BETA


2005/2094(DEC) 2004 discharge: EC general budget, Court of Auditors

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT LUNDGREN Nils (icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 100

Events

2006/12/06
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Court of Auditors for the 2004 financial year.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2006/813/EC of the European Parliament on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004 (Section V - Court of Auditors).

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 27 April 2006 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27/04/2006).

2006/05/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/27
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/04/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) and granted the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004. In its accompanying statement, Parliament noted that in 2004 the European Court of Auditors (ECA) administered a budget of EUR 96 925 410, with a utilisation rate of 81.5 %.

Parliament approved the holding at regular intervals of calls for tender for the appointment of an external firm to audit the ECA's accounts, while expressing concern at the dominant position occupied by a small number of large accountancy practices in Luxembourg and elsewhere. It called for a tender procedure for the appointment of external auditors that is transparent, fair and intelligible to Parliament.

The report noted the ECA's expansion to 25 Members following enlargement and queried the effectiveness of such a structure. Parliament suggested that a review of the ECA's working methods could include as one of the possible options the proposal by the House of Lords to replace the current structure by "a highly qualified chief executive supported by a strong auditing staff, and reporting to a part-time, non-executive board of representatives from each of the Member States".

Parliament went on to invite the ECA to consider publishing Members' declarations of financial interests on its website, thereby contributing to the greater transparency of the institutions.

Finally, it recalled that, following an investigation by OLAF, legal proceedings against a former Member of the ECA have been pending before the courts of Luxembourg for some considerable time. It regretted that all too often final case reports forwarded by OLAF to the Member States' authorities are simply filed without further action. Parliament felt that judicial delay was not an acceptable response to a potentially embarrassing dossier, and stated that it would follow attentively the Luxembourg judicial authorities' hearing of the above case.

Documents
2006/04/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/04/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/03/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/03/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/03/21
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the report by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) recommending that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) be granted discharge for the 2004 budget. In its accompanying comments, the committee expressed concern at the dominant position occupied by "a small number of large accountancy practices in Luxembourg and elsewhere" when it came to appointing an external firm to audit the ECA's accounts. It called for a tender procedure for the appointment of external auditors that is "transparent, fair and intelligible to Parliament".

The report noted the ECA's expansion to 25 Members following enlargement and queried the effectiveness of such a structure. It asked the ECA to look into the possibility of reducing the number of Members to one-third of the number of Member States, and hoped that it would be possible to devise "a more rational structure" before the next enlargement. MEPs suggested that one option, as recommended by the UK House of Lords, might be to replace the current structure by "a highly qualified chief executive supported by a strong auditing staff, and reporting to a part-time, non-executive board of representatives from each of the Member States".

The committee also advocated publishing Members' declarations of financial interests on the ECA's website, "thereby contributing to greater transparency of the EU institutions". Lastly, it referred to the legal proceedings against a former Member of the ECA which had been pending before the Luxembourg courts for a long time. Warning that "judicial delay is not an acceptable response to a potentially embarassing dossier", MEPs said that Parliament would "follow attentively" the Luxembourg judicial authorities' hearing of the case in question.

2006/02/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/02/23
   CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Council recommendation on the discharge to be given to the other institutions in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2004.

CONTENT : having regard to the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council calls on the European Parliament to give a discharge to all of the other EU institutions (other than the Commission).

If overall the observations made by the Council are positive as regards expenditure, the Council believes that the implementation of the budget calls for a series of comments on the discharge which should be followed up.

The Council welcomes the fact that the errors identified by the Court did not materially affect the legality and regularity of administrative expenditure as a whole.

It notes with satisfaction the efforts and the progress made by the Institutions to adapt their supervisory systems and controls to the new Financial Regulation, but underlines that they have not fully implemented the Internal Control Standards.

The Council takes note that the 2004 financial year has introduced specific risks resulting from the adoption of the new staff regulations, the introduction of a new system for calculating staff remuneration and the implementation of the new system in the framework of the new Financial Regulation at the same time.

In this context, the Council shares the Court's view that particular attention should be paid to the various technical weaknesses detected in the implementation of the NAP (new payroll system), to an accurate application of the staff regulations in respect of travel allowances, to the improvement of the control systems concerning the transfer of part of the staff.

Documents
2006/02/03
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/11/30
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Court of Auditors’ report on the implementation of the 2004 budget (other institutions – Court of Auditors).

CONTENT : in its 28 th Annual Report on the implementation of the general budget of the European Union, the Court states that overall improvements have been made by all the institutions in order to adapt their supervisory and control systems to the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, the risks identified in 2003 linked to the implementation of the Financial Regulation, together with the risks resulting from the introduction of new Staff Regulations and computerised systems for calculating salaries and pensions have not been adequately addressed by the supervisory and control systems in 2004.

Despite the progress made by the Commission in reforming its internal control system and the positive impact on the legality and regularity of the Commission’s internal management of expenditure (DAS), further progress is still required in terms of operational effectiveness. The report states that the past audits by the Court showed that the errors found were mostly of a formal nature and not due to serious weaknesses in the control systems.

Supervisory and control systems : in 2004 all the institutions continued improving their supervisory and control systems in order to comply with the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, none of the institutions had fully implemented Internal Control Standards (ICS). In parallel, the NAP (‘Nouvelle Application Paie’), a new computer application for calculating staff remuneration created and managed by the Commission Paymaster Office (PMO), was used by all the institutions. The NAP presented in 2004 various technical weaknesses, which created a new risk and, in many cases, resulted in the erroneous calculation of various elements of staff remuneration. The most evident errors were corrected manually before payment. Concerning one of those elements, in March 2005 NAP programmes were amended, the amounts paid in 2004 recalculated and, where necessary, corrected. These corrections led to recoveries amounting, for all the institutions, to a total of around EUR 1,9 million. Manual data transferred into the NAP from the computer systems recording the situations qualifying the staff for specific entitlements constituted a further specific risk of errors. However, controls were not reinforced accordingly.

A lack of control procedures concerning pension payments were noted in some institutions.

Lastly, except for the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, occasional weaknesses were observed in the supervisory and control systems concerning procurement.

Annual activity reports and declarations of the Directors-General : in 2004, improvements were made to the annual activity reports and the declarations of the Directors-General. However, weaknesses were found in the supervisory and control systems of the institutions.

Specific observations on the Court of Auditors : the report indicates that the expenditure of the institution was EUR 84 million (idem in 2003). As regards the implementation of the Court of Auditr’s budget, the Court states that it is audited by an independent external audit firm which has issued a certificate concerning the regularity and fairness of the financial statements at 31 December 2004, accompanied by a report on the administrative and accounting procedures, the soundness of the financial management and the internal control system. The report states that, in the auditor’s opinion, ‘the current internal control rules ensure that the operational objectives are achieved satisfactorily, the financial statements are reliably drawn up and the legal framework is complied with’. Certificate and report will be published in the Official Journal.

General conclusions : in conclusion, the Court considers, as a result of its audit, and in order to address the risks identified, that improvements should be made in the supervisory and control systems relating to the following areas: documentation of procedures; definition of the nature of the supporting documents which should make it possible to check that the expenditure is in accordance with the terms of the contracts or of the regulations and rules; grading of staff under the new staff regulations; remuneration, in particular payment of allowances and transfers of part of the staff emoluments with the application of a weighting coefficient.

2005/11/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/10/07
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : presentation of the final annual accounts of the European Community for the financial year 2004 – Other institutions : Section V – Court of Auditors.

CONTENT : this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Court of Auditors for 2004 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The available appropriations set out in the Court’s 2004 budget amounted to EUR 97 million, with an 89% utilisation rate.

Main axes of 2004 expenditure : budget implementation of the Court can be characterised by the following :

A slight under-utilisation of enlargement related expenditure ; The end of the building extension works.

Amendments to budget : during 2004, some budget items were subject to amendments totalling EUR 3,3 million. Appropriation transfers between items or chapters were made in order to fund these budget amendments.

The main amendments dealt with:

The strengthening of external expertise; The evaluation of recruitment needs and the setting up of a recruitment competition in Luxembourg and medical examinations; Additional translations costs; The implementation of the « Notenboom » procedure : each year the Court produces a detailed analysis of its budget implementation and its needs for the remainder of the year with a view to respecting the principles of sound financial management : in 2004, the application of the procedure drove the Court to make budget transfers (EUR 532.000) to cover operational costs.

The main issues of the 2004 budget can be summarised as follows:

Title I (Staff costs) : appropriations under this headings were utilised at 88%. This is due to :

Delays in anticipated recruitment brought about by the necessity of waiting for the conclusion of interinstitutional competitions and by the lower than expected number of laureates;

Mission costs (a slow down has been observed for some years now); Exchanges of civil servants and experts (a utilisation rate of 27%). Appropriations in this chapter increased from EUR 291 000 in 2003 to EUR 801 000 in 2004 in anticipation of a greater need in the year of enlargement. The underutilisation results from a less than expected take up in 2004, by the audit offices of the Member States, of positions as detached national experts, following the changes in the rules relating to ICN posts.

Title II (Operational expenditure) : appropriations for moveable property and associated costs were utilised at 70%. The use of appropriations in this chapter is directly associated with the level of recruitment and resulting need for office equipment for staff. On the Court’s extension in Luxembourg (building K.2), it has been in construction since 2001 and was satisfactorily completed in 2004. It was occupied in 2003, ahead of the schedule date of June 2004. In 2004, an amount of EUR 461.730 was transferred to the special bank account for the project which is underpinned by a bank guarantee of up to EUR 10 million. This is an interesting bearing account interest is receivable by the Court on a quarterly basis. At the balance sheet date, the bank account was EUR 3.5 million.

DETAILED SYNTHESIS OF 2004 EXPENDITURE : this detailed synthesis analyses the breakdown of the Court of Auditor’s expenditure for the financial year 2004. The figures mentioned can also be found in the “Final annual accounts of the European Communities - Financial year 2004 – Volume III”.

Implementation rate in 2004 :

Appropriations available for 2004: EUR 96.925.410; Appropriations committed amounted to EUR 85.934.099,96 EUR, a 88,66% utilisation rate; Appropriations paid amounted to EUR 78.990.217,98; Appropriations carried over from 2003 to 2004 : EUR 5.588.870,41.

Main budget items and the use of commitment appropriations (Titles I and II):

I : Institutional costs (Members and active staff) : EUR 73,4 million; II : Operational costs (buildings and material) : EUR 12,54 million.

Documents
2005/10/06
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : presentation of the final annual accounts of the European Community for the financial year 2004 – Other institutions : Section V – Court of Auditors.

CONTENT : this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Court of Auditors for 2004 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The available appropriations set out in the Court’s 2004 budget amounted to EUR 97 million, with an 89% utilisation rate.

Main axes of 2004 expenditure : budget implementation of the Court can be characterised by the following :

A slight under-utilisation of enlargement related expenditure ; The end of the building extension works.

Amendments to budget : during 2004, some budget items were subject to amendments totalling EUR 3,3 million. Appropriation transfers between items or chapters were made in order to fund these budget amendments.

The main amendments dealt with:

The strengthening of external expertise; The evaluation of recruitment needs and the setting up of a recruitment competition in Luxembourg and medical examinations; Additional translations costs; The implementation of the « Notenboom » procedure : each year the Court produces a detailed analysis of its budget implementation and its needs for the remainder of the year with a view to respecting the principles of sound financial management : in 2004, the application of the procedure drove the Court to make budget transfers (EUR 532.000) to cover operational costs.

The main issues of the 2004 budget can be summarised as follows:

Title I (Staff costs) : appropriations under this headings were utilised at 88%. This is due to :

Delays in anticipated recruitment brought about by the necessity of waiting for the conclusion of interinstitutional competitions and by the lower than expected number of laureates;

Mission costs (a slow down has been observed for some years now); Exchanges of civil servants and experts (a utilisation rate of 27%). Appropriations in this chapter increased from EUR 291 000 in 2003 to EUR 801 000 in 2004 in anticipation of a greater need in the year of enlargement. The underutilisation results from a less than expected take up in 2004, by the audit offices of the Member States, of positions as detached national experts, following the changes in the rules relating to ICN posts.

Title II (Operational expenditure) : appropriations for moveable property and associated costs were utilised at 70%. The use of appropriations in this chapter is directly associated with the level of recruitment and resulting need for office equipment for staff. On the Court’s extension in Luxembourg (building K.2), it has been in construction since 2001 and was satisfactorily completed in 2004. It was occupied in 2003, ahead of the schedule date of June 2004. In 2004, an amount of EUR 461.730 was transferred to the special bank account for the project which is underpinned by a bank guarantee of up to EUR 10 million. This is an interesting bearing account interest is receivable by the Court on a quarterly basis. At the balance sheet date, the bank account was EUR 3.5 million.

DETAILED SYNTHESIS OF 2004 EXPENDITURE : this detailed synthesis analyses the breakdown of the Court of Auditor’s expenditure for the financial year 2004. The figures mentioned can also be found in the “Final annual accounts of the European Communities - Financial year 2004 – Volume III”.

Implementation rate in 2004 :

Appropriations available for 2004: EUR 96.925.410; Appropriations committed amounted to EUR 85.934.099,96 EUR, a 88,66% utilisation rate; Appropriations paid amounted to EUR 78.990.217,98; Appropriations carried over from 2003 to 2004 : EUR 5.588.870,41.

Main budget items and the use of commitment appropriations (Titles I and II):

I : Institutional costs (Members and active staff) : EUR 73,4 million; II : Operational costs (buildings and material) : EUR 12,54 million.

Documents
2005/04/20
   EP - LUNDGREN Nils (IND/DEM) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-10-07T00:00:00
docs
title: N6-0027/2005
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2005-10-07T00:00:00
New
2005-10-06T00:00:00
events/3/date
Old
2006-03-28T00:00:00
New
2006-03-27T00:00:00
events/8/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:TOC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.888
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE369.888
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE370.133
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE370.133
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0113_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0113_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4598&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2006-03-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0113_EN.html title: A6-0113/2006
events/3
date
2006-03-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0113_EN.html title: A6-0113/2006
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE
events/6
date
2006-04-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0161_EN.html title: T6-0161/2006
summary
events/6
date
2006-04-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0161_EN.html title: T6-0161/2006
summary
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-13-06B0_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-13-06B0_EN.html
procedure/final/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-13-06B0_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-13-06B0_EN.html
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 100
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 94
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2005-04-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-113&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0113_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-113&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0113_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-161
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0161_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-813&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-13-06B0_EN.html
procedure/final/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-813&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-13-06B0_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-10-07T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N6-0027/2005 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-113&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0113/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4598&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-161 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0161/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-12-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-813&language=EN title: Budget 2006/813 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC title: OJ L 340 06.12.2006, p. 0036-0036
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2005-04-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2005-04-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2005-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:TOC title: OJ C 301 30.11.2005, p. 0001 title: N6-0036/2005 summary: PURPOSE : to present the Court of Auditors’ report on the implementation of the 2004 budget (other institutions – Court of Auditors). CONTENT : in its 28 th Annual Report on the implementation of the general budget of the European Union, the Court states that overall improvements have been made by all the institutions in order to adapt their supervisory and control systems to the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, the risks identified in 2003 linked to the implementation of the Financial Regulation, together with the risks resulting from the introduction of new Staff Regulations and computerised systems for calculating salaries and pensions have not been adequately addressed by the supervisory and control systems in 2004. Despite the progress made by the Commission in reforming its internal control system and the positive impact on the legality and regularity of the Commission’s internal management of expenditure (DAS), further progress is still required in terms of operational effectiveness. The report states that the past audits by the Court showed that the errors found were mostly of a formal nature and not due to serious weaknesses in the control systems. Supervisory and control systems : in 2004 all the institutions continued improving their supervisory and control systems in order to comply with the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, none of the institutions had fully implemented Internal Control Standards (ICS). In parallel, the NAP (‘Nouvelle Application Paie’), a new computer application for calculating staff remuneration created and managed by the Commission Paymaster Office (PMO), was used by all the institutions. The NAP presented in 2004 various technical weaknesses, which created a new risk and, in many cases, resulted in the erroneous calculation of various elements of staff remuneration. The most evident errors were corrected manually before payment. Concerning one of those elements, in March 2005 NAP programmes were amended, the amounts paid in 2004 recalculated and, where necessary, corrected. These corrections led to recoveries amounting, for all the institutions, to a total of around EUR 1,9 million. Manual data transferred into the NAP from the computer systems recording the situations qualifying the staff for specific entitlements constituted a further specific risk of errors. However, controls were not reinforced accordingly. A lack of control procedures concerning pension payments were noted in some institutions. Lastly, except for the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, occasional weaknesses were observed in the supervisory and control systems concerning procurement. Annual activity reports and declarations of the Directors-General : in 2004, improvements were made to the annual activity reports and the declarations of the Directors-General. However, weaknesses were found in the supervisory and control systems of the institutions. Specific observations on the Court of Auditors : the report indicates that the expenditure of the institution was EUR 84 million (idem in 2003). As regards the implementation of the Court of Auditr’s budget, the Court states that it is audited by an independent external audit firm which has issued a certificate concerning the regularity and fairness of the financial statements at 31 December 2004, accompanied by a report on the administrative and accounting procedures, the soundness of the financial management and the internal control system. The report states that, in the auditor’s opinion, ‘the current internal control rules ensure that the operational objectives are achieved satisfactorily, the financial statements are reliably drawn up and the legal framework is complied with’. Certificate and report will be published in the Official Journal. General conclusions : in conclusion, the Court considers, as a result of its audit, and in order to address the risks identified, that improvements should be made in the supervisory and control systems relating to the following areas: documentation of procedures; definition of the nature of the supporting documents which should make it possible to check that the expenditure is in accordance with the terms of the contracts or of the regulations and rules; grading of staff under the new staff regulations; remuneration, in particular payment of allowances and transfers of part of the staff emoluments with the application of a weighting coefficient. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2006-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.888 title: PE369.888 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5971%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05971/2006 summary: PURPOSE : to present the Council recommendation on the discharge to be given to the other institutions in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2004. CONTENT : having regard to the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council calls on the European Parliament to give a discharge to all of the other EU institutions (other than the Commission). If overall the observations made by the Council are positive as regards expenditure, the Council believes that the implementation of the budget calls for a series of comments on the discharge which should be followed up. The Council welcomes the fact that the errors identified by the Court did not materially affect the legality and regularity of administrative expenditure as a whole. It notes with satisfaction the efforts and the progress made by the Institutions to adapt their supervisory systems and controls to the new Financial Regulation, but underlines that they have not fully implemented the Internal Control Standards. The Council takes note that the 2004 financial year has introduced specific risks resulting from the adoption of the new staff regulations, the introduction of a new system for calculating staff remuneration and the implementation of the new system in the framework of the new Financial Regulation at the same time. In this context, the Council shares the Court's view that particular attention should be paid to the various technical weaknesses detected in the implementation of the NAP (new payroll system), to an accurate application of the staff regulations in respect of travel allowances, to the improvement of the control systems concerning the transfer of part of the staff. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE370.133 title: PE370.133 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-113&language=EN title: A6-0113/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4598&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)2095 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-10-07T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: title: N6-0027/2005 summary: PURPOSE : presentation of the final annual accounts of the European Community for the financial year 2004 – Other institutions : Section V – Court of Auditors. CONTENT : this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Court of Auditors for 2004 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The available appropriations set out in the Court’s 2004 budget amounted to EUR 97 million, with an 89% utilisation rate. Main axes of 2004 expenditure : budget implementation of the Court can be characterised by the following : A slight under-utilisation of enlargement related expenditure ; The end of the building extension works. Amendments to budget : during 2004, some budget items were subject to amendments totalling EUR 3,3 million. Appropriation transfers between items or chapters were made in order to fund these budget amendments. The main amendments dealt with: The strengthening of external expertise; The evaluation of recruitment needs and the setting up of a recruitment competition in Luxembourg and medical examinations; Additional translations costs; The implementation of the « Notenboom » procedure : each year the Court produces a detailed analysis of its budget implementation and its needs for the remainder of the year with a view to respecting the principles of sound financial management : in 2004, the application of the procedure drove the Court to make budget transfers (EUR 532.000) to cover operational costs. The main issues of the 2004 budget can be summarised as follows: Title I (Staff costs) : appropriations under this headings were utilised at 88%. This is due to : Delays in anticipated recruitment brought about by the necessity of waiting for the conclusion of interinstitutional competitions and by the lower than expected number of laureates; Mission costs (a slow down has been observed for some years now); Exchanges of civil servants and experts (a utilisation rate of 27%). Appropriations in this chapter increased from EUR 291 000 in 2003 to EUR 801 000 in 2004 in anticipation of a greater need in the year of enlargement. The underutilisation results from a less than expected take up in 2004, by the audit offices of the Member States, of positions as detached national experts, following the changes in the rules relating to ICN posts. Title II (Operational expenditure) : appropriations for moveable property and associated costs were utilised at 70%. The use of appropriations in this chapter is directly associated with the level of recruitment and resulting need for office equipment for staff. On the Court’s extension in Luxembourg (building K.2), it has been in construction since 2001 and was satisfactorily completed in 2004. It was occupied in 2003, ahead of the schedule date of June 2004. In 2004, an amount of EUR 461.730 was transferred to the special bank account for the project which is underpinned by a bank guarantee of up to EUR 10 million. This is an interesting bearing account interest is receivable by the Court on a quarterly basis. At the balance sheet date, the bank account was EUR 3.5 million. DETAILED SYNTHESIS OF 2004 EXPENDITURE : this detailed synthesis analyses the breakdown of the Court of Auditor’s expenditure for the financial year 2004. The figures mentioned can also be found in the “Final annual accounts of the European Communities - Financial year 2004 – Volume III”. Implementation rate in 2004 : Appropriations available for 2004: EUR 96.925.410; Appropriations committed amounted to EUR 85.934.099,96 EUR, a 88,66% utilisation rate; Appropriations paid amounted to EUR 78.990.217,98; Appropriations carried over from 2003 to 2004 : EUR 5.588.870,41. Main budget items and the use of commitment appropriations (Titles I and II): I : Institutional costs (Members and active staff) : EUR 73,4 million; II : Operational costs (buildings and material) : EUR 12,54 million.
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) recommending that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) be granted discharge for the 2004 budget. In its accompanying comments, the committee expressed concern at the dominant position occupied by "a small number of large accountancy practices in Luxembourg and elsewhere" when it came to appointing an external firm to audit the ECA's accounts. It called for a tender procedure for the appointment of external auditors that is "transparent, fair and intelligible to Parliament". The report noted the ECA's expansion to 25 Members following enlargement and queried the effectiveness of such a structure. It asked the ECA to look into the possibility of reducing the number of Members to one-third of the number of Member States, and hoped that it would be possible to devise "a more rational structure" before the next enlargement. MEPs suggested that one option, as recommended by the UK House of Lords, might be to replace the current structure by "a highly qualified chief executive supported by a strong auditing staff, and reporting to a part-time, non-executive board of representatives from each of the Member States". The committee also advocated publishing Members' declarations of financial interests on the ECA's website, "thereby contributing to greater transparency of the EU institutions". Lastly, it referred to the legal proceedings against a former Member of the ECA which had been pending before the Luxembourg courts for a long time. Warning that "judicial delay is not an acceptable response to a potentially embarassing dossier", MEPs said that Parliament would "follow attentively" the Luxembourg judicial authorities' hearing of the case in question.
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-113&language=EN title: A6-0113/2006
  • date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4598&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-161 title: T6-0161/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) and granted the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004. In its accompanying statement, Parliament noted that in 2004 the European Court of Auditors (ECA) administered a budget of EUR 96 925 410, with a utilisation rate of 81.5 %. Parliament approved the holding at regular intervals of calls for tender for the appointment of an external firm to audit the ECA's accounts, while expressing concern at the dominant position occupied by a small number of large accountancy practices in Luxembourg and elsewhere. It called for a tender procedure for the appointment of external auditors that is transparent, fair and intelligible to Parliament. The report noted the ECA's expansion to 25 Members following enlargement and queried the effectiveness of such a structure. Parliament suggested that a review of the ECA's working methods could include as one of the possible options the proposal by the House of Lords to replace the current structure by "a highly qualified chief executive supported by a strong auditing staff, and reporting to a part-time, non-executive board of representatives from each of the Member States". Parliament went on to invite the ECA to consider publishing Members' declarations of financial interests on its website, thereby contributing to the greater transparency of the institutions. Finally, it recalled that, following an investigation by OLAF, legal proceedings against a former Member of the ECA have been pending before the courts of Luxembourg for some considerable time. It regretted that all too often final case reports forwarded by OLAF to the Member States' authorities are simply filed without further action. Parliament felt that judicial delay was not an acceptable response to a potentially embarrassing dossier, and stated that it would follow attentively the Luxembourg judicial authorities' hearing of the above case.
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Court of Auditors for the 2004 financial year. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2006/813/EC of the European Parliament on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004 (Section V - Court of Auditors). CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004. This decision is in line with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 27 April 2006 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27/04/2006). docs: title: Budget 2006/813 url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-813&language=EN title: OJ L 340 06.12.2006, p. 0036-0036 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/6/28840
New
  • CONT/6/28840
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 94
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 094
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.07 Previous discharges
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
activities/6/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:SOM:EN:HTML
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC
activities
  • date: 2005-10-07T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N6-0027/2005 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-113&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0113/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4598&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-161 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0161/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-12-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-813&language=EN title: Budget 2006/813 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 340 06.12.2006, p. 0036-0036
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/6/28840
reference
2005/2094(DEC)
title
2004 discharge: EC general budget, Court of Auditors
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 094
stage_reached
Procedure completed
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
final
subject
8.70.03.07 Previous discharges