BETA

16 Amendments of Michel DANTIN related to 2011/0398(COD)

Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Use of noise abatement operational procedures must not take precedence over the need to ensure flight safety. The competent authorities should therefore ensure that operational restriction measures do not impair the upholding of appropriate safety measures.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation shall apply to movements of aircraft engaged in civil aviation.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
It shall not apply to movements of aircraft engaged in military, customs, police, or similar services.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. The Member States shall notify the Commission of the names and addresses of the designated competent authorities and appeal body referred to in paragraph 1. The Commission shall make this information public.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsoperating restrictions, only after considering the beneficial effect in terms of noise abatement of points (a), (b) and (c) of this article.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) aircraft noise and performance information of the aircraft for noise modelling purposes.deleted
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 3
3. The Agency shall verify the aircraft noise and performance data for modelling purposes in accordance with Article 6 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council. The Agency shall refer to the procedure established by the Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection (CAEP) of the ICAO in order to determine the validity of data supplied by manufacturers.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Where the operating restriction concerns the withdrawal of marginally compliant aircraft from an airport, no new services shall be allowed with marginally compliant aircraft at that airport six months after the notification. The competent authorities shall decide on the annual rate for removing marginally compliant aircraft from the fleet of affected operators at that airport, taking due account of the age of the aircraft and the composition of the total fleet. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of Article 4, this rate shall not be more than 20% of that operator’s fleet ofat that airport. This annual rate may not exceed 20% of movements and must apply uniformly to every operator concerned on the basis of the number of movements of its marginally compliant aircraft serving thatat a given airport.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) aircraft on flights in connection with humanitarian operations.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall decide in accordance with the advisory procedure laid down in Article 13(2), in particular taking into account the criteria in Annex II, whether the competent authority concerned may proceed with the introduction of the operating restriction. The Commission shall communicate its decision to the Council and the Member State concerned.deleted
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Where the Commission has not adopted a decisnotified its opinion within a period of sixtwo months after it has received the informationnotice, as referred to in paragraph 2Article 7(1), the competent authority may apply the envisaged decision on an operating restriction.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) amendments of the definitions of aircraft in Article 2 point (3) and of marginally compliant aircraft in Article 2 point (4);deleted
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) amendments and updates of the noise certification standards provided for in Articles 4 and 8; and of the certification procedure provided for in Article 6(1).deleted
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The delegation of power referred to in Article 11 shall be conferred for an indeterminateon the Commission for a period of timefive years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13
Article 13 Committee 1. The Commission shall be assisted by the committee instituted by Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.22 This committee is a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. 3. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so request.deleted
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.4
Forecast noise contours – including an assessment of the number of people likely to be affected by aircraft noise – distinguish between established residential areas and newly constructed and/or planned residential areas.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN