BETA


2004/2199(INI) More environmentally-friendly fishing methods

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead PECH Ó NEACHTAIN Seán (icon: UEN UEN)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/06/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/03/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/03/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Seán Ó NEACHTAIN (UEN, IE) on more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. It reminded the Commission that it should take a more wide-ranging view of measures to protect the marine environment and rebuild depleted stocks, in particular by considering coastal and offshore pollution, industrial and agricultural effluents, deep-sea dredging and maritime transport, so as to complement current management methods. Technical measures should be based on scientific fishing research.

Parliament stated that, while ecological considerations are of major concern, future fisheries management policies must not be used to further penalise economically and socially vital fishing operations. It was essential to achieve a balance between socio-economic exigencies and environmental sustainability, while underlining the need to activate a mechanism for subsidising or compensating fishermen who are affected by the negative effects of environmentally-friendly fishing. Parliament called for the adoption of technical methods to improve selectivity and, therefore, the possibility of catching fish at the right size, in order to maintain high productivity. Only by ensuring that fish spawn and develop for a minimum specific period can the satisfactory reproduction of fish be made possible.

Any significantly negative impact of fishing on marine biodiversity must be limited through the establishment of marine reserves, real-time area closures and other appropriate and balanced management measures. Parliament expressed particular concern over the issue of ghost fishing and urged the Commission to take action to combat the issue, including close monitoring of the effectiveness of any provisions that are adopted at EU level.

It went on to highlight the need to reduce discards, which produce detrimental biological effects as well as having negative economic impacts, through the adoption of closed seasons, prohibited zones and mesh size regulations. Parliament asked the Commission to bring forward proposals for pilot projects aimed at reducing discards, and suggested that the option of discard bans accompanied by appropriate incentives for fishermen be considered.

Parliament urged the Commission to promote actively the adoption of an FAO International Plan of Action on by-catch reduction. The Commission must avoid conflicting objectives and superfluous regulations and avail itself of this opportunity to simplify the overall regulatory system. It should consider the application of environmentally-friendly fishing technical measures as a complement to existing effort limitations in relation to stock recovery plans. In this context, it was absolutely essential to develop and implement the satellite technology needed to detect the presence of unauthorised fishing vessels in closed areas and in Marine Protected Areas, in order to guarantee effective protection of fish, their critical habitat and other biodiversity.

Documents
2006/03/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/03/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/02/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/02/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/01/31
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Seán Ó NEACHTAIN (UEN, IE) in response to the Commission communication on more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. It reminded the Commission that it needed to take a broader view when it came to measures to protect the marine environment and rebuild depleted stocks, in particular by taking account of factors such as the impact of coastal and off-shore pollution, industrial and agricultural effluents, deep-sea dredging and maritime transport. It also stressed that technical measures should be based on scientific fishing research.

MEPs called for a balance to be achieved between socio-economic requirements and environmental sustainability. There should be a mechanism for subsidising or compensating fishermen affected by the negative effects of environmentally-friendly fishing, particularly those in less-developed areas. The report also called for technical methods to improve selectivity and highlighted the need to reduce discards through appropriate technical measures. The Commission was urged to put forward pilot projects on the latter issue.

The committee said that the negative impact of fisheries on marine biodiversity should be limited through the establishment of marine reserves, real-time closures and other measures, at least until habitats have returned to safe biological levels. Among other measures, it also wanted satellite technology to be used to detect unauthorised fishing vessels in closed and protected areas. Lastly, MEPs called for more technical and financial support for Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) to enable them to play a part in developing, implementing and monitoring specific requirements and "locally appropriate" measures.

2005/12/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/09/22
   EP - Ó NEACHTAIN Seán (UEN) appointed as rapporteur in PECH
2004/06/21
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to propose ways in which the Community can further promote the use of environmentally-friendly fishing methods, particularly through technical conservation measures.

CONTENT : Environmentally-friendly fishing activities contribute to promoting sustainable economic and social conditions in the fishing sector. Fishermen need healthy fish stocks in a balanced environment. Any upset in this balance leads to the cycle of "boom and bust", which is unsustainable in economic terms. Within an integrated management approach there are three main objectives related to

conservation and the development of environmentally-friendly fishing:

- to reduce fishing effort to sustainable levels and keep it there : this is the single most important challenge for the CFP. It has been estimated that, on average, 20 million tonnes are discarded each year from marine capture fisheries worldwide. This corresponds to about 23% of the annual catches. There are no estimates available on the total amount of discards in Community waters. However, the total amount of fishery discards in the North Sea in 1990 was around 260, 000 tonnes of roundfish, 300, 000 tonnes of flatfish, 15, 000 tonnes of rays, skates and dogfish, and 150, 000 tonnes of bottom invertebrates. These discards correspond to about 22% of the total landings from the North Sea and are in line with the worldwide figures. Obviously the problem is not restricted to the North Sea. In other fishing areas of the Community the problem of discarding is probably of a similar order of magnitude. In spite of recent decisions of the Council fishing mortalities for most species are substantially higher than needed in order to take optimal yields from the stocks. For some demersal stocks fishing mortalities have recently been so high that the stocks are under threat of collapse; for many more, fishing mortality rates are judged to be unsustainable in the longer term.

- to optimise catches of target species and minimise unwanted catches. The aim is to make fishing operations as selective as possible, by retaining target specimens of the right species and size with minimum impact on other species or juvenile fish of the target species.

-to minimise the impact of fishing on habitats. The use of some types of fishing gears can damage or even destroy sensitive marine habitats. Gear specifications and area restrictions on the use of certain gears may be necessary to reduce this risk.

Methods of achieving each of these objectives are briefly examined in the communication.

The paper states that a fresh impetus needs to be given to the promotion of more environmentally-friendly

fishing within the CFP. This calls for action under the following headings:

-a more decentralised approach to the development of more environmentally friendly fishing methods;

-greater involvement of the fishing sector in the regulatory process;

-sharing and developing knowledge at Community level;

-simplification of Community rules;

-changing fishermen's behaviour through the development of incentives;

-Further development of impact assessments on the ecological, economic and social effects of environmentally friendly fishing methods, particularly as regards their long-term effects.

The Commission intends to follow up on the ideas outlined above according to the following timetable.

-Review of current technical measures, 2004-2005:

-Reduction of discards, 2004-2006:

-Research, 2005-2006:

-Proposals for new financial incentives, 2004-2005: under the revised fisheries structural fund that will operate from 2007 a high priority should be given to schemes promoting environmentally-friendly fishing, including the development and use of more selective gears and compensation for short term losses for vessels participating in trials of more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. The Commission will include the relevant proposals in the context of the proposal on the future FIFG.

2004/06/21
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted the following conclusions in which it welcomes the Commission's Communication on promoting more environmentally-friendly fishing methods: the role of technical conservation measures. It recognises that making fishing activities more environmentally friendly will contribute to a sustainable fishing industry.

Moreover, the Council believes that improving research and developing technology in partnership with the fishing industry can contribute to developing ways of fishing that will better meet the challenge of rebuilding stocks and maintaining sustainability. It confirms its commitment to dialogue with stakeholders and highlights the key role of Regional Advisory Councils, and recognises that the active involvement of stakeholders, especially the fishing industry, in the development of environmentally friendly fishing measures, can enhance compliance and effectiveness.

In addition, it underlines the importance of encouraging fishermen to move towards more environmentally friendly fishing methods, and in that context calls for an evaluation by the Commission, by end 2005, of the potential for the provision of financial and non-financial incentives.

It is considered that environmentally friendly fishing methods should be promoted equally throughout the Community. In this context, the existing technical measures for the Atlantic and North Sea should, in 2004-2005, be evaluated with a view to their simplification in accordance with the fundamental requirement of ensuring the effectiveness and enforceability of such measures and considering the need for a localised approach.

Priority in research should be given to extending research to the application of environmentally friendly fishing gear technology; improving the understanding of the structure and dynamics of marine ecosystems to aid the development of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management; developing low-impact, species-selective fishing gears and fishing techniques that prevent undesired effects on habitats and on non-target species; the use of closed areas or Marine Protected Areas as a means of protecting sensitive habitats and non-target species; developing appropriate environmental impact assessment techniques for new fishing and aquaculture practices.

Taking into account the above, the Commission is invited to evaluate, by end 2005, the potential for the provision of financial and non-financial incentives in order to encourage fishermen to move towards more environmentally friendly fishing methods; to submit, as soon as practicable, after consultation with stakeholders including the relevant Regional Advisory Councils, a simplified Proposal for technical conservation measures for the Atlantic and North Sea; to give a high priority to schemes promoting and evaluating environmentally-friendly fishing, including, where appropriate, the development and use of more selective gears, compensation for short-term losses for vessels participating in trials of more environmentally-friendly fishing methods, and the training and education of fishermen; when introducing significant new proposals on environmentally friendly fishing

methods, to carry out, as appropriate and on the basis of available information, an assessment of possible economic and social impacts covering an evaluation of both short and long-term effects and consider temporary remedial measures that may be required; to develop a pilot project to address the problem of ghost fishing in Community waters which will include a retrieval system to remove lost gears, gear adjustments that lessen the impact of lost gears and methods to reduce the losses of gears; to report to the Council and to the European Parliament during 2007 on the implementation and impact of the actions set out in these conclusions.

2004/06/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2004/06/20
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to propose ways in which the Community can further promote the use of environmentally-friendly fishing methods, particularly through technical conservation measures.

CONTENT : Environmentally-friendly fishing activities contribute to promoting sustainable economic and social conditions in the fishing sector. Fishermen need healthy fish stocks in a balanced environment. Any upset in this balance leads to the cycle of "boom and bust", which is unsustainable in economic terms. Within an integrated management approach there are three main objectives related to

conservation and the development of environmentally-friendly fishing:

- to reduce fishing effort to sustainable levels and keep it there : this is the single most important challenge for the CFP. It has been estimated that, on average, 20 million tonnes are discarded each year from marine capture fisheries worldwide. This corresponds to about 23% of the annual catches. There are no estimates available on the total amount of discards in Community waters. However, the total amount of fishery discards in the North Sea in 1990 was around 260, 000 tonnes of roundfish, 300, 000 tonnes of flatfish, 15, 000 tonnes of rays, skates and dogfish, and 150, 000 tonnes of bottom invertebrates. These discards correspond to about 22% of the total landings from the North Sea and are in line with the worldwide figures. Obviously the problem is not restricted to the North Sea. In other fishing areas of the Community the problem of discarding is probably of a similar order of magnitude. In spite of recent decisions of the Council fishing mortalities for most species are substantially higher than needed in order to take optimal yields from the stocks. For some demersal stocks fishing mortalities have recently been so high that the stocks are under threat of collapse; for many more, fishing mortality rates are judged to be unsustainable in the longer term.

- to optimise catches of target species and minimise unwanted catches. The aim is to make fishing operations as selective as possible, by retaining target specimens of the right species and size with minimum impact on other species or juvenile fish of the target species.

-to minimise the impact of fishing on habitats. The use of some types of fishing gears can damage or even destroy sensitive marine habitats. Gear specifications and area restrictions on the use of certain gears may be necessary to reduce this risk.

Methods of achieving each of these objectives are briefly examined in the communication.

The paper states that a fresh impetus needs to be given to the promotion of more environmentally-friendly

fishing within the CFP. This calls for action under the following headings:

-a more decentralised approach to the development of more environmentally friendly fishing methods;

-greater involvement of the fishing sector in the regulatory process;

-sharing and developing knowledge at Community level;

-simplification of Community rules;

-changing fishermen's behaviour through the development of incentives;

-Further development of impact assessments on the ecological, economic and social effects of environmentally friendly fishing methods, particularly as regards their long-term effects.

The Commission intends to follow up on the ideas outlined above according to the following timetable.

-Review of current technical measures, 2004-2005:

-Reduction of discards, 2004-2006:

-Research, 2005-2006:

-Proposals for new financial incentives, 2004-2005: under the revised fisheries structural fund that will operate from 2007 a high priority should be given to schemes promoting environmentally-friendly fishing, including the development and use of more selective gears and compensation for short term losses for vessels participating in trials of more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. The Commission will include the relevant proposals in the context of the proposal on the future FIFG.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport O'Neachtain A6-0019/2006 - am. 1 #

2006/03/15 Outcome: -: 348, +: 292, 0: 17
GB EL FR PT SE MT EE AT CY HU IT NL ES BE LU FI SI CZ DK SK IE LT LV PL DE
Total
71
22
71
21
17
5
6
17
6
20
54
26
51
22
4
13
7
21
14
12
12
12
9
51
93
icon: PSE PSE
185

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
29

United Kingdom NI

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: UEN UEN
25

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

For (1)

4

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
236

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Rapport O'Neachtain A6-0019/2006 - am. 2 #

2006/03/15 Outcome: -: 380, +: 266, 0: 7
EL GB FR PT MT EE AT CY HU ES SI LU SE SK IT BE FI LT LV CZ NL IE PL DK DE
Total
22
71
69
20
5
6
17
6
20
51
7
5
18
8
57
22
14
12
8
21
25
12
52
14
91
icon: PSE PSE
181

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
26

United Kingdom NI

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
30

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
25

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1
2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
237

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2004-06-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/0
date
2005-10-12T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.314
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AM-367672_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4521&j=0&l=en
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4521&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4521&j=1&l=en
events/1
date
2004-06-20T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1
date
2004-06-21T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0019_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0019_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4521&j=1&l=en
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf
events/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2006-02-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0019_EN.html title: A6-0019/2006
events/4
date
2006-02-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0019_EN.html title: A6-0019/2006
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE
events/7
date
2006-03-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0091_EN.html title: T6-0091/2006
summary
events/7
date
2006-03-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0091_EN.html title: T6-0091/2006
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
rapporteur
name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-19&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0019_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
docs/4/body
EC
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-19&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0019_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-91
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0091_EN.html
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2592 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0438 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0438:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: UEN name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán
  • date: 2006-01-31T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: UEN name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-19&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0019/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4521&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-91 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0091/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
PECH
date
2004-09-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Fisheries
rapporteur
group: UEN name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2592 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2592*&MEET_DATE=21/06/2004 date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2005-10-12T00:00:00 docs: title: PE353.314 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-12-14T00:00:00 docs: title: PE367.672 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-19&language=EN title: A6-0019/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4521&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)1725 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-06-30T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4521&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)1999 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted the following conclusions in which it welcomes the Commission's Communication on promoting more environmentally-friendly fishing methods: the role of technical conservation measures. It recognises that making fishing activities more environmentally friendly will contribute to a sustainable fishing industry. Moreover, the Council believes that improving research and developing technology in partnership with the fishing industry can contribute to developing ways of fishing that will better meet the challenge of rebuilding stocks and maintaining sustainability. It confirms its commitment to dialogue with stakeholders and highlights the key role of Regional Advisory Councils, and recognises that the active involvement of stakeholders, especially the fishing industry, in the development of environmentally friendly fishing measures, can enhance compliance and effectiveness. In addition, it underlines the importance of encouraging fishermen to move towards more environmentally friendly fishing methods, and in that context calls for an evaluation by the Commission, by end 2005, of the potential for the provision of financial and non-financial incentives. It is considered that environmentally friendly fishing methods should be promoted equally throughout the Community. In this context, the existing technical measures for the Atlantic and North Sea should, in 2004-2005, be evaluated with a view to their simplification in accordance with the fundamental requirement of ensuring the effectiveness and enforceability of such measures and considering the need for a localised approach. Priority in research should be given to extending research to the application of environmentally friendly fishing gear technology; improving the understanding of the structure and dynamics of marine ecosystems to aid the development of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management; developing low-impact, species-selective fishing gears and fishing techniques that prevent undesired effects on habitats and on non-target species; the use of closed areas or Marine Protected Areas as a means of protecting sensitive habitats and non-target species; developing appropriate environmental impact assessment techniques for new fishing and aquaculture practices. Taking into account the above, the Commission is invited to evaluate, by end 2005, the potential for the provision of financial and non-financial incentives in order to encourage fishermen to move towards more environmentally friendly fishing methods; to submit, as soon as practicable, after consultation with stakeholders including the relevant Regional Advisory Councils, a simplified Proposal for technical conservation measures for the Atlantic and North Sea; to give a high priority to schemes promoting and evaluating environmentally-friendly fishing, including, where appropriate, the development and use of more selective gears, compensation for short-term losses for vessels participating in trials of more environmentally-friendly fishing methods, and the training and education of fishermen; when introducing significant new proposals on environmentally friendly fishing methods, to carry out, as appropriate and on the basis of available information, an assessment of possible economic and social impacts covering an evaluation of both short and long-term effects and consider temporary remedial measures that may be required; to develop a pilot project to address the problem of ghost fishing in Community waters which will include a retrieval system to remove lost gears, gear adjustments that lessen the impact of lost gears and methods to reduce the losses of gears; to report to the Council and to the European Parliament during 2007 on the implementation and impact of the actions set out in these conclusions.
  • date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0438 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=438 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to propose ways in which the Community can further promote the use of environmentally-friendly fishing methods, particularly through technical conservation measures. CONTENT : Environmentally-friendly fishing activities contribute to promoting sustainable economic and social conditions in the fishing sector. Fishermen need healthy fish stocks in a balanced environment. Any upset in this balance leads to the cycle of "boom and bust", which is unsustainable in economic terms. Within an integrated management approach there are three main objectives related to conservation and the development of environmentally-friendly fishing: - to reduce fishing effort to sustainable levels and keep it there : this is the single most important challenge for the CFP. It has been estimated that, on average, 20 million tonnes are discarded each year from marine capture fisheries worldwide. This corresponds to about 23% of the annual catches. There are no estimates available on the total amount of discards in Community waters. However, the total amount of fishery discards in the North Sea in 1990 was around 260, 000 tonnes of roundfish, 300, 000 tonnes of flatfish, 15, 000 tonnes of rays, skates and dogfish, and 150, 000 tonnes of bottom invertebrates. These discards correspond to about 22% of the total landings from the North Sea and are in line with the worldwide figures. Obviously the problem is not restricted to the North Sea. In other fishing areas of the Community the problem of discarding is probably of a similar order of magnitude. In spite of recent decisions of the Council fishing mortalities for most species are substantially higher than needed in order to take optimal yields from the stocks. For some demersal stocks fishing mortalities have recently been so high that the stocks are under threat of collapse; for many more, fishing mortality rates are judged to be unsustainable in the longer term. - to optimise catches of target species and minimise unwanted catches. The aim is to make fishing operations as selective as possible, by retaining target specimens of the right species and size with minimum impact on other species or juvenile fish of the target species. -to minimise the impact of fishing on habitats. The use of some types of fishing gears can damage or even destroy sensitive marine habitats. Gear specifications and area restrictions on the use of certain gears may be necessary to reduce this risk. Methods of achieving each of these objectives are briefly examined in the communication. The paper states that a fresh impetus needs to be given to the promotion of more environmentally-friendly fishing within the CFP. This calls for action under the following headings: -a more decentralised approach to the development of more environmentally friendly fishing methods; -greater involvement of the fishing sector in the regulatory process; -sharing and developing knowledge at Community level; -simplification of Community rules; -changing fishermen's behaviour through the development of incentives; -Further development of impact assessments on the ecological, economic and social effects of environmentally friendly fishing methods, particularly as regards their long-term effects. The Commission intends to follow up on the ideas outlined above according to the following timetable. -Review of current technical measures, 2004-2005: -Reduction of discards, 2004-2006: -Research, 2005-2006: -Proposals for new financial incentives, 2004-2005: under the revised fisheries structural fund that will operate from 2007 a high priority should be given to schemes promoting environmentally-friendly fishing, including the development and use of more selective gears and compensation for short term losses for vessels participating in trials of more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. The Commission will include the relevant proposals in the context of the proposal on the future FIFG.
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-01-31T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Seán Ó NEACHTAIN (UEN, IE) in response to the Commission communication on more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. It reminded the Commission that it needed to take a broader view when it came to measures to protect the marine environment and rebuild depleted stocks, in particular by taking account of factors such as the impact of coastal and off-shore pollution, industrial and agricultural effluents, deep-sea dredging and maritime transport. It also stressed that technical measures should be based on scientific fishing research. MEPs called for a balance to be achieved between socio-economic requirements and environmental sustainability. There should be a mechanism for subsidising or compensating fishermen affected by the negative effects of environmentally-friendly fishing, particularly those in less-developed areas. The report also called for technical methods to improve selectivity and highlighted the need to reduce discards through appropriate technical measures. The Commission was urged to put forward pilot projects on the latter issue. The committee said that the negative impact of fisheries on marine biodiversity should be limited through the establishment of marine reserves, real-time closures and other measures, at least until habitats have returned to safe biological levels. Among other measures, it also wanted satellite technology to be used to detect unauthorised fishing vessels in closed and protected areas. Lastly, MEPs called for more technical and financial support for Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) to enable them to play a part in developing, implementing and monitoring specific requirements and "locally appropriate" measures.
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-19&language=EN title: A6-0019/2006
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4521&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-91 title: T6-0091/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Seán Ó NEACHTAIN (UEN, IE) on more environmentally-friendly fishing methods. It reminded the Commission that it should take a more wide-ranging view of measures to protect the marine environment and rebuild depleted stocks, in particular by considering coastal and offshore pollution, industrial and agricultural effluents, deep-sea dredging and maritime transport, so as to complement current management methods. Technical measures should be based on scientific fishing research. Parliament stated that, while ecological considerations are of major concern, future fisheries management policies must not be used to further penalise economically and socially vital fishing operations. It was essential to achieve a balance between socio-economic exigencies and environmental sustainability, while underlining the need to activate a mechanism for subsidising or compensating fishermen who are affected by the negative effects of environmentally-friendly fishing. Parliament called for the adoption of technical methods to improve selectivity and, therefore, the possibility of catching fish at the right size, in order to maintain high productivity. Only by ensuring that fish spawn and develop for a minimum specific period can the satisfactory reproduction of fish be made possible. Any significantly negative impact of fishing on marine biodiversity must be limited through the establishment of marine reserves, real-time area closures and other appropriate and balanced management measures. Parliament expressed particular concern over the issue of ghost fishing and urged the Commission to take action to combat the issue, including close monitoring of the effectiveness of any provisions that are adopted at EU level. It went on to highlight the need to reduce discards, which produce detrimental biological effects as well as having negative economic impacts, through the adoption of closed seasons, prohibited zones and mesh size regulations. Parliament asked the Commission to bring forward proposals for pilot projects aimed at reducing discards, and suggested that the option of discard bans accompanied by appropriate incentives for fishermen be considered. Parliament urged the Commission to promote actively the adoption of an FAO International Plan of Action on by-catch reduction. The Commission must avoid conflicting objectives and superfluous regulations and avail itself of this opportunity to simplify the overall regulatory system. It should consider the application of environmentally-friendly fishing technical measures as a complement to existing effort limitations in relation to stock recovery plans. In this context, it was absolutely essential to develop and implement the satellite technology needed to detect the presence of unauthorised fishing vessels in closed areas and in Marine Protected Areas, in order to guarantee effective protection of fish, their critical habitat and other biodiversity.
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
PECH/6/23837
New
  • PECH/6/23837
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.15 Fisheries policy
  • 3.15.07 Fisheries inspectorate, surveillance of fishing vessels and areas
New
3.15
Fisheries policy
3.15.07
Fisheries inspectorate, surveillance of fishing vessels and areas
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2592 council: Agriculture and Fisheries date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2004-06-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0438/COM_COM(2004)0438_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0438 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0438:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: UEN name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán
  • date: 2006-01-31T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: UEN name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-19&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0019/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4521&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-91 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0091/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: PECH date: 2004-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Fisheries rapporteur: group: UEN name: Ó NEACHTAIN Seán
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/ title: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
PECH/6/23837
reference
2004/2199(INI)
title
More environmentally-friendly fishing methods
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject