Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | EMPL | PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU Marie ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | SARTORI Amalia ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | INTA | DÉSIR Harlem ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | AFET |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
This report on the EU contribution to the promotion of decent work in the world backs up the Commission’s commitment to promote the internationally-agreed decent work agenda through cooperation with the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and other partners, and the mobilisation of all relevant policies. It highlights ongoing efforts and challenges in mobilising the EU’s internal and external policies and all relevant stakeholders to promote decent work for all – by supporting the setting of policy agendas and standards at multilateral level, developing bilateral relations and exchange on these issues with partner countries and regions, as well as integrating decent work objectives into the EU’s trade and development policies.
The report also underlines that the EU Member States can set an example by ratifying and applying up-to-date conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO).
The EU contribution to decent work throughout the world is part of its efforts to strengthen the social dimension of globalisation, both in the EU and outside, and builds on existing EU initiatives in this regard. It is driven by mutually reinforcing economic, employment, social and environmental policies, in line with the internal and external dimensions of the EU Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs and the 2005 European Consensus on Development.
In particular, the report addresses the following elements:
decent work as an EU commitment; the mobilisation of non-state actors; the EU contribution at international, multilateral and regional level; the mobilisation of EU internal and external policies; the ratification and implementation of ILO conventions by EU Member States.
It contains an assessment of progress made since 2006 as well as proposals where further headway could can be made as part of the strategies outlined in the 2006 Communication on "Decent Work", taking into account new developments. The report proposes reviewing progress made at EU level and by the Member States in a report to be prepared in 2011.
The report concludes that the overview of progress made since 2006 clearly demonstrates that a number of important achievements have been made in both internal and external EU policies . The EU actively contributed to international, regional and national initiatives, with a view to move from words to action. The added value of the EU contribution and the leadership of the Commission in this have been widely recognised and appreciated. The mobilisation of EU institutions, EU Member States and stakeholders is on track. There is consensus, both in the EU and internationally, that decent work is a factor in development, governance and performance and that its implementation calls for sustained, coherent and integrated policies and close involvement of social partners and wider civil society.
The international campaign for a worldwide ratification of the eight core labour standards (CLS) Conventions has contributed to a significant increase in the global ratification level. All 27 EU have ratified the CLS Conventions since 2007. The EU's GSP plus scheme has for instance contributed to these efforts in a number of third countries. Ratification of other ILO conventions, classified by ILO as up to date, is also improving. Decent work instruments, tools and programmes are being elaborated and implemented. The objective of decent work for all is now part of mainstream international development goals and frameworks and poverty reduction strategies. Promoting decent work is part of EU development and external assistance cooperation, of a number of EU partnership agreements and cooperation with third countries and regions and of ongoing discussions on EU bilateral trade agreements with third countries. Decent work is an element of the internal and external dimension of the EU Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs.
However many challenges lie ahead as:
recognition of decent work as part of key international development goals and national poverty reduction strategies is a recent evolution; therefore the effective implementation of decent work in development policies and poverty reduction strategies, programmes and frameworks is often still at an embryonic phase in many developing countries and in many donor operations; decent work operates in an increasingly complex international context such as the intensification of globalisation and its relationship with issues such as climate change, trade and higher food prices; all this provides both opportunities such as the employment potential of climate change, as illustrated by the ILO green jobs strategy discussion, and challenges such as labour market transitions to a low carbon economy; decent work as a factor of governance directly relates to the persisting deficits in effective global governance and in labour market governance at national and regional level. This is illustrated by the lack of effective application of ILO Conventions, including CLS, in too many countries and the existence of a large informal economy in most of the developing and emerging economies.
The proposals on "further progress to make" as included in the different sections of this report are intended to improve further the effective implementation of the orientations and strategies made in the 2006 decent work Communication.
All EU institutions have been called upon to ensure an effective and regular follow-up and coordination of the initiatives and actions to promote decent work both by the EU institutions, the EU Member states and stakeholders. As a response to this call, and in view to strengthening synergies and cooperation, it would be appropriate that the EU reports in 2011 on efforts, both by EU institutions, Member States and stakeholders, on promoting decent work throughout the world.
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Marie PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU (EPP-ED, EL) on promoting decent work for all. The report urged EU Member States and candidate countries to ratify and fully implement all relevant conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and called for a decent work development programme and minimum wages. (Please refer to the summary dated 01/03/2007).
Considering that decent work is a centrepiece of the fight against poverty and social exclusion, (§1) MEPs asked the Commission to enforce its proposed strategy for better mobilisation of the EU internal and external policies on the promotion of the decent work agenda, especially in matters of development, external assistance, enlargement, neighbourhood policy, trade and migration ( § 6). The report urged the Council and the Commission to work actively with ILO in ensuring that the terms of the agreements GSP+ are fully complied with and, where necessary, using the powers at its disposal to cancel preferences with any countries failing to respect fundamental social, labour and human rights (§ 8). Moreover the report stressed the need to improve the transparency of labour market, so that all kind of work (temporary, permanent, full-time, and that which is paid on an hourly basis) are official, decently paid, and fully respectful of workers' rights, core labour standards, social gender and gender equality (§ 15).
The committee, convinced that the implementation of the ILO conventions related to decent work should be promoted in the neighbourhood and external policies, called the Commission and the Member States to support the ILO in strengthening its supervisory system and mechanisms (§ 17). In this respect, MEPs asked the Commission to encourage the respect of the ILO Core Labour Standards and the objective of decent work in the trade policy of the WTO members as an effective and binding set of rules, complemented by a mechanism of sanctions for partners which do not adjust to such standards (§ 21). Among its other recommendations, the committee called for granting the observer status at the WTO to ILO as well as for compliance of WTO with ILO's decisions about trade sanctions against countries failing to comply with international conventions social (§ 24 and 26).
Furthermore the report recommended the Commission to investigate and identify companies which continuously and persistently permit the violation of core labour standards in any part of production and supply chain and called for such a list to be made available to EU-based importers (46). MEPs also urged the Member States and the EU to promote the application of good practices of corporate responsibility by all companies, wherever they perform their activities, with the aim of creating a safe, flexible and high-quality working environment (48).
The report called on the Member States to increase the number and quality of the competencies and tools of the labour inspectorate so as to enforce the safety and health at work, working conditions and other social legislation (62) as well as to allocate more resources in order to enable the labour inspectorates to carry out their tasks to ensure that national labour laws are applied and not evaded (63). Lastly, MEPs asked the Commission and the Member States to improve measures to allow all workers to achieve a better balance between work and family life, bearing in mind that long hours, stress and insecurity of employment threaten the fabric of family life (73).
Regarding the Communication of the Commission "Promoting decent work for all - the EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world", the Council published a series of conclusions in which it gave its opinion of the Communication, and, at the same time, its interpretation of “decent work” in the framework of Community policy.
The conclusions may be summarised as follows :
Decent work in the EU : the Council felt that decent work must be promoted in order to strengthen the competitiveness of the EU in a socially sustainable way, to improve productivity and the quality of working life, life-long learning, good working relations as well as better reconciliation of work and private life. The policy must be implemented through combating gender discrimination and all other forms of discrimination in the light of Article 13 (TEC), as well as promoting the social integration of vulnerable groups. EU Member States have ratified a large number of ILO Conventions, including the Conventions on core labour standards. The Council emphasised the relevance of the Decent Work Agenda for EU candidate countries and the complementarity of certain ILO Conventions and strategies with the Community acquis. It also welcomed the Commission's commitment in its Communication on decent work to encouraging the ratification and application of the ILO Conventions on core labour standards, and other ILO Conventions that have been classified by the ILO as up to date.
Decent work and development cooperation : the Council indicated that the promotion of decent work for all across the world is one of the key means of fostering development, poverty eradication and social cohesion. Recalling the European Consensus on Development, it encouraged governments in partner countries to increase their efforts to create an enabling environment for private sector development and investment, the benefits of which include increased investments and employment for the population. The Council recognised in particular the need to promote country-led Decent Work Country Programmes through development cooperation – including policy dialogue on employment impacts of economic policies and governance, budget support measures and capacity building, in particular institutional capacity building. This must be well-coordinated between the European Commission, the Member States and other international development partners, as well as the international financial institutions. All those submitting tenders for EC external assistance funded contracts should respect core labour standards. This obligation should be extended to contracts financed in the framework of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement.
Decent work and trade related issues : the Council stressed that trade liberalisation plays an important role in helping to achieve sustainable growth, full employment, poverty reduction and the promotion of decent work. Highlighting the key role of the EU Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) in the promotion of international conventions on core labour standards and human rights, it welcomed the new GSP with its special incentive for sustainable development and good governance, and supported the improvement of the link between GSP and EC external assistance. There needs to be further development of methodologies assessing the effects of trade and trade agreements on decent work, including in global supply chains and export processing zones. The Council recalled that the endorsement of social objectives should not be used for protectionist purposes, since the objective is to achieve social progress across the board and to ensure that it is spread fairly for the benefit of all.
Cooperation with UN and ILO and other relevant actors : the Council supported the ILO initiative on Decent Work Country Programmes, and felt that the EU should encourage the worldwide ratification and implementation of the ILO Conventions, on core labour standards and other Conventions that have been classified by the ILO as up to date, through technical cooperation and through support for the strengthening of the ILO supervisory mechanism. The EU should take the findings of the ILO supervisory mechanism into account more systematically in its own international relations.
Follow-up : the Council highlighted the importance of an effective and regular follow-up and coordination of the initiatives and actions to promote decent work for all, and welcomed the Commission's intention to produce a follow-up report to its Communication on decent work by the summer of 2008.
PURPOSE: Communication on the EU’s contribution to promoting the decent work agenda.
CONTENT: This paper follows the ILO’s strategy on the decent work agenda. The agenda is based on an integrated approach covering productive and freely chosen work, rights at work, social protection, the social dialogue and the inclusion of the gender dimension. It therefore encompasses the “core labour standards” which form the minimum basis of social rights established by the international community and whose implementation the Union already supports. But the decent work agenda implies more: it seeks not only to guarantee a minimum basis of rights but also to tailor development to values and principles of action and governance which combine economic competitiveness with social justice.
Combining economic competitiveness and social justice in this way is at the heart of the European model of development. Playing an active part in promoting decent work forms an integral part of the European Social Agenda and of the EU's efforts to promote its values and share its experience and its model of integrated economic and social development. In supporting the promotion of the decent work agenda the Commission takes the characteristics and diverse nature of the economic and social situations across the world fully into account. It recognises the importance of a step-by-step strategy which will help partner countries to take ownership and is geared to the circumstances and priorities at national and regional level.
In this Communication, the Commission proposes strategies for ensuring that EU policy and action play a greater part in promoting the decent work agenda. These strategies involve strengthening cooperation between the European institutions, the Member States and all the relevant stakeholders. The EU could promote the agenda by sharing its experience with international organisations and developing a political dialogue with regions and countries outside the EU. The Commission has already introduced specific measures in this area, such as stepping up its cooperation with the ILO, implementing the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), developing the European consensus on development and initiating
dialogues on employment with the countries in Asia and Latin America. The Commission proposes the following:
- raising awareness in order to convince and mobilise more effectively: t he Commission will work with the ILO, the UN and other organisations to explore in greater depth the problem of decent work, improve the capacity of the partner countries and develop appropriate indicators, i.e.:
- identify good practice and successes in the field;
- examine decent work in greater depth and the way in which it interacts with other policies;
- develop methodologies for measuring how decent work is affected by trade liberalisation and global production and distribution systems at global level, including in export processing zones; expand the pilot study under way with the ILO in order to measure the impact of trade on decent work;
- examine in greater depth the impact of trade on sustainable development (SIA);
- improve the link between analyses, operational activities and the planning of external assistance;
- promote a concerted approach between partner countries and regions in order to select priorities more effectively and harness external assistance.
- harnessing the EU’s external policies more effectively: with regard to candidate countries, the Commission will support initiatives on:
- promoting trade union freedom and collective bargaining in order to enhance the capacity of the parties concerned to engage in autonomous social dialogue;
- improving labour administration, labour inspectorates and bodies for managing social protection;
- developing prevention strategies in the field of health and safety at work.
With regard to those countries covered by the European neighbourhood policy, the policy will help to promote decent work through:
- implementation of clear reforms concerning core labour standards, employment, social affairs and equal opportunities set out in the action plans agreed between the EU and the countries concerned;
- regular political dialogue concerning issues relating to the institutional structures established as a result of the partnership and cooperation agreements and the association agreements;
- implementation of the five-year work plan agreed as part of the Barcelona process which seeks to strengthen systems of social protection in the southern Mediterranean countries;
– inclusion of thematic planning and other aspects of cooperation in the strategy documents for each country and region; possible involvement of the countries concerned in certain Community programmes and cooperation with EU agencies, in accordance with arrangements which are still to be determined.
With regard to development cooperation, the Commission will support the following measures as part of thematic programming and the country and regional programming:
- integrate decent work into national and regional strategies to promote development and reduce poverty;
- gradual inclusion of the decent work objective in budget support measures;
- improve the capacity of the competent authorities and civil society organisations;
-development of small and medium-sized enterprises;
- involvement of the social partners and civil society in development strategies and in poverty reduction strategies;
- strengthening of external assistance for social adjustments in countries and regions outside the EU which are involved in trade liberalisation;
- promotion of policy coherence and cooperation with relevant international and regional organisations.
In addition, Regulation 2110/2005/EC imposes an obligation on those submitting tenders for contracts financed by Community assistance to respect core labour standards. The Commission plans to extend this provision to contracts financed through the European Development Fund. The Commission calls on the Member States and other donors to adopt the same approach.
Trade: t he Commission will put more of its commercial weight behind efforts to promote social standards and decent work in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations. In particular, it plans to:
- improve the link between the GSP, the GSP + and Community external assistance;
- take account of the social dimension, decent work and the recommendations of SIA studies in bilateral and regional trade negotiations (including the APE/EPA, the ACP countries, Mercosur, the Gulf Cooperation Council, MED and Central America);
- make use of EU policies and instruments, such as external assistance, to promote decent work in the context of an open system of trade;
- adopt the approach concerning the interaction between trade, social rights and employment which was presented in 2004 in the submissions to the trade policy review mechanism, and encourage other members of the WTO to adopt this approach;
- promote cooperation between the WTO, UNCTAD, the ILO and other relevant organisations.
The Commission also discusses in this paper the need to strengthen international and multilateral governance as part of economic and social cooperation, the need for better management of economic migration, and strengthening the capacity of the social partners and of civil society. It states that it will continue to promote corporate social responsibility, and called on businesses, the European Alliance for CSR and other stakeholders to take action to promote decent work for all.
The Commission will produce a report on the follow-up to this Communication by the summer of 2008.
PURPOSE: Communication on the EU’s contribution to promoting the decent work agenda.
CONTENT: This paper follows the ILO’s strategy on the decent work agenda. The agenda is based on an integrated approach covering productive and freely chosen work, rights at work, social protection, the social dialogue and the inclusion of the gender dimension. It therefore encompasses the “core labour standards” which form the minimum basis of social rights established by the international community and whose implementation the Union already supports. But the decent work agenda implies more: it seeks not only to guarantee a minimum basis of rights but also to tailor development to values and principles of action and governance which combine economic competitiveness with social justice.
Combining economic competitiveness and social justice in this way is at the heart of the European model of development. Playing an active part in promoting decent work forms an integral part of the European Social Agenda and of the EU's efforts to promote its values and share its experience and its model of integrated economic and social development. In supporting the promotion of the decent work agenda the Commission takes the characteristics and diverse nature of the economic and social situations across the world fully into account. It recognises the importance of a step-by-step strategy which will help partner countries to take ownership and is geared to the circumstances and priorities at national and regional level.
In this Communication, the Commission proposes strategies for ensuring that EU policy and action play a greater part in promoting the decent work agenda. These strategies involve strengthening cooperation between the European institutions, the Member States and all the relevant stakeholders. The EU could promote the agenda by sharing its experience with international organisations and developing a political dialogue with regions and countries outside the EU. The Commission has already introduced specific measures in this area, such as stepping up its cooperation with the ILO, implementing the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), developing the European consensus on development and initiating
dialogues on employment with the countries in Asia and Latin America. The Commission proposes the following:
- raising awareness in order to convince and mobilise more effectively: t he Commission will work with the ILO, the UN and other organisations to explore in greater depth the problem of decent work, improve the capacity of the partner countries and develop appropriate indicators, i.e.:
- identify good practice and successes in the field;
- examine decent work in greater depth and the way in which it interacts with other policies;
- develop methodologies for measuring how decent work is affected by trade liberalisation and global production and distribution systems at global level, including in export processing zones; expand the pilot study under way with the ILO in order to measure the impact of trade on decent work;
- examine in greater depth the impact of trade on sustainable development (SIA);
- improve the link between analyses, operational activities and the planning of external assistance;
- promote a concerted approach between partner countries and regions in order to select priorities more effectively and harness external assistance.
- harnessing the EU’s external policies more effectively: with regard to candidate countries, the Commission will support initiatives on:
- promoting trade union freedom and collective bargaining in order to enhance the capacity of the parties concerned to engage in autonomous social dialogue;
- improving labour administration, labour inspectorates and bodies for managing social protection;
- developing prevention strategies in the field of health and safety at work.
With regard to those countries covered by the European neighbourhood policy, the policy will help to promote decent work through:
- implementation of clear reforms concerning core labour standards, employment, social affairs and equal opportunities set out in the action plans agreed between the EU and the countries concerned;
- regular political dialogue concerning issues relating to the institutional structures established as a result of the partnership and cooperation agreements and the association agreements;
- implementation of the five-year work plan agreed as part of the Barcelona process which seeks to strengthen systems of social protection in the southern Mediterranean countries;
– inclusion of thematic planning and other aspects of cooperation in the strategy documents for each country and region; possible involvement of the countries concerned in certain Community programmes and cooperation with EU agencies, in accordance with arrangements which are still to be determined.
With regard to development cooperation, the Commission will support the following measures as part of thematic programming and the country and regional programming:
- integrate decent work into national and regional strategies to promote development and reduce poverty;
- gradual inclusion of the decent work objective in budget support measures;
- improve the capacity of the competent authorities and civil society organisations;
-development of small and medium-sized enterprises;
- involvement of the social partners and civil society in development strategies and in poverty reduction strategies;
- strengthening of external assistance for social adjustments in countries and regions outside the EU which are involved in trade liberalisation;
- promotion of policy coherence and cooperation with relevant international and regional organisations.
In addition, Regulation 2110/2005/EC imposes an obligation on those submitting tenders for contracts financed by Community assistance to respect core labour standards. The Commission plans to extend this provision to contracts financed through the European Development Fund. The Commission calls on the Member States and other donors to adopt the same approach.
Trade: t he Commission will put more of its commercial weight behind efforts to promote social standards and decent work in bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations. In particular, it plans to:
- improve the link between the GSP, the GSP + and Community external assistance;
- take account of the social dimension, decent work and the recommendations of SIA studies in bilateral and regional trade negotiations (including the APE/EPA, the ACP countries, Mercosur, the Gulf Cooperation Council, MED and Central America);
- make use of EU policies and instruments, such as external assistance, to promote decent work in the context of an open system of trade;
- adopt the approach concerning the interaction between trade, social rights and employment which was presented in 2004 in the submissions to the trade policy review mechanism, and encourage other members of the WTO to adopt this approach;
- promote cooperation between the WTO, UNCTAD, the ILO and other relevant organisations.
The Commission also discusses in this paper the need to strengthen international and multilateral governance as part of economic and social cooperation, the need for better management of economic migration, and strengthening the capacity of the social partners and of civil society. It states that it will continue to promote corporate social responsibility, and called on businesses, the European Alliance for CSR and other stakeholders to take action to promote decent work for all.
The Commission will produce a report on the follow-up to this Communication by the summer of 2008.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SEC(2008)2184
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)3608/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)3179
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0206/2007
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0068/2007
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0068/2007
- Committee opinion: PE382.574
- Committee opinion: PE382.365
- Committee opinion: PE378.752
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE378.732
- Committee draft report: PE378.731
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2006)0249
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2006)0249
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2006)0249 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE378.731
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE378.732
- Committee opinion: PE378.752
- Committee opinion: PE382.365
- Committee opinion: PE382.574
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0068/2007
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)3179
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)3608/2
- Follow-up document: SEC(2008)2184 EUR-Lex
Activities
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (6)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan ANDERSSON
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luís QUEIRÓ
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inger SEGELSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jim ALLISTER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Françoise CASTEX
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Derek Roland CLARK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Glyn FORD
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hélène GOUDIN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean-Claude MARTINEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luisa MORGANTINI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alyn SMITH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alessandro BATTILOCCHIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Danutė BUDREIKAITĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ole CHRISTENSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Harlem DÉSIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Brigitte DOUAY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gyula HEGYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Stephen HUGHES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Richard HOWITT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios KARATZAFERIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Timothy KIRKHOPE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Magda KÓSÁNÉ KOVÁCS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Sepp KUSSTATSCHER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Carl LANG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jean LAMBERT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Diamanto MANOLAKOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Marie PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Ona RAINYTÉ-BODARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- José RIBEIRO E CASTRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Esko SEPPÄNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- José Albino SILVA PENEDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Kathy SINNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Marek SIWIEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Peter SKINNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Cristian STĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Ivo STREJČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Margie SUDRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andrzej Jan SZEJNA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jeffrey TITFORD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Feleknas UCA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
- Anne VAN LANCKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Decent work (debate)
Votes
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - am. 1 #
CY | IE | LU | EL | MT | FI | SI | EE | DK | LV | BG | LT | SK | BE | CZ | AT | SE | PT | NL | HU | RO | IT | FR | ES | PL | DE | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
4
|
3
|
3
|
17
|
4
|
9
|
5
|
6
|
11
|
7
|
10
|
11
|
11
|
16
|
20
|
15
|
15
|
20
|
27
|
19
|
32
|
42
|
58
|
36
|
46
|
77
|
54
|
|
Verts/ALE |
30
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
2
|
France Verts/ALEFor (5) |
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (10) |
3
|
||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
27
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (1) |
||||||||||||||||
ITS |
12
|
1
|
5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
5
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
18
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (7) |
||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
26
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Italy UEN |
Poland UENFor (1)Against (13)Abstain (1) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
ALDE |
71
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Lithuania ALDEAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Romania ALDEFor (1)Against (6) |
Italy ALDEAgainst (7) |
France ALDEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Poland ALDEAgainst (4) |
3
|
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (10)Abstain (1) |
||||||
PSE |
175
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
Bulgaria PSE |
2
|
3
|
Belgium PSEAgainst (7) |
1
|
Austria PSEAgainst (7) |
5
|
Portugal PSEFor (1)Against (10) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (7) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (7) |
Romania PSEAgainst (11) |
Italy PSEFor (2)Against (8) |
France PSEAgainst (25)
Adeline HAZAN,
André LAIGNEL,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Bernard POIGNANT,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Béatrice PATRIE,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Gilles SAVARY,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Robert NAVARRO,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Spain PSEAgainst (17)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Enrique BARÓN CRESPO,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Josep BORRELL FONTELLES,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa DÍEZ GONZÁLEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Poland PSEAgainst (8) |
Germany PSEAgainst (18) |
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (18) |
|||
PPE-DE |
214
|
1
|
2
|
Greece PPE-DEFor (1)Against (9)Abstain (1) |
2
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
Slovakia PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
Czechia PPE-DEAgainst (13) |
Austria PPE-DEAgainst (6) |
3
|
Portugal PPE-DEAgainst (7) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (1)Against (6) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (1)Against (9) |
Romania PPE-DEAgainst (8) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (3)Against (11) |
France PPE-DEFor (1)Against (14) |
Spain PPE-DEAgainst (16)
Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA,
Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS,
Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE,
Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ,
Cristobal MONTORO ROMERO,
Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA,
Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA,
Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN,
Francisco José MILLÁN MON,
Gerardo GALEOTE,
José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA,
José Javier POMÉS RUIZ,
Luis HERRERO-TEJEDOR,
Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL,
Pilar AYUSO,
Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
|
Poland PPE-DEAgainst (15) |
Germany PPE-DEFor (1)Against (39)
Albert DESS,
Alexander RADWAN,
Alfred GOMOLKA,
Andreas SCHWAB,
Anja WEISGERBER,
Bernd POSSELT,
Christa KLASS,
Christoph KONRAD,
Daniel CASPARY,
Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH,
Doris PACK,
Elisabeth JEGGLE,
Georg JARZEMBOWSKI,
Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL,
Hans-Peter MAYER,
Hartmut NASSAUER,
Herbert REUL,
Horst POSDORF,
Horst SCHNELLHARDT,
Ingeborg GRÄSSLE,
Ingo FRIEDRICH,
Karl-Heinz FLORENZ,
Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT,
Klaus-Heiner LEHNE,
Kurt LECHNER,
Lutz GOEPEL,
Manfred WEBER,
Markus FERBER,
Markus PIEPER,
Michael GAHLER,
Peter LIESE,
Rainer WIELAND,
Renate SOMMER,
Roland GEWALT,
Rolf BEREND,
Ruth HIERONYMI,
Thomas MANN,
Thomas ULMER,
Werner LANGEN
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEAgainst (15) |
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - ams. 11+19 #
PL | GB | CZ | LT | HU | IT | SK | LV | EL | DE | SI | IE | FI | LU | SE | MT | BG | CY | EE | RO | ES | DK | AT | BE | NL | PT | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
46
|
60
|
21
|
12
|
20
|
49
|
12
|
8
|
16
|
81
|
6
|
4
|
12
|
6
|
15
|
3
|
12
|
4
|
6
|
31
|
37
|
14
|
17
|
21
|
26
|
22
|
64
|
|
PPE-DE |
231
|
Poland PPE-DEFor (14)Against (1) |
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (19)Caroline JACKSON, Christopher BEAZLEY, Daniel HANNAN, Den DOVER, Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT, Giles CHICHESTER, James ELLES, James NICHOLSON, John BOWIS, John PURVIS, Malcolm HARBOUR, Martin CALLANAN, Neil PARISH, Philip BUSHILL-MATTHEWS, Sir Robert ATKINS, Struan STEVENSON, Syed KAMALL, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK, Timothy KIRKHOPE
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (13) |
1
|
Hungary PPE-DEFor (12) |
Italy PPE-DEFor (15)Against (1) |
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (8) |
3
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (39)Alexander RADWAN, Alfred GOMOLKA, Andreas SCHWAB, Anja WEISGERBER, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Georg JARZEMBOWSKI, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst POSDORF, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jürgen SCHRÖDER, Karl von WOGAU, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Roland GEWALT, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
Against (2) |
3
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
Sweden PPE-DE |
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Spain PPE-DEFor (16)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Cristina GUTIÉRREZ-CORTINES, Cristobal MONTORO ROMERO, Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Gerardo GALEOTE, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, José Javier POMÉS RUIZ, Luis HERRERO-TEJEDOR, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
|
1
|
Austria PPE-DE |
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (2) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (7) |
Portugal PPE-DEFor (7)Against (1) |
France PPE-DEFor (16) |
||
ALDE |
83
|
Poland ALDE |
United Kingdom ALDEFor (12) |
Lithuania ALDEFor (7) |
2
|
Italy ALDEFor (8)Against (1) |
1
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (1) |
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
Romania ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
Netherlands ALDEAgainst (2) |
France ALDEFor (5) |
|||||
UEN |
26
|
Poland UENFor (13)Against (1) |
2
|
Italy UENAgainst (1) |
3
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
19
|
3
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMFor (6) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
6
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ITS |
16
|
1
|
Romania ITSAgainst (5) |
1
|
2
|
France ITSFor (1)Against (6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
32
|
Czechia GUE/NGLFor (1)Against (4) |
Italy GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
36
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (4)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (10) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAgainst (2)Abstain (1) |
France Verts/ALEAgainst (6) |
||||||||||||||
PSE |
176
|
Poland PSEAgainst (7)Abstain (1) |
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (18) |
1
|
2
|
Hungary PSEAgainst (6) |
Italy PSEAgainst (10) |
3
|
2
|
Germany PSEAgainst (19) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
Bulgaria PSEAgainst (5) |
3
|
Romania PSEAgainst (11) |
Spain PSEAgainst (17)
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Bárbara DÜHRKOP DÜHRKOP,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Enrique BARÓN CRESPO,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Josep BORRELL FONTELLES,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa DÍEZ GONZÁLEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
Denmark PSEAgainst (5) |
Austria PSEAgainst (7) |
Belgium PSEAgainst (7) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (7) |
Portugal PSEAgainst (11) |
France PSEAgainst (25)
Adeline HAZAN,
André LAIGNEL,
Anne FERREIRA,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Bernard POIGNANT,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Béatrice PATRIE,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Gilles SAVARY,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Robert NAVARRO,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
|
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - am. 21 #
GB | LT | CZ | SK | DE | PL | HU | RO | EL | LV | SI | FI | LU | SE | ES | EE | BG | CY | MT | IE | IT | BE | NL | PT | AT | DK | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
57
|
12
|
20
|
10
|
81
|
45
|
22
|
31
|
17
|
8
|
6
|
12
|
6
|
17
|
37
|
5
|
12
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
47
|
20
|
27
|
20
|
15
|
12
|
63
|
|
PPE-DE |
227
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (17) |
1
|
Czechia PPE-DEFor (12) |
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (8) |
Germany PPE-DEFor (40)Alexander RADWAN, Alfred GOMOLKA, Andreas SCHWAB, Anja WEISGERBER, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Ewa KLAMT, Georg JARZEMBOWSKI, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst POSDORF, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Ingo FRIEDRICH, Jürgen SCHRÖDER, Karl von WOGAU, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Klaus-Heiner LEHNE, Kurt LECHNER, Lutz GOEPEL, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Roland GEWALT, Rolf BEREND, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
Hungary PPE-DEFor (12) |
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
Sweden PPE-DE |
Spain PPE-DEFor (17)Agustín DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA, Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS, Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE, Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ, Cristobal MONTORO ROMERO, Daniel VARELA SUANZES-CARPEGNA, Esther HERRANZ GARCÍA, Fernando FERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN, Francisco José MILLÁN MON, Gerardo GALEOTE, José Ignacio SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA, José Javier POMÉS RUIZ, Luis HERRERO-TEJEDOR, Luis de GRANDES PASCUAL, Pilar AYUSO, Pilar DEL CASTILLO VERA, Íñigo MÉNDEZ DE VIGO
Against (1) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
Belgium PPE-DEAgainst (2) |
Netherlands PPE-DEFor (7) |
Portugal PPE-DEFor (8) |
Austria PPE-DE |
1
|
France PPE-DEFor (14)Against (2) |
||||
ALDE |
82
|
United Kingdom ALDEFor (11) |
Lithuania ALDEFor (7) |
Germany ALDEFor (4) |
Poland ALDEFor (5) |
2
|
Romania ALDEFor (7) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
Italy ALDEFor (7)Against (1) |
4
|
Netherlands ALDE |
1
|
3
|
France ALDEFor (6) |
|||||
IND/DEM |
19
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMFor (7) |
1
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
NI |
5
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
UEN |
26
|
2
|
Poland UENFor (2)Against (12) |
3
|
1
|
Italy UENAgainst (5) |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
ITS |
16
|
Romania ITSFor (1)Against (5) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
France ITSAgainst (6)Abstain (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
31
|
Czechia GUE/NGLAgainst (5) |
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
Italy GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
39
|
United Kingdom Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (11) |
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Netherlands Verts/ALEAbstain (1) |
2
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEFor (1)Against (5) |
||||||||||||||
PSE |
169
|
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (17) |
2
|
1
|
2
|
Germany PSEAgainst (19) |
Poland PSEAgainst (7) |
Hungary PSEAgainst (8) |
Romania PSEAgainst (7)Abstain (2) |
3
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
5
|
Spain PSEAgainst (15)
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Carlos CARNERO GONZÁLEZ,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Enrique BARÓN CRESPO,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Josep BORRELL FONTELLES,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
María SORNOSA MARTÍNEZ,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Raimon OBIOLS,
Rosa DÍEZ GONZÁLEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS
|
2
|
Bulgaria PSEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Italy PSEAgainst (9) |
Belgium PSEAgainst (7) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (7) |
Portugal PSEFor (1)Against (9) |
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
4
|
France PSEAgainst (24)
Adeline HAZAN,
André LAIGNEL,
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernadette BOURZAI,
Bernadette VERGNAUD,
Bernard POIGNANT,
Brigitte DOUAY,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Gilles SAVARY,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Martine ROURE,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Robert NAVARRO,
Yannick VAUGRENARD
Abstain (1) |
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - am. 22 #
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - ams. 13+23 #
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - am. 25 #
Rapport Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou A6-0068/2007 - ams. 9+17 #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-378752_EN.html
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-382365_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-382574_EN.html
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13381&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13381&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2184/COM_SEC(2008)2184_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2184/COM_SEC(2008)2184_EN.pdf |
events/0/date |
Old
2006-05-24T00:00:00New
2006-05-23T00:00:00 |
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.731New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.731 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.732New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.732 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.752&secondRef=02
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE382.365&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE382.574&secondRef=02
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0068_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0068_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13381&j=1&l=en
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2184/COM_SEC(2008)2184_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2184/COM_SEC(2008)2184_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0249/COM_COM(2006)0249_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0249/COM_COM(2006)0249_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070523&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20070523&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-68&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0068_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-68&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0068_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-206New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0206_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
EMPL/6/40619New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0249/COM_COM(2006)0249_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0249/COM_COM(2006)0249_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|