BETA


2004/2268(INI) Public finances in economic and monetary Union EMU in 2004

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON KARAS Othmar (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion BUDG
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2005/03/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2005/02/22
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Othmar KARAS (EPP-ED, AT) on public finances in EMU - 2004. (Please refer to the summary dated 02/02/2005).

In addition the amendments adopted by the committee responsible, Parliament underlines the fact that there is no exception to the rules and procedures of the Stability and Growth Pact but calls on all EU institutions to accept their responsibility in the implementation and control of, and compliance with, the Stability and Growth Pact. Member States are called upon to receive equal treatment and to achieve that, the Commission's role, particularly in launching the excessive deficit procedure, should be enhanced. Member States should successfully conclude the examination of the Stability and Growth Pact during the Luxembourg Presidency.

New Member States are urged to speed up reform of their public finances by re-allocating resources as a further move towards ensuring genuine convergence of their economies and to focus in particular on the modernisation of their pension and social benefits systems in support of an effective employment policy. Parliament stresses the need for continuous improvements in fiscal administration and the establishment of an effective tax collection system, in order to create favourable conditions for the activities of enterprises throughout the single market, promote a culture of entrepreneurship and encourage company start-ups.

Lastly, Parliament reiterates its call for a clear method, which includes a definition of ‘high-quality public expenditure’, of quantifying public budgetary positions and their contribution to growth and investment, with a view to making a positive contribution to the Lisbon goals. Furthermore, it calls for public expenditure to be redirected in such a way as to ensure that the various budget headings at European and national level reflect the major political priorities set for 2010.

2005/02/22
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/02/22
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Othmar KARAS (EPP-ED, AT) on public finances in EMU - 2004. (Please refer to the summary dated 02/02/2005).

In addition the amendments adopted by the committee responsible, Parliament underlines the fact that there is no exception to the rules and procedures of the Stability and Growth Pact but calls on all EU institutions to accept their responsibility in the implementation and control of, and compliance with, the Stability and Growth Pact. Member States are called upon to receive equal treatment and to achieve that, the Commission's role, particularly in launching the excessive deficit procedure, should be enhanced. Member States should successfully conclude the examination of the Stability and Growth Pact during the Luxembourg Presidency.

New Member States are urged to speed up reform of their public finances by re-allocating resources as a further move towards ensuring genuine convergence of their economies and to focus in particular on the modernisation of their pension and social benefits systems in support of an effective employment policy. Parliament stresses the need for continuous improvements in fiscal administration and the establishment of an effective tax collection system, in order to create favourable conditions for the activities of enterprises throughout the single market, promote a culture of entrepreneurship and encourage company start-ups.

Lastly, Parliament reiterates its call for a clear method, which includes a definition of ‘high-quality public expenditure’, of quantifying public budgetary positions and their contribution to growth and investment, with a view to making a positive contribution to the Lisbon goals. Furthermore, it calls for public expenditure to be redirected in such a way as to ensure that the various budget headings at European and national level reflect the major political priorities set for 2010.

Documents
2005/02/22
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/02/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2005/02/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2005/02/02
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Othmar KARAS (EPP-ED, AT) on public finances in EMU - 2004. The report pointed out that higher deficits were "largely the result of a discretionary loosening of budgetary policy by some Member States." It noted that some governments had not taken sufficient measures to combat their deficits, and said that there were "sufficient grounds for concern regarding their prospects for bringing their deficits below 3% of GDP in the immediate future." It underlined that there should be no exception to the rules and procedures of the Stability Pact.

MEPs urged Member States to reduce their deficits to significantly less than 3% of GDP to allow for sufficient financial reserves to be built up to face up to difficult times without breaking the Pact's rules. They also recommended a greater emphasis in the Pact on economic developments and an increased focus on safeguarding the sustainability of public finances. They warned that excessive deficits put price stability, low interest rates and government investment levels at risk, and also reduced the capacity to face the challenge of demographic changes and ageing populations in the EU.

Lastly, the committee highlighted the need to improve budgetary statistics with more accurate and standardised definitions, and greater powers for Eurostat to coordinate, monitor and carry out on-the-spot control of the figures provided by Member States.

2005/01/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2004/12/13
   EP - KARAS Othmar (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2004/06/24
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

In this Communication on the state of public finances in EMU, the European Commission calls for growth-enhancing, sustainable budgets as a means to raise the growth potential in line with the Lisbon strategy. The Commission remarks that challenging developments have taken place in the last years, involving unwelcome tensions in the application of the EU framework for budgetary surveillance. While there is a need to reassess the functioning of the framework, the conduct of fiscal policies in Europe should benefit from past experience. Budgetary consolidations and re-orientation towards non-distorting, growth enhancing revenue and expenditure policies should be continued as economic conditions improve. The Communication summarizes and draws the political implications from the fifth Report on Public Finances in EMU prepared by the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

The need for further and more decisive progress in the EU framework for economic governance has become apparent as a consequence of the difficulties in maintaining budgetary discipline. The persistently low growth resulting largely from the slow progress in the Lisbon strategy implementation demonstrates the need to strengthen governance on non-budgetary issues.

The Commission believes that the EU framework should be strengthened in order to: 1) better combine discipline with economic growth considerations; 2) focus more on the sustainability of the member states' public finances; and 3) improve implementation. The ideas to move forward include the rebalancing the role of the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs) with respect to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), bringing the budgetary policy coordination calendar more into line with our general coordination cycle and ensuring the implementation of the BEPGs through early warnings.

Regarding the strengthening of the SGP implementation called for by the European Council of 18 June 2004, experience to date shows that the way forward could be built around the following pillars: (i) more focus on debt and sustainability, (ii) more incentives for fiscal consolidation during periods of economic growth, (iii) taking into account country-specific circumstances when defining the medium term budgetary objectives, (iv) taking more into account economic developments when formulating recommendations for the correction of excessive deficit situations.

The Report on Public Finances includes a review of the consistency of the objective of fiscal discipline pursued with the objective of growth and how synergies can be improved by making the EU framework for budgetary surveillance and economic governance more effective.

By considering these issues, the Commission aims to lead the way on how to improve economic governance. In this respect, the Communication and the Report, while neither conclusive nor exhaustive, pave the way for the definition of more specific orientations for rejuvenating the framework and strengthening economic governance due to be tabled the Commission.

2004/06/23
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

In this Communication on the state of public finances in EMU, the European Commission calls for growth-enhancing, sustainable budgets as a means to raise the growth potential in line with the Lisbon strategy. The Commission remarks that challenging developments have taken place in the last years, involving unwelcome tensions in the application of the EU framework for budgetary surveillance. While there is a need to reassess the functioning of the framework, the conduct of fiscal policies in Europe should benefit from past experience. Budgetary consolidations and re-orientation towards non-distorting, growth enhancing revenue and expenditure policies should be continued as economic conditions improve. The Communication summarizes and draws the political implications from the fifth Report on Public Finances in EMU prepared by the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs.

The need for further and more decisive progress in the EU framework for economic governance has become apparent as a consequence of the difficulties in maintaining budgetary discipline. The persistently low growth resulting largely from the slow progress in the Lisbon strategy implementation demonstrates the need to strengthen governance on non-budgetary issues.

The Commission believes that the EU framework should be strengthened in order to: 1) better combine discipline with economic growth considerations; 2) focus more on the sustainability of the member states' public finances; and 3) improve implementation. The ideas to move forward include the rebalancing the role of the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs) with respect to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), bringing the budgetary policy coordination calendar more into line with our general coordination cycle and ensuring the implementation of the BEPGs through early warnings.

Regarding the strengthening of the SGP implementation called for by the European Council of 18 June 2004, experience to date shows that the way forward could be built around the following pillars: (i) more focus on debt and sustainability, (ii) more incentives for fiscal consolidation during periods of economic growth, (iii) taking into account country-specific circumstances when defining the medium term budgetary objectives, (iv) taking more into account economic developments when formulating recommendations for the correction of excessive deficit situations.

The Report on Public Finances includes a review of the consistency of the objective of fiscal discipline pursued with the objective of growth and how synergies can be improved by making the EU framework for budgetary surveillance and economic governance more effective.

By considering these issues, the Commission aims to lead the way on how to improve economic governance. In this respect, the Communication and the Report, while neither conclusive nor exhaustive, pave the way for the definition of more specific orientations for rejuvenating the framework and strengthening economic governance due to be tabled the Commission.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Karras A6-0025/2005 - am. 6,1ère partie #

2005/02/22 Outcome: +: 533, -: 60, 0: 28
DE ES FR GB IT PL BE NL HU PT AT DK FI SK EL IE LV LT SE CZ SI LU EE MT CY
Total
90
50
59
65
47
47
22
25
20
20
18
13
12
14
21
13
9
9
19
21
6
5
5
5
6
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
177

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
70
2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

5

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
23

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: NI NI
20
4

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

France IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Rapport Karras A6-0025/2005 - am. 6,2ème partie #

2005/02/22 Outcome: +: 284, -: 280, 0: 57
FR BE LT DK FI ES NL SE EE AT IT MT LU PT SI CY HU SK EL LV GB IE DE CZ PL
Total
64
21
9
13
12
50
26
18
5
18
49
5
4
20
6
6
20
14
21
9
63
13
87
21
47
icon: PSE PSE
175

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Sweden ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

France IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
23

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
228

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Rapport Karras A6-0025/2005 - am. 7 #

2005/02/22 Outcome: -: 331, +: 229, 0: 57
HU FR AT ES PT MT EE DK LU SK SE BE FI CY EL NL LT LV SI IT CZ IE GB PL DE
Total
20
64
18
49
20
5
5
13
5
14
19
20
12
6
21
26
9
8
6
47
21
13
63
47
86
icon: PSE PSE
174

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Austria NI

3

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
31

France IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
23

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Hungary ALDE

2
2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Poland ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2004-06-24T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/0
date
2005-01-11T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.370
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-01-24T00:00:00
docs
title: PE353.486
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/0
date
2004-06-23T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2004-06-24T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0025_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0025_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0035_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0035_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0425/COM_COM(2004)0425_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0425/COM_COM(2004)0425_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2005-02-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0025_EN.html title: A6-0025/2005
events/3
date
2005-02-07T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0025_EN.html title: A6-0025/2005
events/5
date
2005-02-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0035_EN.html title: T6-0035/2005
summary
events/5
date
2005-02-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0035_EN.html title: T6-0035/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar date: 2004-12-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2004-12-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-25&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0025_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-35
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0035_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-25&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0025_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-35
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0035_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0425/COM_COM(2004)0425_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0425 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0425:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2004-12-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
  • date: 2005-02-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2004-12-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2005-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-25&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0025/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3805&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-35 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0035/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2004-12-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KARAS Othmar group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2004-12-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
docs
  • date: 2005-01-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE353.370 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-01-24T00:00:00 docs: title: PE353.486 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2005-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-25&language=EN title: A6-0025/2005 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-35 title: T6-0035/2005 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:304E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 304 01.12.2005, p. 0021-0132 E summary: The European Parliament adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Othmar KARAS (EPP-ED, AT) on public finances in EMU - 2004. (Please refer to the summary dated 02/02/2005). In addition the amendments adopted by the committee responsible, Parliament underlines the fact that there is no exception to the rules and procedures of the Stability and Growth Pact but calls on all EU institutions to accept their responsibility in the implementation and control of, and compliance with, the Stability and Growth Pact. Member States are called upon to receive equal treatment and to achieve that, the Commission's role, particularly in launching the excessive deficit procedure, should be enhanced. Member States should successfully conclude the examination of the Stability and Growth Pact during the Luxembourg Presidency. New Member States are urged to speed up reform of their public finances by re-allocating resources as a further move towards ensuring genuine convergence of their economies and to focus in particular on the modernisation of their pension and social benefits systems in support of an effective employment policy. Parliament stresses the need for continuous improvements in fiscal administration and the establishment of an effective tax collection system, in order to create favourable conditions for the activities of enterprises throughout the single market, promote a culture of entrepreneurship and encourage company start-ups. Lastly, Parliament reiterates its call for a clear method, which includes a definition of ‘high-quality public expenditure’, of quantifying public budgetary positions and their contribution to growth and investment, with a view to making a positive contribution to the Lisbon goals. Furthermore, it calls for public expenditure to be redirected in such a way as to ensure that the various budget headings at European and national level reflect the major political priorities set for 2010. type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-03-31T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=3805&j=0&l=en title: SP(2005)1076/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-06-24T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0425/COM_COM(2004)0425_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0425 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=425 title: EUR-Lex summary: In this Communication on the state of public finances in EMU, the European Commission calls for growth-enhancing, sustainable budgets as a means to raise the growth potential in line with the Lisbon strategy. The Commission remarks that challenging developments have taken place in the last years, involving unwelcome tensions in the application of the EU framework for budgetary surveillance. While there is a need to reassess the functioning of the framework, the conduct of fiscal policies in Europe should benefit from past experience. Budgetary consolidations and re-orientation towards non-distorting, growth enhancing revenue and expenditure policies should be continued as economic conditions improve. The Communication summarizes and draws the political implications from the fifth Report on Public Finances in EMU prepared by the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. The need for further and more decisive progress in the EU framework for economic governance has become apparent as a consequence of the difficulties in maintaining budgetary discipline. The persistently low growth resulting largely from the slow progress in the Lisbon strategy implementation demonstrates the need to strengthen governance on non-budgetary issues. The Commission believes that the EU framework should be strengthened in order to: 1) better combine discipline with economic growth considerations; 2) focus more on the sustainability of the member states' public finances; and 3) improve implementation. The ideas to move forward include the rebalancing the role of the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs) with respect to the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), bringing the budgetary policy coordination calendar more into line with our general coordination cycle and ensuring the implementation of the BEPGs through early warnings. Regarding the strengthening of the SGP implementation called for by the European Council of 18 June 2004, experience to date shows that the way forward could be built around the following pillars: (i) more focus on debt and sustainability, (ii) more incentives for fiscal consolidation during periods of economic growth, (iii) taking into account country-specific circumstances when defining the medium term budgetary objectives, (iv) taking more into account economic developments when formulating recommendations for the correction of excessive deficit situations. The Report on Public Finances includes a review of the consistency of the objective of fiscal discipline pursued with the objective of growth and how synergies can be improved by making the EU framework for budgetary surveillance and economic governance more effective. By considering these issues, the Commission aims to lead the way on how to improve economic governance. In this respect, the Communication and the Report, while neither conclusive nor exhaustive, pave the way for the definition of more specific orientations for rejuvenating the framework and strengthening economic governance due to be tabled the Commission.
  • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2005-02-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Othmar KARAS (EPP-ED, AT) on public finances in EMU - 2004. The report pointed out that higher deficits were "largely the result of a discretionary loosening of budgetary policy by some Member States." It noted that some governments had not taken sufficient measures to combat their deficits, and said that there were "sufficient grounds for concern regarding their prospects for bringing their deficits below 3% of GDP in the immediate future." It underlined that there should be no exception to the rules and procedures of the Stability Pact. MEPs urged Member States to reduce their deficits to significantly less than 3% of GDP to allow for sufficient financial reserves to be built up to face up to difficult times without breaking the Pact's rules. They also recommended a greater emphasis in the Pact on economic developments and an increased focus on safeguarding the sustainability of public finances. They warned that excessive deficits put price stability, low interest rates and government investment levels at risk, and also reduced the capacity to face the challenge of demographic changes and ageing populations in the EU. Lastly, the committee highlighted the need to improve budgetary statistics with more accurate and standardised definitions, and greater powers for Eurostat to coordinate, monitor and carry out on-the-spot control of the figures provided by Member States.
  • date: 2005-02-07T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-25&language=EN title: A6-0025/2005
  • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3805&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-35 title: T6-0035/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Othmar KARAS (EPP-ED, AT) on public finances in EMU - 2004. (Please refer to the summary dated 02/02/2005). In addition the amendments adopted by the committee responsible, Parliament underlines the fact that there is no exception to the rules and procedures of the Stability and Growth Pact but calls on all EU institutions to accept their responsibility in the implementation and control of, and compliance with, the Stability and Growth Pact. Member States are called upon to receive equal treatment and to achieve that, the Commission's role, particularly in launching the excessive deficit procedure, should be enhanced. Member States should successfully conclude the examination of the Stability and Growth Pact during the Luxembourg Presidency. New Member States are urged to speed up reform of their public finances by re-allocating resources as a further move towards ensuring genuine convergence of their economies and to focus in particular on the modernisation of their pension and social benefits systems in support of an effective employment policy. Parliament stresses the need for continuous improvements in fiscal administration and the establishment of an effective tax collection system, in order to create favourable conditions for the activities of enterprises throughout the single market, promote a culture of entrepreneurship and encourage company start-ups. Lastly, Parliament reiterates its call for a clear method, which includes a definition of ‘high-quality public expenditure’, of quantifying public budgetary positions and their contribution to growth and investment, with a view to making a positive contribution to the Lisbon goals. Furthermore, it calls for public expenditure to be redirected in such a way as to ensure that the various budget headings at European and national level reflect the major political priorities set for 2010.
  • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    ECON/6/25471
    New
    • ECON/6/25471
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 5 Economic and monetary system
    • 5.10.01 Convergence of economic policies, public deficit, interest rates
    New
    5
    Economic and monetary system
    5.10.01
    Convergence of economic policies, public deficit, interest rates
    activities
    • date: 2004-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2004/0425/COM_COM(2004)0425_EN.pdf title: COM(2004)0425 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52004DC0425:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
    • date: 2005-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2004-12-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
    • date: 2005-02-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2004-12-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2005-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-25&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0025/2005 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2005-02-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=3805&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-35 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0035/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2004-12-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KARAS Othmar
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      ECON/6/25471
      reference
      2004/2268(INI)
      title
      Public finances in economic and monetary Union EMU in 2004
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject