BETA


2004/2599(RSP) Resolution on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2005/04/25
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2005/04/25
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/04/14
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans.

It stresses that the western Balkans constitutes a region of the highest priority for the EU, and its future is certainly one of European integration, but that this future depends to a very large extent on the countries in the region themselves. Parliament notes that elected bodies in the countries of the region need to be strengthened and recognises that this will require considerable additional financial resources. It expresses serious concern at the economic and social situation. The countries of the region can do much to help themselves to achieve further progress on the road to EU integration by fulfilling the following conditions: cooperation with the ICTY; implementation of an effective policy in favour of the return of refugees and displaced persons; respect for human and minority rights; implementation of active policies against corruption, organised crime and trafficking in human beings, arms and drugs; and effective economic cooperation.

Bosnia and Herzegovina : ten years after the signing of the Dayton agreement, crucial political problems remain unresolved. The country is deeply divided and political stability is vulnerable. Parliament takes the view that new political initiatives based on a bottom-up participation of the three peoples living there in a sustainable peace as neighbours are urgently needed. It underlines therefore the need for the Commission to support the country’s political forces in finding a consensus to reform the political framework as set out in the Dayton agreement. Members draw attention to the priorities which have not yet been met: full cooperation with the ICTY, security issues, institution-building, infrastructure, energy. They also points out the contradiction inherent in some political forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which openly support European integration but obstruct the indispensable reforms needed for a functioning state.

Serbia and Montenegro : Parliament reiterates that the EU should be ready to assist Serbia and Montenegro to work out a lasting arrangement, while adopting a neutral stance on which form that relationship should take. It regrets that there is still a lack of cooperation from Serbia with the ICTY and calls on the authorities to make further progress with military and police reform, with a special focus on the secret police.

Kosovo: Parliament expresses its desire for the EU to start negotiations as soon as possible on the conclusion of a stabilisation and association agreement. It calls on the Council and the Commission to take the leading role in preparing the negotiations on final status and to exclude in advance the following options: return to a constitutional relationship with Serbia and Montenegro; unification with Albania or any other state or territory in the region; partition of Kosovo. It insists, however, on the need for the authorities in Kosovo to take decisive steps to increase security for all citizens of Kosovo.

Albania: Parliament is concerned that the political climate in Albania is problematic, with tensions within the ruling party having led to a split within the party. It condemns the Albanian government's inability to act effectively. Members call on the Albanian government to respect the rights of the ethnic Greek minority, and point out that progress in the negotiation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Albania's European future are closely linked to respect for human and minority rights.

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia : Parliament is of the view that the full participation of the latter in the European integration process will be beneficial not only for the country itself but also for the entire region. Members regret that the March 2005 local elections were marred by irregularities. They take the view that the various EU bodies acting in the country should improve their coordination. In this regard, that the Commission should play a pivotal role in the implementation of EU policies in the country.

Croatia: Parliament welcomes the decision to grant Croatia candidate status. It takes note of the Council's decision to postpone the opening of accession talks with Croatia due to the absence of a common agreement about this country's full cooperation with the ICTY, calling on the Croatian government to do its utmost to prove it is fully cooperating with the ICTY. This is a basic test for all the countries in the region. It also calls on Croatia to settle the remaining border disputes through dialogue with Slovenia and to avoid unilateral acts which intend to prejudice the determination of the Slovenian-Croatian border and affect the demarcation of the border without consent.

The resolution stresses that the need for a clear allocation of responsibilities/competences between the European Agency for Reconstruction and the delegations of the European Commission in the region.

Parliament calls on the Commission and Council and the EU, as appropriate, to do the following:

lay down a clear roadmap and accession strategy for the western Balkan countries over the next few years and, especially in view of the opening of negotiations with Croatia, Parliament asks that the EU send out an unambiguous message to the other south-east European states; support all governments in the region to prepare EU-compatible provisional National Development Plans similar to the one Turkey has prepared in order to build institutional absorption capacity for future EU assistance, especially in the areas of rural, infrastructure and human resources development; take urgent action to strengthen cooperation on border controls as part of a wider justice and home affairs strategy for the region, which should include a study by the Commission on the effects of a progressive easing of visa requirements for the countries of the region; make further efforts to assist the countries of the region in having their multi-ethnic heritage fully reflected in their education systems, and to ensure that they can take part in EU educational exchange programmes; promote the setting-up of twinning programmes at municipal level.

Lastly, Parliament notes that budgetary allocations for relations with the western Balkans have been significantly reduced every year since 2002. It states its determination to provide adequate funding in the next financial perspective taking into account the crucial challenges of the region, the gradual shift from physical reconstruction to institution-building and pre-accession assistance, as well as the region's strategic importance to the EU.

2005/04/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/04/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans.

It stresses that the western Balkans constitutes a region of the highest priority for the EU, and its future is certainly one of European integration, but that this future depends to a very large extent on the countries in the region themselves. Parliament notes that elected bodies in the countries of the region need to be strengthened and recognises that this will require considerable additional financial resources. It expresses serious concern at the economic and social situation. The countries of the region can do much to help themselves to achieve further progress on the road to EU integration by fulfilling the following conditions: cooperation with the ICTY; implementation of an effective policy in favour of the return of refugees and displaced persons; respect for human and minority rights; implementation of active policies against corruption, organised crime and trafficking in human beings, arms and drugs; and effective economic cooperation.

Bosnia and Herzegovina : ten years after the signing of the Dayton agreement, crucial political problems remain unresolved. The country is deeply divided and political stability is vulnerable. Parliament takes the view that new political initiatives based on a bottom-up participation of the three peoples living there in a sustainable peace as neighbours are urgently needed. It underlines therefore the need for the Commission to support the country’s political forces in finding a consensus to reform the political framework as set out in the Dayton agreement. Members draw attention to the priorities which have not yet been met: full cooperation with the ICTY, security issues, institution-building, infrastructure, energy. They also points out the contradiction inherent in some political forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which openly support European integration but obstruct the indispensable reforms needed for a functioning state.

Serbia and Montenegro : Parliament reiterates that the EU should be ready to assist Serbia and Montenegro to work out a lasting arrangement, while adopting a neutral stance on which form that relationship should take. It regrets that there is still a lack of cooperation from Serbia with the ICTY and calls on the authorities to make further progress with military and police reform, with a special focus on the secret police.

Kosovo: Parliament expresses its desire for the EU to start negotiations as soon as possible on the conclusion of a stabilisation and association agreement. It calls on the Council and the Commission to take the leading role in preparing the negotiations on final status and to exclude in advance the following options: return to a constitutional relationship with Serbia and Montenegro; unification with Albania or any other state or territory in the region; partition of Kosovo. It insists, however, on the need for the authorities in Kosovo to take decisive steps to increase security for all citizens of Kosovo.

Albania: Parliament is concerned that the political climate in Albania is problematic, with tensions within the ruling party having led to a split within the party. It condemns the Albanian government's inability to act effectively. Members call on the Albanian government to respect the rights of the ethnic Greek minority, and point out that progress in the negotiation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Albania's European future are closely linked to respect for human and minority rights.

Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia : Parliament is of the view that the full participation of the latter in the European integration process will be beneficial not only for the country itself but also for the entire region. Members regret that the March 2005 local elections were marred by irregularities. They take the view that the various EU bodies acting in the country should improve their coordination. In this regard, that the Commission should play a pivotal role in the implementation of EU policies in the country.

Croatia: Parliament welcomes the decision to grant Croatia candidate status. It takes note of the Council's decision to postpone the opening of accession talks with Croatia due to the absence of a common agreement about this country's full cooperation with the ICTY, calling on the Croatian government to do its utmost to prove it is fully cooperating with the ICTY. This is a basic test for all the countries in the region. It also calls on Croatia to settle the remaining border disputes through dialogue with Slovenia and to avoid unilateral acts which intend to prejudice the determination of the Slovenian-Croatian border and affect the demarcation of the border without consent.

The resolution stresses that the need for a clear allocation of responsibilities/competences between the European Agency for Reconstruction and the delegations of the European Commission in the region.

Parliament calls on the Commission and Council and the EU, as appropriate, to do the following:

lay down a clear roadmap and accession strategy for the western Balkan countries over the next few years and, especially in view of the opening of negotiations with Croatia, Parliament asks that the EU send out an unambiguous message to the other south-east European states; support all governments in the region to prepare EU-compatible provisional National Development Plans similar to the one Turkey has prepared in order to build institutional absorption capacity for future EU assistance, especially in the areas of rural, infrastructure and human resources development; take urgent action to strengthen cooperation on border controls as part of a wider justice and home affairs strategy for the region, which should include a study by the Commission on the effects of a progressive easing of visa requirements for the countries of the region; make further efforts to assist the countries of the region in having their multi-ethnic heritage fully reflected in their education systems, and to ensure that they can take part in EU educational exchange programmes; promote the setting-up of twinning programmes at municipal level.

Lastly, Parliament notes that budgetary allocations for relations with the western Balkans have been significantly reduced every year since 2002. It states its determination to provide adequate funding in the next financial perspective taking into account the crucial challenges of the region, the gradual shift from physical reconstruction to institution-building and pre-accession assistance, as well as the region's strategic importance to the EU.

Documents
2005/04/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/04/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2005/04/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2005/02/21
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2005/02/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/01/31
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2005/01/31
   CSL - Council Meeting
2004/12/02
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2004/12/02
   CSL - Council Meeting

Documents

Votes

B6-0094/2005 - Balkans - am. 45 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 411, -: 102, 0: 45
DE PL ES FR IT PT EL CZ HU SK SE IE NL AT LV GB MT BE SI LU EE CY FI DK LT
Total
79
50
46
56
45
21
19
17
18
12
15
11
24
16
9
51
4
20
3
5
5
3
12
11
6
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
157

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64
2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

B6-0094/2005 - Balkans - am. 46 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 525, 0: 33, -: 6
DE PL FR ES IT GB NL PT HU CZ EL BE SE AT DK IE FI SK LV LT EE SI MT LU CY
Total
82
50
56
45
47
51
24
22
18
18
19
19
15
16
12
11
12
12
9
6
5
4
4
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
209

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
158

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

B6-0094/2005 - Balkans - am. 25 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: -: 398, +: 139, 0: 26
SE LT DK SI FI CY EE LV BE NL LU IE MT IT AT SK CZ HU PT EL GB PL FR DE ES
Total
15
6
12
5
11
3
5
9
20
24
5
10
4
45
16
12
18
18
21
19
49
51
57
83
45
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: UEN UEN
18

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: PSE PSE
159

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
209

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Belgium PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

B6-0094/2005 - Balkans - am. 22 #

2005/04/14 Outcome: +: 526, 0: 22, -: 18
DE PL ES IT FR GB NL PT HU CZ EL SE BE FI AT DK SK LV IE LT EE LU MT SI CY
Total
83
51
45
47
57
50
24
22
18
18
19
15
20
12
15
12
12
9
10
7
5
5
4
3
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
210

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
158

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Italy NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0094_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0094_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0131_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0131_EN.html
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE
events/5
date
2005-04-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0131_EN.html title: T6-0131/2005
summary
events/5
date
2005-04-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0131_EN.html title: T6-0131/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-94&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0094_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-131
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0131_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-131
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0131_EN.html
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2626 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2626*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2004 type: Debate in Council title: 2626 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2637
  • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2641
  • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11527&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-131 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0131/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2656
committees
    council
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2656 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2656*&MEET_DATE=25/04/2005 date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2641 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2641*&MEET_DATE=21/02/2005 date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2637 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2637*&MEET_DATE=31/01/2005 date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2626 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2626*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2004 date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00
    docs
    • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-94&language=EN title: B6-0094/2005 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-131 title: T6-0131/2005 title: OJ C 033 09.02.2006, p. 0496-0565 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans. It stresses that the western Balkans constitutes a region of the highest priority for the EU, and its future is certainly one of European integration, but that this future depends to a very large extent on the countries in the region themselves. Parliament notes that elected bodies in the countries of the region need to be strengthened and recognises that this will require considerable additional financial resources. It expresses serious concern at the economic and social situation. The countries of the region can do much to help themselves to achieve further progress on the road to EU integration by fulfilling the following conditions: cooperation with the ICTY; implementation of an effective policy in favour of the return of refugees and displaced persons; respect for human and minority rights; implementation of active policies against corruption, organised crime and trafficking in human beings, arms and drugs; and effective economic cooperation. Bosnia and Herzegovina : ten years after the signing of the Dayton agreement, crucial political problems remain unresolved. The country is deeply divided and political stability is vulnerable. Parliament takes the view that new political initiatives based on a bottom-up participation of the three peoples living there in a sustainable peace as neighbours are urgently needed. It underlines therefore the need for the Commission to support the country’s political forces in finding a consensus to reform the political framework as set out in the Dayton agreement. Members draw attention to the priorities which have not yet been met: full cooperation with the ICTY, security issues, institution-building, infrastructure, energy. They also points out the contradiction inherent in some political forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which openly support European integration but obstruct the indispensable reforms needed for a functioning state. Serbia and Montenegro : Parliament reiterates that the EU should be ready to assist Serbia and Montenegro to work out a lasting arrangement, while adopting a neutral stance on which form that relationship should take. It regrets that there is still a lack of cooperation from Serbia with the ICTY and calls on the authorities to make further progress with military and police reform, with a special focus on the secret police. Kosovo: Parliament expresses its desire for the EU to start negotiations as soon as possible on the conclusion of a stabilisation and association agreement. It calls on the Council and the Commission to take the leading role in preparing the negotiations on final status and to exclude in advance the following options: return to a constitutional relationship with Serbia and Montenegro; unification with Albania or any other state or territory in the region; partition of Kosovo. It insists, however, on the need for the authorities in Kosovo to take decisive steps to increase security for all citizens of Kosovo. Albania: Parliament is concerned that the political climate in Albania is problematic, with tensions within the ruling party having led to a split within the party. It condemns the Albanian government's inability to act effectively. Members call on the Albanian government to respect the rights of the ethnic Greek minority, and point out that progress in the negotiation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Albania's European future are closely linked to respect for human and minority rights. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia : Parliament is of the view that the full participation of the latter in the European integration process will be beneficial not only for the country itself but also for the entire region. Members regret that the March 2005 local elections were marred by irregularities. They take the view that the various EU bodies acting in the country should improve their coordination. In this regard, that the Commission should play a pivotal role in the implementation of EU policies in the country. Croatia: Parliament welcomes the decision to grant Croatia candidate status. It takes note of the Council's decision to postpone the opening of accession talks with Croatia due to the absence of a common agreement about this country's full cooperation with the ICTY, calling on the Croatian government to do its utmost to prove it is fully cooperating with the ICTY. This is a basic test for all the countries in the region. It also calls on Croatia to settle the remaining border disputes through dialogue with Slovenia and to avoid unilateral acts which intend to prejudice the determination of the Slovenian-Croatian border and affect the demarcation of the border without consent. The resolution stresses that the need for a clear allocation of responsibilities/competences between the European Agency for Reconstruction and the delegations of the European Commission in the region. Parliament calls on the Commission and Council and the EU, as appropriate, to do the following: lay down a clear roadmap and accession strategy for the western Balkan countries over the next few years and, especially in view of the opening of negotiations with Croatia, Parliament asks that the EU send out an unambiguous message to the other south-east European states; support all governments in the region to prepare EU-compatible provisional National Development Plans similar to the one Turkey has prepared in order to build institutional absorption capacity for future EU assistance, especially in the areas of rural, infrastructure and human resources development; take urgent action to strengthen cooperation on border controls as part of a wider justice and home affairs strategy for the region, which should include a study by the Commission on the effects of a progressive easing of visa requirements for the countries of the region; make further efforts to assist the countries of the region in having their multi-ethnic heritage fully reflected in their education systems, and to ensure that they can take part in EU educational exchange programmes; promote the setting-up of twinning programmes at municipal level. Lastly, Parliament notes that budgetary allocations for relations with the western Balkans have been significantly reduced every year since 2002. It states its determination to provide adequate funding in the next financial perspective taking into account the crucial challenges of the region, the gradual shift from physical reconstruction to institution-building and pre-accession assistance, as well as the region's strategic importance to the EU. type: Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects body: EP
    events
    • date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2626*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2004 title: 2626
    • date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
    • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11527&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-131 title: T6-0131/2005 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans. It stresses that the western Balkans constitutes a region of the highest priority for the EU, and its future is certainly one of European integration, but that this future depends to a very large extent on the countries in the region themselves. Parliament notes that elected bodies in the countries of the region need to be strengthened and recognises that this will require considerable additional financial resources. It expresses serious concern at the economic and social situation. The countries of the region can do much to help themselves to achieve further progress on the road to EU integration by fulfilling the following conditions: cooperation with the ICTY; implementation of an effective policy in favour of the return of refugees and displaced persons; respect for human and minority rights; implementation of active policies against corruption, organised crime and trafficking in human beings, arms and drugs; and effective economic cooperation. Bosnia and Herzegovina : ten years after the signing of the Dayton agreement, crucial political problems remain unresolved. The country is deeply divided and political stability is vulnerable. Parliament takes the view that new political initiatives based on a bottom-up participation of the three peoples living there in a sustainable peace as neighbours are urgently needed. It underlines therefore the need for the Commission to support the country’s political forces in finding a consensus to reform the political framework as set out in the Dayton agreement. Members draw attention to the priorities which have not yet been met: full cooperation with the ICTY, security issues, institution-building, infrastructure, energy. They also points out the contradiction inherent in some political forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which openly support European integration but obstruct the indispensable reforms needed for a functioning state. Serbia and Montenegro : Parliament reiterates that the EU should be ready to assist Serbia and Montenegro to work out a lasting arrangement, while adopting a neutral stance on which form that relationship should take. It regrets that there is still a lack of cooperation from Serbia with the ICTY and calls on the authorities to make further progress with military and police reform, with a special focus on the secret police. Kosovo: Parliament expresses its desire for the EU to start negotiations as soon as possible on the conclusion of a stabilisation and association agreement. It calls on the Council and the Commission to take the leading role in preparing the negotiations on final status and to exclude in advance the following options: return to a constitutional relationship with Serbia and Montenegro; unification with Albania or any other state or territory in the region; partition of Kosovo. It insists, however, on the need for the authorities in Kosovo to take decisive steps to increase security for all citizens of Kosovo. Albania: Parliament is concerned that the political climate in Albania is problematic, with tensions within the ruling party having led to a split within the party. It condemns the Albanian government's inability to act effectively. Members call on the Albanian government to respect the rights of the ethnic Greek minority, and point out that progress in the negotiation of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement and Albania's European future are closely linked to respect for human and minority rights. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia : Parliament is of the view that the full participation of the latter in the European integration process will be beneficial not only for the country itself but also for the entire region. Members regret that the March 2005 local elections were marred by irregularities. They take the view that the various EU bodies acting in the country should improve their coordination. In this regard, that the Commission should play a pivotal role in the implementation of EU policies in the country. Croatia: Parliament welcomes the decision to grant Croatia candidate status. It takes note of the Council's decision to postpone the opening of accession talks with Croatia due to the absence of a common agreement about this country's full cooperation with the ICTY, calling on the Croatian government to do its utmost to prove it is fully cooperating with the ICTY. This is a basic test for all the countries in the region. It also calls on Croatia to settle the remaining border disputes through dialogue with Slovenia and to avoid unilateral acts which intend to prejudice the determination of the Slovenian-Croatian border and affect the demarcation of the border without consent. The resolution stresses that the need for a clear allocation of responsibilities/competences between the European Agency for Reconstruction and the delegations of the European Commission in the region. Parliament calls on the Commission and Council and the EU, as appropriate, to do the following: lay down a clear roadmap and accession strategy for the western Balkan countries over the next few years and, especially in view of the opening of negotiations with Croatia, Parliament asks that the EU send out an unambiguous message to the other south-east European states; support all governments in the region to prepare EU-compatible provisional National Development Plans similar to the one Turkey has prepared in order to build institutional absorption capacity for future EU assistance, especially in the areas of rural, infrastructure and human resources development; take urgent action to strengthen cooperation on border controls as part of a wider justice and home affairs strategy for the region, which should include a study by the Commission on the effects of a progressive easing of visa requirements for the countries of the region; make further efforts to assist the countries of the region in having their multi-ethnic heritage fully reflected in their education systems, and to ensure that they can take part in EU educational exchange programmes; promote the setting-up of twinning programmes at municipal level. Lastly, Parliament notes that budgetary allocations for relations with the western Balkans have been significantly reduced every year since 2002. It states its determination to provide adequate funding in the next financial perspective taking into account the crucial challenges of the region, the gradual shift from physical reconstruction to institution-building and pre-accession assistance, as well as the region's strategic importance to the EU.
    • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
    links
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10.04 Third-country political situation, local and regional conflicts
    • 6.40.03 Relations with South-East Europe and the Balkans
    New
    6.10.04
    Third-country political situation, local and regional conflicts
    6.40.03
    Relations with South-East Europe and the Balkans
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    New
    Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
    procedure/subject/0
    Old
    6.10.04 Third-countries political situation, local and regional conflicts
    New
    6.10.04 Third-country political situation, local and regional conflicts
    activities
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 2626 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2626*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2004 type: Debate in Council title: 2626 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2004-12-02T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2005-01-31T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2637
    • date: 2005-02-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2641
    • date: 2005-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20050413&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11527&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-131 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0131/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2005-04-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2656
    committees
      links
      other
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
      procedure
      reference
      2004/2599(RSP)
      title
      Resolution on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Debate or resolution on oral questions
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject