BETA


2004/2229(INI) New prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN QUEIRÓ Luís (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion CULT PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion REGI SUDRE Margie (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Subjects

Events

2005/12/07
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/10/20
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/09/08
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted Luis QUIERO's (EPP-ED, PT) own-initiative report on new prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism by 471 votes in favour to 54 against and 58 abstentions . The report presents various initiatives, which were considered viable and useful to the central goal of sustainability in tourism EU-wide. (Please see the summary of 14/06/2005.)

Parliament pointed out that Europe is the world's leading tourist destination. Tourist and travel services contribute directly - at a rate of at least 4% - to the EU's GDP and account directly for more than seven million jobs. Furthermore, more than two million businesses, a large majority of which are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), are directly involved in providing tourist services. Whilst tourism does not at present constitute a Community policy, it is nevertheless affected by many policies which do come under the Community's remit and that means that it should be given greater consideration at EU level.

Competitiveness and quality of services: Parliament c onsidered it vitally important to complete the internal market in tourist services and to achieve genuine equality of treatment between tourist operators. It proposed a Community-wide classification of tourist services, with the cooperation of the industry, to be used in particular for the classification of hotel facilities. Measures should also be taken to identify and to harmonise professional profiles in the tourist industry in order to avoid unnecessary duplication and guarantee a more transparent service that does not confuse users. Parliament called on the Council to restart work on the proposed revision of the Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the special scheme for travel agents (COM(2003)0078). It reiterated its support for the objectives of simplifying this special VAT scheme and maintaining the competitive position of operators established in the EU vis-à-vis operators from third countries. The Council is asked to conclude the decision-making process on the proposal for amending Directive 77/388/EEC (COM(2003)0397), so as to enable all Member States to apply in a structured way reduced VAT rates for restaurants, as already exist for other tourism-related activities, such as holiday accommodation, plots on campsites, hotels and amusement parks.

Parliament went on to state that consumer rights in the tourism sector should be defined and better protected and that this should include identifying new forms of protection such as conciliation services for tourists. It called on the Commission to consider the drafting of a "tourism package" comprising both a review of the existing directives on consumers" rights with regard to tourism and new measures making it possible to improve consumer protection and quality standards in tourist services (particularly in the hotel and touring sectors) while taking account of new trends on the supply side (electronic sales).

Safety and security of tourism: Amongst other recommendations, Parliament took the view that the Commission should coordinate the establishment of a network for good practice exchange between high risk sports and leisure organisations and the provision of information on risk prevention and management, in particular for young people. It called on the Commission to investigate the desirability of requiring the maximum possible transparency and professionalism from companies managing this type of high risk leisure activity, asking that they take out compulsory care insurance.

New sustainable tourism activities: The report h ighlights of the dangers of mass tourism, senior citizens’ tourism, and also stressed the need for all parties in the sector to take steps to capture new demand outside the high season, to spread visits over the year and to make better use of hotel and accommodation facilities. Parliament pointed to the positive repercussions of conference and business tourism, medical and thermal tourism, commemorative tourism, cultural tourism in every shape and form, gastronomic, naturalist, sports-based, spiritual, historical and language-related tourism, religious tourism, social tourism and so on.

It also considered that the tourism industry occupies a key place in the economic development of countries in the Mediterranean basin and is a vector for rapprochement in the cultural dialogue. Consideration should be given to the possibility of setting up a training exchange programme for people working in tourism in the Mediterranean regions, within the framework of the Barcelona process.

Knowledge and promotion of European tourism: Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to assess the possibility of a scheme, along the lines of the European Capital of Culture initiative, to designate outstanding European tourist destinations, to allow one or more regions or micro-regions to be selected yearly on the basis of quality indicators linked to the preservation and upgrading of cultural and natural heritage and the development of sustainable tourist services. Accordingly, Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to study the desirability of proposing an EU tourism mark or destination, characterised by tremendous diversity and high social quality and sustainability, and to promote it both within and outside the EU through a suitable communication campaign. Preserving the cultural heritage (in particular that which is designated world heritage by UNESCO) is of major importance to the sustainable development of tourism in the EU. Parliament asked the Commission and the Member States to create the "Iron Curtain Trail", an initiative analogous to the "Boston Freedom Trail" in remembrance of the American Independence War or to the "Berliner Mauerweg" in remembrance of the construction and fall of the Berlin Wall, in order to promote European identity.

Tourism and transport: T ransport is essential to tourism, especially in the case of island regions and the most remote regions in general, both as a contribution to the quality of the tourist services chain and in terms of the accessibility of destinations. Parliament emphasised the need to promote combined train and bicycle travel and considers the 'Eurovelo' network to be a good basis for this. It also requested that railway enterprises allow bicycles on trains, including long distance and cross-border trains, as is already the case with the French TGV.

It welcomed the Commission's initiative to establish state-aid guidelines for regional airports and low-cost companies, so as to improve legal certainty and ensure fair competition in favour of tourist accessibility and regional development. Nevertheless, steps should be taken to ensure that the development of low-cost airlines is supervised, so as to avoid a proliferation of air links to specific regions or neighbouring regions, and on the contrary develop to the full the interconnection of air transport and collective land transport. Parliament also hoped for a specific Commission initiative laying down safety standards and monitoring procedures applicable to small carriers, minor airlines and secondary airports. In any case, the activities of the European Aviation Safety Agency must be stepped up and coordination with the Member States' authorities must be improved.

Structural intervention co-funded by the Community: W hen adopting the new structural policy instruments for 2007-2013, it should be ensured that the strategic guidelines provide for an integrated approach to tourism, allowing the EAFRD and the ERDF actions to be coordinated in a spirit similar to that of the LEADER programme and the Interreg and Urban programmes. This approach should allow the implementation of a genuine regional strategy for sustainable tourism. Parliament called on the Member States to establish objectives within their national strategic frameworks and operating programmes which will enable the regions to set up and fund coherent projects for developing sustainable tourism, tailor-made to local conditions and possibilities , including partnerships between different areas and institutions so as to build up appropriate local tourist systems.

Tourism and coordinating Community legislation: Parliament a sked that any draft secondary legislation which has an impact on the tourist sector be identified at the outset of the implementation of the Commission's work programme, and be subject to an impact assessment, with the involvement of bodies representing industry, employees and consumers. It also called on the Commission to consider setting up a network of tourism correspondents/ coordinators in all Commission Directorates whose remit affects tourism activities.

In the debate, however, Commissioner Günther VERHEUGEN told Members that the Commission would not take on board many of their proposals. Consequently, it remains to be seen if proposals such as the introduction of an EU-wide hotel classification system or a European campaign to encourage the development of senior citizens' tourism within the Community will be realized.

2005/09/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/09/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted Luis QUIERO's (EPP-ED, PT) own-initiative report on new prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism by 471 votes in favour to 54 against and 58 abstentions . The report presents various initiatives, which were considered viable and useful to the central goal of sustainability in tourism EU-wide. (Please see the summary of 14/06/2005.)

Parliament pointed out that Europe is the world's leading tourist destination. Tourist and travel services contribute directly - at a rate of at least 4% - to the EU's GDP and account directly for more than seven million jobs. Furthermore, more than two million businesses, a large majority of which are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), are directly involved in providing tourist services. Whilst tourism does not at present constitute a Community policy, it is nevertheless affected by many policies which do come under the Community's remit and that means that it should be given greater consideration at EU level.

Competitiveness and quality of services: Parliament c onsidered it vitally important to complete the internal market in tourist services and to achieve genuine equality of treatment between tourist operators. It proposed a Community-wide classification of tourist services, with the cooperation of the industry, to be used in particular for the classification of hotel facilities. Measures should also be taken to identify and to harmonise professional profiles in the tourist industry in order to avoid unnecessary duplication and guarantee a more transparent service that does not confuse users. Parliament called on the Council to restart work on the proposed revision of the Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the special scheme for travel agents (COM(2003)0078). It reiterated its support for the objectives of simplifying this special VAT scheme and maintaining the competitive position of operators established in the EU vis-à-vis operators from third countries. The Council is asked to conclude the decision-making process on the proposal for amending Directive 77/388/EEC (COM(2003)0397), so as to enable all Member States to apply in a structured way reduced VAT rates for restaurants, as already exist for other tourism-related activities, such as holiday accommodation, plots on campsites, hotels and amusement parks.

Parliament went on to state that consumer rights in the tourism sector should be defined and better protected and that this should include identifying new forms of protection such as conciliation services for tourists. It called on the Commission to consider the drafting of a "tourism package" comprising both a review of the existing directives on consumers" rights with regard to tourism and new measures making it possible to improve consumer protection and quality standards in tourist services (particularly in the hotel and touring sectors) while taking account of new trends on the supply side (electronic sales).

Safety and security of tourism: Amongst other recommendations, Parliament took the view that the Commission should coordinate the establishment of a network for good practice exchange between high risk sports and leisure organisations and the provision of information on risk prevention and management, in particular for young people. It called on the Commission to investigate the desirability of requiring the maximum possible transparency and professionalism from companies managing this type of high risk leisure activity, asking that they take out compulsory care insurance.

New sustainable tourism activities: The report h ighlights of the dangers of mass tourism, senior citizens’ tourism, and also stressed the need for all parties in the sector to take steps to capture new demand outside the high season, to spread visits over the year and to make better use of hotel and accommodation facilities. Parliament pointed to the positive repercussions of conference and business tourism, medical and thermal tourism, commemorative tourism, cultural tourism in every shape and form, gastronomic, naturalist, sports-based, spiritual, historical and language-related tourism, religious tourism, social tourism and so on.

It also considered that the tourism industry occupies a key place in the economic development of countries in the Mediterranean basin and is a vector for rapprochement in the cultural dialogue. Consideration should be given to the possibility of setting up a training exchange programme for people working in tourism in the Mediterranean regions, within the framework of the Barcelona process.

Knowledge and promotion of European tourism: Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to assess the possibility of a scheme, along the lines of the European Capital of Culture initiative, to designate outstanding European tourist destinations, to allow one or more regions or micro-regions to be selected yearly on the basis of quality indicators linked to the preservation and upgrading of cultural and natural heritage and the development of sustainable tourist services. Accordingly, Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to study the desirability of proposing an EU tourism mark or destination, characterised by tremendous diversity and high social quality and sustainability, and to promote it both within and outside the EU through a suitable communication campaign. Preserving the cultural heritage (in particular that which is designated world heritage by UNESCO) is of major importance to the sustainable development of tourism in the EU. Parliament asked the Commission and the Member States to create the "Iron Curtain Trail", an initiative analogous to the "Boston Freedom Trail" in remembrance of the American Independence War or to the "Berliner Mauerweg" in remembrance of the construction and fall of the Berlin Wall, in order to promote European identity.

Tourism and transport: T ransport is essential to tourism, especially in the case of island regions and the most remote regions in general, both as a contribution to the quality of the tourist services chain and in terms of the accessibility of destinations. Parliament emphasised the need to promote combined train and bicycle travel and considers the 'Eurovelo' network to be a good basis for this. It also requested that railway enterprises allow bicycles on trains, including long distance and cross-border trains, as is already the case with the French TGV.

It welcomed the Commission's initiative to establish state-aid guidelines for regional airports and low-cost companies, so as to improve legal certainty and ensure fair competition in favour of tourist accessibility and regional development. Nevertheless, steps should be taken to ensure that the development of low-cost airlines is supervised, so as to avoid a proliferation of air links to specific regions or neighbouring regions, and on the contrary develop to the full the interconnection of air transport and collective land transport. Parliament also hoped for a specific Commission initiative laying down safety standards and monitoring procedures applicable to small carriers, minor airlines and secondary airports. In any case, the activities of the European Aviation Safety Agency must be stepped up and coordination with the Member States' authorities must be improved.

Structural intervention co-funded by the Community: W hen adopting the new structural policy instruments for 2007-2013, it should be ensured that the strategic guidelines provide for an integrated approach to tourism, allowing the EAFRD and the ERDF actions to be coordinated in a spirit similar to that of the LEADER programme and the Interreg and Urban programmes. This approach should allow the implementation of a genuine regional strategy for sustainable tourism. Parliament called on the Member States to establish objectives within their national strategic frameworks and operating programmes which will enable the regions to set up and fund coherent projects for developing sustainable tourism, tailor-made to local conditions and possibilities , including partnerships between different areas and institutions so as to build up appropriate local tourist systems.

Tourism and coordinating Community legislation: Parliament a sked that any draft secondary legislation which has an impact on the tourist sector be identified at the outset of the implementation of the Commission's work programme, and be subject to an impact assessment, with the involvement of bodies representing industry, employees and consumers. It also called on the Commission to consider setting up a network of tourism correspondents/ coordinators in all Commission Directorates whose remit affects tourism activities.

In the debate, however, Commissioner Günther VERHEUGEN told Members that the Commission would not take on board many of their proposals. Consequently, it remains to be seen if proposals such as the introduction of an EU-wide hotel classification system or a European campaign to encourage the development of senior citizens' tourism within the Community will be realized.

Documents
2005/09/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/09/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/07/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/07/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/06/14
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Luis QUEIRO (EPP-ED, PT) on new prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism. MEPs noted that tourism was at the heart of the Lisbon process, with great potential for growth and job creation, in particular among young people and women. The committee also pointed out that, at international level, tourism was extremely competitive. European tourism sectors and industry needed to be well-positioned to meet the significant additional demand that would be created by the development of markets such as Brazil , China , India and Russia .

It was vitally important to complete the internal market in tourist services and to achieve genuine equality between tourist operators. To this end, a Community-wide classification, to be used in particular for the classification of hotel facilities, should be introduced. The Council was also urged to restart work on the proposed revision of the directive amending Directive 77/388/EC as regards the special VAT scheme for travel agents, thereby maintaining the competitive position of operators established in the EU vis-à-vis operators from third countries. In addition, the Council should conclude the decision-making process on the proposed directive amending Directive 77/388/EC as regards reduced VAT rates for restaurants.

The report highlighted safety and security issues, and called inter alia for a contact group to be set up at European level to coordinate information on the management of health crises, natural disasters or acts of terrorism. The Commission was also urged to evaluate the effectiveness of the 1986 Council Recommendation on fire safety in hotels and to promote EU voluntary standards to improve safety aspects of tourism services. Measures should be taken to improve the operation and awareness of the European emergency number .

The committee emphasised the dangers of mass tourism, which represented a threat to local natural and socio-economic balances. The Commission should endeavour to coordinate national holiday arrangements in order to even out the burden on access routes and tourist infrastructures and achieve a more efficient and sustainable deployment of human resources by reducing seasonal fluctuations in employment levels. MEPs also pointed out that the gradual ageing of the population would lead to an increase in the number of off-season tourists, and called on the Commission to encourage the development of senior citizens' tourism within the EU through a low season " third age " campaign which would help to improve older people's quality of life, create jobs and generate demand and growth in the European economy.

Lastly, the committee recalled that transport was essential to tourism, and called for measures to promote combined train and bicycle travel and stimulate inland waterway tourism. While welcoming the Commission's initiative to establish state-aid guidelines for regional airports and low-cost companies, so as to improve legal certainty and ensure fair competition, MEPs nevertheless wanted the development of low-cost airlines to be supervised in order to avoid a proliferation of air links to specific regions or neighbouring regions. Instead, they called for the interconnection of air transport and collective land transport to be developed to the full.

2005/06/01
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/05/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/04/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/04/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/04/18
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

Following a brief exchange of views on the Commission’s communication, the Council adopted conclusions the main points of which were the following:

It noted that the European Union maintains its place as the most important tourism destination in the world, representing a large economic weight and contributing considerably to the employment of the European Union's workforce.

It stressed that the European Union is one of the world's richest and most varied tourist regions, with a huge variety of landscapes and cultures, good-quality infrastructure and a highly professional tourism sector, offering important business opportunities for sustainable growth and employment as well as opportunities for regional development. It takes the view that the rich potential of the new Member States for tourism, which could generate annual earnings of 46 billion euro and support up to 3 million jobs, needs to be fully tapped and notes that the economic development of countries such as China, India, Russia and Brazil will create substantial additional demand, which the European tourism industry needs to be well-positioned to meet.

It takes the view that a number of challenges of an economic and demographic nature, such as the increase in tourists in older age categories, the particular and increasing demands of young tourists, increasing competition from other tourist destinations and the decline foreseen in the European working population from 2010 need to be addressed.

It stresses that the European institutions, the Member States and regions need to continue their cooperation, stimulating the exchange of information among the stakeholders in tourism, in order to develop appropriate policies for sustainable tourism and welcomes the setting up of a Tourism Sustainability Group (TSG) by the Commission, with the task of steering and monitoring the preparation and implementation of a coherent set of actions to be undertaken by the different tourism stakeholders, with a view to the preparation, by 2007, of a "European Agenda 21 for Tourism".

It invites the Member States to:

– participate in the implementation of a cooperative approach between tourism stakeholders with a view to contributing to the work of the TSG;

– encourage the existing bodies specialised in sustainable tourism issues to network at the European level in order to facilitate the exchange of information between tourism destinations.

It invites the European tourism industry and other stakeholders of the tourism sector to:

– participate actively in and support the efforts undertaken by the European Union and the Member States to develop sustainable European tourism, in particular through the work of the TSG.

– contribute to the development of products and services based on sustainable patterns of production and consumption, promote corporate social responsibility and contribute to dialogue and cooperation between public and private stakeholders.

– integrate sustainability, eco-efficiency and exchange of good practices within business strategies and activities in order to strengthen performance and competitiveness in the global market.

It invites the Commission, the Member States and other stakeholders of the tourism sector to:

– work towards the design and use of approaches to and tools for the development and promotion of sustainable patterns of production and consumption with a view to improving the competitiveness, quality and employment potential of the European tourism sector;

– cooperate in favour of the sustainability of tourism destinations, in particular through the protection of natural areas, biodiversity and cultural heritage, which are leading resources and important assets of European tourism;

– make the best possible use of information and communication technologies and environmental technologies for the measures to be developed and implemented;

It further invites the Commission to:

– integrate sustainability concerns into Community policies and initiatives affecting European tourism, in particular by means of its impact assessment tool;

– facilitate the creation of a system to network regional, national, transnational and international bodies and actors so as to cooperate and exchange information on sustainable tourism initiatives;

– inform the Member States about the activities of the TSG in the first half of 2006 and submit a communication on a "European Agenda 21 for Tourism" to the Council before the end of 2007, with recommendations for concrete actions to be implemented by the different public and private stakeholders”.

2005/04/18
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/03/14
   EP - SUDRE Margie (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2005/01/17
   EP - PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/09/29
   EP - QUEIRÓ Luís (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2003/11/21
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to put forward some basic orientations and to invite the Member States to take action to improve the sustainability of European tourism from an economic, social and environmental point of view.

CONTENT: Ensuring the economic, social and environmental sustainability of European tourism is crucial both as a contribution to sustainable development in Europe and worldwide, and for the viability, continued growth, competitiveness and commercial success of this economically highly important sector. The challenges for sustainable European tourism are linked both to consumption patterns, in particular seasonal spread and travel for the purpose of tourism, and to the sector's production patterns, i.e. the value chain and the tourist destinations. Sustainable tourist behaviour and good public and private governance are key to changing unsustainable tourism patterns.

Stakeholders at all levels have started to prepare the ground for better matching of sustainability requirements in tourism and using its potential for sustainable development. Although not specifically targeting the tourism sector, the European Community contributes significantly to these efforts with a wide range of policies and measures that favour sustainable development, both in its global responsibilities and within the European Union. The Commission, therefore, considers the right pathway to the sustainability of European tourism to be reinforcing the existing framework for action and making best use of it. This means relying mainly on the positive effects of established Community policies and measures, while enhancing them, and on initiatives in favour of the sustainability of tourism that stakeholders other than the Community undertake in this field. Some specific measures to fill gaps should complement this approach. In the international context, the Community approach is thus to continue its policy of promoting the sustainability of tourism as a matter of trade and of assistance to the developing countries. It seeks reinforced co-operation for sustainable tourism with United Nations bodies and other international organisations, in respect of its global responsibility and in Europe. The Commission envisages several measures for strengthening the Community contribution to the sustainability of European tourism. These aim at increasing the benefit from European Governance and from the various Community policies and measures affecting European tourism and its sustainability. The Commission also wants to enhance co-operation with the World Tourism Organization and between all stakeholders of the tourism sector in Europe.

The Commission intends to launch a Tourism Sustainability Group composed of representatives of the various stakeholder categories. This group will have the task of drafting a detailed framework for action, which allocates specific activities to the individual stakeholders and include an agreed timetable for implementation. The Commission is willing to promote and support the implementation of activities defined by the group.

Specific initiatives will concern better monitoring and reporting of the sustainability of tourism, activities that further sustainable tourism consumption patterns by European citizens, and promoting sustainability in the tourism value chain and destinations. The development and use of appropriate information tools and networks will assist these initiatives.

The Commission expects other stakeholders in Europe to contribute significantly to the efforts for implementing sustainable tourism. This concerns European citizens and tourists, private sector enterprises, tourist destinations and public authorities, and civil society stakeholders.

The Commission plans to regularly report back on the progress of implementing these basic orientations.

2003/11/20
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to put forward some basic orientations and to invite the Member States to take action to improve the sustainability of European tourism from an economic, social and environmental point of view.

CONTENT: Ensuring the economic, social and environmental sustainability of European tourism is crucial both as a contribution to sustainable development in Europe and worldwide, and for the viability, continued growth, competitiveness and commercial success of this economically highly important sector. The challenges for sustainable European tourism are linked both to consumption patterns, in particular seasonal spread and travel for the purpose of tourism, and to the sector's production patterns, i.e. the value chain and the tourist destinations. Sustainable tourist behaviour and good public and private governance are key to changing unsustainable tourism patterns.

Stakeholders at all levels have started to prepare the ground for better matching of sustainability requirements in tourism and using its potential for sustainable development. Although not specifically targeting the tourism sector, the European Community contributes significantly to these efforts with a wide range of policies and measures that favour sustainable development, both in its global responsibilities and within the European Union. The Commission, therefore, considers the right pathway to the sustainability of European tourism to be reinforcing the existing framework for action and making best use of it. This means relying mainly on the positive effects of established Community policies and measures, while enhancing them, and on initiatives in favour of the sustainability of tourism that stakeholders other than the Community undertake in this field. Some specific measures to fill gaps should complement this approach. In the international context, the Community approach is thus to continue its policy of promoting the sustainability of tourism as a matter of trade and of assistance to the developing countries. It seeks reinforced co-operation for sustainable tourism with United Nations bodies and other international organisations, in respect of its global responsibility and in Europe. The Commission envisages several measures for strengthening the Community contribution to the sustainability of European tourism. These aim at increasing the benefit from European Governance and from the various Community policies and measures affecting European tourism and its sustainability. The Commission also wants to enhance co-operation with the World Tourism Organization and between all stakeholders of the tourism sector in Europe.

The Commission intends to launch a Tourism Sustainability Group composed of representatives of the various stakeholder categories. This group will have the task of drafting a detailed framework for action, which allocates specific activities to the individual stakeholders and include an agreed timetable for implementation. The Commission is willing to promote and support the implementation of activities defined by the group.

Specific initiatives will concern better monitoring and reporting of the sustainability of tourism, activities that further sustainable tourism consumption patterns by European citizens, and promoting sustainability in the tourism value chain and destinations. The development and use of appropriate information tools and networks will assist these initiatives.

The Commission expects other stakeholders in Europe to contribute significantly to the efforts for implementing sustainable tourism. This concerns European citizens and tourists, private sector enterprises, tourist destinations and public authorities, and civil society stakeholders.

The Commission plans to regularly report back on the progress of implementing these basic orientations.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - am. 6 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: -: 457, +: 113, 0: 6
FR CY MT LU EE DK LV LT SI AT FI SE SK CZ IE EL PT NL BE HU IT PL ES GB DE
Total
65
2
4
4
5
11
9
7
7
16
13
15
12
20
10
17
19
26
21
18
45
43
46
58
83
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
164

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
220

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Finland PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 25 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 300, -: 247, 0: 34
DE IT PL HU BE SI FI EL ES AT SK CY MT LU LV FR LT EE IE DK PT NL CZ SE GB
Total
84
45
43
18
22
7
13
17
46
16
12
2
4
4
9
66
7
5
10
12
19
26
20
16
58
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
221

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Hungary ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

5
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
17

Italy UEN

Against (1)

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
164

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 30 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 475, -: 89, 0: 16
DE FR PL ES IT PT BE HU EL FI AT SK IE DK LV SI NL LT EE MT GB CZ CY LU SE
Total
84
65
42
46
46
19
22
18
17
13
16
12
10
12
9
7
26
7
5
4
58
20
2
4
16
icon: PSE PSE
164

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
221

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
18

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

4

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
22

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - am. 7 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 477, -: 102, 0: 5
DE FR PL IT GB ES PT CZ EL HU AT SK BE NL IE LV DK MT LU FI SI LT EE CY SE
Total
84
66
43
47
58
46
20
20
17
18
16
12
22
26
10
9
12
4
4
13
7
7
5
2
16
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
221

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
166

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
67
2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 51,2ème partie #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 473, -: 96, 0: 11
DE FR IT ES PL PT BE HU EL SK NL AT IE FI LV LT SI EE GB DK CZ CY MT LU SE
Total
83
66
46
45
43
20
22
18
17
12
26
16
9
13
9
7
7
5
58
12
20
2
4
4
16
icon: PSE PSE
166

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
220

Ireland PPE-DE

3
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
22

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - am. 8 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: -: 494, +: 79, 0: 6
CY MT LU EE LT LV SI AT CZ FI IE DK SK EL PT PL SE BE HU NL IT ES GB FR DE
Total
2
4
4
5
6
9
7
16
20
13
10
11
12
17
20
44
16
22
18
26
45
45
58
65
84
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
166

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
220

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Finland PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 62 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 445, 0: 69, -: 65
DE FR ES PL IT PT BE EL HU AT SK NL FI SI MT IE LV LU CZ EE DK LT CY GB SE
Total
83
66
44
44
47
19
21
17
18
16
12
26
13
7
5
10
9
4
20
5
12
6
2
57
16
icon: PSE PSE
165

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Sweden PSE

Against (1)

4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
219

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Spain ALDE

1

Poland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Belgium ALDE

For (1)

4

Hungary ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Abstain (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 66 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 470, -: 102, 0: 11
DE FR ES IT PL BE NL HU PT AT EL FI SK IE DK LV LT SI EE MT LU GB CY SE CZ
Total
83
66
44
47
44
22
26
18
20
16
17
13
12
10
12
9
7
7
5
5
4
58
2
16
20
icon: PSE PSE
166

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
221

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 67 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 478, -: 73, 0: 29
DE FR ES IT PL BE NL HU PT EL AT FI SK IE DK LV LT SI GB EE MT LU CY CZ SE
Total
84
64
45
47
42
22
26
18
20
17
16
13
12
10
12
9
7
7
58
5
5
4
2
19
16
icon: PSE PSE
166

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
220

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
22

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - par. 68 #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 506, -: 68, 0: 5
DE FR ES IT PL PT BE HU AT EL FI NL SK IE LV LT SI DK GB EE MT LU CZ CY SE
Total
84
64
45
47
44
20
22
18
16
17
13
26
12
10
9
7
7
11
58
5
5
3
19
1
16
icon: PSE PSE
164

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
222
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Rapport Queiro A6-0235/2005 - résolution #

2005/09/08 Outcome: +: 471, 0: 58, -: 54
DE FR ES IT PL BE PT HU EL NL AT SK IE FI LV SI DK LT GB EE MT LU CZ CY SE
Total
84
65
45
46
44
22
20
18
17
26
16
12
10
13
9
7
12
7
58
5
5
4
20
2
16
icon: PSE PSE
167

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
222

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

5

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
17

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2003-11-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/0
date
2005-03-01T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.597
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-355630_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-355727_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-357923_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-355563_EN.html
events/0
date
2003-11-20T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2003-11-21T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.630&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.563&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0235_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0235_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0335_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0335_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2005-07-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0235_EN.html title: A6-0235/2005
events/4
date
2005-07-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0235_EN.html title: A6-0235/2005
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050907&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050907&type=CRE
events/7
date
2005-09-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0335_EN.html title: T6-0335/2005
summary
events/7
date
2005-09-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0335_EN.html title: T6-0335/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: QUEIRÓ Luís date: 2004-09-29T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2004-09-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: QUEIRÓ Luís group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: SUDRE Margie date: 2005-03-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2005-03-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SUDRE Margie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2005-01-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.630
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.630&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-235&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0235_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-335
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0335_EN.html
docs/7/body
EC
docs/8/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-235&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0235_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-335
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0335_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2003-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0716/COM_COM(2003)0716_EN.pdf title: COM(2003)0716 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52003DC0716:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-03-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: QUEIRÓ Luís
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2653 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2005-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-03-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: QUEIRÓ Luís type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-235&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0235/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050907&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4160&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-335 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0335/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2004-09-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: QUEIRÓ Luís group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2005-01-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2005-03-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SUDRE Margie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2005-03-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2005-01-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2004-09-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: QUEIRÓ Luís
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2653 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2653*&MEET_DATE=18/04/2005 date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2005-03-01T00:00:00 docs: title: PE353.597 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.630 title: PE355.630 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE355.727 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-05-18T00:00:00 docs: title: PE357.923 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-06-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE355.563&secondRef=02 title: PE355.563 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2005-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-235&language=EN title: A6-0235/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-335 title: T6-0335/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:193E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 193 17.08.2006, p. 0255-0325 E summary: The European Parliament adopted Luis QUIERO's (EPP-ED, PT) own-initiative report on new prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism by 471 votes in favour to 54 against and 58 abstentions . The report presents various initiatives, which were considered viable and useful to the central goal of sustainability in tourism EU-wide. (Please see the summary of 14/06/2005.) Parliament pointed out that Europe is the world's leading tourist destination. Tourist and travel services contribute directly - at a rate of at least 4% - to the EU's GDP and account directly for more than seven million jobs. Furthermore, more than two million businesses, a large majority of which are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), are directly involved in providing tourist services. Whilst tourism does not at present constitute a Community policy, it is nevertheless affected by many policies which do come under the Community's remit and that means that it should be given greater consideration at EU level. Competitiveness and quality of services: Parliament c onsidered it vitally important to complete the internal market in tourist services and to achieve genuine equality of treatment between tourist operators. It proposed a Community-wide classification of tourist services, with the cooperation of the industry, to be used in particular for the classification of hotel facilities. Measures should also be taken to identify and to harmonise professional profiles in the tourist industry in order to avoid unnecessary duplication and guarantee a more transparent service that does not confuse users. Parliament called on the Council to restart work on the proposed revision of the Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the special scheme for travel agents (COM(2003)0078). It reiterated its support for the objectives of simplifying this special VAT scheme and maintaining the competitive position of operators established in the EU vis-à-vis operators from third countries. The Council is asked to conclude the decision-making process on the proposal for amending Directive 77/388/EEC (COM(2003)0397), so as to enable all Member States to apply in a structured way reduced VAT rates for restaurants, as already exist for other tourism-related activities, such as holiday accommodation, plots on campsites, hotels and amusement parks. Parliament went on to state that consumer rights in the tourism sector should be defined and better protected and that this should include identifying new forms of protection such as conciliation services for tourists. It called on the Commission to consider the drafting of a "tourism package" comprising both a review of the existing directives on consumers" rights with regard to tourism and new measures making it possible to improve consumer protection and quality standards in tourist services (particularly in the hotel and touring sectors) while taking account of new trends on the supply side (electronic sales). Safety and security of tourism: Amongst other recommendations, Parliament took the view that the Commission should coordinate the establishment of a network for good practice exchange between high risk sports and leisure organisations and the provision of information on risk prevention and management, in particular for young people. It called on the Commission to investigate the desirability of requiring the maximum possible transparency and professionalism from companies managing this type of high risk leisure activity, asking that they take out compulsory care insurance. New sustainable tourism activities: The report h ighlights of the dangers of mass tourism, senior citizens’ tourism, and also stressed the need for all parties in the sector to take steps to capture new demand outside the high season, to spread visits over the year and to make better use of hotel and accommodation facilities. Parliament pointed to the positive repercussions of conference and business tourism, medical and thermal tourism, commemorative tourism, cultural tourism in every shape and form, gastronomic, naturalist, sports-based, spiritual, historical and language-related tourism, religious tourism, social tourism and so on. It also considered that the tourism industry occupies a key place in the economic development of countries in the Mediterranean basin and is a vector for rapprochement in the cultural dialogue. Consideration should be given to the possibility of setting up a training exchange programme for people working in tourism in the Mediterranean regions, within the framework of the Barcelona process. Knowledge and promotion of European tourism: Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to assess the possibility of a scheme, along the lines of the European Capital of Culture initiative, to designate outstanding European tourist destinations, to allow one or more regions or micro-regions to be selected yearly on the basis of quality indicators linked to the preservation and upgrading of cultural and natural heritage and the development of sustainable tourist services. Accordingly, Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to study the desirability of proposing an EU tourism mark or destination, characterised by tremendous diversity and high social quality and sustainability, and to promote it both within and outside the EU through a suitable communication campaign. Preserving the cultural heritage (in particular that which is designated world heritage by UNESCO) is of major importance to the sustainable development of tourism in the EU. Parliament asked the Commission and the Member States to create the "Iron Curtain Trail", an initiative analogous to the "Boston Freedom Trail" in remembrance of the American Independence War or to the "Berliner Mauerweg" in remembrance of the construction and fall of the Berlin Wall, in order to promote European identity. Tourism and transport: T ransport is essential to tourism, especially in the case of island regions and the most remote regions in general, both as a contribution to the quality of the tourist services chain and in terms of the accessibility of destinations. Parliament emphasised the need to promote combined train and bicycle travel and considers the 'Eurovelo' network to be a good basis for this. It also requested that railway enterprises allow bicycles on trains, including long distance and cross-border trains, as is already the case with the French TGV. It welcomed the Commission's initiative to establish state-aid guidelines for regional airports and low-cost companies, so as to improve legal certainty and ensure fair competition in favour of tourist accessibility and regional development. Nevertheless, steps should be taken to ensure that the development of low-cost airlines is supervised, so as to avoid a proliferation of air links to specific regions or neighbouring regions, and on the contrary develop to the full the interconnection of air transport and collective land transport. Parliament also hoped for a specific Commission initiative laying down safety standards and monitoring procedures applicable to small carriers, minor airlines and secondary airports. In any case, the activities of the European Aviation Safety Agency must be stepped up and coordination with the Member States' authorities must be improved. Structural intervention co-funded by the Community: W hen adopting the new structural policy instruments for 2007-2013, it should be ensured that the strategic guidelines provide for an integrated approach to tourism, allowing the EAFRD and the ERDF actions to be coordinated in a spirit similar to that of the LEADER programme and the Interreg and Urban programmes. This approach should allow the implementation of a genuine regional strategy for sustainable tourism. Parliament called on the Member States to establish objectives within their national strategic frameworks and operating programmes which will enable the regions to set up and fund coherent projects for developing sustainable tourism, tailor-made to local conditions and possibilities , including partnerships between different areas and institutions so as to build up appropriate local tourist systems. Tourism and coordinating Community legislation: Parliament a sked that any draft secondary legislation which has an impact on the tourist sector be identified at the outset of the implementation of the Commission's work programme, and be subject to an impact assessment, with the involvement of bodies representing industry, employees and consumers. It also called on the Commission to consider setting up a network of tourism correspondents/ coordinators in all Commission Directorates whose remit affects tourism activities. In the debate, however, Commissioner Günther VERHEUGEN told Members that the Commission would not take on board many of their proposals. Consequently, it remains to be seen if proposals such as the introduction of an EU-wide hotel classification system or a European campaign to encourage the development of senior citizens' tourism within the Community will be realized. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-10-20T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4160&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)4139 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4160&j=1&l=en title: SP(2005)4251/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2003-11-21T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0716/COM_COM(2003)0716_EN.pdf title: COM(2003)0716 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2003&nu_doc=716 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to put forward some basic orientations and to invite the Member States to take action to improve the sustainability of European tourism from an economic, social and environmental point of view. CONTENT: Ensuring the economic, social and environmental sustainability of European tourism is crucial both as a contribution to sustainable development in Europe and worldwide, and for the viability, continued growth, competitiveness and commercial success of this economically highly important sector. The challenges for sustainable European tourism are linked both to consumption patterns, in particular seasonal spread and travel for the purpose of tourism, and to the sector's production patterns, i.e. the value chain and the tourist destinations. Sustainable tourist behaviour and good public and private governance are key to changing unsustainable tourism patterns. Stakeholders at all levels have started to prepare the ground for better matching of sustainability requirements in tourism and using its potential for sustainable development. Although not specifically targeting the tourism sector, the European Community contributes significantly to these efforts with a wide range of policies and measures that favour sustainable development, both in its global responsibilities and within the European Union. The Commission, therefore, considers the right pathway to the sustainability of European tourism to be reinforcing the existing framework for action and making best use of it. This means relying mainly on the positive effects of established Community policies and measures, while enhancing them, and on initiatives in favour of the sustainability of tourism that stakeholders other than the Community undertake in this field. Some specific measures to fill gaps should complement this approach. In the international context, the Community approach is thus to continue its policy of promoting the sustainability of tourism as a matter of trade and of assistance to the developing countries. It seeks reinforced co-operation for sustainable tourism with United Nations bodies and other international organisations, in respect of its global responsibility and in Europe. The Commission envisages several measures for strengthening the Community contribution to the sustainability of European tourism. These aim at increasing the benefit from European Governance and from the various Community policies and measures affecting European tourism and its sustainability. The Commission also wants to enhance co-operation with the World Tourism Organization and between all stakeholders of the tourism sector in Europe. The Commission intends to launch a Tourism Sustainability Group composed of representatives of the various stakeholder categories. This group will have the task of drafting a detailed framework for action, which allocates specific activities to the individual stakeholders and include an agreed timetable for implementation. The Commission is willing to promote and support the implementation of activities defined by the group. Specific initiatives will concern better monitoring and reporting of the sustainability of tourism, activities that further sustainable tourism consumption patterns by European citizens, and promoting sustainability in the tourism value chain and destinations. The development and use of appropriate information tools and networks will assist these initiatives. The Commission expects other stakeholders in Europe to contribute significantly to the efforts for implementing sustainable tourism. This concerns European citizens and tourists, private sector enterprises, tourist destinations and public authorities, and civil society stakeholders. The Commission plans to regularly report back on the progress of implementing these basic orientations.
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: Following a brief exchange of views on the Commission’s communication, the Council adopted conclusions the main points of which were the following: It noted that the European Union maintains its place as the most important tourism destination in the world, representing a large economic weight and contributing considerably to the employment of the European Union's workforce. It stressed that the European Union is one of the world's richest and most varied tourist regions, with a huge variety of landscapes and cultures, good-quality infrastructure and a highly professional tourism sector, offering important business opportunities for sustainable growth and employment as well as opportunities for regional development. It takes the view that the rich potential of the new Member States for tourism, which could generate annual earnings of 46 billion euro and support up to 3 million jobs, needs to be fully tapped and notes that the economic development of countries such as China, India, Russia and Brazil will create substantial additional demand, which the European tourism industry needs to be well-positioned to meet. It takes the view that a number of challenges of an economic and demographic nature, such as the increase in tourists in older age categories, the particular and increasing demands of young tourists, increasing competition from other tourist destinations and the decline foreseen in the European working population from 2010 need to be addressed. It stresses that the European institutions, the Member States and regions need to continue their cooperation, stimulating the exchange of information among the stakeholders in tourism, in order to develop appropriate policies for sustainable tourism and welcomes the setting up of a Tourism Sustainability Group (TSG) by the Commission, with the task of steering and monitoring the preparation and implementation of a coherent set of actions to be undertaken by the different tourism stakeholders, with a view to the preparation, by 2007, of a "European Agenda 21 for Tourism". It invites the Member States to: – participate in the implementation of a cooperative approach between tourism stakeholders with a view to contributing to the work of the TSG; – encourage the existing bodies specialised in sustainable tourism issues to network at the European level in order to facilitate the exchange of information between tourism destinations. It invites the European tourism industry and other stakeholders of the tourism sector to: – participate actively in and support the efforts undertaken by the European Union and the Member States to develop sustainable European tourism, in particular through the work of the TSG. – contribute to the development of products and services based on sustainable patterns of production and consumption, promote corporate social responsibility and contribute to dialogue and cooperation between public and private stakeholders. – integrate sustainability, eco-efficiency and exchange of good practices within business strategies and activities in order to strengthen performance and competitiveness in the global market. It invites the Commission, the Member States and other stakeholders of the tourism sector to: – work towards the design and use of approaches to and tools for the development and promotion of sustainable patterns of production and consumption with a view to improving the competitiveness, quality and employment potential of the European tourism sector; – cooperate in favour of the sustainability of tourism destinations, in particular through the protection of natural areas, biodiversity and cultural heritage, which are leading resources and important assets of European tourism; – make the best possible use of information and communication technologies and environmental technologies for the measures to be developed and implemented; It further invites the Commission to: – integrate sustainability concerns into Community policies and initiatives affecting European tourism, in particular by means of its impact assessment tool; – facilitate the creation of a system to network regional, national, transnational and international bodies and actors so as to cooperate and exchange information on sustainable tourism initiatives; – inform the Member States about the activities of the TSG in the first half of 2006 and submit a communication on a "European Agenda 21 for Tourism" to the Council before the end of 2007, with recommendations for concrete actions to be implemented by the different public and private stakeholders”.
  • date: 2005-06-14T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Luis QUEIRO (EPP-ED, PT) on new prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism. MEPs noted that tourism was at the heart of the Lisbon process, with great potential for growth and job creation, in particular among young people and women. The committee also pointed out that, at international level, tourism was extremely competitive. European tourism sectors and industry needed to be well-positioned to meet the significant additional demand that would be created by the development of markets such as Brazil , China , India and Russia . It was vitally important to complete the internal market in tourist services and to achieve genuine equality between tourist operators. To this end, a Community-wide classification, to be used in particular for the classification of hotel facilities, should be introduced. The Council was also urged to restart work on the proposed revision of the directive amending Directive 77/388/EC as regards the special VAT scheme for travel agents, thereby maintaining the competitive position of operators established in the EU vis-à-vis operators from third countries. In addition, the Council should conclude the decision-making process on the proposed directive amending Directive 77/388/EC as regards reduced VAT rates for restaurants. The report highlighted safety and security issues, and called inter alia for a contact group to be set up at European level to coordinate information on the management of health crises, natural disasters or acts of terrorism. The Commission was also urged to evaluate the effectiveness of the 1986 Council Recommendation on fire safety in hotels and to promote EU voluntary standards to improve safety aspects of tourism services. Measures should be taken to improve the operation and awareness of the European emergency number . The committee emphasised the dangers of mass tourism, which represented a threat to local natural and socio-economic balances. The Commission should endeavour to coordinate national holiday arrangements in order to even out the burden on access routes and tourist infrastructures and achieve a more efficient and sustainable deployment of human resources by reducing seasonal fluctuations in employment levels. MEPs also pointed out that the gradual ageing of the population would lead to an increase in the number of off-season tourists, and called on the Commission to encourage the development of senior citizens' tourism within the EU through a low season " third age " campaign which would help to improve older people's quality of life, create jobs and generate demand and growth in the European economy. Lastly, the committee recalled that transport was essential to tourism, and called for measures to promote combined train and bicycle travel and stimulate inland waterway tourism. While welcoming the Commission's initiative to establish state-aid guidelines for regional airports and low-cost companies, so as to improve legal certainty and ensure fair competition, MEPs nevertheless wanted the development of low-cost airlines to be supervised in order to avoid a proliferation of air links to specific regions or neighbouring regions. Instead, they called for the interconnection of air transport and collective land transport to be developed to the full.
  • date: 2005-07-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-235&language=EN title: A6-0235/2005
  • date: 2005-09-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050907&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4160&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-335 title: T6-0335/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted Luis QUIERO's (EPP-ED, PT) own-initiative report on new prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism by 471 votes in favour to 54 against and 58 abstentions . The report presents various initiatives, which were considered viable and useful to the central goal of sustainability in tourism EU-wide. (Please see the summary of 14/06/2005.) Parliament pointed out that Europe is the world's leading tourist destination. Tourist and travel services contribute directly - at a rate of at least 4% - to the EU's GDP and account directly for more than seven million jobs. Furthermore, more than two million businesses, a large majority of which are small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), are directly involved in providing tourist services. Whilst tourism does not at present constitute a Community policy, it is nevertheless affected by many policies which do come under the Community's remit and that means that it should be given greater consideration at EU level. Competitiveness and quality of services: Parliament c onsidered it vitally important to complete the internal market in tourist services and to achieve genuine equality of treatment between tourist operators. It proposed a Community-wide classification of tourist services, with the cooperation of the industry, to be used in particular for the classification of hotel facilities. Measures should also be taken to identify and to harmonise professional profiles in the tourist industry in order to avoid unnecessary duplication and guarantee a more transparent service that does not confuse users. Parliament called on the Council to restart work on the proposed revision of the Council Directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the special scheme for travel agents (COM(2003)0078). It reiterated its support for the objectives of simplifying this special VAT scheme and maintaining the competitive position of operators established in the EU vis-à-vis operators from third countries. The Council is asked to conclude the decision-making process on the proposal for amending Directive 77/388/EEC (COM(2003)0397), so as to enable all Member States to apply in a structured way reduced VAT rates for restaurants, as already exist for other tourism-related activities, such as holiday accommodation, plots on campsites, hotels and amusement parks. Parliament went on to state that consumer rights in the tourism sector should be defined and better protected and that this should include identifying new forms of protection such as conciliation services for tourists. It called on the Commission to consider the drafting of a "tourism package" comprising both a review of the existing directives on consumers" rights with regard to tourism and new measures making it possible to improve consumer protection and quality standards in tourist services (particularly in the hotel and touring sectors) while taking account of new trends on the supply side (electronic sales). Safety and security of tourism: Amongst other recommendations, Parliament took the view that the Commission should coordinate the establishment of a network for good practice exchange between high risk sports and leisure organisations and the provision of information on risk prevention and management, in particular for young people. It called on the Commission to investigate the desirability of requiring the maximum possible transparency and professionalism from companies managing this type of high risk leisure activity, asking that they take out compulsory care insurance. New sustainable tourism activities: The report h ighlights of the dangers of mass tourism, senior citizens’ tourism, and also stressed the need for all parties in the sector to take steps to capture new demand outside the high season, to spread visits over the year and to make better use of hotel and accommodation facilities. Parliament pointed to the positive repercussions of conference and business tourism, medical and thermal tourism, commemorative tourism, cultural tourism in every shape and form, gastronomic, naturalist, sports-based, spiritual, historical and language-related tourism, religious tourism, social tourism and so on. It also considered that the tourism industry occupies a key place in the economic development of countries in the Mediterranean basin and is a vector for rapprochement in the cultural dialogue. Consideration should be given to the possibility of setting up a training exchange programme for people working in tourism in the Mediterranean regions, within the framework of the Barcelona process. Knowledge and promotion of European tourism: Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to assess the possibility of a scheme, along the lines of the European Capital of Culture initiative, to designate outstanding European tourist destinations, to allow one or more regions or micro-regions to be selected yearly on the basis of quality indicators linked to the preservation and upgrading of cultural and natural heritage and the development of sustainable tourist services. Accordingly, Parliament called on the Commission and the Member States to study the desirability of proposing an EU tourism mark or destination, characterised by tremendous diversity and high social quality and sustainability, and to promote it both within and outside the EU through a suitable communication campaign. Preserving the cultural heritage (in particular that which is designated world heritage by UNESCO) is of major importance to the sustainable development of tourism in the EU. Parliament asked the Commission and the Member States to create the "Iron Curtain Trail", an initiative analogous to the "Boston Freedom Trail" in remembrance of the American Independence War or to the "Berliner Mauerweg" in remembrance of the construction and fall of the Berlin Wall, in order to promote European identity. Tourism and transport: T ransport is essential to tourism, especially in the case of island regions and the most remote regions in general, both as a contribution to the quality of the tourist services chain and in terms of the accessibility of destinations. Parliament emphasised the need to promote combined train and bicycle travel and considers the 'Eurovelo' network to be a good basis for this. It also requested that railway enterprises allow bicycles on trains, including long distance and cross-border trains, as is already the case with the French TGV. It welcomed the Commission's initiative to establish state-aid guidelines for regional airports and low-cost companies, so as to improve legal certainty and ensure fair competition in favour of tourist accessibility and regional development. Nevertheless, steps should be taken to ensure that the development of low-cost airlines is supervised, so as to avoid a proliferation of air links to specific regions or neighbouring regions, and on the contrary develop to the full the interconnection of air transport and collective land transport. Parliament also hoped for a specific Commission initiative laying down safety standards and monitoring procedures applicable to small carriers, minor airlines and secondary airports. In any case, the activities of the European Aviation Safety Agency must be stepped up and coordination with the Member States' authorities must be improved. Structural intervention co-funded by the Community: W hen adopting the new structural policy instruments for 2007-2013, it should be ensured that the strategic guidelines provide for an integrated approach to tourism, allowing the EAFRD and the ERDF actions to be coordinated in a spirit similar to that of the LEADER programme and the Interreg and Urban programmes. This approach should allow the implementation of a genuine regional strategy for sustainable tourism. Parliament called on the Member States to establish objectives within their national strategic frameworks and operating programmes which will enable the regions to set up and fund coherent projects for developing sustainable tourism, tailor-made to local conditions and possibilities , including partnerships between different areas and institutions so as to build up appropriate local tourist systems. Tourism and coordinating Community legislation: Parliament a sked that any draft secondary legislation which has an impact on the tourist sector be identified at the outset of the implementation of the Commission's work programme, and be subject to an impact assessment, with the involvement of bodies representing industry, employees and consumers. It also called on the Commission to consider setting up a network of tourism correspondents/ coordinators in all Commission Directorates whose remit affects tourism activities. In the debate, however, Commissioner Günther VERHEUGEN told Members that the Commission would not take on board many of their proposals. Consequently, it remains to be seen if proposals such as the introduction of an EU-wide hotel classification system or a European campaign to encourage the development of senior citizens' tourism within the Community will be realized.
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    TRAN/6/24786
    New
    • TRAN/6/24786
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 4.50 Tourism
    New
    4.50
    Tourism
    activities
    • date: 2003-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0716/COM_COM(2003)0716_EN.pdf title: COM(2003)0716 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52003DC0716:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
    • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-03-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: QUEIRÓ Luís
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2653 council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) date: 2005-04-18T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2005-06-14T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-03-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: QUEIRÓ Luís type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-235&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0235/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050907&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4160&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-335 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0335/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PODKAŃSKI Zdzisław Zbigniew
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2005-03-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SUDRE Margie
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2004-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: QUEIRÓ Luís
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      TRAN/6/24786
      reference
      2004/2229(INI)
      title
      New prospects and new challenges for sustainable European tourism
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      4.50 Tourism