13 Amendments of Marie TOUSSAINT related to 2021/2046(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the role and incentive potential of intellectual property rights for scentral role of transport and mobility to achieve the European Green Deal objective to become climate neutral by 2050, but also the crucial importance of their legal framework in order to reach such objectives; considers therefore that the Sustainable and Smart mMobility, which is a fast-growing and innovative sector with a major social impact Strategy should contribute to make the European transport sector greener, smarter and more resilient, while leaving no one behind;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that in a sector such as mobility, exclusivity over data rights can produce a barrier to market entry, increased transaction costs, and a barrier to innovation that is harmful to operators, SMEs, and the public; recommends that unnecessary legal barriers pertaining to exclusive rights are removed in order to unlock the potential of the use of non- personal data and to encourage European innovation, including developments based on free and open source software; highlights the importance of allowing text and data mining to be fully exercised for scientific and research purposes, such as identifying aggregated mobility patterns and foreseeing possible additional sustainable collective transport needs associated to those, notably in the aim of improving the quality and the sustainability of means of mobility on the long term;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c Insists on the need to protect smart mobility vehicles and systems against cyber-attacks, especially when the private data of smart mobility means’ users are involved; notes that users’ access to their data is essential to help determine the cause of accidents but also for the purpose of their right of defence when their liability is engaged;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d Highlights that public sector bodies, notably those operating in the transport and mobility sector, should comply with competition law when establishing the principles for re-use of data they hold, avoiding as far as possible the conclusion of agreements, which might have as their objective or effect the creation of exclusive rights for the re-use of certain data; such agreement should be only possible when justified and necessary for the provision of a service of public interest; recalls that public sector bodies shall make available the data for re-use as mandated by the Open Data Directive; recommends that private entities operating in such public interest sectors are subject to similar obligations;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Supports the use of artificial intelligence for the transport of the future, with features such as predictive maintenance, while continuing to pay attention to the centrality of the human factor, the inherent associated risks and additional technical challenges, particularly in terms of safety, and in due consideration of liability aspects;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a Recommends the development of Union-wide trustworthy AI standards for all modes of transport, including the automotive industry, and for testing of AI- enabled vehicles and related products and services; maintains that a design approach based on Union values and ethical principles is strongly needed to create the conditions for widespread social acceptance of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies; considers this approach, aimed at developing trustworthy, ethically responsible and technically robust artificial intelligence, to be an important enabler for sustainable and smart mobility that is safe and accessible;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 e (new)
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e Reiterates its call to the Commission to update the regulatory framework concerning civil liability rules applicable to AI enabled products and services, notably in the sustainable and smart mobility sector where the risk borne by individuals in the public space should be duly assessed;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 g (new)
Paragraph 3 g (new)
3g Emphasises that the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies, shall take into consideration their environmental footprint during their lifecycle and across their entire supply chain, contribute to the green transition and support the achievement of climate neutrality and circular economy goals; calls on the Commission to come up with an impact assessment on the use and impact of AI in the public sector;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that a digital ticketing system at European level is not an appropriate solution for the local level, as it risks diverting customers away from local companies and towards international platforms, thus also limiting the ability of local authorities to manage mobility in their territory, with a particular focus on providing an effective multi-modal through-ticketing with adequate associated passengers’ rights, is essential and has the potential to contribute to a sustainable modal shift, while alternative means need to be ensured at more local level for public transport, in order to guarantee access to all public;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b Highlights that in view of the development of embedded digital content and of objects and devices connected to the Internet-of-Things, including in the sector of smart mobility, proper articulation between the rules applicable to public services on the one hand, and the rules concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services on the other hand, should be further devised;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that any revision of public service obligation (PSO) rules must include prior dialogue with Member States, regions and transport agencies in order to identify territorial and investment priorities and the precise definition of the ‘multimodal PSO system’ for the sake of legal certainty; calls for particular attention to be paid to maritime territorial continuityfocus particularly into establishing additional conditions fostering the uptake of zero-emissions mobility, and duly contribute to the modal shift towards the most sustainable transport modes such as rail;