This Communication analyses the implementation of Community regulations on access to international and cabotage markets for passenger transport. In doing so the Commission is fulfilling an obligation to prepare an update on EU legislation as specified in Regulation 11/98 and 12/98. Although not technically part of the scope of this particular provision the Commission has decided to cover two other important subjects related to the development of road passenger transport, namely safety of vehicles and passenger rights.

The document covers firstly, international passenger transport and secondly, cabotage markets for passenger transports.

As far as international passenger transport is concerned the Commission notes that over the last few years Regulation 11/98 has achieved most of the objectives set out. The Community licence, for example, has facilitated checks carried out outside the Member States of establishment and has therefore improved the conditions of access to the international transport market. At the same time, however, the Commission has received a number of complaints concerning the imposition of penalties by the national authorities when checking documents carried on board the vehicle. Given the importance of the Community licences the Commission calls on interested parties to submit their opinion on the following questions: Are the clarifications made by the Commission regarding the interpretation and application of the provisions on the Community licence adequate? Do they meet the concerns of the authorities issuing Community licences and certified true copies, authorised inspecting officers and carriers?

The authorisation of regular services is another area given due consideration. According to the Commission, the authorisation procedure is the only aspect of the Regulation limiting the development of a liberalised market for passenger transport. Consideration should therefore be given to a new step – intermediate or final – towards a more open market for international regular services. Within this context the Commission report proposes three possibilities and again asks on interested parties to offer their views on which would be the most appropriate action for possible revisions. The degree of liberation could be based on three scenarios.

The first - limiting the cases of refusal to grant authorisation provided for in Article 7(4) of Regulation 11/98. If so, which cases of refusal should be amended or even abolished?

The second - restrict cases of refusal to grant authorisation and provide for tacit authorisation by the authorising authority in the absence of a decision within the period of four months following the date of submission of the application by the carrier.

The third – introduce complete liberalisation of international regular services and special regular services still subject to authorisation on the same lines as occasional services. In such a case, which formalities and documents would have to replace those under the current authorisation procedure?

On the second issue of cabotage transport, the Commission report notes that this has not given rise to any problems of interpretation or application. No infringement has been report by the Member States concerning the essential feature of cabotage, namely that services can be provided in the host Member State on a temporary basis only. An analysis of the market indicates that:

- The impact of cabotage on national markets of the Member States is insignificant and constitutes a residual category. The operators are therefore concentrating their activities on their national market.

- Cabotage operations are carried out mainly in the adjacent Member States.

- One of the main reason why non-resident carriers occupy such a small share in the occasional services market in other Member States is that cabotage has to remain a service provided on a temporary basis.

Given the non-problematic nature of the cabotage market, the Commission proposes that there is no need to consider amending the provisions of Regulation 12/98.

Lastly, the report examines the role of road safety in relation with Community legislation. The report argues that the trend in road safety must be continued particularly in the case of coach and bus transport. To this end, the Commission wishes to examine whether it is expedient and feasible to introduce a system of certification for carriers which, going beyond the minimum safety measures laid down by Community and national legislation, observe particularly high standards in terms of road safety. Under future revisions, the Commission proposes guaranteeing high quality services in terms of greater passenger comfort, right to information on fares, contractual terms, treatment of complaints, mechanisms for resolving disputes, vehicles which are better adapted to the needs of persons with reduced mobility etc. The Commission invites all interested parties and in particular carriers and consumer associations to submit their views and suggestions.

COM(2004)0527
EUR-Lex

EUR-Lex
COM(1999)0327

Regulation 1998/12
OJ L 004 08.01.1998, p. 0010

EUR-Lex
COM(1997)0455

EUR-Lex
COM(1997)0455

OJ C 286 22.09.1997, p. 0071-0084
T4-0378/1997

T4-0378/1997

The rapporteur stated that the common position represented an improvement on the previous legislation. However, Parliament should encourage further progress in this area. This was why only two amendments had been re-tabled at second reading: they stated that Parliament should remain vigilant with regard to cabotage and passenger transport in the Union, in terms of the free movement of people and the freedom of establishment in the internal market. Commissioner Kinnock said that the Commission could accept a redrafted version of Amendment No 1 and the part of Amendment No 2 that dealt with the report on the application of Regulation No 2454/92 which would be presented the following year. On the other hand, it could not accept the amendment of Mr Grosch (EPP, BE) as the exclusion of regional bus services from the amended regulation would be a backward step from the progress already achieved.

Debate in Parliament

A4-0234/1997
OJ C 286 22.09.1997, p. 0008

A4-0234/1997

EUR-Lex
SEC(1997)0721

05302/1/1997
OJ C 164 30.05.1997, p. 0017

05302/1/1997

EUR-Lex
OJ C 124 21.04.1997, p. 0073
COM(1997)0072

EUR-Lex
COM(1997)0072

OJ C 380 16.12.1996, p. 0013-0035
T4-0642/1996

T4-0642/1996

The rapporteur, Mr Killilea (UPE, IRL), welcomed the deregulation of the bus and coach passenger transport sector and at the same time underlined that this had to go hand in hand with the harmonisation of the social, fiscal and technical conditions applying to the road transport system. He also wanted to see measures introduced to reduce the risk of distortions of competition in a sector that had become more vulnerable seeing that the direct benefits of lower prices belonged to the most impoverished strata of society, such as poor students and emigrants with their families. Finally, Mr Killilea stressed that the deregulation of this sector would also pay dividends because of the reduction in the number of vehicles on the roads, which would in turn mean fewer traffic jams and less pollution along the main transport arteries. Mr Kinnock stated that the two proposals aimed at promoting bus and coach transport at both national and international level were fully consistent with the approach outlined in the Green Paper ‘The Citizens’ Network’. He then went on to list those amendments on cabotage that could be taken over, namely Amendments Nos 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, 14, 16 (par. 2) and 18 (part 1). However, he rejected Amendments Nos 2, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 13 (the latter because it would excessively restrict the rights of cabotage). He also excluded Amendment No 12, which ran counter to the objective of harmonisation that was the very subject of the proposal, along with Amendments Nos 15 and 16 (part 1).

Debate in Parliament

The Council held an exploratory debate on the proposal for a regulation. At the end of this discussion the presidency established that there was a consensus for reinstating the repealed regulation as a minimum measure for market liberalisation. The Council asked the Permanent Representatives Committee, by way of a compromise solution, to investigate the possibility of deregulating cabotage transport for regular international services, which was to be added to the relevant safeguard clauses, in order to enable the Council, in the light of Parliament’s opinion, to adopt a common position on this matter at its meeting in December.

1951

A4-0291/1996
OJ C 347 18.11.1996, p. 0004

A4-0291/1996

CES1083/1996
OJ C 030 30.01.1997, p. 0040

EUR-Lex
OJ C 060 29.02.1996, p. 0010
COM(1995)0729

EUR-Lex
COM(1995)0729