7 Amendments of Michel DANTIN related to 2011/0302(COD)
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) The previous Multiannual Financial Framework (2007-2013) showed that a limited budget for the TEN-T prevents progress being made on the biggest projects, particularly cross-border projects. An adequate European budgetary framework for the TEN-T would not only make it more attractive to private investment, but also ensure a greater national political will with regard to European projects, and therefore better cooperation between the Member States involved in a cross-border project. The European Union should be more ambitious about major European infrastructure projects, whose complexity and scale mean that the budget allocated to them should be revised upwards and the budgetary rules applying to them should be adapted. The new TEN-T guidelines should be given the budgetary and regulatory means necessary for their achievement.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the conventional railway networkrailway and waterways network created or improved by means of this Regulation in the EU-27 and by the length of high-speed railway network in the EU-27number of motorways of the sea created;
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii
(iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of inland and maritime ports and airports connected to each other and to the railway network and inland waterways, and by the number of multimodal logistics platforms created.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) actions supporting urban nodes as defined in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines];
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point 3 – introductory part
Annex – Part I – point 3 – introductory part
Algeciras – Madrid – Tarragona Sevilla – Valencia – Tarragona Tarragona – Barcelona – Perpignan – Marseille – Lyon – Torino – Milano – Venezia – Ljubljana – Budapest – UA border
Amendment 635 #
Lyon - Avignon - Rail upgrading Marseille (via Miramas and Fos)
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point 9 – rows 14 a-b (new)
Annex – Part I – point 9 – rows 14 a-b (new)
Lyon - Avignon - Port de Rail upgrading Marseille-Fos Marseille Port hinterland and multimodal terminal connections