Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | HOHLMEIER Monika ( PPE) | |
Former Responsible Committee | LIBE | KLAMT Ewa ( PPE-DE) | |
Former Committee Legal Basis Opinion | JURI | MEDINA ORTEGA Manuel ( PSE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 078-p2, TFEU 218-p6a
Legal Basis:
TFEU 078-p2, TFEU 218-p6aSubjects
Events
PURPOSE: to conclude a Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein allowing Liechtenstein to accede to the Agreement between the Community and Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (Dublin/EURODAC).
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision 2011/351/EC on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland.
BACKGROUND: following the authorisation given to the Commission on 27 February 2006, negotiations with the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein of a Protocol on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland, have been finalised. The protocol was signed on behalf of the European Community on 28 February 2008, subject to its final conclusion at a later date.
It is now necessary to approve the Protocol on behalf of the EU (which replaced the "European Community" following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009).
CONTENT: with this Decision, the Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland and the declarations annexed thereto are approved on behalf of the European Union.
To recall, on 26 October 2004, the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation regarding criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland) (see CNS/2004/0200 ). That Agreement anticipated Liechtenstein's possible association with Switzerland on the Dublin/Eurodac acquis.
The purpose of this Decision is to formally conclude this Agreement.
The final content of the Protocol can be summarised as follows:
Liechtenstein accedes to the Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland and will have to accept the entire Dublin/Eurodac acquis and the development thereof. If Liechtenstein does not accept future developments of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis, the Protocol will cease to operate. Liechtenstein will become a member of the Mixed Committee and will have the right to express its opinion within the Mixed Committee and to preside it. The putting into effect of the Dublin/Eurodac Protocol is linked to the putting into effect of the Schengen Protocol (see CNS/2006/0251 ), as well as to the putting into effect of the Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the participation of Denmark (see CNS/2006/0257 ) and of the Agreement between Liechtenstein and Norway and Iceland on Dublin/Eurodac. Specific provisions are laid down for Liechtenstein concerning the time period needed for the implementation of a development of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis, in case constitutional requirements need to be fulfilled by Liechtenstein (18 months) and the financial contribution that Liechtenstein, like Switzerland, has to pay for administrative and operating costs associated with the setting up and operation of the Eurodac central unit. For Liechtenstein, this amounts to 0.071% of the initial costs of EUR 11 675 000 and from budget year 2004 onwards to an annual contribution of 0.071% of the corresponding budgetary appropriations for the financial year in question. Consequently, there are no financial implications for the EU resulting from Liechtenstein's association with the Dublin/Eurodac acquis.
Territorial measures : according to relevant provisions of the Treaty, the United Kingdom and Ireland shall both participate in the adoption and implementation of this Decision. For its part, Denmark shall not participate in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by or subject to its application.
DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: the Decision shall enter into force on 7 March 2011. The Protocol shall enter into force on 1 April 2011.
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution in which its gives its consent to the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Union, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report drafted by Monika HOHLMEIER (EPP, DE) recommending the European Parliament to give its consent to the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Union, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the accession of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland.
By this Decision, the European Parliament has been once again been consulted on the proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland.
To recall, on 27 February 2006, negotiations with Liechtenstein and Switzerland on the conclusion on the protocol were finalised. In accordance with a Council Decision, the Protocol was signed on behalf of the European Union on 28 February 2008, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community.
It is therefore necessary to approve the protocol on behalf of the European Union on the basis of the new legal basis set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
A new provision has been included stipulating that as a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community and from that date exercises all rights and assumes all obligations of the European Community. Therefore, references to "the European Community" in the Protocol as well as in the Agreement are, where appropriate, to be understood as to "the European Union".
New territorial provisions have also been laid down.
The European Parliament’s consent is also required.
By this Decision, the European Parliament has been once again been consulted on the proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland.
To recall, on 27 February 2006, negotiations with Liechtenstein and Switzerland on the conclusion on the protocol were finalised. In accordance with a Council Decision, the Protocol was signed on behalf of the European Union on 28 February 2008, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
As a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community.
It is therefore necessary to approve the protocol on behalf of the European Union on the basis of the new legal basis set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
A new provision has been included stipulating that as a consequence of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, the European Union has replaced and succeeded the European Community and from that date exercises all rights and assumes all obligations of the European Community. Therefore, references to "the European Community" in the Protocol as well as in the Agreement are, where appropriate, to be understood as to "the European Union".
New territorial provisions have also been laid down.
The European Parliament’s consent is also required.
The European Parliament adopted, by 621 votes to 13 with 50 abstentions under the consultation procedure, a legislative resolution approving the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on implementing the Dublin Regulation in this country (establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland). The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Ewa KLAMT (EPP-ED, DE) on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.
Parliament adopted one amendment to the proposal, indicating that the agreement requires the assent, and not merely a consultation, of the European Parliament. Therefore, they amended the legal basis of the proposal and indicated that they reserve the right to defend the prerogatives as conferred by the Treaty to the European Parliament in this matter.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the consultation report by Ewa KLAMT (EPP-ED, DE) approving the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on implementing the Dublin Regulation in this country (establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland).
MEPs approved one single amendment to the proposal of a legal nature. They believe that this agreement requires the assent , and not merely a consultation , of the European Parliament. Therefore, they are amending the legal basis of the proposal and indicate that they reserve the right to defend the prerogatives as conferred by the Treaty to the European Parliament in this matter.
PURPOSE: to conclude a Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein allowing Liechtenstein to accede to the Agreement between the Community, Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (Dublin/EURODAC).
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
CONTENT: on 26 October 2004, the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation regarding criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland) (see CNS/2004/0200 ).
That Agreement anticipated Liechtenstein's possible association with the Dublin/Eurodac acquis and made provision in its Article 15 for Liechtenstein to accede to the Agreement by means of a protocol determining the rights and obligations of each of the contracting parties.
Following the authorisation given by the Council to the Commission in February 2006, negotiations were held with Liechtenstein and Switzerland and in June 2006 negotiations were finalised and the draft protocol on Liechtenstein's accession to the Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland was initialled.
This proposal aims to conclude the legal basis for the decision on the conclusion of the Protocol. The legal basis of this Protocol is Article 63(1)a, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
The final content of the Protocol can be summarised as follows:
§ Liechtenstein accedes to the Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland and will have to accept the entire Dublin/Eurodac acquis and the development thereof. If Liechtenstein does not accept future developments of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis, the Protocol will cease to operate;
§ Liechtenstein will become a member of the Mixed Committee and will have the right to express its opinion within the Mixed Committee and to preside it;
§ The putting into effect of the Dublin/Eurodac Protocol is linked to the putting into effect of the Schengen Protocol (see CNS/2006/0251 ), as well as to the putting into effect of the Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the participation of Denmark and of the Agreement between Liechtenstein and Norway and Iceland on Dublin/Eurodac (see CNS/2006/0257 );
§ Specific provisions are laid down for Liechtenstein concerning the time period needed for the implementation of a development of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis, in case constitutional requirements need to be fulfilled by Liechtenstein (18 months) and the financial contribution that Liechtenstein, like Switzerland, has to pay for administrative and operating costs associated with the setting up and operation of the Eurodac central unit. For Liechtenstein , this amounts to 0.071% of the initial costs of EUR 11 675 000 and from budget year 2004 onwards to an annual contribution of 0.071% of the corresponding budgetary appropriations for the financial year in question. Consequently, there are no financial implications for the EU resulting from Liechtenstein's association with the Dublin/Eurodac acquis.
PURPOSE: to conclude a Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein allowing Liechtenstein to accede to the Agreement between the Community, Switzerland concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (Dublin/EURODAC).
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
CONTENT: on 26 October 2004, the European Community signed an Agreement with the Swiss Confederation regarding criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland (Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland) (see CNS/2004/0200 ).
That Agreement anticipated Liechtenstein's possible association with the Dublin/Eurodac acquis and made provision in its Article 15 for Liechtenstein to accede to the Agreement by means of a protocol determining the rights and obligations of each of the contracting parties.
Following the authorisation given by the Council to the Commission in February 2006, negotiations were held with Liechtenstein and Switzerland and in June 2006 negotiations were finalised and the draft protocol on Liechtenstein's accession to the Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland was initialled.
This proposal aims to conclude the legal basis for the decision on the conclusion of the Protocol. The legal basis of this Protocol is Article 63(1)a, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
The final content of the Protocol can be summarised as follows:
§ Liechtenstein accedes to the Dublin/Eurodac agreement with Switzerland and will have to accept the entire Dublin/Eurodac acquis and the development thereof. If Liechtenstein does not accept future developments of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis, the Protocol will cease to operate;
§ Liechtenstein will become a member of the Mixed Committee and will have the right to express its opinion within the Mixed Committee and to preside it;
§ The putting into effect of the Dublin/Eurodac Protocol is linked to the putting into effect of the Schengen Protocol (see CNS/2006/0251 ), as well as to the putting into effect of the Protocol between the European Community, Switzerland and Liechtenstein on the participation of Denmark and of the Agreement between Liechtenstein and Norway and Iceland on Dublin/Eurodac (see CNS/2006/0257 );
§ Specific provisions are laid down for Liechtenstein concerning the time period needed for the implementation of a development of the Dublin/Eurodac acquis, in case constitutional requirements need to be fulfilled by Liechtenstein (18 months) and the financial contribution that Liechtenstein, like Switzerland, has to pay for administrative and operating costs associated with the setting up and operation of the Eurodac central unit. For Liechtenstein , this amounts to 0.071% of the initial costs of EUR 11 675 000 and from budget year 2004 onwards to an annual contribution of 0.071% of the corresponding budgetary appropriations for the financial year in question. Consequently, there are no financial implications for the EU resulting from Liechtenstein's association with the Dublin/Eurodac acquis.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2011/351
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 160 18.06.2011, p. 0037
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0048/2011
- Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation: A7-0013/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation: A7-0013/2011
- Committee draft report: PE452.676
- Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation: 06242/2010
- Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published: 06242/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4891
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0322/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0247/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0247/2008
- Committee draft report: PE404.818
- Committee opinion: PE390.621
- Legislative proposal: COM(2006)0754
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2006)0754
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2006)0754 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE390.621
- Committee draft report: PE404.818
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0247/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4891
- Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation: 06242/2010
- Committee draft report: PE452.676
- Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation: A7-0013/2011
Votes
Rapport Klamt A6-0247/2008 - résolution #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-390621_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6/date |
Old
2010-04-26T00:00:00New
2010-04-25T00:00:00 |
events/8 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/9/date |
Old
2011-02-01T00:00:00New
2011-01-31T00:00:00 |
committees/2 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.621
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.818New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.818 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0247_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0247_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE452.676New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE452.676 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0013_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0013_EN.html |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0247_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0247_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/7/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0013_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0013_EN.html |
events/10 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.621&secondRef=01New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.621 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-247&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0247_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-13&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0013_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0754/COM_COM(2006)0754_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0754/COM_COM(2006)0754_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-247&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0247_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-322New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0322_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-13&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0013_EN.html |
events/9 |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-48New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0048_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/6/43492;LIBE/7/03066New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0351New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011D0351 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DecisionNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|