Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFCO | DUFF Andrew ( ALDE), VOGGENHUBER Johannes ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | FEMM | BAUER Edit ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | PETI | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | ŽELEZNÝ Vladimír ( IND/DEM) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | CULT | TRÜPEL Helga ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | AFET | BROK Elmar ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | SCHUTH Willem ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | SWOBODA Hannes ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | JURI | BERGER Maria ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | CONT | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | CAVADA Jean-Marie ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by dAndrew DUFF (ADLE, UK) and Johannes VOGGENHUBER (Greens/ALE, AT) on the period of reflection on the European Constitution. The resolution was adopted by 385 votes in favour, 125 against and 51 abstentions. To recall, the European Constitution was rejected by the people of France and the Netherlands in 2005. The European Council decided on a period of reflection to enable a broad debate to take place, and agreed that the original timetable for the entry into force of the Constitution (1 November 2006) would be extended.
In its resolution, Parliament reaffirmed its conviction that the Treaty of Nice is not a viable basis for the continuation of the European integration process. It confirmed its commitment to achieving a constitutional settlement that strengthens parliamentary democracy, transparency and the rule of law, anchors fundamental rights, develops citizenship, and enhances the capacity of the enlarged Union to act effectively at home and abroad. Without such a constitutional settlement it would not be possible for the Union to expect the support of its citizens, to maintain the momentum of integration and to become a credible partner in world affairs. Parliament called on the European Council of June 2006 solemnly to declare the same commitment to a constitutional settlement on the future of Europe.
Parliament acknowledged that the ratification of the Constitution had now encountered difficulties that may prove to be insurmountable unless measures can be taken to meet the concerns expressed in France, the Netherlands and elsewhere. It stressed that it is not possible to further enlarge the Union after the accession of Bulgaria and Romania on the basis of the Treaty of Nice. The political problems and institutional weakness that the Convention was set up to address will persist – and, indeed, grow – unless and until the reforms enshrined in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe are brought into force. Many of the concerns expressed relate more to general and specific problems of context than to the text itself. If progress could be made in such issues, it would be easier to find a solution regarding the text.
Parliament resisted proposals to establish core groups of certain Member States while the constitutional process was still in train and deplored any suggestion that coalitions of certain Member States could be formed outside the EU system. Furthermore, a strategy based on the selective implementation of the Constitution risked destroying the consensus that achieved a balance between the institutions and among Member States, thereby aggravating the crisis of confidence.
It proposed using the current period of reflection to re-launch the constitutional project on the basis of a broad public debate about the future of European integration. This European dialogue should aim to deepen and democratise the consensus around the Constitution and address criticisms and find solutions where expectations have not been met. This new dialogue, should be conducted across the Union, structured by common themes and in realistic stages according to an agreed framework for evaluation, and designed to lead to decisive political choices.
Parliament insisted that the public debate be engaged within both the European and the national framework, since narrowly focused national debates will do little to change national stereotypes. An imposed dialogue without political goals would become nebulous, even vacuous, thereby giving rise to increased disaffection on the part of European citizens. It proposed that the European Parliament and national parliaments should jointly organise conferences – 'Parliamentary Forums' – in order to stimulate the debate and stated that it would invite the other EU institutions to contribute to the Forums. Parliament will publish 'European Papers' on each of the big issues facing the Union, which may be used as a common European template for the national debates and which, together with contributions from national parliaments, should be used as the basis for the deliberations of the Parliamentary Forums.
A first interparliamentary Forum should be convened in the spring of 2006. It should identify a limited number of priority questions such as: the goal of European integration; the role should Europe have in the world; the future of the European social and economic model in the light of globalisation; defining the borders of the EU; how to enhance freedom, security and justice; and how to finance the EU.
Parliament asked Member States to organise a large number of public meetings and media debates on the future of Europe - 'Citizens" Forums' - at national, regional and local level, structured along the commonly agreed themes, with the assistance of the Commission. It urged the social partners and civil society organisations to get engaged in these debates. Political parties should give much more prominence to the European dimension in both their internal debates and electoral campaigning. Citizens" petitions that contribute to shaping the debate would be welcome.
Parliament went on to suggest that the conclusions of the period of reflection should be drawn at the latest in the second half of 2007, and that a clear decision be reached at that stage about how to proceed with the Constitution. There are several options available to the Union ranging from abandoning the constitutional project altogether, continuing to try to ratify the present text unamended, seeking to clarify or add to the present text, restructuring and/or modifying the present text with the aim of improving it, or embarking upon a complete re-write. A positive outcome of the period of reflection would be that the current text could be maintained, although this would only be possible if accompanied by significant measures to reassure and convince public opinion.
Parliament stressed that Romania and Bulgaria must be involved in all the actions referred to above. In any case every effort should be made to ensure that the Constitution enters into force during 2009.
The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Andrew DUFF ( ALDE , UK ) and Joannes VOGGENHUBER (Greens/ALE, DE) in response to the decision by the European Council in June 2005 to set in train a period of dialogue or reflection on the future of the EU. MEPs stressed the need to involve all European citizens in the process of building Europe 's future. They also criticised the Council and Commission for failing to give a clear focus to the reflection period.
The report said that the EU should achieve a Constitution by 2009 to guarantee an effective and democratic Union . MEPs also argued that no further enlargement, after the accession of Romania and Bulgaria , was possible on the basis of the Treaty of Nice, which was "not a viable basis for the continuation of the European integration process". The report criticised the suggestion that core groups of Member States could be established while the constitutional process was still in train and that "coalitions of certain Member States" could be formed outside the EU system.
The committee noted that a limited number of reforms could be introduced at this stage without treaty change, through inter-institutional agreement or by revising rules of procedure, namely, transparency of lawmaking in the Council, introduction of a form of citizens' initiative, and more rigorous scrutiny by each national parliament of its government's conduct of EU affairs.
MEPs agreed that the European dialogue should be structured by common themes and have clear political goals to ensure citizens' participation. They called for the European Parliament to invite national parliaments to a series of conferences - 'Parliamentary Forums' - in order to stimulate the debate and shape the necessary political conclusions. The media should also be enlisted for the purpose of publicising and intensifying the debate. The priority issues to be addressed by the Parliamentary Forums and in the broader public debate should include the integration process, the EU's global role, the European social and economic model, and freedom, security and justice. The committee also called on the Member States to organise a large number of public meetings and media debates on the future of Europe - 'Citizens' Forums' - at national, regional and local level.
MEPs suggested that the conclusions of the period of reflection should be drawn at the latest in the second half of 2007 and that a clear decision be reached at that stage about how to proceed with the constitution. Although the report looked at the various options available to the Union , which could include abandoning the constitutional project altogether, restructuring and/or modifying the present text with the aim of improving it, or embarking upon a complete re-write, MEPs agreed that it was important not to pre-empt the outcome of the debate. They did say, however, that a "positive outcome of the period of reflection would be that the current text can be maintained", while admitting that this would only be possible if accompanied by "significant measures" to reassure and convince public opinion.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)0919
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)0584
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0027/2006
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE364.885
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0414/2005
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0414/2005
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE365.115
- Committee opinion: PE362.668
- Committee opinion: PE362.640
- Committee opinion: PE362.880
- Committee opinion: PE364.688
- Committee opinion: PE364.822
- Committee opinion: PE364.935
- Committee opinion: PE362.759
- Committee opinion: PE362.681
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1249/2005
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: OJ C 028 03.02.2006, p. 0042-0046
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1249/2005 OJ C 028 03.02.2006, p. 0042-0046
- Committee opinion: PE362.759
- Committee opinion: PE362.681
- Committee opinion: PE362.880
- Committee opinion: PE364.688
- Committee opinion: PE364.822
- Committee opinion: PE364.935
- Committee opinion: PE362.640
- Committee opinion: PE362.668
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE365.115
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE364.885
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0414/2005
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)0584
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)0919
Activities
- Manuel dos SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 The period of reflection: structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the EU
- 2016/11/22 The period of reflection: structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the EU
- 2016/11/22 The period of reflection: structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the EU
- Bernat JOAN i MARÍ
- Jo LEINEN
- Johannes VOGGENHUBER
- Bronisław GEREMEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francis WURTZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jens-Peter BONDE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jim ALLISTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edit BAUER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Irena BELOHORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bas BELDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria BERGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Josep BORRELL FONTELLES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elmar BROK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Marie CAVADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paolo COSTA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian CROWLEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc DEHAENE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Panayiotis DEMETRIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrew DUFF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria da Assunção ESTEVES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica FRASSONI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Genowefa GRABOWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ignasi GUARDANS CAMBÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Roger KNAPMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Stavros LAMBRINIDIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patrick LOUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jules MAATEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jan Tadeusz MASIEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pierre MOSCOVICI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pasqualina NAPOLETANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Reinhard RACK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Willem SCHUTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alexander STUBB
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hannes SWOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír ŽELEZNÝ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - par. 1 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 4 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - par. 23 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 8 #
NL | GB | FR | CZ | DK | SE | LV | CY | EE | MT | PL | LU | SI | IE | FI | LT | AT | BE | SK | PT | IT | EL | HU | ES | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
23
|
59
|
67
|
22
|
11
|
14
|
9
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
45
|
6
|
6
|
11
|
13
|
8
|
14
|
21
|
13
|
20
|
40
|
19
|
20
|
34
|
84
|
|
GUE/NGL |
27
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Czechia GUE/NGLFor (6) |
1
|
2
|
Italy GUE/NGL |
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (4)Against (1) |
||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
24
|
2
|
United Kingdom IND/DEM |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Poland IND/DEMFor (6) |
1
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||
NI |
24
|
3
|
France NI |
1
|
Poland NIFor (5)Against (2) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
|||||||||||||||||
UEN |
24
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
Italy UENAgainst (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
38
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (1) |
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (4)Against (1) |
France Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (4) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (12)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
65
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (1) |
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (4) |
France ALDEFor (1)Against (9) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Poland ALDE |
1
|
2
|
1
|
Finland ALDEFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (2) |
2
|
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (5) |
Italy ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||
PSE |
157
|
Netherlands PSEFor (5)Against (1)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (15) |
France PSEFor (26)Adeline HAZAN, André LAIGNEL, Anne FERREIRA, Benoît HAMON, Bernadette BOURZAI, Bernadette VERGNAUD, Bernard POIGNANT, Brigitte DOUAY, Catherine TRAUTMANN, Françoise CASTEX, Guy BONO, Harlem DÉSIR, Henri WEBER, Jean Louis COTTIGNY, Jean-Claude FRUTEAU, Kader ARIF, Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI, Marie-Line REYNAUD, Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN, Martine ROURE, Pervenche BERÈS, Pierre MOSCOVICI, Pierre SCHAPIRA, Stéphane LE FOLL, Vincent PEILLON, Yannick VAUGRENARD
Against (1) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
Poland PSEAgainst (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
Belgium PSEAgainst (5) |
3
|
Portugal PSEFor (2)Against (7) |
Italy PSEAgainst (9) |
Greece PSEAgainst (6) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (7) |
Spain PSEFor (1)Against (15)
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa DÍEZ GONZÁLEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Germany PSEFor (1)Against (18) |
||
PPE-DE |
212
|
Netherlands PPE-DE |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (17)Against (3) |
France PPE-DEAgainst (16) |
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Sweden PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (5)Abstain (1) |
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (9) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Hungary PPE-DEAgainst (12) |
Spain PPE-DEAgainst (16)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ,
Cristobal MONTORO ROMERO,
Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA,
Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
José Javier POMÉS RUIZ,
José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL,
Luis HERRERO-TEJEDOR,
Luisa Fernanda RUDI UBEDA,
Pilar AYUSO,
Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
|
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (43)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Alfred GOMOLKA,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Christoph KONRAD,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst POSDORF,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl von WOGAU,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Michael GAHLER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Roland GEWALT,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 27 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 10 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 26/1 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 26/2 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 2 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - cons. I,2 #
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - am. 3 #
CZ | GB | CY | SI | MT | FI | DK | EE | LU | SE | LV | LT | SK | IE | NL | PL | AT | BE | PT | EL | HU | IT | ES | FR | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
22
|
57
|
3
|
6
|
4
|
13
|
11
|
5
|
6
|
14
|
8
|
8
|
13
|
11
|
25
|
46
|
14
|
21
|
20
|
19
|
19
|
39
|
32
|
64
|
84
|
|
GUE/NGL |
27
|
Czechia GUE/NGLFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Italy GUE/NGL |
3
|
Germany GUE/NGLFor (4)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
24
|
1
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAbstain (6) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Poland IND/DEMFor (6) |
3
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||
UEN |
23
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
24
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Poland NIFor (1)Against (5)Abstain (1) |
1
|
3
|
2
|
France NIAbstain (5) |
|||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
38
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEFor (4)Against (1) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (2) |
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (13) |
||||||||||||
ALDE |
64
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (1)Against (7) |
1
|
2
|
Finland ALDEFor (3)Against (2) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
Poland ALDE |
1
|
Belgium ALDEAgainst (5) |
1
|
Italy ALDEAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
1
|
France ALDEFor (1)Against (9) |
3
|
|||||
PSE |
155
|
2
|
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (15) |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
Netherlands PSEFor (1)Against (6) |
Poland PSEAgainst (7) |
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
Belgium PSEAgainst (5) |
Portugal PSEAgainst (9) |
Greece PSEAgainst (6) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (7) |
Italy PSEAgainst (9) |
Spain PSEAgainst (15)
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa DÍEZ GONZÁLEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
France PSEAgainst (23)
André LAIGNEL,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Bernard POIGNANT,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Line REYNAUD,
Martine ROURE,
Michel ROCARD,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Stéphane LE FOLL,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
Abstain (1) |
Germany PSEAgainst (20) |
||
PPE-DE |
209
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (7)Against (5) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (18)Christopher HEATON-HARRIS, Den DOVER, Geoffrey VAN ORDEN, Giles CHICHESTER, James NICHOLSON, John BOWIS, Malcolm HARBOUR, Martin CALLANAN, Neil PARISH, Nirj DEVA, Philip BRADBOURN, Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS, Richard ASHWORTH, Robert STURDY, Struan STEVENSON, Syed KAMALL, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK, Timothy KIRKHOPE
Against (1) |
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
Sweden PPE-DEAgainst (5) |
3
|
2
|
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (1)Against (7) |
4
|
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
4
|
Belgium PPE-DEFor (1)Against (5) |
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (9) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (1)Against (10) |
Italy PPE-DEAgainst (7) |
Spain PPE-DEAgainst (15)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carlos ITURGAIZ,
Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ,
Cristobal MONTORO ROMERO,
Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA,
Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
José Javier POMÉS RUIZ,
José Manuel GARCÍA-MARGALLO Y MARFIL,
Luis HERRERO-TEJEDOR,
Luisa Fernanda RUDI UBEDA,
Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
|
France PPE-DEAgainst (16) |
Germany PPE-DEAgainst (42)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Alfred GOMOLKA,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Angelika NIEBLER,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christian EHLER,
Christoph KONRAD,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Elmar BROK,
Hans-Gert PÖTTERING,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst POSDORF,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Jürgen SCHRÖDER,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Michael GAHLER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Reimer BÖGE,
Renate SOMMER,
Roland GEWALT,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
Abstain (1) |
Rapport Duff/Voggenhuber A6-0414/2005 - résolution #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-362759_EN.html
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-362681_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-362880_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-364688_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-364822_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-364935_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-362640_EN.html
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-362668_EN.html
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-365115_EN.html
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-364885_EN.html
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4440&j=1&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4440&j=0&l=en |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4440&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4440&j=1&l=en |
docs/14 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1249)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1249)(documentyear:2005)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.681
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.759
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.880&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.688
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.822
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE364.935
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.640
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.668&secondRef=02
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0414_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0414_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060118&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060118&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.681&secondRef=03New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.681 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.759&secondRef=02New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE362.759 |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-414&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0414_EN.html |
docs/13/body |
EC
|
docs/14/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2005-414&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2005-0414_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-27New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0027_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFCO/6/29414New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European UnionNew
Period of reflection: structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|