5 Amendments of Michel DANTIN related to 2010/2139(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. RecallDeplores the imbalance of the planned transport investments between the different modes (road infrastructure 41 billion versus rail: €23.6 billion and inland waterways €0.6 billion), that is neither helpful to enhance modal swift objectives to reduce CO2 emissions nor to ensure fair and efficient co-modalitywhich is damaging to the creation of sustainable intermodal European transport; hopes therefore that European funds allocated to rail transport projects will be assigned priority and will be increased where road infrastructure is already sufficiently developed;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores the tendency to procrastinate in the launchingslowing down of the cross- border projects and railway projects in general, due to a lack of funding from the European Union and to excessive dependence on financing by the Member States, which risks the TEN-T network to remain a badly connected agglomeration of 27 national networks;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned by the lack of detailed information on the ongoing implementation of transport investments; questions if and by the delays which have occurred in the majority of the TEN-T projects currently under way; calls in this context for a more accurate evaluation of the implementation would not highlight serious delays of the programmed investments on TEN Tof these projects and insists, especially against the background of the economic crisis, on more certainty in respect of the timetable;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that cohesion and structural funding allocated to transport is distributed between transport modes and networks in a way which takes insufficient account of the objectives of the European Union;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls therefore for an increase in the overall funds available for TEN-T through earmarking cohesion funding for cross- border and/or intermodal transport projects and the dedication of an amount within this for the core TEN T network as thuis would lead to a more efficient and consistent use of cohesion funding with the EU climate change and sustainable development targets and a more effective realisation of the TEN-T network;