deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 121 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 31 – paragraph 5
5. The competition referred to in paragraph (4)(b) shall be based on the same terms as applied for the award of the framework agreement and, where necessary, more precisely formulated terms, and, where appropriate, other terms referred to in the specifications of the framework agreement, in accordance with the following procedure: (a) for every contract to be awarded, contracting authorities shall consult in writing the economic operators capable of performing the contract; (b) contracting authorities shall fix a time limit which is sufficiently long to allow tenders for each specific contract to be submitted, taking into account factors such as the complexity of the subject- matter of the contract and the time needed to send in tenders; (c) tenders shall be submitted in writing, and their content shall not be opened until the stipulated time limit for reply has expired; (d) contracting authorities shall award each contract to the tenderer that has submitted the best tender on the basis of the award criteria set out in the specifications of the framework agreement.deleted
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 124 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 5
Where mandatory accessibility standards are adopted by a legislative act of the Union, technical specifications shall, as far as accessibility, environmental or social criteria are concerned, be defined by reference thereto.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 66 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) quality, including technical merit, aesthetic and functional characteristics, accessibility, design for all users, environmental and social characteristics, and innovative character;
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 72 – paragraph 4
4. Where the value of a modification can be expressed in monetary terms, the modification shall not be considered to be substantial within the meaning of paragraph 1, where its value does not exceed the thresholds set out in Article 4 and where it is below 15 % of the price of the initial contract, provided that the modification does not alter the overall nature of the contract. Where several successive modifications are made, the value shall be assessed on the basis of the cumulative value of the successive modifications.
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 196 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex VIII – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) in the case of public works contracts the totality of the technical prescriptions contained in particular in the procurement documents, defining the characteristics required of a material, product or supply, so that it fulfils the use for which it is intended by the contracting authority; those characteristics include levels of environmental and climate performance, design for all requirements (including accessibility for disabled persons) and conformity assessment, performance, safety or dimensions, including the procedures concerning quality assurance, terminology, symbols, testing and test methods, packaging, marking and labelling, user instructions, and production processes and methods, in addition to working conditions, at any stage of the life cycle of the works; those characteristics also include rules relating to design and costing, the test, inspection and acceptance conditions for works and methods or techniques of construction and all other technical conditions which the contracting authority is in a position to prescribe, under general or specific regulations, in relation to the finished works and to the materials or parts which they involve;
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 200 #

2011/0438(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex XVI – row 8 a (new)
CPV Code Description From 79100000-5 to 79140000-7 Legal services Or. it .
2012/06/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
(1) Chemical pollution of surface water presents a threat to the aquatic environment with effects such as acute and chronic toxicity to aquatic organisms, accumulation in the ecosystem and loss of habitats and biodiversity, as well as a threat to human health. As a matter of priority, causes of pollution should be identified and emissions should, where possible, be dealt with at source, in the most economically and environmentally effective manner.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) Furthermore, in order to improve the information basis for future identification of priority substances, in particular as regards emerging pollutants, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the drawing up of a watch list. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, involving experts from the Member States, the industries concerned and NGOs which promote environmental protection.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
The watch list shall contain no more than 25 substances or groups of substances at any given time and shall indicate the monitoring matrix for each substance. The substances shall be selected, by means of a technical procedure, from among those for which the available scientifically relevant information indicates that they may pose a significant risk at Union level to or via the aquatic environment. In selecting the substances for the watch list the Commission shall take into account all available information including research projects, Member States' characterisation and monitoring programmes under Articles 5 and 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC and information on production volumes, use patterns, concentrations in the environment and effects, including that gathered in accordance with Directives 98/8/EC, 2001/82/EC and 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, and with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 concerning the drawing up ofinclusion of substances in the watch list referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and their removal from it.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 123 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 concerning the drawing upcompilation of the watch list referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 127 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a
In exercising the power referred to in the previous subparagraph, the Commission shall establish a transparent technical procedure and the relevant criteria for the inclusion of substances in the watch list referred to in paragraph 1 of this article and their removal from it; it shall, in addition, take account of the recommendations referred to in Article 16(5) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 133 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 6
Directive 2008/105/EC
Article 8 b – paragraph 3 – footnote
1 12 months after the adoptionentry into force of this Directive.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 159 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – footnote
1 12 months after the adoptionentry into force of this Directive.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 172 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table – row 46
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex X – table – row 46
(46) 57-63-6 200-342-2 17-alpha-ethinylestradiol deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table – row 47
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex X – table – row 47
(47) 50-28-2 200-023-8 17-beta-estradiol deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – table – rows 48
Directive 2000/60/EC
Annex X – table – row 48
(48) 15307-79-6 239-346-4 Diclofenac deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 20
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – table – row 20
(20) Lead and its 7439-92-1 17,2 1,3 14 7,2 not applicable not applicable 14 compounds Or. it Motivazione Reinstatement of the values currently in force.
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 206 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 46
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – table – row 46
(46) 17-alpha- 57-63-6 3,5 10-5 7 10-6 not not ethinylestradio applicable applicable l deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 211 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 47
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – table – row 47
(47) 17-beta- 50-28-2 4 10-4 8 10-5 not not estradiol applicable applicabl e deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 216 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table – row 48
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex II – table – row 48
(48) Diclofenac 15307-79-6 0,1 0,01 not not applicable applicable deleted
2012/11/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 252 #

2011/0429(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 10 a (new)
Directive 2008/105/EC
Annex I – part B – point 3
10a. In Annex I, point 3 of Part B is replaced by the following: ‘3. With the exception of cadmium, lead, mercury and nickel (hereinafter ‘metals’) the EQS set up in this Annex are expressed as total concentrations in the whole water sample. In the case of metals the EQS refers to the dissolved concentration, i.e. the dissolved phase of a water sample obtained by filtration through a 0,45 µm filter or any equivalent pre-treatment. Member States may, when assessing the monitoring results against the EQS, take into account: (a) natural background concentrations for metals and their compounds, if they prevent compliance with the EQS value; and (b) hardness, pH or other water quality parameters that affect the bioavailability of metals, the bioavailable concentrations being determined using appropriate bioavailability models.’.
2012/11/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020], tThe financial envelope for the implementation of the specific programme shall be EUR 86198 millionin keeping with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020].
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. No more than 63 % of the amounts referred to in Article 6(2) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020] for the Parts I, II and III of the specific programme shall be for the Commission's administrative expenditure.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The President shall be appointed by the Commission following a recruitment process involving a dedicated search committee, for a term of office limited to four years, renewable once. The recruitment processdure and the candidate selected shall have the approval of the Scientific Council. Before that procedure is completed, the Commission shall forward a report to the European Parliament and the Council, which may give their opinion on the candidate selected.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 74 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The President shall chair the Scientific Council and, shall ensure its leadership and liaison with the dedicated implementation structure, andshall be accountable to the Commission for its activities and shall represent it in the world of science.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Scientific Council shall be composed of no more than six members, chosen from among scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 76 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The members of the Scientific Council shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their identification agreed with the Scientific Councilsearch committee referred to in Article 6(3), including a consultation of the scientific community and a report to, the European Parliament and the Council.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 77 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Decision 2007134/EC is repealed.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 79 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 2
In accordance with Article 18 of Horizon 2020, dedicated measures as set out in the specific objective 'Innovation in SMEs' (dedicated SME instrument) shall be applied in the specific objective 'Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies' and Part III 'Societal challenges'. This integrated approach is expected toshall lead to around 1530 % of their total combined budgets going to SMEs.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.1 – paragraph 4
The members of the Scientific Council shall be compensated for the tasks they perform by means of an honorarium and, where appropriate, reimbursement of 50% of their duly documented travel and subsistence expenses.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.1 – paragraph 5
The ERC President will reside in Brussels for the duration of the appointment and devote most of his/her time to ERC business. He/she will be remunerated at a level commensurate with the Commission's top management.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 89 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.1 – paragraph 6
The Scientific Council shall elect from amongst its members threea Vice-Chairs who shall assist the President in its representation and the organisation of its work. They Vice-Chair may also hold the title of Vice- President of the European Research Council.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 90 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.1 – paragraph 7
Support will be provided to the three Vice Chairs to ensure adequate local administrative assistance at their home institutes.deleted
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.1 – paragraph 7 a (new)
The President of the ERC and the members of the Scientific Council shall carry out their duties on an exclusive, full-time basis.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.2 – paragraph 4
The management of the ERC will be carried out by staff recruited for that purpose, including where necessary, officials fromofficials already in service within Union institutions, and will cover only the real administrative needs in order to assure the stability and continuity necessary for an effective administration.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 93 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part I – point 1.3 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
– regularly inform the programme committee, the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the ERC activities.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 105 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part II – point 1.5 – point 1.5.2 – paragraph 1
ReducIncreasing energy consumption andefficiency and reducing CO2 emissions by the development and deployment of sustainable construction technologies, implementation and replication of measures for an increased uptake of energy-efficient systems and materials in new, renovated and retrofitted buildings. Life-cycle considerations and the growing importance of design-build- operate concepts will be key in addressing the challenge of a transition to nearly zero energy buildings in Europe by 2020 and the realisation of energy-efficient districts through the engagement with the wide stakeholder community.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 106 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part II – point 1.5 – point 1.5.3 – paragraph 1
Increasing the competitiveness of process industries, such as chemical, pulp and paper, glass, or non-ferrous metals and steel by drastically improving, at an affordable cost, resource and energy efficiencies and reducing the environmental impact of such industrial activities. Focus will be on the development, and validation of enabling technologies for innovative substances, materials and technological solutions for low-carbon products and less energy- intensive processes and services along the value chain, as well as the adoption of ultra-low carbon production technologies and techniques to achieve specific GHG emission intensity reductions.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 109 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part II – point 2.2 – title
2.2. Equity facility(Does not affect English version.)
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 110 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part II – point 2.2 – paragraph 2
The facility will also have the possibility to make expansion and growth-stage investments in conjunction with the Equity Facility for Growth (EFG) under the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs(this includes investments in funds-of-funds with a broad investor base and includes private institutional and strategic investors as well as national public and semi-public financial institutions). In the latter case, the investment from the Equity Facility of Horizon 2020 shall not exceed 230% of the total EU investment except in cases of multi-stage funds, where funding from EFG and the equity facility for RDI will be provided on a pro rata basis, based on the funds' investment policy. Like the EFG, the Equity Facility shall avoid buy-out or replacement capital intended for the dismantling of an acquired enterprise. The Commission may decide to amend the 230% threshold in light of changing market conditions.
2012/06/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.1 – point 3.1.1 – paragraph 1
ReducImproving energy consumptionefficiency and eliminating energy waste, while providing the services that society and economy need, requires not only that more, efficient, cost-competitive, environmentally-friendly, and smarter products and services are brought to mass market but also the integration of components and devices in such a way that they cooperate to optimise the overall energy use of buildings, services and industry.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 171 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – paragraph 1
Electricity will play a central role in the establishment of an environmentally sustainable low-carbon economy. The uptake of low-carbon electricity generation is too slow due to the high costs involved. There is a pressing need to find solutions that reduce costs significantlyo as to make them affordable and competitive, with enhanced performance and sustainability, to accelerate the market deployment of low carbon electricity generation.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 173 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – point 3.2.1 – paragraph 1
The objective for wind energy is to reduce the cost of electricity production of onshore and offshore wind by up to about 20 % by 2020 compared to 2010, to increasingly move offshore, and to enable proper integration in the electricity grid. The focus will be on the development, testing and demonstration of next generation wind energy conversion systems of larger scale, higher conversion efficiencies and higher availabilities for both on- and off-shore (including remote locations and hostile weather environments) as well as new serial manufacturing processes. In order to gain a clearer picture of whether wind energy can meet this objective, a separate budget line for wind energy EIIs will be established under the SET Plan.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 174 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 1
The cost of solar energy, covering photovoltaics (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP), should be at least halved by 2020 compared to 2010, if it is to gain share of the electricity market.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 175 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2
For PV, this will need long term research on novel concepts and systems, demonstration and testing of the benefits of mass production with a view to large- scale deployment at an affordable and competitive cost.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
In order to gain a clearer picture of whether solar energy can meet the objectives that have been set, a separate budget line for solar energy EIIs will be established under the SET Plan.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – point 3.2.3
3.2.3. Develop competitive and environmentally safe technologies for CO2 capture, transport and storage Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key option that has to be widely deployed on a commercial scale at global level to meet the challenge of a decarbonised power generation and low carbon industry by 2050. The objective is to minimise the extra-cost of CCS in the power sector for coal-fired and gas-fired power plants compared to equivalent plants without CCS and energy intensive industrial installations. Support will be given, in particular, to demonstrate the full CCS chain for a representative portfolio of different capture, transport and storage technology options. This will be accompanied by research to further develop these technologies and to deliver more competitive capture technologies, improved components, integrated systems and processes, safe geological storage and rational solutions for the large-scale re- use of captured CO2 to enable the commercial deployment of CCS technologies for fossil fuel power plants and other carbon-intensive industries going into operation after 2020.deleted
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 180 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.2 – point 3.2.4 – paragraph 1
Geothermal, hydro, and marine energy as well as other renewable energies can contribute to the decarbonisation of the European energy supply while enhancing its flexibility to variable production and use of energy. The objective is to bring to commercial maturity cost-effective and sustainable technologies, enabling large- scale deployment at an industrial scale including grid integration. Ocean energies such as tidal, current or wave energy offer truly zero-emission, predictable energy. Research activities should include laboratory scale innovative research into low-cost reliable components and materials in a high corrosion, biofouling environment as well as demonstrations under the varied conditions found in European waters. In order to gain a clearer picture of whether hydro, geothermal and marine energy, as well as the other renewable energies, can meet the objectives set, a separate budget line for EIIs for those energies will be established under the SET Plan.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.3 – point 3.3.1 – paragraph 1
The objective for bio-energy is to bring to commercial maturity the most promising technologies, to permit large-scale, sustainable production of advanced second generation biofuels of different value chains for transport, and highly efficient combined heat and power from biomass, including CCS. The aim is to develop and demonstrate the technology for different bio-energy pathways at different scales, taking account of differing geographical and climate conditions and logistical constraints. Longer term research will support the development of a sustainable bio-energy industry beyond 2020. These activities will complement upstream (feedstock, bio- resources) and downstream (integration into vehicle fleets) research activities carried out in other relevant Societal Challenges.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 3.3 – point 3.3.2 – paragraph 1
Fuel cells and hydrogen have a great potential to contribute to addressing energy challenges facing Europe. Bringing these technologies to market competitiveness will require significant cost decrease. As an illustration the cost of fuel cell systems for transportation will have to be reduced by a factor of at least 10 over the next 10 years. To do so, support will be given to large scale demonstrations and pre-commercial deployment activities for portable, stationary, transport applications and the related services, as well as long-term research and technology development to build up a competitive fuel cell chain and a sustainable hydrogen production and infrastructure across the Union. Strong national and international cooperation is needed to enable market breakthroughs of a sufficient scale, including the development of appropriate standards.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 183 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 4.1 – paragraph 1
Europe has set a policy target of achieving a 60 % reduction of CO2 by 2050. It aims at halving the use of ‘conventionally-fuelled’ cars in cities and achieving virtually CO2-free city logistics in major urban centres by 2030. Low- carbon fuels in aviation should reach 40 % by 2050, and CO2 emissions from maritime bunker fuels should be reduced by 40 % by 2050.deleted
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 184 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 4.1 – paragraph 2
Research and innovation will substantially contribute to the development and take up of the necessary solutions for all transport modes, which, at competitive market prices, will drastically reduce transport's emissions that are harmful to the environment (such as CO2, NOx, and SOx), lower its dependence on fossil fuels, and hence reduce transport impact on biodiversity and preserve natural resources.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 185 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 4.1 – paragraph 3 – point 4.1.1 – point a
(a) Developing and accelerating the take- up of cleaner propulsion technologies is important for reducing or eliminating CO2 and pollution from transport. New and innovative solutions at competitive market prices are necessary, based on electric engines and batteries, fuel cells, or hybrid propulsion. Technological breakthroughs will also help improve the environmental performance of traditional propulsion systems.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 196 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 5 – point 5.4 – point 5.4.1 – paragraph 1
All forms of innovation, both incremental and radical, combining technological, organisational, societal, behavioural, business and policy innovation, and strengthening the participation of civil society, will be supported. This will underpin a more circular economy, while reducing environmental impacts and taking account of rebound effects on the environment. This will include business models, industrial symbiosis, product service systems, product design, full life cycle and cradle-to-cradle approaches. The aim will be to improve resource efficiency by reducing, in absolute terms, inputs, waste and the release of harmful substances along the value chain and foster re-use, recycling and resource substitution. Emphasis will be given to facilitate the transition from research to market, involving industry and notably SMEs, from the development of prototypes to their introduction, at affordable prices, in the market and replication. Networking among eco-innovators will also seek to enhance the dissemination of knowledge and better link supply with demand.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 200 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part III – point 6.3 – paragraph 1
The European Union, its citizens and its international partners are confronted with a range of security threats like crime, terrorism, illegal immigration and mass emergencies due to man-made or natural disasters. These threats can span across borders and aim at physical targets or the cyberspace. Attacks against Internet sites of public authorities and private entities for instance not only undermine the citizen's trust but may seriously affect such essential sectors as energy, transport, health, finance or telecommunications.
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – part IV – point 3.3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The JRC will focus on the 20/20/20 climate and energy targets and the Union’s transition to a competitive low-carbon economy by 2050, with research on technological and socio-economic aspects of:
2012/06/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 227 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020], tThe financial envelope for the implementation of the specific programme shall be EUR 86198 millionin keeping with Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020].
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 229 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 4 – paragraph 3
3. No more than 63 % of the amounts referred to in Article 6(2) of Regulation (EU) No XX/2012 [Horizon 2020] for the Parts I, II and III of the specific programme shall be for the Commission's administrative expenditure.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 242 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The President shall be appointed by the Commission following a recruitment process involving a dedicated search committee, for a term of office limited to four years, renewable once. The recruitment processdure and the candidate selected shall have the approval of the Scientific Council. The Commission shall forward a report to the European Parliament and the Council, which may give their opinion on the candidate selected before the procedure is completed.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 244 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3
The President shall chair the Scientific Council and, shall ensure its leadership and liaison with the dedicated implementation structure, andshall be accountable to the Commission for its activities and shall represent it in the world of science.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 248 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. The Scientific Council shall be composed of no more than six members, chosen from among scientists, engineers and scholars of the highest repute and appropriate expertise, ensuring a diversity of research areas and acting in their personal capacity, independent of extraneous interests.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 250 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The members of the Scientific Council shall be appointed by the Commission, following an independent and transparent procedure for their identification agreed with the Scientific Councilsearch committee referred to in Article 6(3), including a consultation of the scientific community and a report to, the European Parliament and the Council.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 265 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 11 – paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Decision No 2007/134/EC is repealed.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 314 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 2
In accordance with Article 18 of Horizon 2020, dedicated measures as set out in the specific objective 'Innovation in SMEs' (dedicated SME instrument) shall be applied in the specific objective 'Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies' and Part III 'Societal challenges'. This integrated approach is expected toshall lead to around 1530 % of their total combined budgets going to SMEs.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 320 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.4 – paragraph 3
and/or mezzanine capital to individual enterprises in the early stage (start-up window). The facility will also have the possibility to make expansion and growth- stage investments in conjunction with the Equity Facility for Growth under the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs, including in funds- of-funds. Or. it(Linguistic amendment only affecting IT version.)
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 323 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.4 – paragraph 5
the debt facility will be implemented as part of two EU Financial Instruments that provide equity and debt to support SMEs' R&I and growth, in conjunction with the equity and debt facilities under the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs. Or. it(Linguistic amendment only affecting IT version.)
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 392 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 4
The members of the Scientific Council shall be compensated for the tasks they perform by means of an honorarium and, where appropriate, reimbursement of 50% of their duly documented travel and subsistence expenses.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 393 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 5
The ERC President will reside in Brussels for the duration of the appointment and devote most of his/her time to ERC business. He/she will be remunerated at a level commensurate with the Commission's top management.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 394 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 6
The Scientific Council shall elect from amongst its members threea Vice-Chairs who shall assist the President in its representation and the organisation of its work. They may also Vice-Chair shall hold the title of Vice- President of the European Research Council.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 395 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 7
Support will be provided to the three Vice Chairs to ensure adequate local administrative assistance at their home institutes.deleted
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 396 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 7 a (new)
The President of the ERC and the members of the Scientific Council shall carry out their duties on an exclusive, full-time basis.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 397 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 4
The management of the ERC will be carried out by staff recruited for that purpose, including where necessary, officials from Union institutions, and will cover only the real administrative needs in order to assure the stability and continuity necessary for an effective administration.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 398 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 4
The management of the ERC will be carried out by staff recruited for that purpose, including where necessary, officials fromofficials in service within Union institutions, and will cover only the real administrative needs in order to assure the stability and continuity necessary for an effective administration.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 401 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 1 – indent 5
– regularly inform the programme committee, the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the ERC activities.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 522 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 1 – point 1.5 – point 1.5.2 – paragraph 1
ReducIncreasing energy consumption andefficiency and reducing CO2 emissions by the development and deployment of sustainable construction technologies, implementation and replication of measures for an increased uptake of energy-efficient systems and materials in new, renovated and retrofitted buildings. Life-cycle considerations and the growing importance of design-build- operate concepts will be key in addressing the challenge of a transition to nearly zero energy buildings in Europe by 2020 and the realisation of energy-efficient districts through the engagement with the wide stakeholder community.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 523 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 1 – point 1.5 – point 1.5.3 – paragraph 1
Increasing the competitiveness of process industries, such as chemical, pulp and paper, glass, or non-ferrous metals and steel by drastically improving, at an affordable cost, resource and energy efficiencies and reducing the environmental impact of such industrial activities. Focus will be on the development, and validation of enabling technologies for innovative substances, materials and technological solutions for low-carbon products and less energy- intensive processes and services along the value chain, as well as the adoption of ultra-low carbon production technologies and techniques to achieve specific GHG emission intensity reductions.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 540 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
The Debt facility will provide loans to single beneficiaries for investment in R&I; guarantees to financial intermediaries making loans to beneficiaries; combinations of loans and guarantees; and guarantees and/or counter-guarantees for national or regional debt-financing schemes. The Debt facility will undertake maturity enhancement activities, and it will support the dedicated SME Instrument (see Part II, section '3. Innovation in SMEs' of this Annex). Provisions from the debt facility may be combined, with the possible addition of grants (including lump sums), with provisions from the equity financial instrument in one or more integrated schemes. Soft loans and convertible loans may also be possible.(Does not affect English version.)
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 546 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 2 – point 2.2 – introductory part
2.2. Equity facility(Does not affect English version.)
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 551 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 2 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 3
In the latter case, the investment from the Equity Facility of Horizon 2020 shall not exceed 230% of the total EU investment except in cases of multi-stage funds, where funding from EFG and the equity facility for RDI will be provided on a pro rata basis, based on the funds' investment policy. Like the EFG, the Equity Facility shall avoid buy-out or replacement capital intended for the dismantling of an acquired enterprise. The Commission may decide to amend the 230% threshold in light of changing market conditions.
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 744 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – Part III– point 3.1.1
3.1.1. ReducEnsuring energy consumptionefficiency and eliminating energy waste, while providing the services that society and economy need, requires not only that more, efficient, cost-competitive, environmentally-friendly, and smarter products and services are brought to mass market but also the integration of components and devices in such a way that they cooperate to optimise the overall energy use of buildings, services and industry.
2012/07/05
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 759 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – paragraph 1
Electricity will play a central role in the establishment of an environmentally sustainable low-carbon economy. The uptake of low-carbon electricity generation is too slow due to the high costs involved. There is a pressing need to find solutions that reduce costs significantlyo as to make them affordable and competitive, with enhanced performance and sustainability, to accelerate the market deployment of low carbon electricity generation.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 766 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.1 – paragraph 1
The objective for wind energy is to reduce the cost of electricity production of onshore and offshore wind by up to about 20 % by 2020 compared to 2010, to increasingly move offshore, and to enable proper integration in the electricity grid. The focus will be on the development, testing and demonstration of next generation wind energy conversion systems of larger scale, higher conversion efficiencies and higher availabilities for both on- and off-shore (including remote locations and hostile weather environments) as well as new serial manufacturing processes. In order to gain a clearer picture of whether wind energy can meet this objective, a separate budget line for wind energy EIIs will be established under the SET Plan.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 770 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 1
The cost of solar energy, covering photovoltaics (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP), should be at least halved by 2020 compared to 2010, if it is to gain share of the electricity market.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 771 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 2
For PV, this will need long term research on novel concepts and systems, demonstration and testing of the benefits of mass production with a view to large- scale deployment at an affordable and competitive cost.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 775 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
In order to gain a clearer picture of whether solar energy can meet the objectives that have been set, a separate budget line for solar energy EIIs will be established under the SET Plan.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 776 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.3
3.2.3. Develop competitive and environmentally safe technologies for CO2 capture, transport and storage Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key option that has to be widely deployed on a commercial scale at global level to meet the challenge of a decarbonised power generation and low carbon industry by 2050. The objective is to minimise the extra-cost of CCS in the power sector for coal-fired and gas-fired power plants compared to equivalent plants without CCS and energy intensive industrial installations. Support will be given, in particular, to demonstrate the full CCS chain for a representative portfolio of different capture, transport and storage technology options. This will be accompanied by research to further develop these technologies and to deliver more competitive capture technologies, improved components, integrated systems and processes, safe geological storage and rational solutions for the large-scale re- use of captured CO2 to enable the commercial deployment of CCS technologies for fossil fuel power plants and other carbon-intensive industries going into operation after 2020.deleted
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 786 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – point 3.2.4 – paragraph 1
Geothermal, hydro, and marine energy as well as other renewable energies can contribute to the decarbonisation of the European energy supply while enhancing its flexibility to variable production and use of energy. The objective is to bring to commercial maturity cost-effective and sustainable technologies, enabling large- scale deployment at an industrial scale including grid integration. Ocean energies such as tidal, current or wave energy offer truly zero-emission, predictable energy. Research activities should include laboratory scale innovative research into low-cost reliable components and materials in a high corrosion, biofouling environment as well as demonstrations under the varied conditions found in European waters. In order to gain a clearer picture of whether hydro, geothermal and marine energy as well as other renewable energies can meet the objectives that have been set, a separate budget line for EIIs for those energies will be established under the SET Plan.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 792 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point 3.3.1 – paragraph 1
The objective for bio-energy is to bring to commercial maturity the most promising technologies, to permit large-scale, sustainable production of advanced second generation biofuels of different value chains for transport, and highly efficient combined heat and power from biomass, including CCS. The aim is to develop and demonstrate the technology for different bio-energy pathways at different scales, taking account of differing geographical and climate conditions and logistical constraints. Longer term research will support the development of a sustainable bio-energy industry beyond 2020. These activities will complement upstream (feedstock, bio- resources) and downstream (integration into vehicle fleets) research activities carried out in other relevant Societal Challenges.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 795 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point 3.3.2 – paragraph 1
Fuel cells and hydrogen have a great potential to contribute to addressing energy challenges facing Europe. Bringing these technologies to market competitiveness will require significant cost decrease. As an illustration the cost of fuel cell systems for transportation will have to be reduced by a factor of at least 10 over the next 10 years. To do so, support will be given to large scale demonstrations and pre-commercial deployment activities for portable, stationary, transport applications and the related services, as well as long-term research and technology development to build up a competitive fuel cell chain and a sustainable hydrogen production and infrastructure across the Union. Strong national and international cooperation is needed to enable market breakthroughs of a sufficient scale, including the development of appropriate standards.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 821 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 1
Europe has set a policy target of achieving a 60 % reduction of CO2 by 2050. It aims at halving the use of ‘conventionally-fuelled’ cars in cities and achieving virtually CO2-free city logistics in major urban centres by 2030. Low- carbon fuels in aviation should reach 40 % by 2050, and CO2 emissions from maritime bunker fuels should be reduced by 40 % by 2050.deleted
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 823 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 2
Research and innovation will substantially contribute to the development and take up of the necessary solutions for all transport modes, which, at competitive market prices, will drastically reduce transport's emissions of greenhouse gases that are harmful to the environment (such as CO2, NOx, and SOx), lower its dependence on fossil fuels, and hence reduce transport impact on biodiversity and preserve natural resources.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 825 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 4 – point 4.1 – paragraph 3 – point 4.1.1 – point a
(a) Developing and accelerating the take- up of cleaner propulsion technologies is important for reducing or eliminating CO2 and pollution from transport. New and innovative solutions at competitive market prices are necessary, based on electric engines and batteries, fuel cells, or hybrid propulsion. Technological breakthroughs will also help improve the environmental performance of traditional propulsion systems.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 875 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.4 – point 5.4.1 –
All forms of innovation, both incremental and radical, combining technological, organisational, societal, behavioural, business and policy innovation, and strengthening the participation of civil society, will be supported. This will underpin a more circular economy, while reducing environmental impacts and taking account of rebound effects on the environment. This will include business models, industrial symbiosis, product service systems, product design, full life cycle and cradle-to-cradle approaches. The aim will be to improve resource efficiency by reducing, in absolute terms, inputs, waste and the release of harmful substances along the value chain and foster re-use, recycling and resource substitution. Emphasis will be given to facilitate the transition from research to market, involving industry and notably SMEs, from the development of prototypes to their introduction in the market at competitive prices and replication. Networking among eco-innovators will also seek to enhance the dissemination of knowledge and better link supply with demand.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 936 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6 – point 6.3 – paragraph 1
The European Union, its citizens and its international partners are confronted with a range of security threats like crime, terrorism, illegal immigration and mass emergencies due to man-made or natural disasters. These threats can span across borders and aim at physical targets or the cyberspace. Attacks against Internet sites of public authorities and private entities for instance not only undermine the citizen's trust but may seriously affect such essential sectors as energy, transport, health, finance or telecommunications.
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 980 #

2011/0402(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – section 4 – point 3 – point 3.3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The JRC will focus on the 20/20/20 climate and energy targets and the Union's transition to a competitive low-carbon economy by 2050 with research on technological and socio-economic aspects of:
2012/07/17
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 51 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The European Commission does noStem cell therapies have been shown to be effective in certain fields, especially in regenerative medicine. The Union should, therefore, continue to support such research. However, the European Commission acknowledges the ethical concerns raised by research on human embryonic stem cells, for which reason it explicitly does not solicit the use of human embryonic stem cells. The use of adult human stem cells, be they adult or embryonicwith particular reference to cord blood stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, if any, depends on the judgement of the scientists in view of the objectives they want to achieve and is subject to stringent Ethics Review. No project involving the use of human embryonic stem cells should be funded that does not obtain the necessary approvals from the Member States. No activity should be funded that is forbidden in all Member States. No activity should be funded in a Member State where such activity is forbidden.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 81 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of Horizon 2020 shall be EUR 87740 million, of which a maximum of EUR 861698 million shall be allocated to activities under Title XIX of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Or. it (See Amendment to Annex II)
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 83 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) Excellent science, EUR 273818 million; Or. it (See Amendment to Annex II)
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) Industrial leadership, EUR 205280 million; Or. it (See Amendment to Annex II)
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) Societal challenges, EUR 3584388 million. Or. it (See Amendment to Annex II)
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The European Institute of Innovation and Technology shall be financed through a maximum contribution from Horizon 2020 of EUR 3192524 million as set out in Annex II. A first allocation of EUR 15042 million shall be provided to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for activities under Title XVII of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. A second allocation of up to EUR 165482 million shall be provided, subject to the review set out in Article 26 (1). This additional amount shall be provided on a pro-rata basis, as indicated in Annex II, from the amount for the specific objective "Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies" within the priority on industrial leadership set out in paragraph 2(b) and from the amount for the priority on societal challenges set out in 2(c). Or. it (See Amendment to Annex II)
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) have a legal system based on democratic principles and an efficient civil service;
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. For the implementation of Horizon 2020, account shall be taken of advice and inputs provided by: advisory groups of independent, high level experts set up by the Commission; dialogue structures created under international science and technology agreements; representatives from industry (especially in the case of EIIs); forward looking activities; targeted public consultations; and transparent and interactive processes that ensure responsible research and innovation is supported.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 121 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) research activity aiming at human and animal cloning for reproductive purposes;
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Research on human stem cells, both adult and embryonic,activities aiming at developing and improving therapies based on adult human stem cells will be supported. Funding for research on adult human stem cells may be fingrancted, depending both on the contents of the scientific proposal and the legal framework of the Member States involved. In particular, research on stem cells from umbilical cord blood and induced pluripotent stem cells will be supported. No funding shall be granted for research activities that are prohibited in all the Member States. No activity shall be funded in a Member State where such activity is forbidden.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. The integrated approach set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 is expected to lead to around 1530% of the total combined budget for the specific objective on "Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies" and the priority "Societal challenges" going to SMEs.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 144 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Particular attention shall be paid to joint programming initiatives between Member States’ regions, preferably ones forming part of the same Euroregion or the same EGTC established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part II Priority 'Industrial leadership' – paragraph 3
Horizon 2020 will take an integrated approach to the participation of SMEs, which could lead to around 1530 % of the total combined budgets for all specific objectives on societal challenges and the specific objective 'Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies' being devoted to SMEs.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 214 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part II – point 1.5.3 – point b –paragraph 1
ReducIncreasing energy consumption andefficiency and reducing CO2 emissions by the development and deployment of sustainable construction technologies.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 248 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 1.1 – paragraph 4
In the Union, CVD annually accounts for more than 2 million deaths and costs the economy more than EUR 192 billion while c. Cancer accounts for a quarter of all deaths and is the number one cause of death in people aged 45-64. O while over 27 million people in the Union suffer from diabetes and the total cost of brain disorders (including, but not limited to those affecting mental health) has been estimated at EUR 800 billion. This figure will continue to rise dramatically - largely as result of Europe's ageing population and the associated increases in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Environmental, life-style and socio- economic factors are relevant in several of these conditions with up to one third of the global disease burden estimated to be related to these. However, for other conditions – in particular neurodegenerative diseases – effective prevention strategies will first require a considerable boost in research into their causes and the development of better early diagnosis and treatment options.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 281 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 1.3 – paragraph 3
An increasing disease and disability burden in the context of an aging population places further demands on health and care sectors. If effective health and care is to be maintained for all ages, efforts are required to improve decision making in prevention and treatment provision, to identify and support the dissemination of best practice in the health and care sectors, and to support integrated care and the wide uptake of technological, organisational and social innovations empowering in particular older persons, persons with chronic diseases as well as disabled persons to remain active and independent. Doing so will contribute to increasing, and lengthening the duration of their physical, social, and mental well- being.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 288 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 1.3 – paragraph 4
All of these activities shall be undertaken in such a way as to provide support throughout the research and innovation cycle, strengthening the competitiveness of the European based industries and development of new market opportunities. Emphasis will also be placed on engaging all health stakeholders –including patient and patient organisations– in order to develop a research and innovation agenda that actively involves citizens and reflects their needs and expectations.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 320 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 2.3 – point b – paragraph 1
The aim is to meet the requirements of citizens for good quality, safe, healthy and affordable food, and to make food and feed processing and distribution more sustainable and the food sector more competitive. The activities shall focus on good quality, healthy and safe foods for all, informed consumer choices, and competitive food processing methods that use less resources and produce less by- products, waste and green-house gases.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 323 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The European Commission does not explicitlyStem cells have proved their effectiveness in various medical treatments, particularly in the field regenerative medicine. The Union should therefore continue to encourage research in this direction. The European Commission, however, acknowledges that human embryo stem cell research raises ethical issues and therefore expressly refrains from soliciting the use of human embryonic stem cells. The use of adult human stem cells, be they adult or embryonic, if anyin particular those obtained from umbilical cord blood or induced pluripotent stem cells, depends on the judgement of the scientists in view of the objectives they want to achieve and is subject to stringent Ethics Review. No project involving the use of human embryonic stem cells should be funded that does not obtain the necessary approvals from the Member States. No activity should be funded that is forbidden in all Member States. No activity should be funded in a Member State where such activity is forbidden.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 330 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 3.1 – paragraph 1
The Union intends to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20 % below 1990 levels by 2020, with a further reduction to 80-95 % by 2050. In addition, renewables should cover 20 % of final energy consumption in 2020 coupled with a 20 % energy efficiency target. Achieving these objectives will require an overhaul of the energy system combining low carbon profile, energy security and affordability, while at the same time reinforcing Europe's economic competitiveness. Europe is currently far from this overall goal. 80 % of the European energy system still relies on fossil fuels, and the sector produces 80 % of all the Union's greenhouse gas emissions. Every year 2.5 % of the Union's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is spThe system needs to be overhauled in this way because, faced with volatile energy prices on the world market (coupled with concerns over security of supply), an increased tax burdent on energy importsources and this is likely to increase. This trend would lead to total dependence on oil and gas imports by 2050. Faced with volatile energy prices on the world market, coupled with concerns over security of supplye high cost of adapting to the EU’s environmental policies, European industries and consumers are spending an increasing share of their income on energy.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 333 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 3.1 – paragraph 2
The roadmap to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 shows that the targeted reductions in greenhouse gas emissions will have to be met largely within the territory of the Union. This would entail reducing CO2 emissions by over 90 % by 2050 in the power sector, by over 80 % in industry, by at least 60 % in transport and by about 90 % in the residential sector and services.deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 335 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 3.1 – paragraph 3
To achieve these reductions, significant investments need to be made in research, development, demonstration and market roll-out at affordable prices of efficient, safe and reliable low- carbon energy technologies and services. These must go hand in hand with non- technological solutions on both the supply and demand sides. All this must be part of an integrated low-carbon policy, including mastering key enabling technologies, in particular ICT solutions and advanced manufacturing, processing and materials. The goal is to produce efficient energy technologies and services that can be taken up widely on European and international markets and to establish intelligent demand-side management based on an open and transparent energy trade market and intelligent energy efficiency management systems.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 336 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 3.1 – paragraph 3 a (new)
From the perspective of optimising resources, the adoption of separate budget lines for each technology mentioned in the SET plan provides European added value.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 337 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 3.3 – point b – paragraph 1
Activities shall focus on research, development and full scale demonstration - of innovative renewables and carbon capture and storage technologies offering larger scale, lower costrenewables that are affordable, environmentally safe technologies withand have a higher conversion efficiency and higher availability for different market and operating environments.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 340 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 3.3 – point c – paragraph 1
Activities shall focus on research, development and full scale demonstration of technologies and value chains to make bio-energy more competitive and sustainable, to reduce time to market for biomethane, hydrogen and fuel cells and to bring new options showing long-term potential to maturity.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 346 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 4.3 – point a – paragraph 2
The focus of activities shall be to reduce resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions and improve vehicle efficiency, to accelerate the development and deployment of a new generation of electric and other low or zero emission vehicllow emission vehicles at affordable market prices, including through breakthroughs in engines, batteries and infrastructure; to explore and exploit the potential of alternative fuels and innovative and more efficient propulsion systems, including fuel infrastructure; to optimise the use of infrastructures, by means of intelligent transport systems and smart equipment; and to increase the use of demand management and public and non-motorised transport, particularly in urban areas.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 347 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 4.3 – point a – paragraph 2
The focus of activities shall be to reduce resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions and improve vehicle efficiency, to accelerate the development and deployment of a new generation of electric and other low or zero emission vehicles at affordable market prices, including through breakthroughs in engines, batteries and infrastructure; to explore and exploit the potential of alternative fuels and innovative and more efficient propulsion systems, including fuel infrastructure; to optimise the use of infrastructures, by means of intelligent transport systems and smart equipment; and to increase the use of demand management and public and non- motorised transport, particularly in urban areas.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 348 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 4.3 – point c – paragraph 2
The focus of activities shall be to develop the next generation of innovative transport means and to prepare the ground for the following one, by working on novel concepts and designs at competitive market prices, smart control systems and interoperable standards, efficient production processes, shorter development times and reduced lifecycle costs.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 359 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 5.2 – paragraph 2
The focus of Union actions shall therefore be on supporting key Union objectives and policies including: the Europe 2020 strategy; the Innovation Union; Resource- Efficient Europe and the corresponding Roadmap; the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050; Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action; the Raw Materials Initiative; the Union's Sustainable Development Strategy; an Integrated Maritime Policy for the Union; the Marine Strategy Framework Directive; the Eco-innovation Action Plan and the Digital Agenda for Europe. These actions shall reinforce the ability of society to become more resilient to environmental and climate change and ensure the availability of raw materials.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 369 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 5.3 – point d – paragraph 1
The aim is to foster all forms of eco- innovation that enable the transition to a green economy. Activities shall focus on: strengthening eco-innovative technologies, processes, services and products and boosting their market uptake andt affordable prices and their replication, with special attention for SMEs; supporting innovative policies and societal changes; measuring and assessing progress towards a green economy; and fostering resource efficiency through digital systems.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 376 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 6.3.3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) strengthen security through border management, with particular reference to combating illegal immigration into the EU's territory;
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 378 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 1 – paragraph 1
Europe is facing a number of structural weaknesses when it comes to innovation capacity and the ability to deliver new services, products and processes. Among the main issues at hand are Europe's relatively poor record in talent attraction and retention; the impoverishment of technical and scientific skills characteristic historically of various regions; the underutilisation of existing research strengths in terms of creating economic or social value; low levels of entrepreneurial activity; a scale of resources in poles of excellence which is insufficient to compete globally; and an excessive number of barriers to collaboration within the knowledge triangle of higher education, research and business on a European level.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 380 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 2 – paragraph 4
The EIT, via its KICs, operates in line with business logic. Strong leadership is a pre- requisite: each KIC is driven by a CEO. KIC partners are represented by single legal entities to allow more streamlined decision-making. KICs must produce annual business plans, including an ambitious portfolio of activities from education to business creation, with clear targets and deliverables, looking for both market and societal impact, and clear added value determined by a results- oriented approach. The current rules concerning participation, evaluation and monitoring of KICs allow fast-track, business-like decisions.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 381 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 3 – point b – paragraph 2
The EIT’s strategy and activities shall be driven by a focus on societal challenges that are of utmost relevance to the future, such as climate change or sustainable energy. By addressing key societal challenges in a comprehensive way, the EIT will promote inter- and multi- disciplinary approaches and help focus the research efforts of the partners in the KICs.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 382 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 3 – point c – paragraph 2
The EIT shall fully integrate education and training at all stages of careers and develop new and innovative curricula to reflect the need for new profiles engendered by complexnstant changes in societal andy, the economic challengesy and the labour market. To this end, the EIT will play a key role in encouraging recognition of new degrees and diplomas in Member States.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 383 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 3 – point c – paragraph 3
The EIT will also play a substantial role in fine-tuning the concept of ‘entrepreneurship’ via its educational programmes, which promote entrepreneurship in a knowledge- intensive context, building on innovative research and contributing to solutions of high societal relevance.deleted
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 384 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 3 – point f – paragraph 2
The EIT will make a strong contribution to the objectives set in Horizon 2020, in particular by addressing societal challenges in a way complementing other initiatives in these areas. It will test out new and simplified approaches to funding and governance and thereby play a pioneering role within the European innovation landscape. Its approach to funding will be firmly based on a strong leverage effect, mobilising both public and private funds. Moreover, it will employ entirely new vehicles for targeted support to individual activities through the EIT Foundation.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 385 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part V – point 3 – point g – paragraph 2
Via the KICs and their co-location centres – nodes of excellence, bringing together higher education, research and business partners in a given geographical location – the EIT will also be linked to regional policy. In particular, it shall ensure a better connection between higher education institutions, the labour market and regional and local innovation and growth, in the context of local, regional and national smart specialisation strategies. In doing so, it will contribute to the objectives of the Union’s Cohesion Policy.
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 387 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – table
I Excellent science, of which: 27818 23818 1. The European Research Council 15008 10008 2. Future and Emerging Technologies 3505 4505 3. Marie Curie actions on skills, training and career 6503 6503 development 4. European research infrastructures (including 2802 2802 eInfrastructures) II Industrial leadership, of which: 205280 1. Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies* 15580 of which 500 for EIT EIT 2. Access to risk finance** 46000 3. Innovation in SMEs 3700 III Societal challenges, of which 35888 4388 1. Health, demographic change and wellbeing; 90713147 of which 292 for EIT EIT 2. Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and 4694 of which 150 for maritime research and the bio- economy; EIT 3. Secure, clean and efficient energy 64537 of which 2140 for EIT EIT 4. Smart, green and integrated transport 76690 of which 2417 for EIT 5. Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials 3571003 of which 1145 for EIT EIT 6. Inclusive, innovative and secure societies 4317 of which 138 for EIT European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) 15042 + 165482*** Non-nuclear direct actions of the Joint Research Centre 2212 TOTAL 87740
2012/06/25
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 406 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The financial envelope for the implementation of Horizon 2020 shall be EUR 87740 million, of which a maximum of EUR 86198 million98.8% shall be allocated to activities under Title XIX of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 409 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) Excellent science, EUR 27818 million27.1% of total funding;
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 411 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) Industrial leadership, EUR 20280 million 28.8% of total funding;
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 416 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) Societal challenges, EUR 35888 million39,% of total funding.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 421 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The maximum overall amount for the Union financial contribution from Horizon 2020 to the non-nuclear direct actions of the Joint Research Centre shall be EUR 2 212 million2.5% of total funding.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 429 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
3. The European Institute of Innovation and Technology shall be financed through a maximum contribution from Horizon 2020 of EUR 3194 million as set out in Annex II. A first allocation of EUR 1542 million shall be provided to the European Institute of Innovation and Technology for activities under Title XVII of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. A second allocation of up to EUR 1652 million shall be provided, subject to the review set out in Article 26 (1). This additional amount shall be provided on a pro-rata basis, as indicated in Annex II, from the amount for the specific objective "Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies" within the priority on industrial leadership set out in paragraph 2(b) and from the amount for the priority on societal challenges set out in 2(c)2.9% of total funding as set out in Annex II.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 449 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii a (new)
(iiia) have a system based on democratic principles and an efficient civil service;
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 465 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. For the implementation of Horizon 2020, account shall be taken of advice and inputs provided by: advisory groups of independent, high level experts set up by the Commission; dialogue structures created under international science and technology agreements; representatives from industry (especially in the case of EIIs); forward looking activities; targeted public consultations; and transparent and interactive processes that ensure responsible research and innovation is supported.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 552 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) research activity aiming at human and animal cloning for reproductive purposes;
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 578 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Research on human stem cells, both adult and embryonic,activities aiming at developing and improving therapies based on adult human stem cells shall be supported. Funding for research on adult human stem cells may be fingrancted, depending both on the contents of the scientific proposal and the legal framework of the Member States involved. In particular, research on stem cells from umbilical cord blood and induced pluripotent stem cells shall be supported. No funding shall be granted for research activities that are prohibited in all the Member States. No activity shall be funded in a Member State where such activity is forbidden.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 615 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. The integrated approach set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 is expected to lead to around 1530% of the total combined budget for the specific objective on "Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies" and the priority "Societal challenges" going to SMEs.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 670 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Particular attention shall be paid to joint programming initiatives between Member States’ regions, preferably regions forming part of the same Euroregion or the same European grouping of territorial cooperation established pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on a European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC)*. * OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 804 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – broad lines of the specific objectives and activities – paragraph 12
Horizon 2020 will take an integrated approach to the participation of SMEs, which could lead to around 1530 % of the total combined budgets for all specific objectives on societal challenges and the specific objective 'Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies' being devoted to SMEs.
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1157 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 2 – point 1 – point 1.5 – point 1.5.3 – point b – paragraph 1
ReducImproving energy consumption andefficiency and reducing CO2 emissions by the development and deployment of sustainable construction technologies.
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1204 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 2 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 3
A facility for debt ('Debt facility') and a facility for equity ('Equity facility') will help overcome such problems by improving the financing and risk profiles of the R&I activities concerned. This, in turn, will ease access by firms and other beneficiaries to loans, guarantees and other forms of risk finance; promote early-stage investment and the development of new venture capital funds; improve knowledge transfer and the market in intellectual property; attract funds to the venture capital market; and, overall, help catalyse the passage from the conception, development and demonstration of new products and services to their commercialisat(Does not affect English version.)
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1219 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 2 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point b – paragraph 3
The Equity facility will focus on early- stage venture capital funds providing venture capital and quasi-equity (including mezzanine capital) to individual portfolio enterprises. The facility will also have the possibility to make expansion and growth- stage investments in conjunction with the Equity Facility for Growth under the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs, to ensure a continuum of support during the start up and development of companies.(Does not affect English version.)
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1223 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 2 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point b – paragraph 7
The growth window shall make expansion and growth-stage investments in conjunction with the Equity Facility for Growth under the Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and SMEs, including investments in funds-of-funds operating across borders and investing in venture capital funds, most of which will have a thematic focus that supports the goals of Europe 2020.(Does not affect English version.)
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1286 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 5
In the Union, CVD annually accounts for more than 2 million deaths and costs the economy more than EUR 192 billion while. cancer accounts for a quarter of all deaths and is the number one cause of death in people aged 45-64. O, while over 27 million people in the Union suffer from diabetes and the total cost of brain disorders (including, but not limited to those affecting mental health) has been estimated at EUR 800 billion. This figure will continue to rise sharply, largely as a result of the growing incidence of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, which is linked to the rising average age of Europe’s population. Environmental, life- style and socio-economic factors are relevant in several of these conditions with up to one third of the global disease burden estimated to be related to these. In the case of other conditions, in particular neurodegenerative diseases, however, if prevention strategies are to be effective a major boost will need to be given to etiological research and better early diagnosis and treatment options will need to be developed.
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1331 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 3
An increasing disease and disability burden in the context of an aging population places further demands on health and care sectors. If effective health and care is to be maintained for all ages, efforts are required to improve decision making in prevention and treatment provision, to identify and support the dissemination of best practice in the health and care sectors, and to support integrated care and the wide uptake of technological, organisational and social innovations empowering in particular older persons as well as, persons suffering from chronic illnesses and disabled persons to remain active and independent. Doing so will contribute to increasing, and lengthening the duration of their physical, social, and mental well-being.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1338 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 4
All of these activities shall be undertaken in such a way as to provide support throughout the research and innovation cycle, strengthening the competitiveness of the European based industries and development of new market opportunities. Particular emphasis shall also be placed on engaging all interested parties in the health sector - including patients and patients’ organisations - in order to develop a research and innovation agenda in which citizens are actively involved and which reflects their needs and expectations.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1415 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point b – paragraph 1
The aim is to meet the requirements of citizens for good quality, safe, healthy and affordable food, and to make food and feed processing and distribution more sustainable and the food sector more competitive. The activities shall focus on good quality, healthy and safe foods for all, informed consumer choices, and competitive food processing methods that use less resources and produce less by- products, waste and green-house gases.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1438 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 2
The Union intends to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20 % below 1990 levels by 2020, with a further reduction to 80-95 % by 2050. In addition, renewables should cover 20 % of final energy consumption in 2020 coupled with a 20 % energy efficiency target. Achieving these objectives will require an overhaul of the energy system combining low carbon profile, energy security and affordability, while at the same time reinforcing Europe's economic competitiveness. Europe is currently far from this overall goal. 80 % of the European energy system still relies on fossil fuels, and the sector produces 80 % of all the Union's greenhouse gas emissions. Every year 2.5 % of the Union's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is spThe system needs to be overhauled in this way because, faced with volatile energy prices on the world market (coupled with concerns over security of supply), an increased tax burdent on energy importsources and this is likely to increase. This trend would lead to total dependence on oil and gas imports by 2050. Faced with volatile energy prices on the world market, coupled with concerns over security of supplye high cost of adapting to the Union’s environmental and climate- change legislation, European industries and consumers are spending an increasing share of their income on energy.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1448 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 3
The roadmap to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050 shows that the targeted reductions in greenhouse gas emissions will have to be met largely within the territory of the Union. This would entail reducing CO2 emissions by over 90 % by 2050 in the power sector, by over 80 % in industry, by at least 60 % in transport and by about 90 % in the residential sector and services.deleted
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1461 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 4
To achieve these reductions, significant investments need to be made in research, development, demonstration and market roll-out at affordable prices of efficient, safe and reliable low- carbon energy technologies and services. These must go hand in hand with non- technological solutions on both the supply and demand sides. All this must be part of an integrated low-carbon policy, including mastering key enabling technologies, in particular ICT solutions and advanced manufacturing, processing and materials. The goal is to produce efficient energy technologies and services that can be taken up widely on European and international markets and to establish intelligent demand-side management based on an open and transparent energy trade market and intelligent energy efficiency management systems.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1473 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 3 – point 3.2 – paragraph 3 a (new)
From the perspective of optimising resources, the adoption of separate budget lines for each technology mentioned in the SET plan provides European added value.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1497 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point b – paragraph 1
Activities shall focus on research, development and full scale demonstration - of innovative renewables and carbon capture and storage technologies offering larger scale, lower costrenewables that are affordable, environmentally safe technologies withand have a higher conversion efficiency and higher availability for different market and operating environments.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1511 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point c – paragraph 1
Activities shall focus on research, development and full scale demonstration of technologies and value chains to make bio-energy more competitive and sustainable, to reduce time to market for biomethane, hydrogen and fuel cells and to bring new options showing long-term potential to maturity.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1582 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 4 – point 4.3 – point a – paragraph 2
The focus of activities shall be to reduce resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions and improve vehicle efficiency, to accelerate the development and deployment of a new generation of electric and other low or zerocompetitively priced low emission vehicles, including through breakthroughs in engines, batteries and infrastructure; to explore and exploit the potential of alternative fuels and innovative and more efficient propulsion systems, including fuel infrastructure; to optimise the use of infrastructures, by means of intelligent transport systems and smart equipment; and to increase the use of demand management and public and non-motorised transport, particularly in urban areas.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1595 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 4 – point 4.3 – point c – paragraph 2
The focus of activities shall be to develop the next generation of innovative transport means and to prepare the ground for the following one, by working on competitively priced novel concepts and designs, smart control systems and interoperable standards, efficient production processes, shorter development times and reduced lifecycle costs.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1629 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 5 – point 5.2 – paragraph 2
The focus of Union actions shall therefore be on supporting key Union objectives and policies including: the Europe 2020 strategy; the Innovation Union; Resource- Efficient Europe and the corresponding Roadmap; the Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 205030; Adapting to climate change: Towards a European framework for action31; the Raw Materials Initiative32; the Union's Sustainable Development Strategy33; an Integrated Maritime Policy for the Union34; the Marine Strategy Framework Directive35; the Eco-innovation Action Plan and the Digital Agenda for Europe36. These actions shall reinforce the ability of society to become more resilient to environmental and climate change and ensure the availability of raw materials. These actions shall reinforce the ability of society to become more resilient to environmental and climate change and ensure the availability of raw materials.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1654 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 5 – point 5.3 – point d – paragraph 1
The aim is to foster all forms of eco- innovation that enable the transition to a green economy. Activities shall focus on: strengthening eco-innovative technologies, processes, services and products and boosting their market uptake at competitive prices and replication, with special attention for SMEs; supporting innovative policies and societal changes; measuring and assessing progress towards a green economy; and fostering resource efficiency through digital systems.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1745 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.3 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) strengthen security through border management, in particular with a view to combating illegal immigration into the Union;
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1773 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 1 – paragraph 2
Europe is facing a number of structural weaknesses when it comes to innovation capacity and the ability to deliver new services, products and processes. Among the main issues at hand are: Europe's relatively poor record in talent attraction and retention; the depletion of the technical and scientific skills that have historically characterised various regions; the underutilisation of existing research strengths in terms of creating economic or social value; low levels of entrepreneurial activity; a scale of resources in poles of excellence which is insufficient to compete globally; and an excessive number of barriers to collaboration within the knowledge triangle of higher education, research and business on a European level.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1780 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 2 – paragraph 6
The EIT, via its KICs, operates in line with business logic. Strong leadership is a pre- requisite: each KIC is driven by a CEO. KIC partners are represented by single legal entities to allow more streamlined decision-making. KICs must produce annual business plans, including an ambitious portfolio of activities from education to business creation, with clear targets and deliverables, looking for both market and societal impact and clear value added, determined by means of a results- based approach. The current rules concerning participation, evaluation and monitoring of KICs allow fast-track, business-like decisions.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1794 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 3 – point b – paragraph 1
The EIT’s strategy and activities shall be driven by a focus on societal challenges that are of utmost relevance to the future, such as climate change or sustainable energy. By addressing key societal challenges in a comprehensive way, the EIT will promote inter- and multi- disciplinary approaches and help focus the research efforts of the partners in the KICs.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1795 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 3 – point c – paragraph 1
The EIT shall fully integrate education and training at all stages of careers and develop new and innovative curricula to reflect the need for new profiles engendered by complex societal and economic challengesthe way in which society, the economy and the labour market are constantly changing. To this end, the EIT will play a key role in encouraging recognition of new degrees and diplomas in Member States.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1798 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 3 – point c – paragraph 2
The EIT will also play a substantial role in fine-tuning the concept of ‘entrepreneurship’ via its educational programmes, which promote entrepreneurship in a knowledge- intensive context, building on innovative research and contributing to solutions of high societal relevance.deleted
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1800 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 3 – point f – paragraph 1
The EIT will make a strong contribution to the objectives set in Horizon 2020, in particular by addressing societal challenges in a way complementing other initiatives in these areas. It will test out new and simplified approaches to funding and governance and thereby play a pioneering role within the European innovation landscape. Its approach to funding will be firmly based on a strong leverage effect, mobilising both public and private funds. Moreover, it will employ entirely new vehicles for targeted support to individual activities through the EIT Foundation.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1801 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – Part 5 – point 3 – point g – paragraph 1
Via the KICs and their co-location centres – nodes of excellence, brining together higher education, research and business partners in a given geographical location – the EIT will also be linked to regional policy. In particular, it shall ensure a better connection between higher education institutions, the labour market and regional and local innovation and growth, in the context of local, regional and national smart specialisation strategies. In doing so, it will contribute to the objectives of the Union’s Cohesion Policy.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 1809 #

2011/0401(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Breakdown of the budget – table
I Excellent science, of which: 2781827.1% 1. European Research Council 1500811.4% 2. Future and Emerging Technologies 35055.1% 3. Marie Curie actions on skills, training and career development 65037.4% 4. European research infrastructures (including eInfrastructures) 28023.2% II Industrial leadership, of which: 2028028.8% 1. Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies* 15580 of which 500 for EIT 17.8% 2. Access to risk finance** 40006.8% 3. Innovation in SMEs 7004.2% III Societal challenges, of which 3588839.2% 1. Health, demographic change and wellbeing; 9077 of which 292 for EIT15% 2. Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritime research and the 4694 of which 150 for EIT 5.3% and the bio- economy; 3. Secure, clean and efficient energy 6537 of which 210 for EIT5.2% 4. Smart, green and integrated transport 7690 of which 247 for EIT7.6% 5. Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials 3573 of which 115 for EIT 6. Inclusive, innovative and secure societies 1.2% 6. Inclusive, innovative and secure societies 4317 of which 138 for EIT.9% European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) 1542 + 1652*** Non-nuclear direct actions of the Joint Research Centre 2.4% Non-nuclear direct actions of the Joint Research Centre 2212 .5% TOTAL 87740 100%
2012/07/04
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 129 #

2011/0399(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) These rules for the participation and dissemination should provide a coherent, comprehensive and transparent framework to ensure the most efficient implementation possible, taking into account the need for easy access by all participants, notably small and medium-sized enterprises and Civil Society Organisations, in particular organisations of persons with disabilities, through simplified procedures. The financial assistance from the Union could be provided through different forms.
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 138 #

2011/0399(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) Accessibility of patent applications, standards, publications or any other dissemination tools, also in electronic form, relating to project results funded by Horizon 2020 requires the provision of accessible formats for all. Accessible formats include, but are not limited to, large print, Braille, easy-to-read text, audio, video, and electronic format.
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 148 #

2011/0399(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Horizon 2020 should provide for funding to cover all the additional costs related to the participation of researchers and participants with disabilities in projects funded by Horizon 2020. All disability-related additional costs shall be eligible costs. Such costs include, but are not limited, to sign language interpretation, Braille format, live text transcription, including velotyping systems, provision of personal assistance and the use of accessible buildings for events.
2012/07/02
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 404 #

2011/0399(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. AWithout prejudice to paragraph 4, a single reimbursement rate of the eligible costs shall be applied per action for all activities funded therein. The maximum rate shall be fixed in the work programme or work plan.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 422 #

2011/0399(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 4
4. The Horizon 2020 grant may reach a maximum of 100 % of the total eligible costs, without prejudice to the co- financing prinin particular for organisations of persons with disabilities for all projects in which they participlate.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 676 #

2011/0399(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. All patent applications, standards, publications or any other dissemination tools, also in electronic form, relating to results shall be made available and accessible, on an equal basis with others, to persons with disabilities.
2012/07/03
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 68 #

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 1 – point 1.2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Nurturing talent across borders and fostering entrepreneurship through knowledge triangle integration: The EIT nurtures people-driven innovation and puts students, researchers, and entrepreneurs at the heart of its efforts. It provides new career paths between academia and the private sector, and innovative schemes for professional development. The EIT label attached to innovative KICs' Masters and PhD programmes will contribute to creating an internationally recognized brand of excellence helping to attract talent from Europe and abroad, bearing in mind the distinctive features and the requirements of individual regions and facilitating the establishment and development of cultural districts in association with local industry. Entrepreneurship is fostered through a new generation of world-class students, equipped with the knowledge and attitudes to turn ideas into new business opportunities.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 87 #

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 5
Returns on EIT investment in KICs will be measured in terms of tangible benefits for the European economy and society at large, such as creation of new business, products and services in existing and future markets, better skilled entrepreneurial people, new and more attractive job opportunities, as well as by drawing on the strengths of local communities that are already symbols of excellence, and the attraction and retention of talent from across the EU and abroad.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 124 #

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 8 – introductory part
In view of the two waves of KIC selections foreseen in 2014 and 2018, threefour themes have been identified for the first wave. Reflecting the need for a gradual approach in establishing new KICs, the selection of the first threefour themes has been based on the maturity of the field, the potential societal and economic impact, as well as the opportunities for synergies with other initiatives. They are:
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 125 #

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 8 – point 1 a (new)
Added-value manufacturing
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 139 #

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 2 – point 2.1 – point 2.1.2 – paragraph 9
For the second wave in 2018, the remaining themes (urban mobility, added- value manufacturing and smart secure societies) will be considered, while taking into account new and unforeseen challenges which may arise in the future.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 152 #

2011/0387(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex – part 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 6
The EIT will therefore put in place a specific people scheme to ensure that talent – students, researchers, teaching staff and entrepreneurs at all career levels – beyond the co-location centres will be fully connected to the initiative. Such a scheme will not only provide top talents from beyond the KICs with the opportunity to benefit from the innovation environments created within the co-location centres, but will also provide them with incentives to make full use of the knowledge and know- how acquired in areas beyond the KICs. Typically, the EIT Foundation could play a significant role in this area.
2012/06/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 105 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Although initially foreseen, the EIT Foundation will not receive a direct contribution from the EU budget, the EU discharge procedure should not apply to it. deleted Or. it (Cf. amendment deleting Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point n)
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 120 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 4 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h
(aa) point (h) is replaced by the following: ‘(h) ensure complementarity, synergy and consistency between EIT activities and other Community programmes;’
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 127 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 5
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) education and training activities at masters and doctoral level, as well as professional training courses, in disciplines with the potential to meet the future European socio-economic needsneeds of the Union’s employment market and which promote the development of innovation-related skills, the improvement of managerial and entrepreneurial skills and the mobility of researchers and students;
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 145 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 6 – point c
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The minimum condition to form a KIC is the participation of at least three partner organisations, established in at least threewo different Member States. All these partner organisations must be independent of each other, within the meaning of Article 7 of the Rules for Participation.
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 155 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 9 – paragraph 3
(8a) In Article 9, paragraph 3 is amended as follows: ‘3. The EIT shall also take appropriate account of policies and initiatives at local, regional, Euroregional, national and intergovernmental levels in order to make use of best practices, well-established concepts and existing resources.’
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 157 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 10
(e) capital endowments, including those managed by the EIT Foundation; ; Or. it (Cf. amendment deleting Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point n)
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 160 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 13 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 16 – paragraph 2
(a) in pParagraph 2, the word "five" is replaced by the word "three"; is replaced by the following: ‘2. By June 2011, and every three years after the entry into force of a new financial framework, the Commission, after consulting stakeholders at both European and national level, shall present a report on the evaluation of the activities of the EIT and the KICs. The report shall assess the criteria for determining the added value of the EIT and also assess its impact and the effectiveness, sustainability, efficiency and relevance of the activities pursued and their relationship, consistency and/or complementarity with existing national and Community policies to support higher education, research and innovation.’
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 161 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 17 – paragraph 2 a
2 a. The SIA shall include an analysis of the mutual consistency of, and potential synergies and complementarities between, EIT activities and other Union initiatives, instruments and programmes."
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 163 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 19
The financial envelope from Horizon 2020 for the implementation of this Regulation during the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 is set at EUR 3.182,230 million The ashall be laid down by Article 6(3) of Regulation (EU) No [XXX/XXXX] establishing Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020). Annual appropriations shall be authorised by the budgetary authority within the limits of the financial framework. The EIT financial contribution to the KICs shall be provided under this financial envelope. Or. it (Cf. Article 6(3) of the proposal for a regulation, COM(2011)809.)
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 164 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 15 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 20 – paragraph 1
(15a) Article 20(1) is replaced by the following: ‘1. The expenditure of the EIT shall include staff, administrative, management, infrastructure and operational expenses. Administrative, management and operational expenses shall be kept to a minimum, on the basis of criteria relating to economy, efficiency and effectiveness.’
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 165 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 20
Regulation (EC) No 294/2008
Article 22 a
In the event of winding up of the EIT, its liquidation shall intervene under the supervision of the Commission in conformity with the laws applicable. The agreements with the KICs and the act establishing the EIT Foundation shall lay down the appropriate provisions in such situation." Or. it (Cf. amendment deleting Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point n)
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 166 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 1
2. There shall be 12a maximum of six appointed members, appointed by the Commission, providing a balance between those with experience in business (including SMEs), higher education and research. They shall have a four-year non- renewable term of office.
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 168 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 3
The Commission shall have regard to the balance between higher education, research, innovation and business experience as well as to gender balance and an appreciation of the higher education, research and innovation environments across the Union.
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 169 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 4
The Commission shall appoint the member(s) andfter informing the European Parliament and the Council about the selection process and the final appointment of those members of the Governing Board. Before the Commission makes any such appointments, Parliament and the Council may express an opinion concerning the candidates selected.
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 170 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 1 – point 2 – paragraph 6
During a transitional period, the Board members initially appointed for a six year period shall complete their mandate. Until that time there shall be 18 appointed members. Within six months after entry into force of this regulation, one third of twelvehe six members appointed in 2012 shall be chosen by the Governing Board with the Commission approval to serve for a two year period, one third for a four year period and one third for a six year period. Or. it (Cf. amendment to section 1, point 2, paragraph 1)
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 172 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 1 – point 4
4. The Governing Board members shall act in the interests of the EIT, safeguarding its goals and mission, identity and coherence, in an independent way. They shall carry out their duties on an exclusive, full-time basis.
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 173 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point g
g) define, with the Commission’s agreement, appropriate honoraria for members of the Governing Board and of the Executive Committee; these honoraria shall be benchmarked againstset at the average level of similar provision in the Member States;
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 176 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point n
(n) be empowered to establish a Foundation (hereinafter referred to as the BIT Foundation) with the specific objective of promoting and supporting the activities of the EIT;deleted
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 179 #

2011/0384(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex – section 2 – point 1 – point o
o) decide on EIT’s language regime, taking into account the existing legislation and principles on multilingualism and the practical requirements of its operations;
2012/07/10
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the non-CO2 related climate impacts associated with emissions from civil aviation caused by aircraft stopovers at Member State airports;
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) meeting the greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments of Member States under Decision No 406/2009/EC and achieving further long-term emission reductions and enhancements of removals by sinks in all sectors in line with the Union’s objective to reduce emissions by 80 to 95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels, in the context of necessary reductions, according to the IPCC, by developed countries as a group.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) meeting the greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments of Member States under Decision No 406/2009/EC and achieving long-term emission reductions and enhancements of removals by sinks in all sectors in line with the Union’s objective to reduce emissions by 80 to 95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels, in the context of necessary reductions, according to the IPCC, by developed countries as a group.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 66 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) meeting the greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments of Member States under Decision No 406/2009/EC and achieving further long-term emission reductions and enhancements of removals by sinks in all sectors in line with the Union’s objective to reduce emissions by 80 to 95% by 2050 compared to 1990 levels, in the context of necessary reductions, according to the IPCC, by developed countries as a group.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8
Article 8 Committee procedure Approximated greenhouse gas inventories Member States shall by 31 July each year ('year X') submit to the Commission approximated greenhouse gas inventories for the year X-1. The Commission shall, on the basis of the Member States’ approximated greenhouse gas inventories or, where necessary on the basis of its own estimates, annually compile a Union approximated greenhouse gas inventory. The Commission shall make this information available to the public each year by 30 September.deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 148 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) compiling the Union approximated greenhouse gas inventory, pursuant to Article 8 of this Regulation;deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 150 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) compiling the Union approximated greenhouse gas inventory;deleted
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 151 #

2011/0372(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29 of this Regulation to set out detailed reporting rules, including rules on the content, structure, format and submission processes for Member States' reporting of information pursuant to Articles 4, 5, 7, 8 and 13 to 19 of this Regulation.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 189 #

2011/0339(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.2
1.2. Health innovation and e-Health: increasing the interoperability of patient registers and other e-Health solutions, including voluntary use of a health card containing relevant patient information; supporting European cooperation on e- Health, notably on registries and uptake by health professionals. This will serve the European voluntary network on e-Health set up by the Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2012/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 191 #

2011/0339(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 1 – point 1.5 a (new)
1.5a. Support for the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020, especially in the area for action relating to health.
2012/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 203 #

2011/0339(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.4
2.4. Safety: improve the prudent use of antimicrobial agents in medicinal products and reduce the practices that increase antimicrobial resistance; reduce the burden of resistant infections and healthcare- associated infections and secure the availability of effective antimicrobials; promote the establishment of a European system of interoperable national registers of patients who, as a result of medical errors or vaccine therapies, have contracted serious diseases, chronic illnesses, or disabilities, one of its aims being to encourage Member States to grant fair compensation to such patients and allow them to receive appropriate treatments free of charge.
2012/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 206 #

2011/0339(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 2 – point 2.5
2.5. Actions required by or contributing to the implementation of Union legislation in the fields of tissues and cells, blood, and organs (including awareness raising to encourage unpaid voluntary donation), medicinal products use and patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Such action may include activities aimed at ensuring the implementation, application, monitoring and review of that legislation.
2012/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2011/0339(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – point 3 – point 3.2
3.2. Chronic diseases: support European cooperation and networking on preventing and improving the response to chronic diseases including cancer, by sharing knowledge, good practice and developing joint activities on prevention. Cancer: fFollow- up work already undertaken; set up a European cancer information system with comparable data; support cancer screening, including voluntary accreditation mechanisms; support the development of European guidelines for prevention where major inequalities exist.
2012/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7a Fund for the compensation of environmental damage An ‘Environmental damage guarantee fund’ shall be set up at the Commission for the compensation of damage caused by offshore activities.
2012/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 34 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 b (new)
Article 7b Amount of the guarantee fund The amount of the guarantee fund referred to in Article 7a shall be 5% of the value of the offshore activity and shall be paid by the licensee or any entity participating in the offshore operations on the basis of a contract with the licensee. The payment to the guarantee fund shall in no way be charged to final purchasers of products put on the market by the licensee.
2012/07/19
Committee: JURI
Amendment 121 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7a Environmental damages fund An ‘environmental damages guarantee fund’ shall be set up with the Commission for the repair of damage caused by offshore activity.
2012/08/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 b (new)
Article 7b Amount of the guarantee fund The amount of the guarantee fund referred to in Article 7a shall be 5% of the value of the offshore activity and shall be paid by the licensee or any participant in the offshore operations under contract with the licensee. The payment to the guarantee fund shall in no way be charged to final purchasers of products put on the market by the licensee.
2012/08/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority shall prohibit the operation or bringing into operation of any installation or any part thereof where the measures proposed by the operator for the prevention and mitigation of major accidents pursuant to Articles 10, 11, 13 and 14 are considered seriously deficient.
2012/08/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. Requests for information obtained by the competent authority under this Regulation may be refused where the conditions laid down in Article 4(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council are fulfilled.
2012/08/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 225 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 2 – point 13
(13) a description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected, an assessment of the identified potential environmental effects, in particular releases of dangerous substances or pollutants to the environment, and a description of the technical and non-technical measures envisaged to prevent, reduce or offset them, including monitoring.
2012/08/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 226 #

2011/0309(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part 3 – point 14
(14) a description of the aspects of the environment likely to be significantly affected, an assessment of the identified potential environmental effects, in particular releases of dangerous substances or pollutants to the environment, and a description of the technical and non-technical measures envisaged to prevent, reduce or offset them, including monitoring.
2012/08/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 68 #

2011/0300(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 2
Projects, which are withdrawn from the Union-wide list, lose all rights and obligations arising from this Regulation for projects of common interest. This article shall be without prejudice to any Union financing paid to the project prior to the withdrawal decision.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #

2011/0300(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall endeavour to ensure that appeals challenging the substantive or procedural legality of a comprehensive decision are handled in the swiftest and most efficient way possible.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 143 #

2011/0300(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – point 2 – point b
(b) Competent authorities shall ensure that public consultation procedures for projects of common interest are as concentrated whereas possible. Each public consultation shall cover all subject matters relevant to the particular stage of the procedure, and one subject matter relevant to the particular stage of the procedure shall not be addressed in more than one public consultation. The subject matters addressed by a public consultation shall be clearly indicated in the notification of the public consultation.
2012/03/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 14 #

2011/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) EU ETS operators will be subject to the Market Abuse provisions on emission allowances upon changes in the MiFID Directive, and their presence on the emission allowances market is due to compliance under the EU ETS and binding EU Climate Policy obligations.
2012/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 16 #

2011/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) As a consequence of the classification of emission allowances as financial instruments as part of the review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, those instruments will also come within the scope of this Regulation. Bearing in mind the specific nature of those instruments and structural features of the carbon market, it is necessary to ensure that the activity of Member States, the European Commission and other officially designated bodies involving emission allowances is not restricted in the pursuit of the Union’s climate policy. Moreover, the duty to disclose inside information needs to be addressed to the participants in that market in general. Nevertheless, in order to avoid exposing the market to reporting that is not useful and as well as to maintain cost- efficiency of the measure foreseen, it appears necessary to limit the regulatory impact of that duty to only those EU ETS operators,emission allowance market participants that – by virtue of their size and activity – can reasonably be expected to be able to have a significant effect on the price of emission allowances. Where emission allowance market participantEU ETS (Emissions Trading System) operators already comply with equivalent inside information disclosure duties, notably pursuant to Regulation on energy market integrity and transparency (Regulation (EU) No…of the European Parliament and the Council on Wholesale Energy Market Integrity and Transparency), the obligation to disclose inside information concerning emission allowances should not lead to the duplication of mandatory disclosures with substantially the same content.
2012/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 19 #

2011/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 42
(42) The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty. In particular, delegated acts should be adopted in respect of the conditions for buy-back programmes and stabilisation of financial instruments, the indicators for manipulative behaviour listed in Annex 1, the thresholds for determining the application of the public disclosure obligation to emission allowance market participantEU ETS operators, the conditions for drawing up insider lists and the threshold and conditions relating to managers’ transactions. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
2012/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2011/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The first subparagraph shall not apply to an emission allowance market participant EU ETS operator where the installations or aviation activities that it owns, controls or is responsible for, in the preceding year have had emissions not exceeding a minimum threshold of 3 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent and, where they carry out combustion activities, have had a rated thermal input not exceeding a minimum threshold of 300 MW.
2012/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #

2011/0295(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 32 concerning the supplementing and amending of the conditions for buy- back programmes and stabilisation of financial instruments, the definitions in this Regulation, the thresholds for determining the application of the public disclosure obligation to EU ETS operators, the conditions for drawing up insider lists, the conditions relating to managers’ transactions and the arrangements for persons who provide information that may lead to the detection of breaches of this Regulation.
2012/05/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the impact of climate changeextreme weather phenomena and of potential natural and man-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users.
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) adequate consideration of the vulnerability of transport infrastructure with regard to a changing climateextreme weather phenomena as well as natural and man- made disasters.
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 49 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – point g
(g) improve resilience to climate changeextreme weather phenomena;
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 50 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – title
Climate change proven infrastructureInfrastructure resilience to extreme weather phenomena and disaster resiliences
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 51 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters shall give due consideration to the risk assessments and adaptation measures adequately improving the resilience to climate changeextreme weather phenomena, in particular in relation to precipitation, floods, storms, high temperature and heat waves, low temperature and cold spells, droughts, sea level rise and coastal surges, in compliance with any requirement which may be set out in relevant Union legislation.
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 1
– the development of rest areas approximatelyt least every 50 kilometres on motorways in order to improve road safety and inter alia to provide sufficient parking space for commercial road users with an appropriate level of safety and security;
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 59 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 3 a (new)
- a plan agreed with the regional and local authorities concerned for remediation works to facilitate acceptance of the infrastructure by local populations;
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 61 #

2011/0294(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 4
– risk assessment, including the possible impacts of climate changeextreme weather phenomena on the infrastructure and where appropriate proposed measures to enhance climate resilience;
2012/07/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 80 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) To ensure the sustainable development of rural areas, it is necessary to focus on a limited number of core priorities relating to knowledge transfer and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas, the competitiveness of all types of agriculture and farm viability, food chain organisation, short supply chains and risk management in agriculture, restoring, preserving and enhancing ecosystems dependant on agriculture and forestry, resource efficiency and the shift towards a low carbon economy in the agricultural, food and forestry sectors, and promoting social inclusion, poverty reduction and the economic development of rural areas. In doing so account must be taken of the diversity of situations that affect rural areas with different characteristics or different categories of potential beneficiaries and the cross-cutting objectives of innovation, environment and climate change mitigation and adaptation. Mitigation action should relate to both limiting emissions in agriculture and forestry from key activities such as livestock production, fertilizer use and to preserving the carbon sinks and enhancing carbon sequestration with regard to land use, land use change and the forestry sector. The Union priority for rural development relating to knowledge transfer and innovation in agriculture, forestry and rural areas should apply horizontally in relation to the other Union priorities for rural development.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 87 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) In order to ensure the immediate start and efficient implementation of rural development programmes, support from the EAFRD should be based on the existence of sound administrative framework conditions. Member States should therefore assess compliance with certain ex ante conditionalities. Each Member State should prepare either a national rural development programme for its entire territory or a set of regional programmes. Each programme should identify a strategy for meeting targets in relation to the Union priorities for rural development and a selection of measures. Programming should comply with Union priorities for rural development, while being adapted to national and regional contexts and complement the other Union policies, in particular the agricultural market policy, cohesion policy and the common fisheries policy. If a Member States which opts for a set of national and/or regional programme should be able to also prepare a ns, the National fFramework, without a separate budgetary allocation, in order to facilitate co-ordination among the regions in addressing nation-wide challeng should comprise common elements to ensure coherence and links between the national strategy and regional strategies.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 90 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Member States should be able to include in their rural development programmes thematic sub-programmes to address specific needs in areas of particular importance to them. Thematic sub- programmes should concern among others young farmers, women in agriculture, small farms, mountain areas and the creation of short supply chains. Thematic sub-programmes should also be used to provide for the possibility to address restructuring of agricultural sectors which have a strong impact on the development of rural areas. As a means to increase the efficient intervention of such thematic sub- programmes Member States should be allowed to provide for higher support rates for certain operations covered by them.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 114 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
(18) Union or national quality schemes for agricultural products and food provide consumers with assurances on the quality and characteristics of the product or the production process used as a result of the participation of farmers in such schemes, achieve added value for the products concerned and enhance their market opportunities. Farmers should therefore be encouraged to participate in these schemes. Given that it is at the moment of entering such schemes and in the early years of their participation that additional costs and obligations imposed on farmers as a result of their participation are not fully remunerated by the market, support should be limited to new participation and cover a period of no more than five years. Given the special characteristics of cotton as a farm product, quality schemes for cotton should also be covered. In order to ensure the efficient and effective use of EAFRD budgetary resources, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the Union quality schemes that may be covered by this measure.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 120 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Member States with regional programmes mayshall also submit for approval a national framework containing common elements for these programmes without a separate budgetary allocation.
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 153 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Agri-environment-climate payments should continue to play a prominent role in supporting the sustainable development of rural areas and in responding to society's increasing demands for environmental services. They should further encourage farmers and other land managers to serve society as a whole by introducing or continuing to apply agricultural practices contributing to climate change mitigation and adaptation and compatible with the protection and improvement of the environment, the landscape and its features, natural resources, the soil and genetic diversity. In this context the conservation of genetic resources in agriculture and the additional needs of farming systems that are of high nature value should be given specific attention. Payments should contribute to covering additional costs and income foregone resulting from the commitments undertaken and should only cover commitments going beyond relevant mandatory standards and requirements, in accordance with the "polluter pays" principle. In many situations the synergies resulting from commitments undertaken jointly by a group of farmers multiply the environmental and climate benefit. However, joint action brings additional transaction costs which should be compensated adequately. In order to ensure that farmers and other land managers are in a position to correctly implement the commitments they have undertaken, Member States should endeavour to provide them with the required skills and knowledge. Member States should maintain the level of efforts made during the 2007-2013 programming period and have to spend a minimum of 25% of the total contribution from the EAFRD to each rural development programme for climate change mitigation and adaptation and land management, through the agri- environment-climate, organic farming and payments to areas facing natural or other specific constraints measures.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 181 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
(37) Farmers are exposed today to increasing economic and environmental risks as a consequence of climate change and increased price volatility. In this context, effective management of risks has an increased importance for farmers. For this reason a risk management measure should be set up to assist farmers in addressing the most common risks faced by them. This measure should therefore support farmers to cover the premiums they pay for crop, animal and plant insurance as well as the setting up of mutual funds and the compensation paid by such funds to farmers for losses suffered as a result of the outbreak of animal or plant diseases, adverse climatic events or environmental incidents. It should also cover an income stabilisation tool in the form of a mutual fund to support farmers facing a severe drop in their income. In order to ensure that there is equal treatment among farmers across the Union, that competition is not distorted and that the international obligations of the Union are respected, specific conditions should be provided for the granting of support under these measures. In order to ensure the efficient use of EAFRD budgetary resources the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of defining the minimum and maximum duration of commercial loans to mutual funds.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 237 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point t
(t) "short supply chain": a supply chain involving a limited number of economic operators, who have direct relations with consumers or are committed to co- operation, local economic development, and close geographical and social relations between producers and consumers;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 247 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point u
(u) "young farmer": farmer who is less than 40 years of age at the moment of submitting the application, possesses adequate occupational skills and competence and is setting up for the first time in an agricultural holding as head of the holding and/or who possesses adequate occupational skills and competence;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 257 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point x b (new)
(xb) “agricultural service-providers”: agromechanical entrepreneurs who provide, and are qualified to provide, professional agricultural services in rural areas and who, for hire or reward, perform work relating to field crops, livestock farming or management of woodland and green areas belonging to public authorities, where the use of large and technically advanced equipment and machinery is required.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 258 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point x c (new)
(xc) "agricultural services": performance by agricultural service-providers, for public and private procurers, of work in fields, such as that relating to field crops, livestock farming and the management of woodland and green areas.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 339 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
(a) facilitating restructuring of farms facing major structural problems, notably farms with a low degree of market participation, market-oriented farms in particular sectors and farms in need of agricultural diversificationand modernisation of farms;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 385 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
(b) supporting farm risk management:the management of farm risk generated by economic, environmental and social factors.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 460 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. A Member State may submit either a single programme for its entire territory or a set of regional programmes, a set of regional programmes or a set of national and regional programmes. If a Member State opts for a set of national and regional programmes, each measure or type of operation shall be programmed at national or regional level.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 466 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Member States with regional programmes may also submit for approval a national framework containing common elements for these programmes without a separate budgetary allocation. If a Member State opts for a set of national and regional programmes, the national framework shall contain the common elements so as to ensure consistency and linkage between its national and regional strategies.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 475 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) young farmers and women in agriculture;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 505 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) the development and promotion of agricultural products, including organic products, bearing official quality labels.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 597 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
In addition to tThe ex ante conditionalities referred to in Annex IV, the general ex ante conditionalities established in Annex IV of Regulation (EU) No [CSF/2012] shall apply for the EAFRD shall apply for EAFRD programmes if they are relevant and applicable to the specific objectives pursued in accordance with those programmes’ priorities.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 636 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Each rural development measure shall be programmed to contribute specifically to the achievement of one or more Union priorities for rural development. An indicative list of measures of particular relevance to the Union priorities is set out in Annex V.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 758 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Support under this measure shall cover new participation by farmers, also through producer group associations and agri-food companies, cover new participation by farmers or previous participation during the 2007-2013 programming period in:
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 794 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Support shall be granted as an annual incentive payment, the level of which shall be determined according to the level of the fixed costs arising from participation in supported schemes, for a maximum duration of five years. Payments shall be made annually on presentation of the necessary documentation. However, the producer shall make a single application covering a five-year period.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 798 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For the purposes of this paragraph, 'fixed costs' means the costs incurred for entering a supported quality scheme and the annual contribution for participating in that scheme, including, where necessary, expenditure on checks required to verify compliance with the specifications of the scheme. The costs of the checks incurred by producer group associations which have submitted an application for recognition of a quality label shall be admissible from the commencement of the transitional period, that is to say while the documents are being forwarded by the Member State to the Commission.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 835 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) concern infrastructure related to the development and adaptation of agriculture, including access to farm and forest land, land consolidation and improvement, energy supply and, water management and hydro storage to sustain farming and in particular crop systems; or
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 848 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) are non productive investments linked to the achievement of agri- and forest- environment commitments, biodiversity conservation status of species and habitat as well as enhancing the public amenity value of a Natura 2000 area or other high nature value area to be defined in the programme.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 875 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2
2. Support under paragraph 1(a) shall be granted to agricultural holdings. In the case of investments to support farm restructuring, only farms not exceeding a certain size, to be defined by the Member States in the programme based on the SWOT analysis carried out in relation to the Union priority for rural development “enhancing competitiveness of all types of agriculture and enhancing farm viability”, shall be eligibleindividual or combined agricultural holdings and agricultural service providers.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 892 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. Support under this measure shall be limited to the maximum support rates laid down in Annex I. These maximum rates may be increased for young farmers, women in agriculture, collective investments and integrated projects involving support under more than one measure, investments in areas facing significant natural constraints as referred to in Article 33(3) and operations supported in the framework of the EIP for agricultural productivity and sustainability in accordance with the support rates laid down in Annex I. However, the maximum combined support rate may not exceed 90%.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 894 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 4
4. Paragraph 3 shall not apply to investments referred to in paragraph 1(c) and non- productive investments referred to in paragraph 1(d).
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 911 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 2
2. Support shall be granted to farmers or groups of farmers and undertakings engaged in the processing and/or marketing of products listed in Annex 1 of the Treaty. Support may also be granted to public entities where a link between the investment undertaken by such entities and agricultural production potential is established.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 922 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) young farmers and women in agriculture;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 929 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) non-agricultural activities and provision of agricultural services in rural areas;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 938 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) investments in non-agricultural activities and provision of agricultural services;
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 962 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Support under paragraph 1(a)(i) shall be granted to young farmers and women in agriculture.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 979 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Support under paragraph 1(a)(ii) shall be granted to farmers or members of the farm household diversifying into non- agricultural activities and to non- agricultural micro- and small- enterprises and the provision of agricultural services in rural areas.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 993 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Support under paragraph 1(b) shall be granted to non- agricultural micro- and small- enterprises in rural areas and to farmers or members of the farm household and micro- and small- enterprises providing agricultural services.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1012 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Support under paragraph 1(a)(i) may be used also for the purchase and/or lease of: (a) land; (b) equipment and machinery; (c) barns; taking the form of a bank guarantee for lease and/or purchase contracts for land and related capital investments. In such cases, the support shall be added to the flat-rate payment and subject to the rates specified in Annex I in accordance with the provisions of Article 18.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1062 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) investments by public and private bodies in recreational infrastructure, tourist information and sign-posting of touristic sites;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1077 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3
3. Investments under paragraph 1 shall be eligible for support where the relevant operations are implemented in accordance with plans for the development of municipalities in rural areas and their basic services, where such plans exist and shall by are consistent with any local development strategy, where one exists.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1120 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(a) shall be granted to private land-owners and tenants, to other land managers, and to municipalities and their associations and shall cover the costs of establishment and an annual premium per hectare to cover the costs of agricultural income foregone and maintenance, including early and late cleanings, for a maximum period of ten years.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1142 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(b) shall be granted to private land public owners, tenants, other land managers and municipalities and their associations and shall cover the costs of establishment and an annual premium per hectare to cover the costs of maintenance for a maximum period of threeseven years.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1188 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
In the case of preventive actions concerning pests and diseases, the risk of a relevant disaster occurrence must be supported by scientific evidence and acknowledged by scientific public organisations. Where relevant, the list of species of organisms harmful to plants which may cause a disaster must be provided in the programme.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1204 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. Support under paragraph 1(d) shall be subject to the formal recognition by the competent public authorities of Member States that a natural disaster has occurred and that this disaster, or measures adopted in accordance with Directive 2000/29/EC to eradicate or contain a plant disease or pest has caused the destruction of at least 3015% of the relevant forest potential. This percentage shall be determined on the basis of either the average existing forest potential in the three-year period immediately preceding the disaster or on the average of the five-year period immediately preceding the disaster, excluding the highest and the lowest entry.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1213 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(d) shall be granted to natural persons, private forest owners, private law, public and semi- public bodies, municipalities and their associations. In the case of state forests support may also be granted to bodies managing such forests, which are independent from the state budget.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1228 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1
1. Support under Article 22(1)(e) shall be granted to private forest owners, municipalitieand public land-owners and tenants and to otheir associationland managers and to SMEs for investments enhancing forestry potential or relating to processing and marketing adding value to forest products. In the territories of the Azores, Madeira, the Canary islands, the smaller Aegean islands within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 2019/93 and the French overseas departments support may also be granted to enterprises that are not SMEs.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1296 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. Agri-environment-climate payments shall be granted to farmers, groups of farmers or groups of farmers and other land-managers who undertake, on a voluntary basis, to carry out operations consisting ofwhich correspond to one or more agri- environment-climate commitments on agricultural land. Where duly justified to achieve environmental objectives, agri- environment-climate payments may be granted to other land- managers or groups of other land- managers.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1301 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Agri-environment-climate payments cover only those commitments going beyond the relevant mandatory standards established pursuant to Chapter I of Title VI of Regulation (EU) No HR/2012 and other relevant obligations established under Chapter 2 of Title III of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012, relevant minimum requirements for fertiliser and plant protection products use as well as other relevant mandatory requirements established by national legislation. All such mandatory requirements shall be identified in the programme.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1313 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall endeavosure to providehat persons undertaking to carry out operations under this measure withhave the opportunity to acquire the knowledge and information required to implement them, including by setting up commitment-related expert advice and/or by making support under this measure conditional to relevant trainingsory services.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1333 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 6
6. Payments shall be granted annually and shall compensate beneficiaries for all or part of the additional costs and income foregone resulting from the commitments made. Where necessary they may also cover transaction costs to a value of up to 20% of the premium paid for the agri- environment-climate commitments. Where commitments are undertaken by groups of farmers and/or by other land managers, the maximum level shall be 30%.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1336 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Where commitments under this measure include the implementation of greening measures in preparation for meeting other commitments under the measure, these greening measures may be compensated within the measure. In that case they may not receive support as 'non- productive investments' under Article 18(1)(d).
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1397 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Payments to farmers in mountain areas and other areas facing natural or other specific constraints shall be granted annually per hectare of UAA in order to compensate farmers for additional costs and income foregone related to the constraints for agricultural production in the area concerned, and to avoid the risk of those areas being abandoned owing to their low profitability.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1430 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
In order to be eligible for payments under Article 32, mountain areas shall be characterized by a considerable limitation of the possibilities for using the land as well as low profitability and by an appreciable increase in production costs due to:
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1519 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) joint action undertaken with a view to mitigating or adapting to climate change, such as measures relating to water management and storage to sustain farming and in particular agricultural systems;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1570 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) an income stabilisation tool, in the form of financial contributions toa mutual funds, to providinge compensation to farmers who experience a severe drop in their income.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1648 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
The financial contributions referred to in Article 37(1)(c) may only relate to the amounts paid by the mutual fund as financial compensation to farmers. In addition, the financial contribution may relate to interest on commercial loans taken out by the mutual fund for the purpose of paying the financial compensation to farmers in case of crisis.deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1655 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Support under Article 37(1)(c) may take the form of a financial contribution towards farmers’ payments into the mutual fund. Member States shall lay down rules governing farmers’ contributions to the fund.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1678 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
In cases where co-operation projects are not selected by the local action groups, Member States shall establish a system of ongoing application for co-operation projects.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1686 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. In order to be eligible for EAFRD support investment operations shall be preceded by an assessment of the expected environmental impact in accordance with legislation specific to that kind of investment where the investment is likely to have negative effects on the environment.deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1715 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 3
3. In the case of irrigation, onlynew investments that lead to a reduction of previous water use by at least 25% shall be considered as eligible expenditure. By way of derogation, in the Member States that adhered to the Union from 2004 onwards investments in new irrigation installations can, including measures to sustain farming and crop systems and/or to modernise existing systems for the improvement of water use efficiency, shall be considered as eligible expenditure in cases where an environmental analysis provides evidence that the investment concerned is sustainable and has no negative environmental impact.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1729 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 50 – paragraph 1
For the purposes of this Regulation the Managing Authority"rural area" shall be define "rural area" at programmd at Member State level.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1889 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1
1. EIP operational groups shall form part of the EIP for agricultural productivity and sustainability. They shall be set up by interested actors such as farmers, collective entities, land and irrigation managers, researchers, advisors and businesses involved in the agriculture and food sector.
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1994 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 1
The funds transferred to the EAFRD in application of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No DP/2012 shall be reserved for operations which provide a significant contribution to innovation relevant to agricultural productivity and sustainability, including climate mitigation or adaptation.deleted
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2000 #

2011/0282(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 4
4. PExcept for forms of support under Article 57(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) [CSF/2012], payments by beneficiaries shall be supported by invoices and documents proving payment. Where this cannot be done, payments shall be supported by documents of equivalent probative value, except for forms of support under Article 57(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) [CSF/2012].
2012/07/26
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 440 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In order to assist farms whose activities are mostly seasonal, such as fruit and vegetables, or wine, for which more staff are employed at certain times of the year, and to facilitate employment for workers who are considered to be at risk of social exclusion, a system of work vouchers for the payment of casual labour should be introduced, along the lines of the system provided for under Italian legislation.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 510 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 85 a (new)
(85a) Data collected by the Farm Accountancy Data Network should be taken into consideration when formulating studies and research with the aim of preventing crises in the various agricultural sectors, given that they reflect the performance of farms. These data should be a useful tool for crisis prevention and management.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 530 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 94 a (new)
(94a) However, the implementation of international agreements should not depart from the principle of reciprocity, particularly with regard to tariffs, plant health and the environment, and it should be carried out so as to ensure strict compliance with the mechanisms for entry prices, specific additional duties and compensatory levies.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 655 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) common and durum wheat, barley and maize;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 721 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) for common and durum wheat, barley, maize, paddy rice, sorghum and skimmed milk powder shall be equal to the respective reference prices fixed in Article 7 in the case of buying-in at a fixed price and shall not exceed the respective reference prices in the case of buying-in by tendering;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 728 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. The public intervention prices referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be without prejudice to price increases or reductions for quality reasons for common and durum wheat, barley, maize, sorghum and paddy rice. Moreover, taking into account the need to ensure that production is orientated towards certain varieties of paddy rice, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 to fix increases and reductions of the public intervention price.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 744 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Aid for private storage mayshall be granted in respect of the products referred to in Article 1(2) and the following products, subject to the conditions set out in this Section and to requirements and conditions to be adopted by the Commission, by means of delegated and/or implementing acts, pursuant to Article 17 to 19:
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 817 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160, where necessary in order to provide for market transparency to lay down the conditions under which it may decide to grant private storage aid for the products listed in Article 16, taking into account average recorded Union market prices and, the reference prices forand production costs of the products concerned or the need to respond to a particularly difficult market situation or economic developments in the sector in one or more Member States.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 835 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. To implement the measure for the products referred to in point (g) of Article 1(2), in relation to specific areas of production, the Commission may, by means of delegated acts: (a) link the granting of aid to respective gross margins; (b) limit the placing of the stored product on the market to the period of February to August, to prevent any overlapping with the start of the new marketing year; (c) incentivise the placing of the stored product on third-country markets, through measures – such as a targeted promotion campaign together with the supply of a 'service package' – designed to facilitate the placing of the product on the markets of 'developing countries'. The measure shall be limited to the first three months of storage.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 878 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) the conditions according to which it may be decided that products covered by private storage contracts may be re- marketed or disposed of, seeking to avoid re-marketing in certain periods in order to eliminate problems of supply surpluses;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 967 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) the dissemination of information on measures carried out by operators’ organisations and on traceability and certification systems to improve the quality of olive oil and table olives;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 978 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) 7590 % for activities in the areas referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 981 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 7590 % for fixed assets investments and 560 % for other activities in the area referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1;
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1037 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f
f) support for the administrative costs of setting up and maintaining mutual funds.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1070 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 a (new)
Article 34a 1. Member States may establish a national fruit and vegetable network that unites the organisations, associations and authorities involved in implementing the national strategy. 2. The network shall be financed by a maximum levy of 0.5% of the Community share of the financing of the operational funds and its aim shall be: to manage the network, examine transferable good practices and gather the relevant information, organise conferences and seminars for those involved in managing the national strategy, conduct programmes to monitor and assess the national strategy and carry out other activities identified by the national strategy.
2012/07/20
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1106 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
(ha) use of concentrated grape must in accordance with Article 49(a);
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1107 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, Member States may grant national aid in accordance with the relevant Community rules on State aid for the measures referred to in Articles 43, 47 and 48.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1116 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1
1. Support under this Article shall cover information or promotion measures concerning Union wines in third countries and on the internal market, thereby improving their competitiveness in those countries.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1123 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) information campaigns, in particular on the Union systems covering designations of origin, geographical indications and organic production; to that end it would be desirable for agreements to be concluded with major retail chains in third countries to ensure that the information given to consumers about these products in sales outlets is as clear as possible;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1135 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2
2. Support for green harvesting shall contribute to improving the quality of the grapes and restoring the balance of supply and demand in the Union wine market in order to prevent market crises.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1139 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1
1. Support for the setting up and consolidation of mutual funds shall provide assistance to producers seeking to insure themselves against market fluctuations.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1142 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2
2. Support for the setting up and consolidation of mutual funds may be granted in the form of temporary and degressive aid to cover the administrative costs of the funds.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1160 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Support may be granted for tangible or intangible investments, including the registration of collective marks, in processing facilities, winery infrastructure, distilleries and marketing of wine which improve the overall performance of the enterprise and concern one or more of the following:
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1193 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 a (new)
Article 49a Use of concentrated grape must 1. Support may be granted to wine producers who use concentrated grape must, including rectified concentrated grape must, to increase the natural alcoholic strength of products, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Annex XVa. 2. The amount of the aid shall be fixed per % volume potential alcoholic strength and per hectolitre of the must used for enrichment. 3. The maximum applicable aid levels for this measure in the different wine growing zones shall be fixed by the Commission.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1233 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 3
3. A product shall be considered as conforming to the general marketing standard where the product intended to be marketed is in conformity with an applicable standard adopted by any of the international organisations listed in Annex V.deleted
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1235 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 57
Article 57 Delegated powers Taking into account the need to address changes in the market situation, and the specificity of each sector, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 to adopt, modify and derogate from the requirements concerning general marketing standard referred to in Article 56(1), and rules on conformity referred to in Article 56(3).deleted
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1240 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Fruit and vegetables that are intended to be sold to consumers as fresh products may be marketed only if they are of sound, fair and marketable quality and if the country of origin is indicated.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1242 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 1
1. Taking into account the expectations of consumers and the need to improve the economic conditions for the production and marketing of agricultural products as well as their quality, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 on marketing standards referred to in Article 55, at all stages of the marketing, as well as derogations and exemptions from such standards to adapt to the constantly changing market conditions, to the evolving consumer demands, to developments in relonly for a limited time and in exceptional cases, or in the evaent international standards and avoid creating obstacles to product innovationof market crises.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1244 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The marketing standards referred to in paragraph 1 may cover one or more of the following requirements, determined on a sectoral or product basis, and based on the characteristics of each sector, on the need to regulate the placing on the market and on the conditions laid down in paragraph 3:
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1274 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the interest of consumers to receive adequate and transparent product information, including the place of farming to be determined on a case by case approach at the appropriate geographical levelby providing for the indication of the place of production;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1283 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) the standard recommendations adopted by international bodies in Annex V.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1284 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(ea) the possible risk of consumers being misled due to their expectations and habits, having regard to the availability and feasibility of informational means to exclude such risks;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1285 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 59 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Place of farming, in accordance with paragraph 3(c), shall mean the place of cultivation or breeding, namely the country from which the non-processed agricultural product, or product used in the preparation or production of a food, originates.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1296 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 3
3. Taking into account the need to adapt to evolving consumer demands, and technical progress and to avoid creating obstacles to product innovation, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 on modifications, derogations or exemptions to the definitions and sales descriptions provided for in Annex VI.deleted
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1299 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1
Taking into account the specificity of each sector, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 on tolerancerough the ordinary procedure a tolerance may be adopted for each standard beyond which the entire batch of products shall be considered as not respecting that standard.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1300 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 61 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In exceptional cases, or in the event of market crises and for a limited period of time, the Commission may adopt, by means of delegated acts, a tolerance for each standard beyond which the entire batch of products shall be considered as not respecting that standard.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1308 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The Commission shall, where necessary, adoptIn accordance with Article 43(2) of the Treaty, the methods referred to in point (d) of Article 59(3) for products listed in Part II of Annex VI by means of implementing actsshall be adopted. Those methods shall be based on any relevant methods recommended and published by the OIV, unless they would be ineffective or inappropriate in view of the legitimate objective pursued. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 162(2)
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1311 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 65 – paragraph 3
3. Member States may allow the experimental use of unauthorised oenological practices in accordance with the conditions specified by the Commission, by means of delegated acts adopted pursuant to paragraph 4.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1312 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 66 – paragraph 1
Taking into account the specificities in trade between the Union and certain third countries and the special character of some agricultural products, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 160 to defineensuring that consumers are not being misled due to their expectations and habits, the conditions under which imported products are considered to have an equivalent level of compliance with the Union marketing standards and conditions allowing derogation from Article 58 and determinemay be defined, through the ordinary procedure, and the rules concerning the application of the marketing standards to products exported from the Union may be determined.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1336 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 70 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
(da) include the name of the vine variety together with the geographical reference.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1350 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
2a. The specification shall consist at least of: (a) the name to be protected; (b) a description of the wine(s); (i) for wines with a designation of origin, the description of their principal analytical and organoleptic characteristics; (ii) for wines with a geographical indication, the description of their principal analytical characteristics in addition to an evaluation or indication of their organoleptic characteristics; (c) where applicable, the specific oenological practices used to make the wine(s) as well as the relevant restrictions on making the wine(s); (d) the demarcation of the geographical area concerned; (e) the maximum yields per hectare; (f) an indication of the wine grape variety or varieties the wine(s) is/are obtained from; (g) applicable requirements laid down in Union or national legislation or, where provided for by Member States, by an organisation which manages the protected designation of origin or the protected geographical indication, having regard to the fact that such requirements shall be objective, and non-discriminatory and compatible with Union law; (h) the name and address of the authorities or bodies verifying compliance with the provisions of the product specification and their specific tasks.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1361 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 80 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall take the steps necessary to stop the unlawful use of protected designations of origin or protected geographical indications within the meaning of paragraph 2.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1377 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the elements of the product specification;deleted
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1391 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 86 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) preliminary national procedure;deleted
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1414 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
(ga) an indication of the sugary substances used to increase the alcohol content of the wines.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1415 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 96 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. By way of derogation from point (ga) of paragraph 1, the indication may be omitted in the following cases: (a) for sparkling and semi-sparkling wines obtained from cuvées produced without the addition of any sugary substances; (b) for all grapevine products for which added sugary substances have been used, where the latter derive solely from grapes.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1616 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) concentration of supply and the direct placing on the market of the products produced by its members;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1645 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point c – point vii a (new)
(viia) taking action to improve quality, especially at the market placement stage;
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1650 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point c – point vii b (new)
(viib) implementing policies designed to strengthen producer organisations and associations of producer organisations from an organisational, commercial and financial point of view.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1656 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 106 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) do not hold a dominant position on a given market unless this is necessary in pursuance of the objectives of Article 39 of the Treaty.deleted
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1828 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 111 – paragraph 1
Where rules of a recognised producer organisation, a recognised association of producer organisations or a recognised interbranch organisation are extended under Article 110 and the activities covered by those rules are in the general economic interest of persons whose activities relate to the products concerned, the Member State which has granted recognition may decide that individuals or groups, in addition to processors and merchants, which are not members of the organisation but which benefit from those activities shall pay the organisation all or part of the financial contributions paid by its members to the extent that such contributions are intended to cover costs directly incurred as a result of pursuing the activities in question.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2179 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part IX – product line (new)
0714201 Sweet potatoes, fresh, whole, and intended for human consumption.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2204 #

2011/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex VI – Part I – point I – paragraph 2 – point B – introductory part
B) Category Z: bovine animals aged from 8 months to lessno more than 12 months
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 93 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Farmers who, in 2011, activated at least one payment entitlement under the single payment scheme or claimed support under the single area payment scheme, gross saleable agricultural production, added value or number of workers employed, both in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, shall receive payment entitlements the first year of application of the basic payment scheme provided they are entitled to be granted direct payments in accordance with Article 9.
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to have threewo different crops on their arable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 3 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year;
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 116 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 3 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the year, cultivation on the arable land shall consist of at least threewo different crops. Noneeither of those threewo crops shall cover less than 5 % of the arable land and the main one shall not exceed 70 % of the arable land.
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 127 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Areas under ligneous plants shall be deemed equivalent to reference areas under permanent grassland within the meaning of the previous paragraph.
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 133 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In order to take into account specific new elements and to guarantee the protection of the rights of beneficiaries, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of laying down further definitions regarding the access to support under this Regulation, establishing the framework within which Member States shall define the minimum activities to be carried out on areas naturally kept in a state suitable for grazing or cultivation as well as the criteria to be met by farmers in order to be deemed to have respected the obligation of maintaining the agricultural area in the state suitable for production and the criteria to detat is, any area taken up by arable land, permanent grassland and pasture or permiane the predominance of grasses and other herbaceous forage as regards permanent grasslandnt crops – in the state suitable for production.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 140 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. Farmers shall ensure that at least 73 % of their eligible hectares as defined in Article 25(2), excluding areas under permanent grassland, is ecological focus area such as land left fallow, terraces, landscape features, buffer strips and afforested areas as referred to in article 25(2)(b)(ii).
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 147 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 1
1. In order to finance the payment referred to in this Chapter, Member States shall use 320 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II.
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 155 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1
1. In order to finance the voluntary coupled support, Member States may decide, by 1 August of the year preceding the first year of implementation of such support, to use up to 520 % of their annual national ceiling set out in Annex II.
2012/05/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 179 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Due to the successive integration of various sectors into the single payment scheme and the ensuing period of adjustment granted to farmers, it has become increasingly difficult to justify the presence of significant individual differences in the level of support per hectare resulting from use of historical references. Therefore direct income support should be more equitably distributed between Member States, by reducing the link to historical references and having regard to the overall context of the Union budget. To ensure a more equal distribution of direct support, while taking account of the differences that still exist in wage levels and input costs, the levels of direct support per hectare should be progressively adjusted. Member States with direct payments below the level of 90 % of the average should close one third of the gap between their current level and this level. This convergence should be financed proportionally by all Member States with direct payments above the UnThe redistribution of direct payments should comply with the basic principles of Europa 2020, while highlighting the need to use Union resources for economic growth. To that end, direct payments should be redistributed on the basis of appropriate, objective and non-discriminatory criteria such as the value of agricultural production, averagedded value, labour and purchasing power. In addition, all payment entitlements activated in 201922 in a Member State or in a region should haveapproximate to or reach a uniform unit value following a convergence towards this value that should take place during the transition period in linear steps. However, in order to avoid disruptive financial consequences for farmeproductive sectors, Member States having used the single payment scheme, and in particular the historical model, should be allowed to partially take historical factors into account when calculating the value of payment entitlements in the first year of application of the new scheme. The debate on the next Multiannual Financial Framework for the period starting in 2021 should also focus on the objective of complete convergence through the equal distributionmay retain an element of differentiation in relation to direct support in order to take account of differecnt support across the European Union during that periodtypes of land use.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 233 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) One of the objectives of the new CAP is the enhancement of environmental performance through a mandatory "greening" component of direct payments which will support agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment applicable throughout the Union. For that purpose, Member States should use part of their national ceilings for direct payments to grant an annual payment, on top of the basic payment, for compulsory practices to be followed by farmers addressing, as a priority, both climate and environment policy goals. Those practisces should take the form of simple, generalised, non- contractual and annual actions that go beyond cross- compliance and are linked to agriculture such as crop diversification, maintenance of permanent grassland and pastures, of perennial crops associated with appropriate agronomic practices and of ecological focus areas. The compulsory nature of those practisces should also concern farmers whose holdings are fully or partly situated in "Natura 2000" areas covered by Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora and by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, as long as these practisces are compatible with the objectives of those Directives. Farmers who fulfil the conditions laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 should benefit from the "greening" component without fulfilling any further obligation, given the recognised environmental benefits of the organic farming systems. Non-respect of the "greening" compThe same should apply to farmers who sign up for agri-environmental programmes as an aspect of rural development or take part in a national certification scheme of recognised environmental value, or who comply with the environment should lead to penalties on the basis of Article 65 of Regulation (EU) No […] [HZR]al guidelines applicable to sustainable operational programmes under the Single CMO, or who adhere to agri-environmental schemes approved at national level.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 256 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) In order to ensure that the land under permanent grassland and permanent crops is maintained as such by the farmers, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission for the purpose of the adoption of rules concerning the application of the measure.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 270 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) In order to promote the sustainable development of agriculture in areas with specific natural constraints and abandoned areas, Member States should be able to use part of their national ceilings for direct payments to grant an annual area-based paymentpayment based on new criteria such as gross marketable output, added value or the number of workers employed, on top of the basic payment, to all farmers operating in such areas. That payment should not replace the support given under rural development programs and should not be granted to farmers in areas which were designated in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) but have not been designated in accordance with Article 46(1) of Regulation (EU) No […] of the European Parliament and of the Council of …. on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) [RDR].
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 277 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) (31) The creation and development of new economic activity in the agricultural sector by women and young farmers is financially challenging and constitutes an element that should be considered in the allocation and targeting of direct payments. This development is essential for the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in the Union and, for that reason, an income support to women and young farmers commencing their agricultural activities should be established in order to facilitate the initial establishment of women and young farmers and the structural adjustment of their holdings after the initial setting up. Member States should be able to use part of their national ceilings for direct payments to grant an annual area- based payment, on top of the basic payment, to young farmers. That payment should only be granted during a period of maximum five years, since it should only cover the initial period of the life of the business and should not become an operating aid.
2012/07/18
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 342 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
(iv) a payment for young farmers who commence their agricultural activity and for women in farming;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 550 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. No direct payments shall be granted to natural or legal persons, or to groups of natural or legal persons, whereMember States shall decide to grant direct payments to farmers in one of the following applicases:
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 588 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the annual amount of direct payments is lessmore than 5 % of the total receiptsincome they obtained from non-agricultural activities in the most recent fiscal year; or
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 610 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) their agricultural areas are mainly areas naturally kept in a state suitable for grazing or cultivation and they do not carry out on those areas the minimum activity established by Member States in accordance with Article 4(1)(c).;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 621 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) they are identified in a national public register, on the basis of objective criteria, as are farmers;
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 626 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) they devote a substantial amount of their working time to agricultural activities and earn a significant part of their income from such activities, in accordance with criteria established by the Member State.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 644 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to farmers who received less than EUR 52 000 of direct payments for the previous year, to holdings in mountain areas affected by natural constraints or to holdings which restore abandoned areas.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 655 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Entities such as transport companies, airports, real estate companies, companies managing sport grounds, motorway companies, campsites and mining companies shall not receive direct payments. After having notified the Commission, the Member States may decide to add other types of entity to those listed in paragraph 2a.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 776 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. The amount referred to in paragraph 1 shall be calculated by subtracting the salaries effectively paid and deccost of labour (salaries, wages and vouchers), calcularted by the farmer in the previous year, including taxes and social on a flat-rate basis per labour unit used, also taking into accountributions related to employment work done by family members, from the total amount of direct payments initially due to the farmer without taking into account the payments to be granted pursuant to Chapter 2 of Title III of this Regulation.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 835 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Before 1 August 2013, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom may decide to increase by a maximum of 10 points the percentage of their annual ceilings referred to in the first subparagraph.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 852 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) Should Article 20 of this Regulation be applied, the Member States may make available to the regions the amount referred to in the first subparagraph, in accordance with objective and non-discriminatory criteria.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 897 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, Member States in which certain types of livestock farms are particularly important for economic and/or social reasons may retain their special entitlements until 31 December 2020.
2012/07/19
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1263 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. FarmersMember States shall grant an annual payment for agricultural practices beneficial for the climate and the environment to farmers who are entitled to a payment under the basic payment scheme referred to in Chapter 1 shallwhen they observe on their eligible hectares as defined in Article 25(2) the following agricultural practises beneficial for the c, and in respect of which a greening applimcate and the environment: ion has been made, the following practices:
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1288 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to have threewo different crops on their arable land where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 315 and up to 20 hectares, and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the yearthree different crops where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 50 hectares;
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1323 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to maintain existing permanent grassland and pasture on their holding; and
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1330 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) to maintain existing permanent crops on their farms, together with specific agronomic practices; or
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1332 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) more than 70% of which is cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the growing cycle, or a combination of these.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1424 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Farmers shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this Chapter when they come within the following categories: – farmers complying with the requirements laid down in Article 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No° 834/2007 as regards organic farming shall be entitled ipso facto to the payment referred to in this Chapter, or – beneficiaries of agri-environment- climatic payments established pursuant to Article 39(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and/or Article 29 of Regulation (EU) No [...] [RDR]; – farmers who comply with the environmental guidelines applicable to sustainable operational programmes under the single CMO or with national agri-environmental guidelines.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1452 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The first subparagraph shall apply only to the units of a holding that are used for organic production in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 or are covered by agri-environment- climate measures in accordance with Article 39(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and/or Article 29 of Regulation (EU) N° [...] [RDR] or by measures/actions provided for in the environmental guidelines applicable to sustainable operational programmes under the single CMO.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1469 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. The payment referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the form of an annual payment per eligible hectare declared according to Article 26(1), the amount of which shall be calculated annually by dividing the amount resulting from the application of Article 33(1) by the total number of eligible hectares declared in the Member State concerned according to Article 26.deleted
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1493 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 in order to lay down further conditions relating to the commitments and the certification schemes referred to in paragraph 4a, in order to make sure that they are equivalent to the practices referred to in paragraph 1 in terms of the climate-related and environmental benefits they offer.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1508 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 315 hectares and is not entirely used for grass production (sown or natural), entirely left fallow or entirely cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the yearup to 50 hectares, cultivation on the arable land shall consist of at least two different crops. None of those crops shall cover less than 10 % of the arable land. Where the arable land of the farmer covers more than 50 hectares, cultivation on the arable land shall consist of at least three different crops. None of those threeThe main crops shall not cover lessmore than 570 % of the arable land and the two main one shall not exceed 70crops together shall not cover more than 95 % of the arable land.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1557 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The first paragraph shall not apply to farms: – where the arable land is mainly used for grass production or other forage, mainly left fallow, mainly cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the growing cycle, or a combination of these, or – where the arable land of the farmer covers up to 50 hectares and more than 80% of the eligible agricultural area of the holding is covered by permanent grassland and historical pastures, or by permanent crops.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1574 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. For the purposes of this article, “crop” means a crop of one of the genera defined in the botanical classification of crops or a crop of one of the species in the Brassicaceae, Solonaceae and Cucurbitaceae families, as well as land left fallow. However, autumn/winter crops and spring/summer crops shall be deemed to differ from each other even where they are of the same genus.
2012/07/23
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1585 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 laying down the definition of 'crop' andin order to add other crops to those listed in paragraph 1b and to establish the rules concerning the application of the precise calculation of shares of different crops.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1705 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. FWhere the agricultural area, excluding areas under permanent grassland, covers more than 15 hectares, farmers shall ensure that at least 73 % of their eligible hectares as defined in Article 25(2), excluding areas under permanent grassland, is ecological focus area such as land left fallow, terraces, landscape features, buffer stripland under permanent crops, terraces, landscape features such as hedges or stone walls, buffer strips, land cultivated with crops under water for a significant part of the growing cycle, land under soil-improving crops such as pulses and afforested areas as referred to in article 25(2)(b)(ii).
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1908 #
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1935 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall grant an annual payment to young farmers and to women engaged in farming and contributing to the rural economy who are entitled to a payment under the basic payment scheme referred to in Chapter 1.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 1993 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
In order to finance the payment referred to in Article 36, Member States shall use a percentage of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II which shall not be higher than 24 %. They shall notify the Commission, by 1 August 2013, of the estimated percentage necessary to finance that payment.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2000 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to the maximumfigure of 24 % set under paragraph 1, where the total amount of the payment applied for in a Member State in a particular year exceeds the ceiling set pursuant to paragraph 4, and where that ceiling is lower than 24 % of the annual national ceiling set out in Annex II, Member States shall apply a linear reduction to all payments to be granted to all farmers in accordance with Article 25.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2025 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Coupled support may be granted to the following sectors and productions: cereals, oilseeds, protein crops, grain legumes, flax, hemp, rice, nuts, starch pot referred to in Annex I to the Treatoy, milk and milk products, seeds, sheepmeat and goatmeat, beef and veal, olive oil, silk worms, dried fodder, hops, sugar beet, cane and chicory, fruit and vegetables and short rotation coppicewith the exception of fisheries products.
2012/07/24
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2251 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) a level equal to the amount to which the farmer would be entitled in respect of the number of hectares declared for the 2014 calendar year.
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 2288 #

2011/0280(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II
[The breakdown of resources among the Member States that is put forward in Annex II should be reviewed on the basis of objective criteria, as provided for in Recital 21.]
2012/07/25
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 41 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that environmental, biodiversity, and ecosystem protection requirements, resource efficiency, climate change mitigation and adaptation, disaster resilience and risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation and implementation of Partnership Contracts and programmes. Member States shall provide information on the support for climate change and biodiversity objectives using the methodology adopted by the Commission. The Commission shall adopt this methodology by means of an implementing act. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 143(3).
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1588 #

2011/0276(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 107 – paragraph 4
4. Union networks comprising the members designated by the Member States and the managing authorities shall be set up by the Commission to ensure exchange on the results of the implementation of the communication strategies, the exchange of experience in implementing the information and communication measures, and the exchange of good practices. Each management authority will use the EU information network’s Europe Direct Centres effectively in the implementation of information and communication activities at a local and regional level.
2012/06/06
Committee: REGI
Amendment 42 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 4 – point a
(a) promoting the sustainable and cost-efficient production and distribution of renewable energy sources;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 5 – point b
(b) promoting investment to address specific risks, ensuring disaster resilience and developing disaster management systems, including the restoration of river, coastal and mountain ecosystems;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 54 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 6 – point c
(c) protecting, promoting and developing natural and cultural heritage;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 6 – point c
(c) protecting, promoting and developing tangible and intangible cultural heritage;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 57 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 6 – point d
(d) protecting biodiversityand restoring biodiversity, landscapes and ecosystems, soil protection and promoting ecosystem services including NATURA 2000 and green infrastructures;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 59 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 6 – point e
(e) action to improve the urban environment, includingstarting with the regeneration of brownfield sites and the reduction of air pollution, particularly by particulates;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 61 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – point 7 – point c
(c) developing integrated and intermodal environment-friendly and low-carbon local public transport systems and promoting sustainable urban mobility;
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 71 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex - table- row 21 – 'Urban transport' – column 1
UrbanLocal public transport
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 72 #

2011/0275(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex - table - row 21 – 'Urban transport' – column 3
Increase of passenger trips using supported public urban and suburban transport services
2012/05/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) housing.deleted
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i
i) promoting the sustainable and cost- effective production and distribution of renewable energy sources;
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
ii) promoting investment to address specific risks, ensuring disaster resilience and developing disaster management systems, including through the restoration of river, coastal and mountain ecosystems;
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 43 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
iii) protecting and restoring biodiversity, landscapes and ecosystems, including through green infrastructures;
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 47 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv
iv) improving the urban environment, includingthrough regeneration of brownfield sites and a reduction of airin air pollution, in particular fine particle pollution.
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 51 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d – point ii
ii) developing integrated, intermodal, environment-friendly and low-carbon local public transport systems including promoting sustainable urban and suburban mobility;
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Allegato – tabella – rigo 24 – colonna 1
UrbanLocal public transport
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2011/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Allegato – tabella – rigo 24 – colonna 3
Increase of passenger trips using supported urban and suburban public transport service
2012/06/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 and more in particular bovine identification and voluntary beef labelling were listed as "information obligations with special importance in terms of the burdens they impose on businesses" in the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on an "Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU" .deleted
2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) Section II of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 lays down rules for a voluntary beef labelling system which provide for the approval of certain labelling specifications by the competent authority of the Member State. The administrative burden and the costs incurred by Member States and economic operators in applying this system are not proportionate to the benefits of the system. That Section should therefore be deleted.
2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 53 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
(22) In order to ensure that the necessary rules for the proper functioning of the identification, registration and traceability of bovine animals and beef are applied, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty should be delegated to the Commission in respect of requirements for alternative means of identification of bovine animals, special circumstances in which Member States may extend the maximum periods for the application of the means of identification, data to be exchanged between the computerised databases of the Member States, the maximum period for certain reporting obligations, the requirements for means of identification, the information to be included in the passports and in the individual registers to be kept on each holding, the minimum level of official controls, the identification and registration of movements of bovine animals when put out to summer grazing in different mountain areas, rules for labelling certain products which should be equivalent to the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000, the definitions of minced beef, beef trimmings or cut beef, the specific indications that may be put on labels, the labelling provisions related to the simplification of the indication of origin, the maximum size and composition of certain groups of animals, the approval procedures related to labelling conditions on packaging of cut meat. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up such delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 14
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Articles 16 - 18
(14) Articles 16, 17 and 18 are deleted. deleted Or. it (See Amendment deleting Recital 20.)
2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the specific indications that may be put on labels; deleted Or. it (See Amendment to Recital 22.)
2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2011/0229(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 15
Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000
Article 19 – point c
(c) the labelling provisions related to the simplification of the indication of origin; deleted Or. it (See Amendment to Recital 22.)
2012/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 104 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 4
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 3 a
Member States shall ensure that marine fuels are not used or placed on the market within their territory if their sulphur content exceeds 3.5 % by mass.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 126 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) 0.50 % as from 1 January 2020 or 2025.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 133 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point c
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 1 a – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a of this Directive concerning the date from which the sulphur standard laid down in point (b) of this paragraph applies. Based onIn line with the assessment and the conclusions by the IMO of the availability of marine fuel to comply with the maximum sulphur content of fuel of 0.50% by mass, referred to in Regulation 14(8) of Annex VI of MARPOL, this date shall be 1 January 2020 or 1 January 2025.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 149 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 6 – point e
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 a – paragraph 4 – point d
(d) 0.10 50% as from 1 January 2020 or 2025.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 164 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 c – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall allow the use of emission abatement methods by ships of all flags in their ports, territorial seas, exclusive economic zones and pollution control zones, as an alternative to using marine fuels that meet the requirements of Articles 3a, 4a and 4b, subject to the provisions of paragraphs 2 and 3.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 171 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
3. The emission abatement methods referred to in paragraph 1 shall comply with the criteria specified in the instruments referred to in Annex 2.1, unless superseded or supplemented by the criteria set out in Annex 2.2.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 174 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 9a and with the relevant instruments and standards adopted by the IMO concerning:
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 177 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – point 7
Directive 1999/32/EC
Article 4 c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
The Commission shall take into account, inter alia, scientific and technological progress as well as the relevant instruments and standards adopted by the International Maritime Organisation.
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 206 #

2011/0190(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex
Directive 1999/32/EC
Annex 2 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– document thoroughly that any waste streams discharged into the sea, including enclosed ports, harbours and estuaries have no significant negative impacts on and do not pose risks to human health and the environment.deleted
2011/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #

2011/0177(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Provide the necessary means to Environment and Climate action, better using the appropriate instruments, strengthening energy safety, and building a resource-efficient and climate resilient economy andeconomy capable of adapting to climate change, so as to enhancinge Union competitiveness with more and greener jobsand ensure sustainable growth in employment;
2012/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 18 #

2011/0177(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Secure environment and climate investments, combining mainstreaming and a dedicated instrument (LIFE), suggesting an earmarking of 20and considering earmarking an amount of no more than 5% MFF funds for climate policy;
2012/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 35 #

2011/0177(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Earmark resources of European Regional Development Fund to energy efficiency, sustainable renewables, innovation and SMEs support;
2012/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 36 #

2011/0177(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Provide Cohesion Fund support for projects in the field of environment, especially urban environment and air pollution, refusingtaking account of macroeconomical conditionalities;
2012/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 57 #

2011/0177(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. HighlightTake account of the increasing number and gravity of natural and man-made disasters and the fact that climate change may trigger more extreme disasters; focus the Union Civil Protection Mechanism on actions inside the Union, allocating appropriate budgetary resources;
2012/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2011/0177(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Provide at least 70% of budget to actions inside Heading 3 and 30no more than 15% to actions outinside Heading 45.
2012/07/18
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 18 #

2011/0172(COD)

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to propose rejection of the Commission proposal.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions29 includes energy efficiency among the criteria for determining the Best Available Techniques that should serve as a reference for setting the permit conditions for installations within its scope, including combustion installations with a total rated thermal input of 50 MW or more. However, that Directive gives Member States the option not to impose requirements relating to energy efficiency on combustion units or other units emitting carbon dioxide on the site, for the activities listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community30. To ensure that significant energy efficiency improvements are achieved in electricity and heat generation installations and mineral oil and gas refineries, actual energy efficiency levels should be monitored and compared with the relevant energy efficiency levels associated with the application of the Best Available Techniques. The Commission should compare energy efficiency levels and consider proposing additional measures if significant discrepancies exist between the actual energy efficiency levels and the levels associated with the application of the Best Available Techniques. The information collected on the actual energy efficiency values should also be used in reviewing the harmonised efficiency reference values for separate production of heat and electricity set out in Commission Decision 2007/74/EC of 21 December 200631. __________________ 31. OJ L 32, 06.02.07, p. 183. deleted Or. it (See amendment deleting Article 19(5).).
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
This Directive establishes a common framework of measures for the promotion of energy efficiency within the Union in order to ensure the achievement of the Union's target of 20% primary energy savings by 20202020 20% headline target on energy efficiency and to pave the way for further energy efficiency improvements beyond that date.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 53 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
It lays down rules designed to remove barriers in the energy market and overcome market failures that impede efficiency in the supply and use of energy, and provides for the establishment of indicative national energy efficiency targets for 2020.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. ‘energy service’ means the physical benefit, utility or good derived from a combination of energy with energy management systems and/or energy efficient technology or with action, which may include the operations, maintenance and control necessary to deliver the service, which is delivered on the basis of a contract and in normal circumstances has proven to result in verifiable and measurable or estimable energy efficiency improvement or primaryfinal energy savings;
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
11. ‘energy service provider’company (ESCo)' means a natural or legal person who delivers energy services or other energy efficiency improvement measures in a final customer's facility or premises; (This amendment applies throughout the text.)
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 66 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13
13. ‘energy performance contracting’ means a contractual arrangement between the beneficiary and the provider of an energy efficiency improvement measure, according to which the payment for the investment made by the provider is in relation to a contractually agreed guaranteed level of energy efficiency improvement or other agreed energy performance criterion, such as financial savings or kilowatt hour savings;
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 76 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall set an indicative national energy efficiency target expressed as an absolute level ofon primary energy consumption in 2020. When setting these targets, they shall take into account the Union's 2020 20% headline target of 20 % energy savingsefficiency, the measures provided for in this Directive, the measures adopted to reach the national energy savingefficiency targets adopted pursuant to Article 4(1) of Directive 2006/32/EC and other measures to promote energy efficiency within Member States and at Union level. When setting the national energy efficiency targets, Member States may take account of national circumstances affecting primary energy consumption: changes of energy imports and exports, development of biomass utilisation as well as wind and solar energy, and carbon capture and storage.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. By 30 June 2014, the Commission shall assess whether the Union is likelyon track to achieve its target of 20 % primary energy savings by 20202020 20% headline target on energy efficiency, requiring a reduction of EU primary energy consumption of 368 Mtoe in 2020, taking into account the sum of the national targets referred to in paragraph 1 and the evaluationassessment referred to in Article 19(47).
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Article 7 of Directive 2010/31/EU, Member States shall ensure that as from 1 January 2014, 31% of the total floor area owned by their public bodies is renovated each year to meet at least the minimum energy performance requirements set by the Member State concerned in application of Article 4 of Directive 2010/31/EU. The 31% rate shall be calculated on the total floor area of buildings with a total useful floor area over 2500 m2 owned by the public bodies of the Member State concerned that, on 1 January of each year, does not meet the national minimum energy performance requirements set in application of Article 4 of Directive 2010/31/EU.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 107 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Member States may decide not to set or apply the requirements referred to in paragraph 1 to buildings officially protected as part of a designated environment, or because of their special architectural or historical merit, in so far as compliance with certain minimum energy performance requirements would unacceptably alter their character of appearance.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 114 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, by 1 January 2014, Member States shall establish and make publicly available an inventory of buildings owned by their public bodies indicatingwith a total useful floor area as referred to in paragraph 1 containing the following data:
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 116 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the useful floor area in m2; and
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 118 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the energy performance of each building.; and
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) the use of ESCos and energy performance contracting.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 121 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. As an alternative approach to paragraphs 1 and 2, Member States may take other measures to achieve an equivalent annual improvement of the energy performance of the buildings owned by their public bodies as required in paragraph 1. Member States may prioritise renovation of the buildings owned by their public bodies, based on the most cost-effective improvement of the energy performance of their building stock. For the purpose of this alternative approach, they may estimate the energy savings that paragraphs 1 and 2 would result in by using appropriate standard values for the energy consumption of a building before and after renovation. Member States opting for an alternative approach shall notify to the Commission, by 1 January 2014 at the latest, the alternative measures that they plan to adopt and showing how they would achieve an equivalent improvement of the energy performance of the buildings owned by their public bodies.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Member States shall ensure that public bodies purchase only products, services and buildings with high energy efficiency performance, taking into account cost- effectiveness, economical feasibility and technical suitability, as well as sufficient competition, as referred to in Annex III.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 144 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Each Member State shall set up an energy efficiency obligation scheme. This scheme shall ensure that either all energy distributors or all retail energy sales companies operating on the Member State's territory achieve annual energy savings equal to 1.5%as a quota of their energy sales, by volume, in the previous year in that Member State excluding energy used in transport. This amount of. This amount of energy savings shall be achieved by the obligated parties among final customers. The energy savings target shall be achieved by the obligated parties among final customersintroduced gradually, with a starting level differentiated on a national basis in order to take into full account of early actions and results achieved so far, including efficiency measures already adopted in the fuel sector. Measures that target long-term savings or structured programs proposed by operators in the energy efficiency sector should be encouraged through incentives or specific fiscal treatment.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 159 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) permit obligated parties to count towards their obligation certified energy savings achieved by energy service providers or other third parties; in this case they shall establishnsure that an accreditation process is in place that is clear, transparent and open to all market actors, and that aims at minimising the costs of certification;
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 173 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 9 – subparagraph 2
Member States opting for this option shall notify to the Commission, by 1 January 2013 at the latest, the alternative measures that they plan to adopt, including the rules on penalties referred to in Article 9, and demonstratshowing how they would achieve the required amount of savings. The Commission may refuse such measures or make suggestions for modifications in the 3 months following notification. In such cases, the alternative approach shall not be applied by the Member State concerned until the Commission expressly accepts the resubmitted or modified draft measures.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 188 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that enterprises not included in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 are subject to and encouraged an energy audit carried out in an independent and cost-effective manner by qualified or accredited experts at the latest by 30 June 2014 and every three years from the date of the previous energy audit.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. For the purpose of the assessment referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall carry out a cost-benefit analysis covering their territory, including based on climate conditions, economical feasibility or technical suitability, in order to identify and facilitate implementation of the most cost-efficient solutions to meet heating and cooling requirements.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 225 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. Based on the assessments referred to in paragraphs 1 and 1a, Member States shall take the necessary measures to develop efficient district heating and cooling infrastructure to accommodate the development of high- efficiency cogeneration and the use of heating and cooling from waste heat and renewable energy sources in accordance with paragraphs 1, 3, 6 and 78. When developing district heating and cooling, they shall to the extent possible opt for high-efficiency cogeneration rather than heat-only generation when heat is produced in combustion installations.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 238 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Member States shall adopt authorisation criteria as referred to in Article 7 of Directive 2009/72/EC, or equivalent permit criteria, to ensure that the provisions of the first subparagraph are met. They shall in particular ensure that the location of new installations takes into account the availability of suitable heat loads for cogeneration in accordance with Annex VIIIthe assessment referred to in paragraph 1.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 241 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States may include in their authorisation criteria or equivalent permit criteria conditions for exempting individual installations from the provisions in the first sub-paragraph when: (a) a cost-benefit analysis carried out for the individual installation shows that the cost outweigh the benefits in comparison with the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investments, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling; or (b) the requirement in point (b) of the first subparagraph related to the location of the installation cannot be met due to the need to locate an installation close to a geological storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 242 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
Member States shall notify such conditions for exemption to the Commission by 1 January 2014.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 243 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions of paragraph 3 when: (a) the threshold conditions related to the availability of heat load set out in point 1 of Annex VIII are not met; (b) the requirement in point (b) of paragraph 3 related to the location of the installation cannot be met due to the need to locate an installation close to a geological storage site permitted under Directive 2009/31/EC; or (c) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison with the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling. Member States shall notify such conditions for exemption to the Commission by 1 January 2014. The Commission may refuse those conditions or make suggestions for modifications in the 6 months following notification. In such cases, the conditions for exemption shall not be applied by the Member State concerned until the Commission expressly accepts the resubmitted or modified conditions.deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 257 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall ensure that national regulations on urban and rural spatial planning are adapted to the authorisation criteria referred to in paragraph 3 and are in line with the national heating and cooling plans referred to in paragraph 1.deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 260 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Member States shall ensure that, whenever an existing electricity generation installation with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW is substantially refurbished or when, in accordance with Article 21 of Directive 2010/75/EC, its permit is updated, conversion to allow its operation as a high-efficiency cogeneration installation is set as a condition in the new or updated permit or licence, provided that the installation is sited in a location where the waste heat can be used by heat demand points in accordance with point 1 of Annex VIII.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 267 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States may include in their authorisation criteria or permit criteria conditions for exempting individual installations from the provisions in the first sub-paragraph when a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison with the full life- cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 268 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 b (new)
Member States shall notify such conditions for exemption to the Commission by 1 January 2014.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 269 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7
7. Member States may lay down conditions for exemption from the provisions of paragraph 6 when: (a) the threshold conditions related to the availability of heat load set out in point 1 of Annex VIII are not met; or (b) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison with the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling. Member States shall notify such conditions for exemption to the Commission by 1 January 2014. The Commission may refuse those conditions or make suggestions for modifications in the 6 months following notification. In such cases, the conditions for exemption shall not be applied by the Member State concerned until the Commission expressly accepts the resubmitted or modified conditions.deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 282 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – introductory part
Member States may lay down conditions for exempinclude in their authorisation criteria or permit criteria conditions for exempting individual installations from the provisions in the first sub-paragraph when: a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison with the full life- cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of electricity and heat with separate heating or cooling.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 285 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – point a
(a) the threshold conditions related to the availability of heat load set out in point 2 of Annex VIII are not met; ordeleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 287 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 3 – point b
(b) a cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs outweigh the benefits in comparison with the full life-cycle costs, including infrastructure investment, of providing the same amount of heat with separate heating or cooling.deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 289 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 4
Member States shall notify such conditions for exemption to the Commission by 1 January 2014. The Commission may refuse those conditions or make suggestions for modifications in the 6 months following notification. In such cases, the conditions for exemption shall not be applied by the Member State concerned until the Commission expressly accepts the resubmitted or modified conditions.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 291 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 9
9. The Commission shall establish by 1 January 2013 by means of a delegated act in accordance with Article 18 a methodology for the cost-benefit analysis referred to in paragraphs 4 (c), 7 (b)in accordance with Annex VIII for the cost-benefit analysis covering a Member State’s entire territory referred to in paragraph 1a and the cost-benefit analysis for individual installations referred to into paragraphs 3, 6 and 8(b).
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 296 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1
Member States shall draw up an inventory of data in accordance with Annex X for all installations undertaking the combustion of fuels with total rated thermal input of 50 MW or more and installations undertaking the refining of mineral oil and gas within their territory. This shall be updated every three years. The annual installation-specific data contained in these inventories shall be made available to the Commission upon request. Member States shall include a non-confidential summary containing aggregated information of the inventories in the reports referred to in Article 19(2).
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 314 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) requiring public authorities to consider the use of Energy Performance Contracting (EPC), when carrying out a buildings renovation
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 337 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
The Commission’s assessment of the first supplementary report shall include an assessment of the energy efficiency levels of existing and new installations undertaking the combustion of fuels with a total rated thermal input of 50 MW or more and installations undertaking the refining of mineral oil and gas, in the light of the relevant best available techniques as developed in accordance with Directive 2010/75/EU and Directive 2008/1/EC. Where this assessment identifies significant discrepancies between the actual energy efficiency levels of such installations and energy efficiency levels associated with the application of the relevant best available techniques, the Commission shall propose, if appropriate, requirements to improve the energy efficiency levels achieved by such installations or that the use of such techniques shall in future be a condition for the permitting of new installations and for the periodic review of the permits for existing installations. The Commission shall also monitor the impact of implementing this Directive on Directive 2003/87/EC, Directive 2009/28/EC as well as Directive 2010/31/EC.deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 349 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 7
7. By 30 June 2014 the Commission shall submit the assessment referred to in Article 3(2) to the European Parliament and to the Council, followed, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal laying down mandatory national targetsnecessary, by proposals for further measures. The assessment shall also be based on the evaluation of the first annual report referred to in paragraph 1.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 351 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 8 – point a
(a) to change the saving rate laid down in Article 6(1);deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 352 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 9
9. By 30 June 2018, the Commission shall assess the progress made by Member States in removing the regulatory and non- regulatory barriers referred to in Article 15(1); this assessment shall be followed, if appropriate, by a legislative proposalrecommendations.
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 387 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 8 – heading 1
Guidelines for siting of thermal electricity installations and industrial installationsCost-benefit analysis [to be completed]
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 388 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 8 – point 1 – introductory part
1. Siting of thermal electricity generation installations as referred in Article 10(3) and (6) Where a heat demand point of the capacity given in the column C exists or there is a potential heat demand point, the power plant must be located at less than the corresponding distance in column A. A potential heat demand point is defined as one where it can be shown that one can reasonably be created, for example by constructing a district heating network. For example, using standard estimation techniques, if an aggregate heat load in excess of 15 MW / km2 can be shown to exist, this is deemed to be a heat demand point. The total sum of such connectible km square loads shall be deemed to be the demand capacity of such heat demand points. Distance A is a pipeline route, not a straight line, along which it is considered feasible by engineering experts using standard estimating techniques such as quantity surveying, to construct a water carrying pipeline of the corresponding size at moderate cost. This excludes obstacles such as mountain ranges, city centres, difficult river or sea crossings etc. ABCMaximum distance between proposed electricity installation and heat demand pointPower station electrical CapacityHeat demand point estimated annual consumption< 100 km> 1999* MWe> 7500 TJ/year< 65 km>500>1875 TJ/year< 15 km> 20 MW> 50 TJ/year * New plant will operate typically at 90% load factor. deleted Or. en (Consequence of the amendment to Article 11.)
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 389 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 8 – point 2 – introductory part
2. Siting of industrial waste heat sources referred to in Article 10(8). ABCMaximum distance between proposed industrial installations and heat demand pointCapacityHeat demand point estimated annual consumption< 75 km> 75 MW(at 60-70% load)> 1600 TJ/year< 60 km> 50 MW at 60% load factor>1000 TJ/year< 25 km> 50 MW(> 85% load factor )> 400 TJ/year< 15 km> 20 MW> 100 TJ/yeardeleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 394 #

2011/0172(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 10 – paragraph 1 – point d – introductory part
(d) a non-nominative list of installations undertaking the refining of mineral oil and gas, indicating for each: – annual average installation energy input (MWth); – annual average installation energy output (energy content of the fuel mix, MWth); – annual average feedstock; – plant type and technology employed at the installation; – design efficiency (theoretical); – operation start date; – date of last substantial refurbishment; – the number of annual average operating hours; – annual average net operational efficiency.deleted
2011/11/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 8 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on food intended for infants and young children and on food for special medical purposes and foodstuffs for people intolerant to gluten(presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 17 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) A limited number of categories of food constitutes the sole source of nourishment of certain groups of the population or represent a partial source of nourishment; such categories of food are vital for the management of certain conditions and/or are essential to maintain the intended nutritional adequacy for certain well-established vulnerable groups of the population. Those categories of food include infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food and food for special medical purposes, and food for people intolerant to gluten. Experience has shown that the provisions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC, as well as Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 ensure the free movement of such food in a satisfactory manner, while ensuring a high level of protection of public health. It is therefore appropriate that this Regulation focuses on the general compositional and information requirements for infant formula and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food for infants and young children and to food for special medical purposes, and food for people intolerant to gluten taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009.
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 20 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) To ensure legal certainty, definitions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 should be transferred to this Regulation. However, the definitions of infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and food for people intolerant to gluten should be regularly adapted taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 30 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should provide the criteria for the establishment of the specific compositional and information requirements for infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and food for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009. In order to adapt the definitions of infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and food for people intolerant to gluten laid down in this Regulation taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, to lay down the specific compositional and information requirements with respect to the categories of food covered by this Regulation, including for additional labelling requirements to, or derogations from, the provisions of Directive 2000/13/EC and for the authorisation of nutrition and health claims, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 33 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) It is appropriate to establish and update a Union list of vitamins, minerals, amino acids and other substances that may be added for specific nutritional purposes to infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and food for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Regulation 953/2009, Commission Directives 2006/141/EC and 2006/125/EC, subject to certain criteria laid down in this Regulation. Given the fact that the adoption of the list implies the application of criteria set out in this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in that respect. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers. The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts updating the Union list, where, in duly justified cases relating to public health, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 37 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Currently, the statements ‘gluten-free’ and ‘very low gluten’ may be used for food intended for particular nutritional uses and for food for normal consumptiofor specialised nutrition intended for people intolerant to gluten under the rules specified in article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 concerning the composition and labelling of foodstuffs suitable for people intolerant to gluten. Such statements could be construed as nutrition claims, as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. For the sake of simplification, those statements should be regulated solely by Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and comply with requirements therein. It is necessary that technical adaptations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, incorporating the nutrition claims ‘gluten-free’ and ‘very low gluten’ and their associated conditions of use as regulated under Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 be completed prior to the entry into application of this RegulationIn addition, the statement ‘gluten-free’ may be used for foodstuffs for normal consumption and other food for specialised nutrition suitable for people intolerant to gluten under the rules specified in article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 concerning the composition and labelling of foodstuffs suitable for people intolerant to gluten which do not allow the use of the statement ‘very low gluten’ for these foods. Such food for specialized nutrition intended for people intolerant to gluten shall be maintained in this Regulation, as providing such safe food intended for people intolerant to gluten and informing coeliacs about the absence of gluten is vital to the management of the disease. This is in line with the international standard for food for special dietary use for persons intolerant to gluten (CODEX STAN 118-1979 revised in 2008). Also the conditions of use of the claim ‘gluten-free’ for food for normal consumption should be maintained in Regulation (CE) No 41/2009.
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 43 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Regulation establishes compositional and information requirements for the following categories of food for specialized nutrition:
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 46 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(c a) food for people intolerant to gluten
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 50 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(h a) ‘food for people intolerant to gluten’ means foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses which are specially produced, prepared and/or processed to meet the special dietary needs of people intolerant to gluten
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 57 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on food intended for infants and young children and, on food for special medical purposes and on foodstuffs for people intolerant to gluten
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on food intended for infants and young children and on, food for special medical purposes and other food for specialised nutrition
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) Directive 2009/39/EC foresees that specific provisions could be adopted regarding the two following specific categories of food falling within the definition of foodstuffs for particularspecialised nutritional uses: ‘food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, especially for sportsmen’ and ‘food for persons suffering from carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes)’. With regard to food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, no successful conclusion could be reached to date as regard the development of specific provisions due to widely diverging views among Member States and stakeholders concerning the scope of the specific legislation, the number of sub- categories of the food to be included, the criteria for establishing composition requirements and the potential impact on innovation in product development, the mandatory information for the safe use of food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, and the potential impact on innovation in product development. There is a genuine need for harmonisation of the category of food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, especially for sportsmen. Harmonisation will remove barriers to free movement of this category of food, while providing sportsmen a high level of safety and guaranteeing the absence of doping substances, the latter being considered as a priority by the European Commission in its communication on Sports of 18th January 2011. As regards special provisions for food for persons suffering from carbohydrate metabolism disorders (diabetes), a Commission report9 concludes that the scientific basis for setting specific compositional requirements is lacking.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 65 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. TParagraph 3 shall not prevent the dissemination of any useful information or recommendations with reference to the categories of food referred to in Article 1 (1) may be made exclusively byexclusively intended for persons having qualifications in medicine, nutrition, pharmacy or other professionals responsible for maternal and child health care.
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 67 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Therefore, the concept of ‘foodstuffs for particular nutritional uses’ should be abolished andspecialised nutrition' should be maintained but strictly limited to products that can demonstrate their unique ability to fulfil the specific nutritional needs of vulnerable groups of the population, which otherwise could not be placed on the market using current Union acts and where harmonisation ensures the free movement of such food in a satisfactory manner. Directive 2009/39/EC should be replaced by the present act. To simplify its application and to ensure consistency throughout the Member States, the present act should take the form of a Regulation.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 68 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) A limited number of categories of food constitutes the sole source of nourishment of certain groups of the population or represent a partial source of nourishment; such categories of food are vital for the management of certain conditions and/or are essential to maintain the intended nutritional adequacy for certain well-established vulnerable groups of the population. Those categories of food include infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food and, food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten. Experience has shown that the provisions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC, as well as Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation 41/2009 ensure the free movement of such food in a satisfactory manner, while ensuring a high level of protection of public health. It is therefore appropriate that this Regulation focuses on the general compositional and information requirements for infant formula and follow-on formulae, processed cereal- based food and baby food for infants and young children and to, food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 69 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) A limited number of categories of food constitutes the sole source of nourishment of certain groups of the population or represent a partial source of nourishment; such categories of food are vital for the management of certain conditions and/or are essential to maintain the intended nutritional adequacy for certain well-established vulnerable groups of the population. Those categories of food include infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food and, food for special medical purposes, food intended for weight reduction and control, and food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort. Experience has shown that the provisions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, as well as Commission Directive 1999/2196/8/EC ensure the free movement of such food in a satisfactory manner, while ensuring a high level of protection of public health. It is therefore appropriate that this Regulation focuses on the general compositional and information requirements for infant formula and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food for infants and young children and to, food for special medical purposes, food intended for weight reduction and control, and food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC. and Commission Directive 96/8/EC. In addition, the concept of 'specialised nutrition' should be maintained and strictly limited to products that demonstrate their unique ability to fulfil the specific nutritional needs of vulnerable groups of the population, which otherwise could not be placed on the market using current Union acts.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 71 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Subject to the general requirements of Articles 7 and 9 and taking into account Directive 2006/141/EC, Directive 2006/125/EC and Directive 1999/21/EC, and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 as well as any technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated Regulations, for foods covered under Article 1(1) no later than [2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation], in accordance with Article 15, with respect to the following:
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 76 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) To ensure legal certainty, definitions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, and Commission Regulation 41/2009 should be transferred to this Regulation. However, the definitions of infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten should be regularly adapted taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 80 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) To ensure legal certainty, definitions laid down in Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC and Commission Directive 96/8/EC should be transferred to this Regulation. However, the definitions of infant formulae and follow-on formulae, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, food intended for weight reduction and control, and food intended to meet expenditure for intense muscular effort should be regularly adapted taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should provide the criteria for the establishment of the specific compositional and information requirements for infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC, Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009. In order to adapt the definitions of infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten laid down in this Regulation taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, to lay down the specific compositional and information requirements with respect to the categories of food covered by this Regulation, including for additional labelling requirements to, or derogations from, the provisions of Directive 2000/13/EC and for the authorisation of nutrition and health claims, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Directive 96/8/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 are repealed from [the first day of the month 2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation].deleted
2012/01/18
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 94 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) This Regulation should provide the criteria for the establishment of the specific compositional and information requirements for infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, food intended for weight reduction and control, and food intended to meet expenditure of intense muscular effort, taking into account Commission Directive 2006/141/EC, Commission Directive 2006/125/EC and, Commission Directive 1999/21/EC and Commission Directive 96/8/EC. In order to adapt the definitions of infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes, food intended for weight reduction and control, and food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort laid down in this Regulation taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, to lay down the specific compositional and information requirements and the process for placing on the market of food resulting from scientific and technological innovations with respect to the categories of food covered by this Regulation, including for additional labelling requirements to, or derogations from, the provisions of Directive 2000/13/EC and for the authorisation of nutrition and health claims, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission. It is of particular importance that the Commission carries out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) Whereas food controlled by this Regulation is specialised food distinguishable from foodstuffs intended for normal consumption, and which is governed by specific compositional criteria and which is required to provide additional mandatory labelling information to foodstuffs intended for normal consumption, it is appropriate to provide derogations, where appropriate, to those mandatory labelling requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) It is appropriate to establish and update a Union list of vitamins, minerals, amino acids and other substances that may be addedsubstances that may be added for specific nutritional purposes to infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby foods, and food for special medical purposes, and foods for people intolerant to gluten, taking into account Regulation (EC) No. 953/2009, Commission Directives 2006/141/EC and 2006/125/EC, subject to certain criteria laid down in this Regulation. Given the fact that the adoption of the list implies the application of criteria set out in this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in that respect. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts updating the Union list, where, in duly justified cases relating to public health, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 102 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) It is appropriate to establish and update a Union list of vitamins, minerals, amino acids and other substances that may be addedsubstances that may be added for specific nutritional purposes to infant formula, follow-on formula, processed cereal-based food and baby food, and food for special medical purposes and food intended for weight reduction and control, taking into account Regulation 953/2009, Commission Directive 2006/141/EC and Commission Directive 2006/125/EC, subject to certain criteria laid down in this Regulation. Given the fact that the adoption of the list implies the application of criteria set out in this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission in that respect. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. The Commission should adopt immediately applicable implementing acts updating the Union list, where, in duly justified cases relating to public health, imperative grounds of urgency so require.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 112 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) Currently, the statements 'gluten-free' and 'very low gluten' may be used for food intended for particular nutritional uses and for food for normal consumptios for specialised nutrition intended for people intolerant to gluten under the rules specified in article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 concerning the composition and labelling of foodstuffs suitable for people intolerant to gluten. Such statements could be construed as nutrition claims, as deIn addition, the statement 'gluten-free' may be used for foodstuffs for normal consumption and other foods for specialised nutrition suitable for people intolerant to gluten under the rules specifined in Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. For the sake of simplification, those statements should be regulated solely by Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and comply with requirements therein. It is necessary that technical adaptations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, incorporating the nutrition claims ‘gluten-free’ and ‘very low gluten’ and their associated conditions of use as regulated under Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 be completed prior to the entry into application ofarticle 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 concerning the composition and labelling of foodstuffs suitable for people intolerant to gluten which do not allow the use of the statement 'very low gluten' for these foods. Such foods for specialized nutrition intended for people intolerant to gluten shall be maintained in this Regulation, as providing such safe foods intended for people intolerant to gluten and informing coeliacs about the absence of gluten is vital to the management of the disease. This is in line with the international standard for foods for special dietary use for persons intolerant to gluten (CODEX STAN 118-1979 revised in 2008). Also the conditions of use of the claim "gluten- free" for foods for normal consumption should be maintained in thise Regulation (CE) 41/2009.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) ‘Meal replacement for weight control’ and ‘total diet replacement for weight control’ are considered as food for particular nutritional uses and are governed by specific rules adopted under Directive 96/8/EC. However, more and more food intended for the general population has appeared on the market carrying similar declarations which are presented as health claims for weight control. In order to eliminate any potential confusion between food marketed for weight control and in the interests of legal certainty and coherence of Union legislation, such statements should be regulated solely by Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 and comply with requirements therein. It is necessary that technical adaptations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, incorporating the health claims referring to the body weight control for food presented as ‘total diet replacement for weight control’ and as ‘meal replacement for weight control’ and associated conditions of use as regulated under Directive 96/8/EC be completed prior to the entry into application of this Regulation.deleted
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 121 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Regulation establishes compositional and information requirements for the following categories of food for specialised nutrition:
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Regulation establishes compositional and information requirements for the following categories of food for specialised nutrition:
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 126 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) infant formula and follow-on formula for infants in good health;
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 130 #
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) food for people intolerant to gluten.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new)
(cb) food intended for weight reduction and control;
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 140 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c c (new)
(cc) food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 142 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. This Regulation establishes rules for the placing on the market of other food for specialised nutrition.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 149 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a a(new)
(aa) 'food for specialised nutrition' means foodstuffs which, owing to their special composition or manufacturing process, are clearly distinguishable from foodstuffs for normal consumption, which are suitable for their claimed nutritional purposes and which are marketed in such a way as to indicate such suitability.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 151 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g – point ii
(ii) milk intended for young children;deleted
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 162 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) 'food intended for weight reduction and control' means food specially formulated, when used as instructed by the manufacturer, to replace the whole or part of the total daily diet: (i) for use in energy-restricted diets for weight reduction. They are divided in two categories: – products presented as a replacement for the whole of the daily diet (low calorie diet and very low calorie diet); – products presented as a replacement for one or more meals of the daily diet (meal replacement); (ii) for weight control (products presented as a dish or part of a meal or light meal or snack).
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 166 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
(ha) 'food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort' means food specially formulated and presented to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort, especially for sportsmen.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 170 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to adapt the definitions of 'infant formula', 'follow-on formula', 'processed cereal-based food' and 'baby food’ and ‘', 'food for special medical purposes', and 'food for people intolerant to gluten' taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 171 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 to adapt the definitions of ‘infant formula’, ‘follow-on formula’, ‘processed cereal-based food’ and ‘baby food’ and, ‘food for special medical purposes’, 'food intended for weight reduction and control' and 'food intended to meet the expenditure of intense muscular effort', taking into account technical and scientific progress and relevant developments at international level, as appropriate.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 174 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
Food referred to in Article 1(1) and 1(1a) may be placed on the market only if it complies with the provisions of this Regulation.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. Where it is evident that a food referred to in Article 1(1) and 1(1a) is likely to constitute a serious risk to human health and that such risk cannot be contained satisfactorily by means of measures taken by the Member State(s) concerned, the Commission on its own initiative or at the request of a Member State, shall without delay take any appropriate interim emergency measures, including measures restricting or prohibiting the placing on the market of the food concerned, depending on the gravity of the situation. Those measures shall be adopted by means of implementing acts in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 184 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Food referred to in Article 1(1) shall comply with any requirement of Union law applicable to food, save as regards changes made to them to ensure their conformity with the definitions given in Article 1.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. The composition of food referred to in Article 1(1) and 1(1a) shall be such that it is appropriate to satisfy the specific nutritional needs of, and it is suitable for the persons to whom it is intended, in accordance with generally accepted scientific data.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 188 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Food referred to in Article 1(1) and 1(1a) shall not contain any substance in such quantity as to endanger the health of the persons to whom they are intended.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. The labelling, presentation and advertising of food referred to in Article 1(1) and 1(1a) shall provide adequate consumer information and must not be misleading and shall not attribute properties to such products for the prevention, treatment or cure of human disease, or imply such properties.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 198 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. TParagraph 3 shall not prevent the dissemination of any useful information or recommendations with reference to the categories of food referred to in Article 1 (1) may be made exclusively byexclusively intended for persons having qualifications in medicine, nutrition, pharmacy or other professionals responsible for maternal and child health care. Or. en (See Directive 2009/39/EC, Article 8(2).)
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 207 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Food referred to in Article 1(1) and 1(1a) must comply with the requirements of Article 7 and composition and information requirements provided in Article 9.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 208 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Subject to the general requirements of Articles 7 and 9 and taking into account Directive 2006/141/EC, Directive 2006/125/EC and, Directive 1999/21/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009, as well as any technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated Regulations, for foods covered by Article 1(1) no later than [2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation], in accordance with Article 15, with respect to the following:
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 209 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Subject to the general requirements of Articles 7 and 9 and taking into account Directive 2006/141/EC, Directive 2006/125/EC and, Directive 1999/21/EC and Directive 96/8/EC as well as any technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated Regulations for foods covered by Article 1(1), no later than [2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation], in accordance with Article 15, with respect to the following:
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 220 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) the process for the placing on the market of food referred to in Article 1(1) resulting from scientific and technological innovations which do not comply with the rules as to composition laid down by the delegated regulations;
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)
(fa) the requirements for information to be provided on recommendations for appropriate use of the foods referred to in Article 1(1).
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 226 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1a (new)
Due to the additional specific requirements on mandatory information to be provided on labels of certain foods referred to in Article 1(1) of this Regulation, the Commission may, if appropriate, establish by means of the delegated regulations referred to in paragraph 2, derogations from the minimum font size and other legibility requirements established in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011;
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 268 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Directive 96/8/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 are repealed from [the first day of the month 2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation].deleted
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 269 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. Directive 96/8/EC and Regulation (EC) No 41/2009 are repealed from [the first day of the month 2 years after the date of the entry into force of this Regulation].deleted
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 276 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18
Food not complying with this Regulation but complying with Directives 2009/39/EC and 96/8/EC, Regulations (EC) No 41/2009 and (EC) No 953/2009, and labelled prior to [2 years after the date of the entry into forceapplication of this Regulation] may continue to be marketed after that date until stocks are exhausted.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 277 #

2011/0156(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1169/2011 shall apply to food referred to in Article 1(1) 3 years after the date of the entry into force of the delegated regulations referred to in Article 10(2) of this Regulation.
2012/01/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) Article 5 of Directive 2003/96/EC permits the application of differentiated rates of taxation in certain cases. However, in order to ensure the consistency of the CO2 price signal, the possibility for Member States to differentiate national rates should be restricted to general energy consumption taxation. Moreover, the possibility to apply a lower level of taxation to oil derived motor fuel used by taxis is no longer compatible with the objective of policies promoting alternative fuels and energy carriers and the use of cleaner vehicles in urban transport and should thus be removed.
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In the case of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and natural gas used as propellantsused as motor fuel, advantages in the form of lower minimum levels of general energy consumption taxation or the possibility to exempt thoseis energy products from taxation are no longer justified, in particular in the light of the need to increase the market share of renewable energy sources and should therefore be removed in the medium term. In the case of natural gas and biomethane used as motor fuels, advantages in the form of lower minimum levels of general energy consumption taxation or the possibility to exempt this energy product from taxation should only be removed after an assessment, by 2023, on the implementation of the provisions of this Directive relating to the level of taxation applicable to natural gas in road transport. This assessment shall, inter alia, examine the progress in the availability of natural gas and biomethane, the growth of the refilling stations network in Europe, the market share of natural gas vehicles in the EU, the innovation and technological developments of biomethane as fuel in transport, the real value of the minimum level of taxation.
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 54 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
(21) The general rules introduced by this Directive take account of the specificities of fuels that are biomass or made of biomass complying with the sustainability criteria laid down in Article 17 of Directive 2009/28/EC with regard both to their contribution to the CO2-balance and to their lower energy content per quantitative unit of liquid biofuels, as compared to some of the competing fossil fuels. Consequently, the provisions in Directive 2003/96/EC authoriszing reductions or exemptions for those fuels should be removed in the medium term. For the interim period, it should be ensured that the application of these provisions is made consistent with the general rules introduced by this Directive. Biofuels and bioliquids defined in Article 2(h) and (i) of Directive 2009/28/EC should therefore only benefit from additional tax advantages applied by Member States if they fulfil the sustainability criteria laid down in Article 17 of this Directive. In the case of biomethane, the energy content per quantitative unit is the same as for natural gas. Given the fact that biomethane injected into the natural gas grid helps to increase the share of renewable sources, biomethane will be tax exempted with respect to the CO2 and energy content, provided it is produced according the sustainability criteria.
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 66 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point b
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 4 – paragraph 4 - subparagraph 1a (new)
In the case of natural gas and biomethane as motor fuels, higher minimum levels of general energy consumption taxation should apply only after an assessment, by 2023, on the implementation of the provisions of this Directive relating to the level of taxation applicable to natural gas in road transport. The report shall, inter alia, examine the progress in the availability of natural gas and biomethane, the growth of the refilling stations network in Europe, the market share of natural gas vehicles in the EU, the innovation and technological developments of biomethane as fuel in transport, the real value of the minimum level of taxation.
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 5 – third indent
– for the following uses: local public passenger transport (excluding taxis running on oil derived motor fuels), waste collection, armed forces and public administrations, disabled people, ambulances;
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 78 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13(1) – point a – point (i)
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point (i)
(i) Until 1 January 2023, natural gas, biomethane and LPG used as propellantsmotor fuels, without prejudice to Article 29, paragraph 4a;
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 83 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 13(1) – point 1 – point (a) – point (i) a (new)
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(ia) A new subparagraph is added: In the case of biomethane, the energy content per quantitative unit is the same as for natural gas. Given the fact that biomethane injected into the natural gas grid helps to increase the share of renewable sources, biomethane will be tax exempted with respect to the CO2 and energy content, provided it is produced according to the sustainability criteria.
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 21
Directive 2003/96/EC
Article 29 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
By 2023 the Commission submits to the Council an assessment on the implementation of the provisions of this Directive relating to the level of taxation applicable to natural gas in road transport and a proposal for its modification. This assessment shall, inter alia, examine the progress in the availability of natural gas and biomethane, the growth of the refilling stations network in Europe, the market share of natural gas vehicles in the Union, the innovation and technological developments of biomethane as fuel in transport, the real value of the minimum level of taxation.
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #

2011/0092(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Annex
Directive 2003/96/EC
Annex I - table A - columns 2-5 - row 7 (natural gas)
Natural gas │ 20 €/t CO2 │ 1.5 € GJ │ 5.51 €/GJ │ 9.61 €/GJ
2011/11/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2010/2291(ACI)

Proposal for a decision
Paragraph 7
7. ADoes not approves conclusion of the agreement below and decides to annex it to its Rules of Procedurereopen the negotiations;
2011/04/01
Committee: AFCO
Amendment 18 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that the availability and quality of access to all services, particularly health and care services, is a fundamental principle of the European model of solidarity;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – point c
(c) provide adequate, wide-ranging rehabilitation services which are based on the desire for autonomy of people with disabilities and which seek to reintegrate them into the world of work; provide adequate rehabilitation services and promote mental health services and the development of early intervention and needs assessment services,
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 31 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) support the families of patients and professionals working in the national health systems by means of targeted information and training measures and by involving patients’ associations in decision-making and monitoring processes;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – point d a (new)
(da) set up an ‘integrated one-stop shop for access to services for people with disabilities’ in order to go beyond the limited approach taken by existing social and health advisory facilities;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 38 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Member States to take measures to recognise sign language and Braille;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to promote initiatives geared to the requirements of people with disabilities or sick people who cannot find appropriate solutions to their problems because those solutions are not considered profitable by companies which produce nutritional or prosthetic aids;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 50 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to promote the establishment of a European network of accredited centres for the diagnosis and treatment of specific forms of rare diseases, in order to coordinate and monitor their activities and the benefits they have for patients;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 54 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Member States to guarantee full mobility for people with disabilities by: (a) removing architectural barriers from road infrastructure; (b) incorporating dedicated transport services for people with disabilities into the public transport system; (c) providing appropriate information and communication systems in stations and airports and at bus stops;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Highlights the role of voluntary work as a vital support for people with disabilities and calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue and to improve the initiatives and support programmes devoted to such work;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2010/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Stresses the importance of research into new therapeutic methods which further facilitate the integration of people with disabilities into society; in this regard, drama and pet therapy, for instance, are proving to be effective since they promote socialisation and interpersonal communication;
2011/05/03
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1 #

2010/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that a future sustainable economy is not just a moral objective, but as much an global economic necessity; believes that the EU should leadmanage this transformation to, keeping European industry competitive and to ensureing a clean and healthy living environment; emphasises that this objective can be achieved only by means of a global approach involving both the Union and third countries;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #

2010/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the need to strengthen integration of EU environmental legislation and objectives into sectoral policies (including the CAP, the cohesion policy and the CFP); suggests therefore mainstreaming EU finances to ensure compliance with EU environmental legislation and policy objectives; underlines the importance of future research and innovation programmes in delivering the EU's objectives of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 22 #

2010/2211(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates the importance of reaching EU climate and biodiversity targets and urges the EU to ensure that thesePoints out that the EU’s environmental targets arshould be reflected in all other policies; calls upon the EU to commit to sufficient funding on a structural basis to reach these targets, and to further enhance the capacity of developing countries to mainstream environment and climate mitigation and adaptation across sectors and economic development plans, in order to guarantee consistency in EU funding policy;
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2010/2154(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the technology based on backscatter x-ray scanning emits a low dose of X-rays. Clearly, any exposure to ionising radiation, however low, may have long-term effects on health due to the cumulative effect of radiation. It is therefore proposed that we avoid this technology, or at least ensure that all exposures are as low as possible for workers and regular passengers, or limit it to flights to sensitive destinations and to periods of high alert;
2010/12/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

2010/2153(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas this systematic vaccination strategy is based essentially on an approach that relies on blind faith in the effectiveness of influenza vaccines, without taking into account scientific data that contradict that belief (see Cochrane journals), and the majority of the studies available on the efficacy of the medicinal products, including vaccines, have been conducted by pharmaceutical companies, meaning that no objective proof has been provided of the efficacy of influenza vaccines,
2010/12/20
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2010/2111(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that the excessive import of protein crops made vulnerable the European livestock sector, contributed to the large-scale price volatility and thus kept down the profitability, especially of small and medium-sized livestock producers, while it led to, which is due to greater, uncontrolled liberalisation of agricultural markets, has exposed the entire European agricultural sector to direct and indirect damage, for example in the form of distortions of trade and of competitive dynamics, large-scale price volatility and the consequent reduction in profitability, placing on the market of counterfeit protein crops, which are potentially damaging to human health, and unsustainable agricultural practices in third countries;
2010/12/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the EU, as the largest trading bloc in the world, can set worldwide standards, and supports the development and more widespread use of certification and labelling schemes which take account of social and ecological criteria; notes the successful work done by international NGOs to develop and promote such labels and certificates and expressly advocates, advocating their wider use;
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the EU to negotiate, within the WTO, the introduction of a carbon tax on third-country imports where these do not contribute actively to the fight against climate change, on a basis of binding reduction targets similar to those of the EU and of the principle of 'shared but differentiated responsibility';
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the conclusion of an internationally binding agreement on climate protection and strongly supports the objective of a 320% reduction in CO2 emissions in the EU by 2020, irrespective of international negotiations, and the long-term EU objective of reduc; believes that any further reduction ing emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases by at least 85% by 2050in the EU by 2020 should be conditional on similar reduction targets being adopted by other industrialised and emerging countries;
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the conclusion of an internationally binding agreement on climate protection and strongly supports the objective of a 320% reduction in CO2 emissions in the EU by 2020, irrespective of international negotiations, and the long- term EU objective of further reducing emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases by at least 85% by 2050;
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 17 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the conclusion of an internationally binding agreement on climate protection and strongly supports the objective of a 320% reduction in CO2 emissions in the EU by 2020, irrespective of international negotiations, and the long-term EU objective of reducing emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases by at least 85% by 2050;
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 26 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that the rise in CO2 emissions related to transport and international trade is undermining the EU's climate change strategy; points out that a number of studies have shown that the production and supply of goods within Europe result in a lower CO2 emissions rate than do third-country imports; considers this a valid argument in favour of moving away from an export-based development strategy and towards endogenous development based on diversified and local production and consumption in the developing countries; stresses that such a strategy would have a positive impact on employment in both the EU and the developing countries;
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2010/2103(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Opposes subsidies for fossil fuels and calls for greater support for environmentally sound renewable energies and identification and development of decentralised energy sources, particularly in developing countries;
2010/09/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 17 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas health inequalities have also an important gender dimension: women in general live longer than men but may spend a longer proportion of their lives in ill health,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas inequalities in health between peoplecitizens in higher and lower educational, occupational and income groups have been found in all Member States,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 28 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas measurement of health inequalities is a fundamental first step towards effective action,deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 32 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas rates of morbidity aremay usually be higher among those in lower educational, occupational and income groups and substantial inequalities are also found in the prevalence of most specific diseases, including mental illness, and most specific forms of disability,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas a social gradient in health status exists, whereby people in lower educational, occupational and income groups tend to die at a younger age and to have a higher prevalence of most types of health problems,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 45 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas health inequalities are due to differences between population groupcitizens in a wide range of factors which affect health, including: living conditions; health-related behaviours; education, occupation and income; health care, disease prevention and health promotion services; and public policies influencing the quantity, quality and distribution of these factors,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the Commission forecasts that unemployment is likely to reach 10.3% by the end of 2010, and whereas there is widespread concern that the present economic crisis, particularly its effect on unemployment, will adversely affect population healththe possibility of equal access to health services,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas the combination of poverty with other vulnerabilities, such as childhood or, old age, or disability or minority background, further increases health risks,
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the key suggestions made by the Commission in its Communication entitled ‘Solidarity in health: reducing health inequalities in the EU’: 1) making a more equitable distribution of health part of our overall goals for social and economic development, 2) improving the data and knowledge bases (including measuring, monitoring, evaluation, and reporting), 3) building commitment across society for reducing health inequalities, 4) meeting the needs of the most vulnerable groupcitizens, and 5) developing the contribution of EU policies to the reduction of health inequalities;
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 74 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Takes the view, however, that a number of references contained in the communication, to ethnic background and educational levels for example, are irrelevant, since they are not in themselves factors regarding health inequalities; considers also that a number of affirmations contained therein (for example: ‘women … may spend a longer proportion of their lives in ill health’) are questionable and unfounded;
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 77 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that attention must focus onbe given to the whole social gradient, with particular attention to be given to the needs of peoplecitizens in poverty, disadvantaged migrant and ethnic minority groups, people with disabilities, elderly people and children living in poverty; (Reference to ethnic background is irrelevant.)
2010/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages all the Member States to invest in social, educational, environmental and health services infrastructure;
2011/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 134 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Points to the importance of raising the average level of healthcare and decreasing the inequalities between different social groupindividuals, and underlines that these objectives could be achieved through the optimisation of public spending for healthcare;
2011/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission and Member States to develop a common set of indicators to monitor health inequalities by age, sex, socio-economic status and geographic dimension and to set a methodology to audit the health situation in Member States aimed at identifying and prioritising areas of improvement and best practices;deleted
2011/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 187 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Council to promote the tackling of health inequalities as a policy priority in all Member States, taking into account the social determinants of health, by means of actions in policy areas such as the environment, educathealthcare provision and working conditions;
2011/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 194 #

2010/2089(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take steps to establish common standards of healthcare in all the Member States so as to ensure that in each Member State uniform, coordinated action is taken to protect public health and put an end to health inequalities;
2011/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2 #

2010/2001(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the increase of the overall level of appropriations of the LIFE+ to EUR 333,5 million which represent an increase of 8,68% compared to 2010 budget levels and notes that this increase will finance an increase in the level of resources available for projects in all policy areas, including climate, an increase of 60 % of the resources available to support measures undertaken by the Commission in support of Climate policy and legislation as well as a sustained level of support to NGOs and policy support measures to Environment;(Does not affect English version.) (Linguistic amendment to the Italian version, which has been reworded to avoid repetition.)
2010/07/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 3 #

2010/2001(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the increase of the overall level of appropriations of the LIFE+ to EUR 333,5 million which represent an increase of 8,68% compared to 2010 budget levels and notes that this increase will finance an increase in the level of resources available for projects in all policy areas, including climate, an increase of 60 % of the resources available to suppfort measures undertaken by the Commission in support of Climate policy and legislation as well as a sustained level of support to NGOs and policy supportfor policy measures to Environment;
2010/07/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the exploitation (exploration, extraction and processing) of minerals in mines, quarries, or by means of boreholes, with the exception of underground gas storage in natural strata, salt cavities and disused mines and of chemical and thermal processing operations and storage related to those operations which involve dangerous substances, as defined in Annex I;
2011/06/22
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 64 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) In line with the Aarhus Convention, effective public participation inconsultation of the members of the public affected by decision- making is necessary to enable the public to express, and the decision-maker to take account of, opinions and concerns that may be relevant to those decisions, thereby increasing the accountability and transparency of the decision-making process and contributing to public awareness of environmental issues and support for the decisions taken. Under no circumstances must such consultations result in delays or unwarranted complications in the process of making and implementing decisions. Members of the public concerned should have access to justice in order to contribute to the protection of the right to live in an environment that is adequate for personal health and well-being.
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 83 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the exploitation (exploration, extraction and processing) of minerals in mines, quarries, or by means of boreholes, with the exception of underground gas storage in natural strata, salt cavities and disused mines and of chemical and thermal processing operations and storage related to those operations which involve dangerous substances, as defined in Annex I;
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 8
8. ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person who operates or controls an establishment or installation or, where this is provided for by national legislation, to whom decisive economic and/or decision- making power over the technical functioning of the establishment or installation has been delegated;
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 104 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. ‘dangerous substance’ means a substance or mixture listed in Part 1 or Part 2 of Annex 1 and present as a raw material, product, by-product, residue or intermediate, including those substances which it is reasonable to suppose may be generated in the event of accident in quantities equal to or in excess of the thresholds set out in Parts 1 and 2 of Annex I;
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 126 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) the immediate environment of the establishment, elements liable to cause a major accident or to aggravate the consequences thereof, including details of neighbouring establishments, whether or not those are covered by this Directive, as well as other sites, areas and developments that could increase the risk or consequences of a major accident and of domino effects.deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) any significant increase in the quantity or significant change in the nature or physical form of the dangerous substance present which could have significant repercussions on major accident hazards, as indicated in the notification provided by the operator pursuant to paragraph 1, or any change in the processes employing it,
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 134 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. Without prejudice to paragraph 4, the operator shall periodically review and where necessary update the notification, at least every five years. The operator shall send the updated notification to the competent authority without delay.deleted
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 152 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) cooperate insupply details to the authority responsible for the preparation of external emergency plans so as to informing the public and neighbouring establishments that fall outside the scope of this Directive, and in supplying information to the authority responsible for the preparation of external emergency plans.
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 165 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – – introductory part
installation, establishment, storage facility, or process or of the nature or quantity of dangerous substances which could have significant repercussions on major-accident hazards, the Member States shall ensure that the operator:
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall ensure that the information referred to in Annex V is permanently available to the public, including in an electronic format. The information shall be reviewed and where necessary updated at least once aThe information referred to in Annex V shall be reviewed every three years and, where necessary, repeated and updated, at least if there is any modification within the meaning of Article 10. It shall be permanently available to the public, including in an electronic format. The maximum period between the repetition of the information to the public shall, in any case, be no longer than five years.
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 197 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. Requests for access to the information referred to in paragraph 2(a), (b) and (c) shall be handled in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 5 of Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 200 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – title
Public consultation and participation in decision-making
2011/06/28
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 207 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) details of the arrangements for public participation and consultation made pursuant to paragraphoint 5.
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
Reasonable time-frames for the different phases shall be provided, allowing sufficient time for informing the public and for the public concerned to prepare and participate effectively in environmental decision-making subject to the provisions of this Article., subject to the provisions of this Article, but without unduly prolonging or complicating the time-frames for decision-making and the associated implementing measures;
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 215 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 6 – point b
(b) the results of the consultations held before the decision was taken and an explanation of how they were taken into account in that decision.
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 250 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
What constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right shall be determined by the Member States, consistently with the objective of giving the public concerned wide access to justice. To this end, the interest of any non-governmental organisation promoting environmental protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of paragraph 2(a)shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of paragraph 1(a) provided the organisation: (a) has an office based in the territory affected by the decisions, acts or omissions subject to the provisions of Article 14, and (b) meets the requirements of national law.
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 260 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part 1 – Table – Section 'H' – row H2– Column 1
HH2 ACUTE TOXIC Category 2, all exposure routes Category 3, daermal andosol inhalation exposure routes (see note 7)
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 288 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part 2 – Table – row 37 a (new)
Mineral products (a) crude oil 5000 50000
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 301 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) identification, on the basis of information provided or made available by the competent authority, of neighbouring establishments, as well as other sites, areas and developments that could increase the risk or consequences of a major accident and of domino effects;
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 327 #

2010/0377(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex VI – Part I - point 1
Any fire or explosion or accidental discharge of a dangerous substance involving, a quantity of at least 13 % of the qualifying quantity laid down in column 3 of Annex I.
2011/06/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 10 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) In July and August 2010, following heavy monsoon rains, devastating floods affected extensive regions of Pakistan, notably the areas of Balochistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, Sindh and Gilgit- Baltistan. According to United Nations sources, the flooding affected some 20 million people and 20 per cent of Pakistan's land, equivalent to at least 160,000 square kilometres, and leaving up to 12 million people in need of urgent humanitarian aid. However, the textile producing areas are situated outside the areas hit by the floods and there was no direct damage caused to plant or machinery.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 11 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Pakistan’s textile industry is located in areas which were not affected by the floods and did not suffer any direct damage as a result of them.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 12 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) In November 2010, serious floods, caused by torrential rains, hit the Veneto Region, in Italy, and in particular the provinces of Vicenza, Verona and Padua, where there is a strong presence and concentration of textile and leather SMEs and industries. Some 293 municipalities were affected over an area of 140 hectares and the floods caused around EUR 1 billion’s worth of direct damage to land, homes, people, factories and machinery in these areas.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 14 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The autonomous trade preferences instrument is not an appropriate way of dealing with and resolving humanitarian emergency situations.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 15 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) The effects of the application of the trade instrument would only be felt years after the floods and would mostly benefit international exporters and industrial groups in the sector, increasing their profits. Such measures would in no way mitigate the destruction of farmlands, the damage to civilian infrastructure and homes and the population’s dramatic health conditions resulting from the floods.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 16 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 c (new)
(3c) The European Union addressed Pakistan’s humanitarian emergency by providing some EUR 150 million in humanitarian aid and the international community as a whole swiftly and effectively supplied Pakistan with EUR 500 million in humanitarian aid.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 18 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) It will be important to use all available appropriate means to support Pakistan's recovery from this emergency and progress towards future development.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Trade, Growth and World Affairs – Trade Policy as a core component of the EU's 2020 strategy’ (COM(2010)612/4) states that in 2011 the Commission will assess the application of international trade as a standard aid instrument for third countries hit by natural disasters.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 29 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
(7) It is therefore not appropriate to extend autonomous trade preferences to Pakistan by suspending for a limited period of time all tariffs for certain products of export interest to Pakistan. The provision of these trade preferences would not cause any meaningfulhave significant adverse effects on the domestic market of the Union and would not affect, especially on the markets of Member States with a strong presence and concentration of textile and manufacturing sectors, and would negatively affect least developed Members of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in competition with Pakistan for products in respect of which it is being proposed that customs duties be suspended.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 33 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The suspension of customs duties for Pakistan in respect of the textile and manufacturing sectors would be an unfair and inappropriate measure in the light of the similar floods which have recently hit the Veneto Region and Vicenza, Verona and Padua provinces in Italy, manufacturing areas with a high concentration of textile and leather producers. These events directly hit and flooded not only homes and extensive areas under crops, but also thousands of businesses, laboratories, factories and machines, causing a halt in production, the closure of many production plants and the loss of thousands of jobs. The trade measure involving the suspension of customs duties for Pakistan would cause a further deterioration in the situation of people living in the textile and manufacturing areas of the Veneto Region hit by the floods.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) The Commission has not carried out any impact assessment on the measures to suspend customs duties for Pakistan as regards EU textile and manufacturing products. Such measures would cause direct and serious damage to the EU industry at an extremely critical juncture, characterised by a fall-off in orders, plant closures and steadily rising unemployment.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 35 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 c (new)
(7c) Pakistan’s territory is characterised by the presence of high hydro-geological risk levels and has already experienced many floods of a similar magnitude in the past. The problems posed by Pakistan’s territory could be significantly reduced through engineering and environmental operations to make risk areas secure. The proposed trade instrument cannot enable the Pakistani Government to implement the necessary civil and environmental protection work, which would be the only means of ensuring that there is no recurrence of such disasters. The suspension of customs duties would provide benefits only for a few international trade operators.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 37 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 e (new)
(7e) The suspension of customs duties in respect of the textile and leather sectors would cause serious damage to the equivalent EU manufacturing and industrial sectors, which are already in a state of grave crisis.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 38 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 f (new)
(7f) European textile and leather production is based and concentrated in specific manufacturing and industrial areas within only a few Member States. The textile sector is the main economic and social asset of such areas. The harmful economic effects of the suspension of customs duties for Pakistan would hit such areas not only in terms of loss of earnings and increased unemployment, but would also have adverse repercussions on their entire social fabric, worsening situations of social distress resulting from the sector’s economic crisis.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 41 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) The autonomous trade preferences will be either in the form of an exemption from customs duties upon import in the Union or in the form of tariff-rate quotas.deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 42 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Humanitarian aid is the most suitable and appropriate instrument for bringing relief to the flood victims in Pakistan and for humanitarian crisis situations in general. The trade instrument is not in this case an effective and appropriate instrument for urgent and efficacious action against the effects of the flooding.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 43 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) It would be better if the Commission implemented a strategy to support and revive Europe’s industrial and manufacturing textile sector. The Pakistani flood victims will not be helped by aid being granted to strong global competitors and private industrial groups, which will damage the European textile sector, employment and the European Union’s strategy for growth.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 44 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 c (new)
(8c) EU citizens in textile regions look to the EU institutions for protection and strategies for economic revival and development. Granting trade measures to assist the Pakistani textile sector would harm the textile regions of the Union, with economic damage, lack of growth, a drop in orders, rising unemployment and the spread of social unrest as a consequence. Decisions made by the EU institutions to which EU citizens look for protection and development would instead be inflicting economic damage on them.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 54 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Given the urgency of the situation in Pakistan, the Regulation should apply as of 1 January 2011, provided that the WTO has approved the request from the Union for the waiver from its obligations under GATT Articles I and XIII.deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 61 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) In order to ensure an immediate and sustainable impact on the economic recovery of Pakistan in the aftermath of the floods it is recommended to limit the duration of the trade preferences until 31 December 2013the granting of humanitarian aid is recommended as the better solution.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 65 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
Preferential arrangements 1. Products originating in Pakistan included in Annex I shall be exempt from customs duties upon import into the Union. 2. Products originating in Pakistan and included in Annex II shall be admitted for import into the Union subject to the special provisions laid down in Article 3.deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 66 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Parliament rejects the Commission’s proposal and calls on it to apply the humanitarian aid instrument, increasing its scope, as this would seem in this case to be more suitable and effective in view of the urgent and needy conditions prevailing in the Pakistani humanitarian crisis.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 67 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. Products originating in Pakistan included in Annex I shall be exempt from customs duties upon import into the Union.deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 68 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. Products originating in Pakistan and included in Annex II shall be admitted for import into the Union subject to the special provisions laid down in Article 3.deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 92 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 a (new)
Safeguard clause 1. Where a product cited in Annex I and originating in Pakistan is imported on terms which cause, or threaten to cause serious difficulties to a Union producer of like or directly competing products, Common Customs Tariff duties on that product may be reintroduced at any time by the European Commission. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may reject or amend the Commission's proposal. 2. At the request of a Member State or a national trade association or on the Commission's own initiative, the Commission shall take a formal decision to initiate an investigation within a reasonable period of time. Where the Commission decides to initiate an investigation, it shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union announcing the investigation. The notice shall provide a summary of the information received, and state that any relevant information should be sent to the Commission. It shall specify the period, which shall not exceed four months from the date of publication of the notice, within which interested parties may make their views known in writing. 3. The Commission shall seek all information it deems necessary and may verify the information received with Pakistan and any other relevant source. It may be assisted by officials of the Member State on whose territory verification might be sought, if that Member State so requests. 4. In examining whether there are serious difficulties, the Commission shall take account, inter alia and where the information is available, of the following factors concerning Community producers: – market share, – production, – stocks, – production capacity, – capacity utilisation, – employment, – imports, – prices. 5. The investigation shall be completed within four months after the publication of the notice referred to in paragraph 2. 6. The Commission shall take a decision within one month of the investigation being concluded, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 8(2). This decision shall enter into force one month after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. 7. Where exceptional circumstances requiring immediate action make an investigation impossible, the Commission may, after informing the Committee, take any preventive measure which is strictly necessary.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 93 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 b (new)
Revoking the measures If Pakistan adopts measures restricting human rights and workers’ rights, gender equality or religious rights or if it provides terrorist organisations of any kind with backing or support, the Commission shall immediately revoke the measures in this Regulation.
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 116 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
CN Code Description GRAIN SPLITS OF BOVINE (INCLUDING BUFFALO) LEATHER, WITHOUT HAIR ON, FURTHER PREPARED 41079210 AFTER TANNING OR CRUSTING; OTHER THAN WHOLE HIDES AND SKINS LEATHER OF BOVINE (INCLUDING BUFFALO), WITHOUT HAIR ON, FURTHER PREPARED AFTER TANNING OR 41079910 CRUSTING; OTHER THAN WHOLE HIDES AND SKINS, OTHER THAN UNSPLIT FULL GRAINS AND GRAIN SPLITS deleted deleted deleted deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 117 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
CN Code Description deleted GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITS, OF LEATHER OR 42032100 COMPOSITION LEATHER, SPECIALLY DESIGNED FORdeleted deleted deleted deleted deleted USE IN SPORTS deleted deleted GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITS, OF LEATHER OR 42032910 COMPOSITION LEATHER, PROTECTIVE FOR ALL TRADES, OTHER THAN SPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR USE IN SPORTS MEN'S AND BOYS' GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITTS, OF LEATHER OR COMPOSITION LEATHER, OTHER THAN 42032991 SPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR USE IN SPORTS, OTHER THAN PROTECTIVE FOR ALL TRADES GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITTS, OF LEATHER OR COMPOSITION LEATHER, OTHER THAN SPECIALLY 42032999 DESIGNED FOR USE IN SPORTS, OTHER THAN PROTECTIVE FOR ALL TRADES, OTHER THAN MEN'S AND BOYS' GLOVES IMPREGNATED, COATED OR COVERED WITH 61161020 RUBBER, KNITTED OR CROCHETED 61161080 MITTENS AND MITTS, IMPREGNATED, COATED OR COVERED WITH PLASTICS OR RUBBER, KNITTED OR CROCHETED, AND GLOVES, IMPREGNATED, COATED OR COVERED WITH PLASTICS, KNITTED OR CROCHETED GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITTS, OF COTTON, KNITTED OR 61169200 CROCHETED GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITTS, OF SYNTHETIC FIBRES, 61169300 KNITTED OR CROCHETED 62160000 GLOVES, MITTENS AND MITTS deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 118 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
CN Code Description SINGLE COTTON YARN, OF UNCOMBED FIBRES, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52051200 MEASURING LESS THAN 714,29 DECITEX BUT NOT LESS THAN 232,56 DECITEX (EXCEEDING 14 METRIC NUMBER BUT NOT EXCEEDING 43 METRIC NUMBER), NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE SINGLE COTTON YARN, OF COMBED FIBRES, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, MEASURING LESS THAN 714,29 DECITEX BUT NOT LESS 52052200 THAN 232,56 DECITEX (EXCEEDING 14 METRIC NUMBER BUT NOT EXCEEDING 43 METRIC NUMBER), NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE SINGLE COTTON YARN, OF COMBED FIBRES, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, MEASURING LESS THAN 232,56 DECITEX BUT NOT LESS 52052300 THAN 192,31 DECITEX (EXCEEDING 43 METRIC NUMBER BUT NOT EXCEEDING 53 METRIC NUMBER), NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE SINGLE COTTON YARN, OF COMBED FIBRES, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, MEASURING LESS THAN 192,31 DECITEX BUT NOT LESS 52052400 THAN 125 DECITEX (EXCEEDING 52 METRIC NUMBER BUT NOT EXCEEDING 80 METRIC NUMBER), NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE MULTIPLE "FOLDED" OR CABLED COTTON YARN, OF UNCOMBED FIBRES, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, MEASURING PER SINGLE YARN 52053200 LESS THAN 714,29 DECITEX BUT NOT LESS THAN 232,56 DECITEX (EXCEEDING 14 METRIC NUMBER BUT NOT EXCEEDING 43 METRIC NUMBER PER SINGLE YARN), NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE MULTIPLE "FOLDED" OR CABLED COTTON YARN, OF COMBED FIBRES, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, MEASURING PER SINGLE YARN 52054200 LESS THAN 714,29 DECITEX BUT NOT LESS THAN 232,56 DECITEX (EXCEEDING 14 METRIC NUMBER BUT NOT EXCEEDING 43 METRIC NUMBER PER SINGLE YARN), NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE UNBLEACHED, PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52081190 WEIGHING NOT MORE THAN 100 G/M2, OTHER THAN FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS AND MEDICAL GAUZES UNBLEACHED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52081216 WEIGHING MORE THAN 100 G/M2 BUT NOT MORE THAN 130 G/M2, OF A WIDTH NOT EXCEEDING 165 CM UNBLEACHED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52081219 WEIGHING MORE THAN 100 G/M2 BUT NOT MORE THAN 130 G/M2, OF A WIDTH EXCEEDING 165 CM 52081300 UNBLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, IN 3-THREAD OR 4-THREAD TWILL, INCLUDING CROSS TWILL OTHER UNBLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52081900 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON BLEACHED, PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING NOT MORE THAN 100 G/M2, OTHER THAN BLEACHED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52082190 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING NOT MORE THAN 100 G/M2, OTHER THAN FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS AND MEDICAL GAUZES BLEACHED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52082219 WEIGHING MORE THAN 100 G/M2 BUT NOT MORE THAN 130 G/M2, OF A WIDTH EXCEEDING 165 CM BLEACHED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52082296 WEIGHING MORE THAN 130 G/M2, OF A WIDTH NOT EXCEEDING 165 CM OTHER BLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52082900 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON OTHER DYED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52083900 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON PRINTED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52085100 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING NOT MORE THAN 100 G/M2 PRINTED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52085200 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING MORE THAN 200 G/M2 OTHER PRINTED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52085990 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON UNBLEACHED PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52091100 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING MORE THAN 200 G/M2 UNBLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52091200 WEIGHING MORE THAN 200 G/M2, IN 3-THREAD OR 4- THREAD TWILL, INCLUDING CROSS TWILL OTHER UNBLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52091900 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON BLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING MORE 52092200 THAN 200 G/M2, IN 3-THREAD OR 4-THREAD TWILL, INCLUDING CROSS TWILL OTHER BLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52092900 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON DYED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING MORE 52093200 THAN 200 G/M2, IN 3-THREAD OR 4-THREAD TWILL, INCLUDING CROSS TWILL OTHER DYED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, 52093900 CONTAINING 85% OR MORE BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, WEIGHING MORE THAN 200 G/M2 UNBLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CONTAINING LESS THAN 85% BY WEIGHT OF COTTON, 52111200 MIXED PRINCIPALLY OR SOLELY WITH MAN-MADE FIBRES, WEIGHING MORE THAN 200 G/M2, IN 3-THREAD OR 4-THREAD TWILL, INCLUDING CROSS TWILL WOVEN FABRICS OF YARN CONTAINING LESS THAN 85% BY WEIGHT OF SYNTHETIC FILAMENTS, INCLUDING WOVEN FABRICS OBTAINED FROM SYNTHETIC 54078100 MONOFILAMENT OF 67 DECITEX OR MORE AND OF WHICH NO CROSS-SECTIONAL DIMENSION EXCEEDS 1 MM, MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH COTTON, UNBLEACHED OR BLEACHED WOVEN FABRICS OF YARN CONTAINING LESS THAN 85% BY WEIGHT OF SYNTHETIC FILAMENTS, INCLUDING WOVEN FABRICS OBTAINED FROM SYNTHETIC 54078200 MONOFILAMENT OF 67 DECITEX OR MORE AND OF WHICH NO CROSS-SECTIONAL DIMENSION EXCEEDS 1 MM, MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH COTTON, DYED YARN (OTHER THAN SEWING THREAD) OF POLYESTER 55095300 STAPLE FIBRES , MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH COTTON, NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE WOVEN FABRICS OF POLYESTER STAPLE FIBRES, CONTAINING LESS THAN 85% BY WEIGHT OF SUCH FIBRES, MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH COTTON, OF A 55131120 WEIGHT NOT EXCEEDING 170 G/M2, PLAIN WEAVE, UNBLEACHED OR BLEACHED, OF A WIDTH OF 165 CM OR LESS WOVEN FABRICS OF POLYESTER STAPLE FIBRES, CONTAINING LESS THAN 85% BY WEIGHT OF SUCH 55132100 FIBRES, MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH COTTON, OF A WEIGHT NOT EXCEEDING 170 G/M2, PLAIN WEAVE, DYED WOVEN FABRICS OF POLYESTER STAPLE FIBRES, CONTAINING LESS THAN 85% BY WEIGHT OF SUCH 55134100 FIBRES, MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH COTTON, OF A WEIGHT NOT EXCEEDING 170 G/M2, PRINTED CN Code Description deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 119 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
CN Code Description MEN'S OR BOYS' ANORAKS (INCLUDING SKI JACKETS), 61012090 WINDCHEATERS, WIND-JACKETS AND SIMILAR ARTICLES, OF COTTON, KNITTED OR CROCHETED MEN'S OR BOYS' JACKETS AND BLAZERS, OF COTTON, 61033200 KNITTED OR CROCHETED MEN'S OR BOYS' TROUSERS, BIB AND BRACE OVERALLS, 61034200 BREECHES AND SHORTS (OTHER THAN SWIMWEAR), OF COTTON, KNITTED OR CROCHETED MEN'S OR BOYS' NIGHTSHIRTS AND PYJAMAS, OF 61072100 COTTON, KNITTED OR CROCHETED WOMEN'S OR GIRLS' NIGHTDRESSES AND PYJAMAS, OF 61083100 COTTON, KNITTED OR CROCHETED T-SHIRTS, SINGLETS AND OTHER VESTS OF WOOL OR 61099020 FINE ANIMAL HAIR OR MAN-MADE FIBRES, KNITTED OR CROCHETED BABIES' GARMENTS AND CLOTHING ACCESSORIES, OF 61112090 COTTON, KNITTED OR CROCHETED (OTHER THAN GLOVES, MITTENSAND MITTS) TRACK-SUITS OF SYNTHETIC FIBRES, KNITTED OR 61121200 CROCHETED PANTYHOSE, TIGHTS, STOCKINGS, SOCKS AND OTHER HOSIERYAND FOOTWEAR WITHOUT APPLIED SOLES, OF COTTON, KNITTED OR CROCHETED (EXCL. GRADUATED 61159500 COMPRESSION HOSIERY, PANTYHOSE AND TIGHTS, WOMEN'S FULL-LENGTH OR KNEE-LENGTH STOCKINGS, MEASURING PER SINGLE YARN LESS THAN 67 DECITEX) MEN'S OR BOYS' ANORAKS, WINDCHEATERS, WIND- 62019300 JACKETS AND SIMILAR ARTICLES, OF MAN-MADE FIBRES MEN'S OR BOYS' TROUSERS AND BREECHES OF 62034319 SYNTHETIC FIBRES (OTHER THAN INDUSTRIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL) WOMEN'S OR GIRLS' ENSEMBLES, OF COTTON (OTHER 62042280 THAN INDUSTRIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL) 62046290 WOMEN'S OR GIRLS' COTTON SHORTS MEN'S OR BOYS' SINGLETS AND OTHER VESTS, 62079100 BATHROBES, DRESSING GOWNS AND SIMILAR ARTICLES, OF COTTON WOMEN'S OR GIRLS' SINGLETS AND OTHER VESTS, 62089100 BRIEFS, PANTIES, NEGLIGES, BATHROBES, DRESSING GOWNS AND SIMILAR ARTICLES, OF COTTON 62114290 WOMEN'S OR GIRLS' GARMENTS, OF COTTON WOMEN'S OR GIRLS' APRONS, OVERALLS, SMOCK- 62114310 OVERALLS AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL AND OCCUPATIONAL CLOTHING, OF MAN-MADE FIBRES TOILET LINEN AND KITCHEN LINEN, OF TERRY 63026000 TOWELLING OR SIMILAR TERRY FABRICS, OF COTTON TOILET LINEN AND KITCHEN LINEN, OF COTTON, OTHER 63029100 THAN OF TERRY TOWELLING OR SIMILAR TERRY FABRICS CURTAINS (INCLUDING DRAPES) AND INTERIOR BLINDS, 63039100 CURTAIN OR BED VALANCES, OF COTTON, NOT KNITTED OR CROCHETED CURTAINS (INCLUDING DRAPES) AND INTERIOR BLINDS, 63039290 CURTAIN OR BED VALANCES, OF SYNTHETIC FIBRES, NOT NONWOVENS, NOT KNITTED OR CROCHETED CURTAINS (INCLUDING DRAPES) AND INTERIOR BLINDS, CURTAIN OR BED VALANCES, NOT OF COTTON OR 63039990 SYNTHETIC FIBRES, NOT NONWOVENS, NOT KNITTED OR CROCHETED OTHER FURNISHING ARTICLES, OF COTTON, NOT 63049200 KNITTED OR CROCHETED FLOORCLOTHS, DISHCLOTHS, DUSTERS AND SIMILAR 63071090 CLEANING CLOTHS, NOT KNITTED OR CROCHETED, NOT NONWOVENS OTHER MADE-UP TEXTILE ARTICLES, INCLUDING DRESS 63079099 PATTERNS, NOT KNITTED OR CROCHETED, NOT OF FELT CN Code Description deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 120 #

2010/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
CN Code Description FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF RUBBER, PLASTICS OR COMPOSITION LEATHER AND UPPERS OF LEATHER, WITH IN-SOLES OF A LENGTH OF 24 CM OR MORE, WHICH CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED AS MEN'S OR WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR, OTHER THAN SPORTS FOOTWEAR AND 64039993 FOOTWEAR INCORPORATING A PROTECTIVE METAL TOECAP, NOT COVERING THE ANKLE, NOT MADE ON A BASE OR PLATFORM OF WOOD (NOT HAVING AN INNER SOLE), OTHER THAN FOOTWEAR WITH A VAMP MADE OF STRAPS OR WHICH HAS ONE OR SEVERAL PIECES CUT OUT, OTHER THAN SLIPPERS FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF RUBBER, PLASTICS OR COMPOSITION LEATHER AND UPPERS OF LEATHER, WITH IN-SOLES OF A LENGTH OF 24 CM OR MORE, FOR MEN, OTHER THAN SPORTS FOOTWEAR AND FOOTWEAR INCORPORATING A PROTECTIVE METAL TOECAP, NOT 64039996 COVERING THE ANKLE, NOT MADE ON A BASE OR PLATFORM OF WOOD (NOT HAVING AN INNER SOLE), OTHER THAN FOOTWEAR WITH A VAMP MADE OF STRAPS OR WHICH HAS ONE OR SEVERAL PIECES CUT OUT, OTHER THAN SLIPPERS FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF RUBBER, PLASTICS OR COMPOSITION LEATHER AND UPPERS OF LEATHER, WITH IN-SOLES OF A LENGTH OF 24 CM OR MORE, FOR WOMEN, OTHER THAN SPORTS FOOTWEAR AND FOOTWEAR INCORPORATING A PROTECTIVE METAL 64039998 TOECAP, NOT COVERING THE ANKLE, NOT MADE ON A BASE OR PLATFORM OF WOOD (NOT HAVING AN INNER SOLE), OTHER THAN FOOTWEAR WITH A VAMP MADE OF STRAPS OR WHICH HAS ONE OR SEVERAL PIECES CUT OUT, OTHER THAN SLIPPERS deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted deleted
2010/12/14
Committee: INTA
Amendment 30 #

2010/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) encourage Member States or regions to develop or introduce integrated maritime governance;Deleted
2011/02/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2010/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a
a) third countries including those bordering a European sea basin,
2011/02/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #

2010/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point b
b) actors in third countries operating in or bordering on a European sea basin,
2011/02/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #

2010/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2
2. The Programme may benefit third countriesMember States, third countries bordering on a European sea basin, stakeholders in third countries, and international organisations or bodies which pursue one or more of the general and specific objectives set out in Article 2 and 3.
2011/02/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 21 #

2010/0254(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 1 – introductory part
Directive 2001/112/EC
Article 3 - paragraphs 3 and 4
(1) In Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4 areis replaced by the following:
2011/04/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 22 #

2010/0254(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 1 a (new)
Directive 2001/112/EC
Article 3 - paragraphs 3 and 4
(1a) In Article 3, paragraph 4 is repealed.
2011/04/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2010/0254(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 2001/112/EC
Article 3 - paragraph 4
4. Nectars and specific products of Annex III may be sweetened by the addition of sugars or honey. The sales name shall include the word ‘sweetened’ or ‘with added sugar’, followed by an indication of the maximum quantity of sugar added, calculated as dry matter and expressed in grams per litre."deleted
2011/04/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 38 #

2010/0254(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 2001/112/EC
Article 3 - paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The nutritional claim 'no added sugar' may be used for the labelling of fruit juices in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods1. __________________ 1 OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p. 9.
2011/04/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #

2010/0254(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 2001/112/EC
Annex I – part I – point 5 – paragraph 1
The fermentable but unfermented product obtained by adding water and/or, with or without the addition of sugars and/or honey, to the products defined in Parts I.1, I.2, I.3 and I.4, to fruit purée and/or to concentrated fruit purée and/or to a mixture of those products, that product, moreover, meeting the requirements of Annex IV.
2011/04/26
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 299 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) In order to allow manufacturers of components or separate technical units to apply for EU type-approval for components or separate technical units or authorisation, it is also important for these manufacturers to have access to certain information that is available only from the vehicle manufacturer, such as the technical information, including drawings, required for the development of parts for the aftermarket.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 303 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
(21) Unrestricted aAccess to vehicle repair information, via a standardised format which can be used to retrieve the technical information, and effective competition on the market for vehicletractor repair and maintenance information services are necessary to improve the functioning of the internal market, particularly as regards the free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services. A great proportion of such information is related to on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems and their interaction with other vehicle systems. It is appropriate to lay down technical specifications that the websites of the manufacturers should follow, along with targeted measures to ensure reasonable accessconsidering the principle of reasonableness and proportionality, both for small and medium-sized enterpriseses volume of vehicle types and/or manufacturers dimension.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 310 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation shall not apply to interchangeable machinery that is fully raised from the ground or that cannot articulate around a vertical axis when the vehicle to which it is attached is in use on a road.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 312 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) mobile machinery;deleted
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 314 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) track-laying tractors (category C)
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 317 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c b (new)
(cb) special purpose wheeled tractors (categories T4.1 and T4.2)
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 333 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point n
(n) rear protective structures;deleted
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 335 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point o
(o) lateral protection;deleted
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 337 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. TIn order to ensure that a high level of functional safety is obtained, the Commission shall be delegated powers to adopt in accordance with Article 57 a delegated act laying down the detailed technical requirements including test procedures and limit values, where applicable, for the subjects listed in paragraph 2 in order to ensure that a high level of road safety will be obtained. The detailed technical requirements shall ensure that, when relevant, vehicles with a maximum speed of more than 40 km/h, with the exclusion of towed implements S, meet an equivalent level of road safety with regards to brake performance and anti- lock braking systems as motor vehicles and their trailers.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 349 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 4
4. The certificate of conformity shall be designed to prevent forgery. To that end, the paper used shall be protected either byby adequate means such as coloured graphics or by a watermark in the form of the manufacturer’s identification mark.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 351 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall apply, in the case of complete vehicles, for a period of twelve24 months from the date on which validity of the EU type-approval expired and, in the case of completed vehicles, for a period of eighteen30 months from that date.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 356 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. The complete test reports issued on the basis of the standardised OECD Codes listed in Annex I, approved according to the general rules of OECDor equivalent standards, may be used as an alternative to the test reports drawn up under this Regulation or the separate Regulations. The specific type approval may be issued by the type approval authority or, when relevant, by OECD, at the choice of the manufacturer.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 358 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 16 – title
Access to vehicletractor repair and maintenance information
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 362 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Manufacturers shall provide unrestricted and standardisedsimilar access to vehicletractor repair and maintenance information to authorized dealers and repairers and independent operators through websites using a standardised format in a readily accessible and prompt manner. In particular, this access shouldall be granted in a manner which is non- discriminatory compared to the provision given or access granted to authorised dealers and repairers.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 365 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
This information shall include information required for fitting parts or equipment on vehicletractors.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 367 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Until the Commission has adopted a common standard for the information provided to independent operators, this shall be available in a consistent manner that can be processed with reasonable effort.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 368 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2
2. MTo the exclusion of software for changing parameters and data sets, manufacturers shall make training material and related appropriate tools available to independent operators and authorised dealers and repairers. They shall also provide them with adequate training with regard to the download of software and the diagnostic trouble codes management
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 371 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In order to ensure vehicle functional safety and environment protection, a standard shall be defined and established by the relevant national authority to certify quality and capability of the repairers. Specific and adequate training shall be granted by manufacturers and subject to the payment of a reasonable fee.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 374 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall include as a minimum all ofll the following:
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 376 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 – point g
(g) the software calibration identification part number applicable to a vehicle type;
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 379 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 – point i
(i) data recordtechnical information and two- directional monitoring and test data;
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 382 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 – point j
(j) work units.deleted
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 384 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 4
4. Authorised dealers or repairers within the distribution system of a given vehicletractor manufacturer shall be regarded as independent operators for the purposes of this Regulation to the extent that they provide repair or maintenance services for vehicles in respect of which they are not members of the vehicletractor manufacturer’s distribution system.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 386 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 5
5. The vehicletractor repair and maintenance information shall always be available, except as required for maintenance purposes of the information system.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 388 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 6
6. For the purposes of manufacture and servicing of OBD-compatible replacement or service parts and diagnostic tools and test equipment, manufacturers shall provide the relevant OBD and vehicletractor repair and maintenance information on a non-discriminatory basis to any interested component, diagnostic tools or test equipment manufacturer or repairer.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 391 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 7
7. For the purposes of the design and manufacture of automotive equipment for alternative fuel tractors, manufacturers shall provide the relevant OBD and vehicletractor repair and maintenance information on a non-discriminatory basis to any interested manufacturer, installer or repairer of equipment for alternative fuel vehicletractors.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 394 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 10
10. The manufacturer shall make subsequent amendments and supplements to vehicletractor repair and maintenance information available on its websites at the same time they are made available to authorised repairers.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 396 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 11
11. Where repair and maintenance records of a vehicletractor are kept in a central database of the vehicletractor manufacturer or on its behalf, independent repairers shall have access free of charge, when duly justified and for a reasonable fee, to such records and shall be able to enter information on repair and maintenance which they have performed.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 399 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 12
12. The Commission shall be delegated powers to adopt in accordance with Article 57 a delegated act laying down the detailed requirements with regard to access to repair and maintenance information, in particular technical specifications relating to the way in which vehicletractor repair and maintenance information shall be provided. The Commission shall ensure that information provided and related procedures follow the principle of reasonableness and proportionality, both for sales volume of vehicle types and/or manufacturers dimension. Specific attention should be paid to the needs of SMEs.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 406 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1
1. Manufacturers may charge reasonable and proportionate fees for access to vehicletractor repair and maintenance information, working tools, website access and training courses covered by this Regulation.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 409 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2
2. A fee shall not be reasonable or proportionate if it discourages access by failing to take into account the extent to which the independent operator uses it. Manufacturers shall make available vehicletractor repair and maintenance information on a daily, monthly, and yearly basis, with fees for access to such information varying in accordance with the respective periods of time for which access is granted.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 413 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 60 – paragraph 2
2. Approval authorities shall continue to grant extension of approvals to those vehicles, systems, components or separate technical units under the terms of Directive 2003/37/EC and any of the directives listed in Article 562 (21).
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 416 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 1
1. Directive 2003/37/EC as well as Directives 74/347/EEC, 76/432/EEC, 76/763/EEC, 77/537/EEC, 78/764/EEC, 80/720/EEC, 86/297/EEC, 86/298/EEC, 86/415/EEC, 87/402/EEC, 2000/25/EC, 2009/57/EC, 2009/58/EC, 2009/59/EC, 2009/60/EC, 2009/61/EC, 2009/63/EC, 2009/64/EC, 2009/66/EC, 2009/68/EC; 2009/75/EC, 2009/76/EC, 2009/144/EC are repealed with effect from 1 January 2014the date as referred in Article 64 paragraph 2.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 419 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
It shall apply from 1 January 2014.to:
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 423 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) New types of vehicles from 1 January 2014, but not before two years after the date of entry into force of the last Delegated Act applicable to the vehicle category;
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 424 #

2010/0212(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (new)
(b) To all new vehicles from 1 January 2018, but not earlier that four years after the date of entry into force of the last delegated act applicable to the vehicle category.
2011/10/25
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 77 #

2010/0208(COD)

Proposal for a regulation - amending act
Article 1 – point 1
(a) those measures are based on: (i) grounds other than those related torelating to environmental impacts which might arise from the deliberate release or the placing on the market of GMOs, and which are complementary to the environmental impacts examined during the assessment of the adverse effect on thealth and environment which might arise from the deliberate release or theconducted under Part C of this Directive; or (ii) the absence or lack of data on the potential negative impacts of the release of GMOs on the territory or biodiversity of the Member State; or (iii) other grounds that may include, inter alia, changes in agricultural practices, land use, town and country placnning on the market of GMO, the need to ensure the purity of seed, socioeconomic impacts or other legitimate factors;
2011/03/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 35 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 5
(5) During the transition from Stage III A to Stage III B, the percentage of the number of engines used for application other than propulsion of railcars and locomotives placed on the market under the flexibility scheme, should be increased from 20% to 50% of the equipment manufacturer's annual salesquantity of equipment placed on the market with engines in that category. The maximumoptional alternative that a fixed number of engines that may be placed on the market under the flexibility scheme should be adapted accordingly.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 6
(6) The rules applicable to the flexibility scheme should be adapted to extend theits application of that scheme to engines for use in propulsion of railcars and locomotives.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 45 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Recital 7
(7) The measures provided in this Directive reflect a temporary difficulty faced by the manufacturing sector. They should therefore be restricted to the transition from Stage III A to Stage III B and expire by 31 December 2013 at the latest; as such, these shall be restricted to Stage III B.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 51 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 97/68/CE
Article 2- last indent
(-1) In Article 2 the last indent is replaced by the following: – flexibility scheme shall mean the exemption procedure whereby a Member State allows placing on the market of a limited quantity of engines according to Article 10.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 53 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point -1 a (new)
Directive 97/68/CE
Article 2 - new indent
(-1a) In Article 2 the following new indent is added: – engine category shall mean the engine classification combining the power range, the exhaust emission stage requirements and the engine classification according to Section I of Annex I.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 56 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 1
Directive 97/68/CE
Article 4 - paragraph 6
1. Article 4(6) is replaced by the following: (6) ‘Compression ignition engines for use other than in propulsion of inland waterway vessels may be placed on the market under a flexibility scheme in accordance with the procedure referred to in Annex XIII in addition to paragraphs 1 to 5.’ deleted Or. en (See amendment on Article 1 - paragraph 1 - point 1 - introductory part)
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 70 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 97/68/CE
Article 10 – paragraph 7
(7) Member States shall permit the placing on the market of engines, as defined in Section 1 of Annex I under A(i), A(ii), A(iv) and A(v), under the flexibility scheme in accordance with the provisions in Annex XIII. Spark ignited engines, as defined in Section 1 of Annex I under A(iii), and engines for propulsion of inland waterways vessels are excluded from this procedure. The flexibility scheme shall start when placing on the market of engines becomes compulsory for any given Stage and shall have the duration of any given stage, but not more than three years. The engines shall be type approved according to the Stage immediately preceding the one under consideration.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Article 1 – point 2 – point b
Directive 97/68/CE
Article 10 – paragraph 8
(b) The following paragraph 8 is added: ‘(8) The flexibility scheme, in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.2 of Annex XIII, shall apply only for the transition from Stage III A to Stage III B and expire on 31 December 2013.’deleted
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 81 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex - introductory part
Directive 97/68/CE
-
Section 1 of Annex XIII is replaced by the following:
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 83 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.1.
1.1. With the exception of the transition period between Stage III A and Stage III B, an OEM that wishes to make use of the flexibility schemeout prejudice to 1.2, an OEM that wishes to make use of the flexibility scheme, with the exception of engines for propulsion of locomotives, shall request permission from any approval authority to purchase from his engine supplifor the OEM’s engine manufacturers, the quantities of engines described in sections 1.1.1. and 1.1.2., that do not comply with the current emission limit values, but are approved to the nearest previous stage of emission limitso place on the market engines intended for the OEM’s exclusive use. With the exception of Stage IIIB, the quantities of engines shall not exceed those described in sections 1.1.1. and 1.1.2.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 85 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.1.1
1.1.1. The number of engines placed on the market under a flexibility scheme shall, in each engine category, not exceed 20 % of the OEM's annual salesquantity of equipment placed on the market with engines in that engine category, (calculated as the average of the latest 5five years sales on the EU market). Where an OEM has. In case an OEM placed on the marketed equipment in the EU for a period offor less than 5five years, the average wishall be calculated based on the period for which the OEM has marketplaced equipment ion the EUmarket.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 87 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.1.2
1.1.2. As an optional alternative to section 1.1.1. and with the exception of engines for use in propulsion of railcars and locomotives, the OEM may seek permission for hithe OEM’s engine supplimanufacturers to place on the market a fixed number of engines undefor the flexibility schemOEM’s exclusive use. The number of engines in each engine category shall not exceed the following values:
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 88 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.1.2 - table - title
Engine CategoryPower Range
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 91 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.2.
1.2. During the transition period from Stage III A to Stage III B, with the exception of engines for use in propulsion of railcars and locomotives, an OEM that wishes to make use of the flexibility scheme shall request permission from any approval authority to purchase from his engine suppliers, tfor the OEM’s engine manufacturers to place on the market engines intended for the OEM’s exclusive use. The quantities of engines shall not exceed those described in sections 1.2.1. and 1.2.2., that do not comply with the current emission limit values, but are approved to the nearest previous stage of emission limits The engines shall meet the requirements of Article 10(7).
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 93 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.2.1.
1.2.1. The number of engines placed on the market under sucha flexibility scheme shall, in each engine category, not exceed 50 % of the OEM's annual salesquantity of equipment placed on the market with engines in that engine category, (calculated as the average of the latest 5five years sales on the EU market). Where an OEM has. In case an OEM placed on the marketed equipment in the EU for a period offor less than 5five years, the average wishall be calculated based on the period for which the OEM has marketplaced equipment ion the EUmarket.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 97 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.2.2.
1.2.2. As an optional alternative to section 1.2.1., the OEM may seek permission for hithe OEM’s engine supplimanufacturers to place on the market a fixed number of engines undefor the flexibility schemOEM’s exclusive use. The number of engines in each engine category shall not exceed the following values:
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.2.2. - table - title
Engine CategoryPower Range
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 100 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
1.3 As regards engines for use in propulsion of railcars, the flexibility scheme as defined in section 1.1.1. shall be applicable as from the transition period between Stage III A and Stage III B.deleted
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.4.
1.4 As regards engines for use in propulsion of locomotives, during the transition period between Stage III A and Stage III B anthe OEM may seek permission for hithe OEM’s engine supplimanufacturers to place on the market a maximum of 12 engines for use in propulsion of locomotthe OEM’s exclusives under the flexibility schemse.
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 112 #

2010/0195(COD)

Proposal for a directive - amending act
Annex
Directive 97/68/EC
Annex XIII – section 1 - point 1.5.introductory part
1.5. The OEM shall include in his the application to an approval authority the following information:
2011/02/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 27 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that research efforts should be strengthened, within the framework of the current Seventh Framework Programme and future research framework programmes, in order to address existing knowledge gaps and develop modalities and techniques for assessing the costs and benefits of adaptation to the impacts of climate change;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 33 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Encourages the Commission to ensure full access to detailed climate change data (including data on the scientific research methods used), which should be regarded as a public good;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 45 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Highlights the importance, in terms of limiting the adverse impact of climate change on water resources, of ensuring that rain water is retained where it falls as far as possible, so that it does not flow into water courses too suddenly in the event of heavy rainfall, causing floods and extensive soil erosion, and of constructing overflow basins to enable the overflow to penetrate into the soil, thereby replenishing the surface water tables;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 95 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Stresses the need to ensure that, as part of environmental impact assessment, all building permits , land urban plansse changes, urban plans and spatial planning in general take into account different adaptation scenarios;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 102 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Encourages the Commission to proceed with its plan to incorporate climate change impacts into construction standards in order to increase the resistance of buildings in risk areas;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Competitiveness 22a. Stresses the need for climate change adaptation measures adopted unilaterally by the EU not to jeopardise the competitiveness of the EU’s economic fabric on the world market;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 153 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Urges the Council and the Commission to reactivate the process of revision of the Solidarity Fund Regulation (EUSF), in order to limit purely ex-post compensation and shift the emphasis to ex-ante financing schemes which will make it possible to address damage caused by natural or man-made disasters in a more effective, flexible and timely manner;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 154 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Notes that the financing requirements for climate change adaptation measures also dictate that new and innovative financing arrangements be introduced, but emphasises that it is essential to establish limits and controls to ensure that these do not trigger fresh speculation similar to that which led to the current serious economic crisis;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 170 #

2009/2152(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Supports the proposal of the Commission to set up an impact and adaptation steering group; asks the Commission to ensure that this group includes representatives of Parliament as observers, as well as private stakeholders in an expert capacity;
2010/02/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2009/2151(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 - point d a (new)
(d a) sustaining the agricultural activity in areas affected by depopulation and subject to the risk of natural disasters and contributing to the reintegration of human activity by creating infra- structures to enable those who live in such areas to remain on the territory.
2010/03/24
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the health check of species and habitat types protected under the Habitat Directive shows that a majority of species and habitat types have an unfavourable conservation status, that the extinction rate is disturbingly high and that the drivers of excessive biodiversity changeloss show no evidence of declining; whereas habitats and species of EU interest are potentially threatened by anthropogenic climate change,
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas the biodiversity is put on a risk even by the alteration of the ecosystem equilibrium caused by the excessive protection of certain species without enough natural enemies,
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 17 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. wWhereas, according to the study on the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), the loss of biodiversity gives rise to substantial economic and welfare losses,
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 26 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines that ongoing studies, such asNotes that the TEEB study, estimates that the welfare loss from biodiversity loss is currently around EUR 50 billion per year (just under 1% of GDP), rising to EUR 14 trillion or 7% of estimated GDP per year in 2050;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 40 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes furthermore the conclusions on biodiversity of the March 15 Environment Council, including the new headline target of halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020 and restoring them in so far as feasible, without prejudice to natural changes in biodiversity;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 41 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that halting biodiversity loss constitutes the absolute minimum level of ambition to be realised by 2020;deleted
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 52 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines furthermore that, as a part of a policy aimed at protecting and improving biodiversity, a coordinated strategy to tackle the problem of invasive alien species and of excessively protected species without enough natural enemies is necessary;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Remains concerned, regardless of tangible andPoints to the positive results in the conservation status of several species, about in the implementation of Natura 2000 legislation;
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Given these differences between Member States, invites the Commission to provide further clarification of the Directives or guidance where necessary;deleted
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 161 #

2009/2108(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Furthermore, underlines the need to incorporate external costs, such as the damage done to biodiversity or the costs incurred to support biodiversity, into the final price of products on the market;deleted
2010/06/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2009/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that many forms of aquaculture may have a negative impact on both animal welfare and human health, such as destruction of habitats, use of chemicals for combating disease, depletion and salinisation of drinking water and agricultural land, nutrient contamination and disturbance of biodiversity through the escaping of farmed fish, and calls on the Commission to introduce legislation to eliminate these negative effects;
2010/02/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1 #

2009/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Suggestion 6
6. Considers that introducing different levels ofthe double level of protection (national and Community) could be one of the instruments to obviate the growing demand for PDOs and PGIs for small-scale proteduction for European quality designations could create unfairness, especially if the main criteria employed are economic; believes, therefore, that all geographical indications should enjoy the same degree of recognitionproducts with purely local distribution; also considers that although national protection, which is based on the same selective criteria laid down in Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 but is managed nationally by the individual Member States using domestic procedures, does not ensure protection at European level, it would enable products to establish themselves in local markets and allow access to rural development programmes, without creating conflict with designations of origin which are recognised at Community level;
2009/12/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2009/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Suggestion 8
8. Favours the voluntaStresses the need for compulsory indication of the origin of the raw materials which have goneprimary ingredient into processed foods, while opposing the compulsory indication and of the place of origin of agricultural products since this would saddle European industry with high costs which would be disproportionate to the potential value added generated by such a measure; is aware that European industry already has to meet strict labelling requirements in the interests of accurate consumermany consumers attach considerable value to such information;
2009/12/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 23 #

2009/2104(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on Member States to explore the promotion of donation from living donors as a complement to deceased donationsonly as a last resort when no suitable alternatives, such as the availability of an organ from a deceased donor, are available;
2010/02/17
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2009/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers compliance with air quality norms as laid down in EU legislation as crucial, given the increase in respiratory and other diseases related to air pollution mainly, resulting also from transport. Favours, in particular in urban contexts, low emission zones and traffic calming measures which provide an incentive for walking and cycling, subject to the principles of feasibility and functionality;.
2009/12/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2009/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises the fact that road transport has brought down considerably its emissions of particulate matter (PM 10), acidifying substances and ozone precursors, but is still worried about its level of nitrogen oxides and of fine particulates (Term report 2008, fig. 5.1) . Is however particularly disappointed about its CO2 emissions, which in the period from 1990 - 2006 increased by 28 %, compared to a reduction of 3 % in the other sectors. Calls for freight traffic to be gradually transferred off the roads and onto rail for medium- to long-haul transport;
2009/12/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 25 #

2009/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to urge the Member States to remove local obstacles that are slowing down the establishment of railway communication corridors;
2009/12/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 26 #

2009/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned about the expected emissions of SOx and NOx from maritime transport which will be approximately equivalent to land-based transport by 2020, and the failed attempt by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to put in place a CO2 emission reduction system. Demands therefore the inclusion of maritime transport in the European Emission Trading Scheme.;
2009/12/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Manufacturers should have flexibility to decide how to meet their targets under this Regulation and should be allowed to average emissions over their new vehicle fleet rather than having to respect CO2 targets for each individual vehicle. Manufacturers should therefore be required to ensure that the average specific emission for all the new light commercial vehicles registered in the Community for which they are responsible does not exceed the average of the emissions targets for those vehicles. This requirement should be phased in between 20145 and 20168 in order to facilitate its introduction. This is consistent with the lead times given and the duration of the phase-in period set in Regulation 443/2009.
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light commercial vehicles established an integrated approach with a view to reaching the Community target of 120 g CO2/km by 2012, while also presenting a longer-term vision of further emission reductions. Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 substantiates this longer-term view by setting a target of 95 g CO2/km as average emissions for the new car fleet. In order to ensure consistency with that approach and to provide planning certainty for the industry, a long-term target for the specific emissions of CO2 of light commercial vehicles in 2020 should be set.deleted
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. From 2020, tThis Regulation sets a target of 135 60g CO2/km for the, starting in 2020, as average emissions ofor the new light commercial vehicles registered in the Communityfleet, in accordance with Article 12(4). This Regulation sets a target of 145g CO2/km, starting in 2025, as average emissions for the new light commercial vehicles fleet, in accordance with Article 12(5).
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
For the calendar year commencing 1 January 20145 and each subsequent calendar year, each manufacturer of complete light commercial vehicles shall ensure that its average specific emissions of CO2 do not exceed its specific emissions target determined in accordance with Annex I or, where a manufacturer is granted a derogation under Article 10, in accordance with that derogation.
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 108 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
65% in 2015
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
– 75 % in 20146,
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 124 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– 80 % in 20157,
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 132 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – indent 3
– 100 % from 20168 onwards. As of 1 January 2016 completed vehicles shall also be included in determining each manufacturer’s average specific CO2 emissions.
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 252 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. By 1 January 2018, the Commission shall complete a review of the specific emission target in Annex I and of the derogations in Article 10, with the aim of defining: – the modalities for reaching a long-term target of 145 g CO2/km, starting in 2025, in a cost-effective manner; and – the aspects of the implementation of that targets, including the excess emissions premium. On the basis of such a review and its impact assessment, which includes an overall assessment of the impact on the car industry and its dependent industries, the Commission shall, if appropriate, make a proposal to amend this Regulation in a way which is as neutral as possible from the point of view of competition, and which is socially equitable and sustainable. The European Commission shall make a proposal to the European Parliament and European Council on those measures, designed to amend essential elements of this Regulation.
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 288 #

2009/0173(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 7
7. TBy 2011 the Commission shall by 2015 review the method of determining the specificset up a procedure to obtain representative values of CO2 emissions of CO2and mass of completed vehicles in paragraph 7 of Part B of Annex II and, if appropriate, submit a proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council to amend Annex IIfor monitoring purposes.
2010/05/21
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 241 #

2009/0076(COD)

Council position
Article 42 – paragraph 4a (new)
4a. Where the Register for Biocidal Products shows that a competent authority is examining an application relating to the same or a similar biocidal product or has already authorised the same or a similar biocidal product, the Agency shall nominate the original evaluating competent authority to evaluate the application. For products or families of products already authorised, the original evaluating competent authority shall submit its evaluation report and its evaluation conclusions to the Agency within 90 days from the request of the Agency.
2011/09/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 246 #

2009/0076(COD)

Council position
Article 44 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) a list of all relevant data that it haswithout prejudice to Article 20 (1), all relevant data required under Article 19 that has been generated since the initial authorisation or, as appropriate, previous renewal; and, or a letter of access to these data;
2011/09/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 247 #

2009/0076(COD)

Council position
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
The evaluating competent authority may at any time require the applicant to submit the data from the list referred to in Article 44(2)(a).deleted
2011/09/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 291 #

2009/0076(COD)

Council position
Article 66 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The following information held by the Agency or, as appropriate, the Commission on active substances shall be made publicly and easily available free of charge, free of charge, publicly available in a single database, in a structured format on at least the relevant website of the Commission:
2011/09/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 302 #

2009/0076(COD)

Council position
Article 75 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(j a) providing assistance to and coordinating between Member States in order to avoid the parallel assessment of applications relating to the same or similar biocidal products referred to in Articles 28 (4) and 42 (5).
2011/09/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) It is well known that the internet represents one of the main routes for falsified medicinal products to enter the European market. In view of the difficulty of pinpointing the actual physical address of internet sites and, therefore, of granting them certification of authenticity with complete certainty and of verifying the quality, safety and efficacy of the pharmaceutical, the internet sale of all types of medicinal product should be prohibited, unless they have been authorised under national legislation in force on the date of entry into force of this Directive.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 64 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Recital 7
(7) In order to take account of new risk profiles, while at the same time ensuring the functioning of the internal market for medicinal products, safety features designed to ensure the identification, authentication and traceability of prescription medicinal products should be established at Community level. When introducing obligatory safety features for prescription medicinal products, due account should be taken of the particularities of certain products or categories of products, such as generic medicines. This includes the risk of falsifications in view of their price and past incidences in the Community and abroad, as well as the consequences of falsifications for public health in view of the specific characteristics of the products concerned or of the severity of the conditions intended to be treated.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 129 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 1 – point 2 a - paragraph 1 - introductory part (new)
Addition of a reference to the package leaflet, in the interests of greater precision and thoroughness-1) In Article 1, the following point 2a is inserted: 2a. Falsified medicinal product: Any medicinal product with a false representation of: Or. it Justification.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 136 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 1 – point 2 a - paragraph 1 - point a (new)
a) its identity, including its packaging and labelling and package leaflet, name, composition in respect of any of its components and strength; and/or
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 1 – point 2 a - paragraph 1 - point b (new)
b) its source, including the manufacturer, country of manufacture, country of origin and marketing authorisation holder; and/or
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 148 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 1 – point 2 a - paragraph 1 - point c (new)
c) its history, including the records and documents relating to distribution channels.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 154 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 1 – point 2 a - paragraph 2 (new)
This definition is not related to infringements of legislation on intellectual and industrial property rights or patent rights.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 221 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 9
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 54a - paragraph 2 – introductory part
(2) The safety features referred to in point (o) of Article 54 shall not be partly or fully removed or covered-up, unless the following conditions are fulfilled: 2. Member States shall ensure that the holder of a manufacturing authorisation does not exchange, partly or fully remove, or cover up the safety features referred to in point (o) of Article 54, unless that holder has a marketing authorisation for the relevant medicinal product in accordance with Article 6(1) or has obtained written authorisation from the marketing authorisation holder.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 223 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 9
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 54a - paragraph 2 – point a
(a) The manufacturing authorisation holder verifies, prior to partly or fully removing or covering-up the safety feature, the authenticity of the product;deleted
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 226 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 9
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 54a - paragraph 2 – point b
(b) The manufacturing authorisation holder complies with point (o) of Article 54 by replacing the safety feature with a safety feature which is equivalent as regards the possibility to ascertain identification, authenticity and uninterrupted traceability of the medicinal product, and without opening the immediate packaging as defined in Article 1(23);deleted
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 237 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 - point 9
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 54a - paragraph 2 – point c
(c) The replacement of the safety feature is subject to supervision by the competent authority.deleted
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 334 #

2008/0261(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 14 a (new)
Directive 2001/83/EC
Title VII a (new) – Article 85 c (new)
14a. The following Title VIIa and Article 85c are inserted after Article 85b: "TITLE VIIa INTERNET SALES Article 85c 1. Internet sales of all medicines and medicinal products shall be prohibited, without prejudice to any national regulations to the contrary that are in effect on the date this Directive enters into force. 2. The Commission shall adopt measures to increase awareness among the general public of the health risks linked to purchasing medicinal products on the internet. The Commission shall adopt these measures by means of delegated acts in accordance with Articles 121a to 121c. 3. Member States which allow internet sales on the date this Directive enters into force shall ensure that they are continuously monitored by a designated body, and shall take legal action in the event of non-compliance with this Directive.
2010/03/12
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 176 #

2008/0260(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 21
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 102 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) take all appropriate measures to encourage patients, doctors, pharmacists and other health-care professionals to report suspected adverse reactions to the national competent authority or the marketing authorisation holder; such measures shall include the training of health-care workers and a public information campaign aimed at patients;
2010/03/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 181 #

2008/0260(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 21
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 102 – point 1 a (new)
(1a) take appropriate measures to ensure that spontaneous reports by patients are properly presented and guided efficiently by health-care professionals;
2010/03/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 194 #

2008/0260(COD)

Proposal for a directive – amending act
Article 1 – point 21
Directive 2001/83/EC
Article 102 – paragraph 2 a (new)
The reporting of suspected adverse reactions due to medication errors should not be the subject of – nor give rise to – legal action against persons reporting them.
2010/03/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 24 #

2008/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Recital 7
(7) In order to ensure the availability of the necessary expertise and resources for pharmacovigilance assessments at Community level, it is appropriate to create a new scientific committee within the Agency, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Advisory Committee. That committee should be composed of independent scientific experts withone member per Member State and seven members appointed by the Commission, among whom one should represent health professionals and one should represent patients. These members should possess competence in the safety of medicines including the detection, assessment, minimisation and communication of risk, and the design of post-authorisation safety studies and pharmacovigilance audit.
2010/03/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2008/0257(COD)

Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Article 1 – point 14
Regulation(EC) No.726/2004
Article 61a – paragraph 1
1. The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Advisory Committee shall be composed of the following: (a) tenone members and tenone alternates appointed by the Management Board, on the basis of proposals by the national competent authorities for each Member State, appointed by the competent national authority in agreement with the Management Board; (b) fiseven members and fiseven alternates appointed by the Commission, among whom one should represent health professionals and one should represent patients, on the basis of a public call for expressions of interest, after consulting the European Parliament. The alternates shall represent and vote for the members in their absence. The Commission may adapt the number of members and alternates in the light of technical and scientific needs. Those measures, designed to amend non- essential elements of this Regulation, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 87(2a).
2010/03/01
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 61 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 –paragraph 1
1. This Directive shall apply to electrical and electronic equipment falling under the categories set out in Annex I.A of this Directive 20xx/xx/EC (RoHS)and to the WEEE generated by such equipment.
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 63 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 –paragraph 3 - point b
(b) Equipment which is specifically designed as part of another type of equipment that does not fall within the scope of this Directive, such as part of a finished product outside the scope of the Directive or as part of a fixed installation, and can fulfil its function only if it is part of that equipment.
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 73 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 - point a
(a) ‘electrical and electronic equipment’ or ‘EEE’ means equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and fields falling under the categories set out in Annex I.A of this Directive 20xx/xx/EC (RoHS) and designed for use with a voltage rating not exceeding 1000 Volt for alternating current and 1500 Volt for direct current.
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 - point b
(b) ‘waste electrical and electronic equipment’ or ‘WEEE’ means electrical or electronic equipment which is waste within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2008/xx98/EC on waste, including all components, subassemblies and consumables which are part of the product at the time of discarding or which is sold or given to any actor that will treat or resell the WEEE to recover some material or parts for the positive economic rest value;
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 84 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Recital 8
(8) This Directive should cover all EEE used by consumers and EEE intended for professional use. This Directive should apply without prejudice to Union legislation on safety and health requirements protecting all actors in contact with WEEE, as well as specific Union waste management legislation, in particular Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and Union product design legislation, in particular Directive 2009/125/EC. The preparing for re-use, recovery and recycling of waste cooling equipment and the substances, mixtures or components thereof should be in accordance with the relevant legislation of the Union, in particular, Regulation (EC) No 1005/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on substances that deplete the ozone layer and Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases. The objectives of this Directive can be achieved without including large-scale fixed installations such as oil platforms, airport luggage transport systems or elevators within its scope.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 94 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii
(iii) can only be replaced by the same specifically designed equipment with equivalent functionalities;
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 101 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – point q
(q) "remove" means manual, or mechanical, chemical or metallurgic handling with the result that hazardous substances, preparations and components are contained as an identifiable stream or identifiable part of a stream at the end of the treatment process. A substance, preparation or component is identifiable if it can be monitored to prove environmentally safe treatment separation of hazardous substances, preparations and components as identified in Annex II.
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new)
(oa) 'Large appliances' are all those appliances which are not in principle movable or which are intended to remain in their place of use for the duration of their service life.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 104 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o b (new)
(ob) 'Small appliances' means all those appliances which in principle are movable or are not intended to remain in their place of use throughout their useful life.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 106 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2(c), Member States may designate the operators that are allowed to collect WEEE from private households as referred to in paragraph 2.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 106 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 point s a(new)
(sa) 'fixed installation' shall mean fixed installation in the meaning of Article 2(c) of Directive 2004/108/EC on electromagnetic compatibility;
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 107 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
For this purpose, Member States may require that collection schemes or facilities, as appropriate, provide for the separation at the collection points of WEEE that is to be prepared for re-use from other separately collected WEEE.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 108 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 point s b(new)
(sb) 'finished products' shall mean any device or unit of equipment that has direct function, its own enclosure and - if applicable - ports and connections intended for end users. 'Direct function' is defined as any function of a component or a finished product which fulfils the intended use specified by the manufacturer in the instructions for use and end-user. This function can be available without further adjustment or connections other than simple ones which can be performed by any person.
2010/03/11
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. Member States may requirepermit producers voluntarily to show purchasers, at the time of sale of new products, the costs of collection, treatment and disposal in an environmentally sound way. The costs mentioned shall not exceed the best estimate of the actual costs incurred.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 127 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Article 23 – paragraph 3
3. The costs of appropriate analyses and inspections, including storage costs, of used EEE suspected to be WEEE may be charged to the producers, to third parties acting on their behalf or to other persons arranging the shipment of used EEE suspected to be WEEE only in cases where the used EEE analysed and inspected indeed proves to be WEEE.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 130 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 3 – point 1 – heading
1. Temperature exchange equipment using fluids other than water
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 131 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 3 – point 2 – heading
2. Screens, and monitors, and equipment containing screens having a surface greater than 100 cm2 Or. it (Cf. Amendment 78 in Parliament’s position at first reading.)
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 135 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 3 – point 4 – heading
4. Large equipment (one length greater than 50cm) including:not belonging to Categories 1, 2 and 3
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 137 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 3 – point 4 – paragraph 1
Household appliances; IT and telecommunication equipment; consumer equipment; luminaires; equipment reproducing sound or images, musical equipment; electrical and electronic tool; toys, leisure and sports equipment; medical devices; monitoring and control instruments; automatic dispensers; equipment for the generation of electric currents. This category does not include equipment included in categories 1 to 3.deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 3 – point 5 – heading
5. Small equipment (no length more than 50cm) including:t belonging to Categories 1, 2 and 3
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 141 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 3 – point 5 – paragraph 1
Household appliances; IT and telecommunication equipment; consumer equipment; luminaires; equipment reproducing sound or images, musical equipment; electrical and electronic tool; toys, leisure and sports equipment; medical devices; monitoring and control instruments; automatic dispensers; equipment for the generation of electric currents. This category does not include equipment included in categories 1 to 3.deleted
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 142 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 4 – point 1 – heading
1. Temperature exchange equipment using fluids other than water
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 143 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 4 – point 1 – paragraph 1
Refrigerators, Freezers, Equipment which automatically deliver cold products, Air conditioning equipment, Dehumidifying equipment, Heat pumps which do not form part of large-scale fixed installations, Radiators containing oil and other temperature exchange equipment using other fluids than water for the temperature exchange.
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 145 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 4 – point 2 – heading
2. Screens, and monitors, and equipment containing screens having a surface greater than 100 cm2 Or. it (Cf. Amendment 97 in Parliament’s position at first reading.)
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 155 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 4 – point 4 – heading
4. Large equipment not belonging to Categories 1, 2 and 3
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 160 #

2008/0241(COD)

Council position
Annex 4 – point 5 – heading
5. Small equipment not belonging to Categories 1, 2 and 3
2011/09/13
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 172 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 - introductory part
1. Regarding all WEEE separately collected and sent for treatment in accordance with Articles 8, 9 and 10 or for preparation for reuse, Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2011, producers and any other WEEE operators meet the following minimum targets:
2010/03/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 174 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 - point a
(a) for WEEE falling under categories 1 and 10 of Annex IA to this Directive 20xx/xx/EC (RoHS), , - 85% shall be recovered, and - 80% shall be prepared for reuse and recycled;
2010/03/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 178 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 1 - point b
(b) for WEEE falling under categories 3 and 4 of Annex IA to this Directive 20xx/xx/EC (RoHS), – 80% shall be recovered, and – 70% shall be prepared for reuse and recycled;
2010/03/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 264 #

2008/0241(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I A (new)
ANNEX IA Categories of electrical and electronic equipment covered by this Directive 1. Large household appliances 2. Small household appliances 3. IT and telecommunications equipment 4. Consumer equipment 5. Lighting equipment 6. Electrical and electronic tools (with the exception of large-scale stationary industrial tools) 7. Toys, leisure and sports equipment 8. Medical devices (with the exception of all implanted and infected products) 9. Monitoring and control instruments 10. Automatic dispensers
2010/03/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 82 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The substances covered by this Directive arshould be scientifically well researched and evaluated and have beenprior to establishing restrictions and becoming subject to different measures both at Community and at national level.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 - paragraph 3- point b
(b) equipment which is specifically designed as part of another type of equipment that does not fall within the scope of this Directive, such as part of a finished product outside the scope of the Directive or as a part of a fixed installation, and can fulfil its function only if it is part of that equipment;
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 125 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 - paragraph 3- point c a (new)
(ca) non electrical and electronic consumables and accessories.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 147 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 - paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Any change in scope of the Directive requires a thorough and representative impact assessment at EU level with consultation of affected stakeholders.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 150 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 - point a
(a) ‘electrical and electronic equipment’ hereinafter ‘EEE’ means equipment which is dependent on electric currents or electromagnetic fields in order to work properly and equipment for the generation, transfer and measurement of such currents and fields, falling under the categories set out in Annex I.A of this Directive and designed for use with a voltage rating not exceeding 1000 volts for alternating current and 1500 volts for direct current. Dependent shall mean that the equipment needs electricity as its primary energy to fulfil its basic function;
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 165 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 - point p a (new)
(pa) 'fixed installation' shall mean fixed installation in the meaning of article 2(c) of Directive 2004/108/EC on electromagnetic compatibility, which are assembled, installed and intended to be used permanently at a predefined location;
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 166 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 3 - point p b (new)
(pb) 'finished product' shall mean any device or unit of equipment that has a direct function, its own enclosure and - if applicable - ports and connections intended for end users. 'Direct function' is defined as any function of a component or a finished product which fulfils the intended use specified by the manufacturer in the instructions for use and end-user. This function can be available without further adjustment or connections other than simple ones which can be performed by any person.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 202 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 4 - paragraph 7
7. When there is an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment, arising from the use of substances, and in particular the substances listed in Annex III, which needs to be addressed on a Community-wide basis, the list of prohibited substances in Annex IV shall be reviewed using a methodology based on the process set out in Articles 69 to 72 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. Those measures designed to amend non essential elements of this Directive shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 18(2)e evaluation of substances for future restrictions as well as exemptions under this Directive shall: - be based on sound science, - include an impact of alternatives, and - take into account: (a) socio-economic considerations (b) availability and reliability of alternatives. The methodology for evaluating substance restrictions and exemptions shall in particular take into consideration positive and negative impacts on human health and safety of substances and potential alternatives to them, related to: - all relevant life phases including end-of- life scenarios of reuse, recycling and treatment of WEEE - uncontrolled or diffuse dispersion to the environment - exposure to these substances of workers and the environment. Such a methodology shall ensure to the largest possible extent coherence with other legislation related to chemicals, in particular Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) and the knowledge obtained from the application of such legislation. In particular, reference shall be made to any relevant chemical safety report or risk assessment submitted.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 213 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 - paragraph 1 - point aa (new)
(aa) set the level of the tolerated maximum concentration value for each substance listed in Annex IV;
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 229 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 5 - paragraph 2
2. Measures adopted in accordance with point b of paragraph 1 shall have a maximum validity period of four years and may be renewed. The Commission shall decide in due time onspecify the validity date for the inclusion of any material and application of EEE in Annexes V and VI on a case-by-case basis. The process to determine a validity date shall in particular take into consideration appropriate periods required to place EEE containing alternatives on the market as well as technical functionality and reliability of the equipment. The Commission shall decide on any application for renewal no later than 9 months after any application for renewal that isis submitted. The application for renewal shall be submitted no later than 1827 months before an exemption expires.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 256 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 6 - paragraph 1 - indent 2
- Complying with the maximum concentration values of Article (4) (2)mandating the European standardisation bodies without delay to develop harmonised standards for RoHS compliance for each product category listed in Annex I. The definition of 'homogeneous material' in point (l) of Article 3shall serve as the common basis for further specification in standardisation, especially on sample preparation;
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 293 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 16 - paragraph 2
Electrical and electronic equipment on which tests and measurements have been performed in accordanceis in conformity with harmonised standards, or parts thereof the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be presumed to comply with all the relevant requirements of this Directive to which such standards relate.
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 302 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex I - point 9
9. Monitoring and control instruments including industrial monitoring and control instruments
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 305 #

2008/0240(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex II - point 9
9. Monitoring and control instruments, including Smoke detector Heating regulators Thermostats Measuring, weighing or adjusting appliances for household or as laboratory equipmentuse Industrial monitoring and control instruments
2010/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 160 #

2008/0238(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Living donations shall be seen as subsidiary to post-mortem donations and only serve as a last resort where no suitable alternative such as an organ from a deceased donor is available. Living donations shall in general, due to the implicit danger of exploitation, be restricted to donations among close relatives and spouses and within stably cohabiting couples. Or.it (See rapporteur's amendment 31)
2010/03/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 163 #

2008/0238(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In order to comply with the principle of non-commercialisation of the human body, Member States shall ensure that any compensation to living donors is strictly limited to making good the expenses directly related to the donation (such as travelling expenses, childminding costs, loss of earnings due to the need to convalesce, loss of work or incapacity for work), avoiding any financial incentives for a potential donor. Or.it (See rapporteur's amendment 32)
2010/03/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 167 #

2008/0238(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. A person who has suffered undue damage resulting from an intervention shall be entitled to fair compensation. Or.it (See rapporteur's amendment 33)
2010/03/04
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 169 #

2008/0142(COD)

Council position
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Subject to the provisions of Articles 8 and 9, the Member State of affiliation shall ensure the costs incurred by an insured person who receives cross-border healthcare are reimbursed, if the healthcare in question is among the benefits to which the insured person is entitled in the Member State of affiliation, within the bounds set by the provisions of paragraphs 3, 4 and 7 of this Article.
2010/10/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 170 #

2008/0142(COD)

Council position
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Any costs incurred by the insured person over and above the level reimbursed by the Member State of affiliation shall be borne solely by the insured person, unless the Member State of affiliation decides also to reimburse the insured person for the costs incurred in excess of that level.
2010/10/05
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 117 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The indication of the country of origin or of the place of provenance of a food should be provided as a mandatory requirement under Article 25 whenever its absence is likely to mislead consumers as to the true country of origin or place of provenance of that product. In all cases, the indication of country of origin or place of provenance should be provided in a manner which does not deceive the consumer and on the basis of clearly defined criteria which ensure a level playing field for industry and improve consumers' understanding of the information related to the country of origin or place of provenance of a food. Such criteria shouldmust not apply to indications related to the name or address of the food business operator.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) In some cases, food business operators may want to indicate the origin of a food on a voluntary basis to draw consumers' attention to the qualities of their product. Such indications should also comply with harmonised criteria.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 122 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
(33) The indication of origin is currently mandatory for beef and beef products in the Union following the bovine spongiform encephalopathy crisis and it has created consumer expectations. The impact assessment of the Commission confirms that the origin of meat appears to be consumers' prime concern. There are other meats widely consumed in the Union, such as swine, sheep, goats and poultry. It is therefore appropriate to impose a mandatory declaration of origin for those products. The specific origin requirements could differ from one type of meat to another according to the characteristics of the animal species. It is appropriate to provide for the establishment through implementing rules of mandatory requirements that could vary from one type of meat to another taking into account the principle of proportionality and the administrative burden for food business operators and enforcement authorities.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 126 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
(34) Mandatory origin provisions have been developed on the basis of vertical approaches for instance for honey, fruits and vegetables, fish, beef and beef products and olive oil. There is a need to explore the possibility to extend mandatory origin labelling for other foodstuffs. It is therefore appropriate to request the Commission to prepare reports covering the following foodstuffs: types of meat other than beef, swine, sheep, goat and poultry meat, such as: types of meat other than beef; milk; milk used as an ingredient in dairy products; meat used as an ingredient; unprocessed foods; and single ingredient products; and ingredients that represent more than 50 % of a food. Milk being one of the products for which an indication of origin is considered of particular interest, the Commission report on this product should be made available as soon as possible. Based on the conclusions of such reports, the Commission may submit proposals to modify the relevant Union provisions or may take new initiatives, where appropriate, on a sectoral basis.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 129 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
(35) The Union's non-preferential rules of origin are laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code1 and its implementing provisions in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code2. Determination of the country of origin of foods will be based on those rules, which are well known to food business operators and administrations and should ease their implementation. __________________ 1 OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1. 2. OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g
(g) 'place of provenance' means anythe place where a food is indicated to com, country or region where the fprom, and that is not the 'country of origin' as determined in accordance withducts or agricultural ingredients are wholly obtained within the meaning of Articles 23 to 26(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92;
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 142 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point o
(o) 'primary ingredient' means an ingredient or ingredients of a food that represent more than 50 % of that food or which are usually associated with the name of the food by the consumer and for which in most cases a quantitative indication is required;deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 157 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the net quantity of the food; See amendment 95 of the Parliament’s first reading posi at the moment of packaging; Or.en Justification
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the name or business name and address of the food business operator referred to in Article 8(1)or a registered trademark and the address of the manufacturer established within the Union, of the packager and, for products coming from third countries, of the seller/the importer or, where appropriate, of the food business operator under whose name or business name the food is marketed ;
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 162 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to specific Union provisions applicable to particular foods as regards the requirements referred to in points (a) to (k) of Article 9(1), when appearing on the package or on the label attached thereto, the mandatory particulars listed in Article 9(1) shall be printed on the package or on the label in characters using a font size where the x- height, as defined in Annex IV, is equal to or greater than 1,2 mm. The mandatory particulars shall be presented in such a way as to ensure a significantCriteria other than font size, such as font type, contrast between the prifont and the background, line and character pitch, should also be considered.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 163 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to specific Union provisions applicable to particular foods as regards the requirements referred to in points (a) to (k) of Article 9(1), when appearing on the package or on the label attached thereto, the mandatory particulars listed in Article 9(1) shall be printed on the package or on the label in characters using a font size where the x-height, as defined in Annex IV, is equal to or greater than 1,2 mm. The mandatory particulars shall be presented in such a way as to ensure a significant contrast between the print and the background. See Amendment 334 in Parliament’s position at first reading.such a way as to ensure that they are clearly legible. (If this amendment is adopted, Article 13(3) and Annex IV will need to be deleted.) Or.it Justification
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 172 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. In case of packaging or containers the largest surface of which has an area of less than 60 cm2, the x-height of the font size referred to in paragraph 2 shall be equal to or greater than 0,9 mm.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 173 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. In case of packaging or containers the largest printable surface of which has an area of less than 680 cm2, the minimum x- height of the font size referred to in paragraph 2 shall be equal to or greater than 0,9 mmnot apply.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 182 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. For the purpose of ensuring a uniform implementation of paragraph 2 of this Article, the Commission may, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 46(2), adopt detailed rules on contrast between the print and the background.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 184 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
For the purpose of achieving the objectives of this Regulation, the Commission shall, together with the stakeholders, establish, by means of delegated acts, in accordance with Article 49 and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 50 and 51, guidelines for the criteria on legibility additional to those specified under paragraph 2 of this Article.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 186 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2
For the same purpose as referred to in the first subparagraph, the Commission may, by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 49 and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 50 and 51, extend the requirements under paragraph 6 of this Article to additional mandatory particulars for specific types or categories of foods.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 189 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. In the case of glass bottles intended for reuse which are indelibly marked and which therefore bear no label, ring or collar, only the particulars listed in points Article 9(1)(a), (c), (e), (f) and (l) of Article 9(1f) shall be mandatory.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 201 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Where several ingredients or processing aids of a food originate from a single substance or product listed in Annex II, the labelling shall make it clear for each ingredient or processing aid concerned.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 212 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Indication of the country of origin or place of provenance shall be mandatory for:
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 218 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) where failure to indicate this– meat; – poultry; – milk and milk products; – other single-ingredient products; – meat, poultry and fish when used as an ingredient in processed foods. For meat and poultry, the country or place of provenance may be given as a single place for animals only where the animals have been born, reared and slaughtered in the same country or place. In other cases information on each of the different places of birth, rearing and slaughter shall be given. For all other foods, the country or place of provenance must be indicated where failure to do so might mislead the consumer to a material degree as to the true country of origin or place of provenance of the food, in particular if the information accompanying the food or the label as a whole would otherwise imply that the food has a different country of origin or place of provenance; in such cases the indication shall be in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 49 and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 50 and 51.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 219 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) TWithout prejudice to the existing compulsory sectoral rules on origin labelling, the indication of the country of origin or of the place of provenance of a food should be provided whenever its absence is likely to mislead consumers as to the true country of origin or place of provenance of that product. In other cases, the provision of the indication of country of origin or place of provenance is left to the appreciation of food business operator, including as regards the primary ingredient of processed products. In allother cases, the indication of country of origin or place of provenance should be provided in a manner which does not deceive the consumer and on the basis of clearly defined criteria which ensure a level playing field for the industry and improve consumers' understanding of the information related to the country of origin or place of provenance of a food. Such criteria shouldall not apply to indications related to the name or address of the food business operator.
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 220 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) for meat falling within the Combined Nomenclature ('CN') codes listed in Annex XI. The application of this point shall be subject to adoption of implementing rules referred to in paragraph 6.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 238 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 3
3. Where the country of origin or the place of provenance of a food is given and where it is not the same as that of its primary ingredient: (a) the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient in question shall also be given; or (b) (b) the country of origin or place of provenance of the primary ingredient shall be indicated as being different to that of the food. The application of this paragraph shall be subject to adoption of the implementing rules referred to in paragraph 6.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 243 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41
(41) Member States should retain the right, depending on local practical conditions and circumstances, to lay down rules in respect of the provision of information concerning non-prepacked foods and foods supplied to mass catering services. Although in such cases the consumer demand for other information is limited, information on potential allergens is considered very important. Evidence suggests that most food allergy incidents can be traced back to non-prepacked food. ThereforeTherefore it should always be possible for such information should alwaysto be provided to the consumer.
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 249 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 4
4. Within five years from the date of application of point (b) of paragraph 2, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council to evaluate the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for products referred to in that point.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 251 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 5
5. By …39, the Commission shall submit reports to the European Parliament and the Council regarding the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance for: (a) types of meat other than beef and those referred to in point (b) of paragraph 2; (b) milk; (c) milk used as an ingredient in dairy products; (d) meat used as an ingredient; (e) unprocessed foods; (f) single ingredient products; (g) and ingredients that represent more than 50 % of a food. Those reports shall take into account the need for the consumer to be informed, the feasibility of providing the mandatory indication referred to in the first subparagraph and an analysis of the costs and benefits of the introduction of such measures, including the legal impact on the internal market and the impact on international trade. The Commission may accompany those reports with proposals to modify the relevant Union provisions. __________________ 39. * OJ: Please insert the date: three years from the entry into force of this Regulation.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 263 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 6
6. By …40, the Commission shall adopt, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 46(2), implementing rules concerning the application of point (b) of paragraph 2 of this Article and the application of paragraph 3 of this Article. __________________ 40. * OJ: Please insert the date: two years from the entry into force of this Regulation.deleted
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 267 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 a (new)
25a. The name or address of the food business operator placed on the label does not constitute an indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of the food product concerned.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 291 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 - point a
(a) the name of the food and/or the sales denomination;
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 294 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The energy content, expressed in kcal per 100g or 100ml or per portion, shall be repeated in the bottom right-hand corner of the front-of-pack, in a font size of 3 mm and surrounded by a boarder.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 295 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the name or business name andor a registered trademark and the address of the manufacturer, orf the packager and, for products coming from third countries, of a seller established within the Community;
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 297 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) the name or business name andor a registered trademark and the address of the manufacturer, orf the packager and, for products coming from third countries, of a seller established within the Community;
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 304 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. The particularsWhere the labelling of a prepacked food provides the mandatory nutrition declaration referred to in Aarticle 29(3) may1), the information on energy shall be presented togepeated on the front of pack per 100 g/ml and per portion. In addition, the amounts of fat, saturates, sugars, salt expressed per 100 g/ml or per portion may be repeated thereon:
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 312 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 34
...44 __________________ 44. from the entry into force of this Regulation.deleted * OJ: Please insert the date: eight years
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 313 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) in the case of processed food products, the country of origin of the primary ingredient;
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 319 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission may amend Annex III. Those measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it shall be adopted, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(4).deleted
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 327 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 2
2. By means of paragraph 1, Member States may introduce measures concerning the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods only where there is a proven link between certain qualities of the food and its origin or provenance. When notifying such measures to the Commission, Member States shall provide evidence that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of that information.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 332 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 3
3. The Member State which deems it necessary to adopt new food information legislation may take the envisaged measures only three months after the notification referred to in paragraph 1, provided that it has not received a negative opinion from the Commission.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 333 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 4
4. If the Commission's opinion is negative, and before the expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, the Commission shall initiate the regulatory procedure provided for in Article 46(2) in order to determine whether the envisaged measures may be implemented subject, if necessary, to the appropriate modificationspropose, if necessary, the modifications deemed appropriate.
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 349 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Article 9(2), mandatory food information shall appear in a language easily understood by the consumerthe official languages of the Member States where a food is marketed and shall be couched in a form of words understandable to the average consumer.
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 360 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV
[whodele text of Annex IV]d
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 362 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex V – point 19 a (new)
See Amendment 223 in Parliament’s position at first reading.19a. Indelibly marked glass bottles. Or. it Justification
2011/03/23
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 437 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
3. The mandatory nutrition declaration shall be expressed, as appropriate, as a percentage of the reference intakes set out in Part B of Annex XI in relation to per 100 g or per 100 ml or per portion. When provided, the declaration on vitamins and minerals shall also be expressed as a percentage of the reference intakes set out in point 1 of Part A of Annex XI.deleted
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 444 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 32
1. If the food is prepackaged in portions, including individual portions, in addition to the nutrition declaration per 100g or per 100ml referred to in Article 31(2), the information may be expressed per portion as quantified on the label, provided that; in this case, the number of portions contained in the package ismust be stated. 2. The nutrition declaration may be expressed on a per portion basis alone if the food is prepacked as an individual portion. 3. The expression on a per portion basis alone for foods presented in packages containing multiple pIn cooperation with food enterprises and the competent authoritiones of the food, that have not been prepacked as individual portions, shall be established by the CommissionMember States, the Commission shall develop guidelines concerning the indication of realistic portion sizes. Thoese measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it shall be adopted, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 49(3).
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 490 #

2008/0028(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Without prejudice to labelling in accordance with specific Community legislation, in particular Council Regulations (EC) Nos 509/2006 and 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 and the provisions of Article 9(1)(ia), paragraphs 3 and 4 shall apply where the country of origin or the place of provenance of a food is voluntarily indicated to inform consumers that a food originates or comes from the European Community or a given country or place. In such cases, the food shall be labelled 'manufactured in the EU (Member State)'. In addition, the name of a region may be indicated.
2009/12/22
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 128 #

2008/0002(COD)

Council position – amending act
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) In order to avoid animal testing, testing on vertebrate animals for the purposes of this Regulation should be undertaken only as a last resort. This Regulation should ensure that testing on vertebrate animals is minimised, with special focus on double-testing, and should promote the use of non-animal test methods and intelligent testing strategies. Existing results from tests on vertebrate animals should be shared in the process of developing novel foods. Moreover, in accordance with Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes1, tests on vertebrate animals must be replaced, restricted or refined. Implementation of this Regulation should, where possible, be based on the use of appropriate alternative testing methods. Not later than seven years after the entry into force of this Regulation., the Commission should review the rules on the data protection of results from tests on vertebrate animals and, where necessary, change those rules. 1 OJ L 358, 18.12. 1986, p. 1.
2010/04/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 130 #

2008/0002(COD)

Council position – amending act
Recital 22
(22) If traditional foods from third countries are included in the list of traditional foods from third countries, they should be allowed to be placed on the market within the Union, under conditions that correspond to those for which the history of safe food use has been demonstrated. As regards the safety assessment and management of traditional food from third countries, their history of safe food use in their country of origin should be taken into account. The history of safe food use should not include non- food uses or uses not related to normal dietsAs regards the safety assessment and management of traditional food from third countries, the EU rules in force should be taken into account.
2010/04/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 99 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) where applicable, a baseline report in accordance with Article 22(2);deleted
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 107 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. DFollowing consultation of the forum, decisions on the BAT conclusions shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 75(2). This paragraph shall apply to the adoption and review of BAT reference documents following the entry into force of this directive.
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 149 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 15 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3
Emission limit values shall, however, not exceed the emission limit values set out in Annexes V to VIII, where applicable.deleted
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 193 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 22 – paragraph 3– subparagraph 1
3. Upon definitive cessation of the activities, the operator shall assess the state of soil and groundwater contamination by relevant hazardous substances used, produced or released by the installation. Where and shall draw up a risk analysis. Where, on the basis of that risk analysis, it is established that the installation has caused significant pollution of soil or groundwater by relevant hazardous substances compared to the state established in the baseline report referred to in paragraph 2, the operator shall take the necessary measures to address that pollution so as to return the site to that state. For that purpose, the technical feasibility of such measures may be taken into account.
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 235 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
1. During the period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 20203, Member States may draw up and implement a transitional national plan covering combustion plants which were granted the first permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003. For each of the combustion plants covered by the plan, the plan shall cover emissions of one or more of the following pollutants: nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide and dust. For gas turbines, only nitrogen oxides emissions shall be covered by the plan.
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 239 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 32 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
The ceiling for the year 2016 shall be calculated on the basis of the relevant emission limit values set out in Annexes III to VII to Directive 2001/80/EC or, where applicable, on the basis of the rates of desulphurisation set out in Annex III to Directive 2001/80/EC. In the case of gas turbines, the emission limit values for nitrogen oxides set out for such plants in Part B of Annex VI to Directive 2001/80/EC shall be used. The ceilings for the years 201922 and 20203 shall be calculated on the basis of the relevant emission limit values set out in Part 1 of Annex V to this Directive or, where applicable, the relevant rates of desulphurisation set out in Part 5 of Annex V to this Directive. The ceilings for the yearsperiod 2017 andto 20218 shall be set providing a linear decrease of the ceilings between 2016 and 201922.
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 243 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 32 – paragraph 4
4. The transitional national plan shall also contain provisions on monitoring and reporting that comply with the implementing rules established in accordance with point (b) of Article 41, as well as the measures foreseen for each of the plants in order to ensure timely compliance with the emission limit values that will apply from 1 January 20214.
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 272 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Article 72 – paragraph 4 - point b
(b) for combustion plants which do not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, the number of operating hours per year.
2010/03/30
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 302 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 2 – paragraph 2
2. Combustion plants, using solid fuels which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, and which do not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, shall be subject to an emission limit value for SO2 of 800 mg/Nm3. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 303 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 2 – paragraph 3
Combustion plants using liquid fuels, which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, and which do not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, shall be subject to an emission limit value for SO2 of 850 mg/Nm3 in case of plants with a total rated thermal input not exceeding 300 MW and of 400 mg/Nm3 in case of plants with a total rated thermal input greater than 300 MW. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 304 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 2 – paragraph 4
A part of a combustion plant discharging its waste gases through one or more separate flues within a common stack, and which does not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, may be subject to the emission limit values set out in the preceding two paragraphs in relation to the total rated thermal input of the entire combustion plant. In such cases the emissions through each of those flues shall be monitored separately. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 308 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 4 – paragraph 3
Combustion plants using solid or liquid fuels with a total rated thermal input not exceeding 500 MW which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, and which do not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, shall be subject to an emission limit value for NOx of 450 mg/Nm3. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 311 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 4 – paragraph 5
Combustion plants using liquid fuels, with a total rated thermal input greater than 500 MW which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, and which do not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, shall be subject to an emission limit value for NOx of 400 mg/Nm3. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 312 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 4 – paragraph 6
A part of a combustion plant discharging its waste gases through one or more separate flues within a common stack, and which does not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, may be subject to the emission limit values set out in the preceding three paragraphs in relation to the total rated thermal input of the entire combustion plant. In such cases the emissions through each of those flues shall be monitored separately. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 313 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 4 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Combustion plants using indigenous solid fuels with a total rated thermal input exceeding 300 MW shall be subject to an emission limit value for NOx of 400 mg/Nm3. Or. xm (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 323 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 6 – paragraph 3 (after the notes)
For gas turbines (including CCGT) which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, and which do not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, the emission limit value for NOx is 150 mg/Nm³ when firing natural gas and 200 mg/Nm³ when firing other gases or liquid fuels. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 324 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 6 – paragraph 4 (after the notes)
A part of a combustion plant discharging its waste gases through one or more separate flues within a common stack, and which does not operate more than 1 53 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, may be subject to the emission limit values set out in the preceding paragraph in relation to the total rated thermal input of the entire combustion plant. In such cases the emissions through each of those flues shall be monitored separately. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 326 #

2007/0286(COD)

Council position
Annex V – Part 1 – section 6 – paragraph 5 a (new) (after the notes)
For combustion plants using gaseous fuels with a total rated thermal input not exceeding 500 MW which were granted a permit before 27 November 2002 or the operators of which had submitted a complete application for a permit before that date, provided that the plant was put into operation no later than 27 November 2003, and which do not operate more than 3 000 operating hours per year as a rolling average over a period of five years, the emission limit value for NOx is 200 mg/Nm³. Or. it (In line with Amendment 6.)
2010/03/31
Committee: ENVI