BETA


2007/2119(INI) Community strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI DAVIES Chris (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ITRE HARMS Rebecca (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion IMCO BULFON Wolfgang (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion ECON
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/11/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/10/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/10/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report of Chris DAVIES (ALDE, UK) in response to the Commission’s Communication on the results of the Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles.

The main points are the following:

Timetable and targets : the report welcomed the Commission's plan to submit an EU legislative framework for CO2 emissions reduction including binding measures for improving the fuel economy of light vehicles by improving engine technology, other technological improvements and the use of biofuels. Parliament insisted that the proposed use of "complementary measures" to achieve the previously agreed emissions target of 120g CO2/km be made possible through quantifiable standards and believed that legislation should set clear and measurable targets for emissions reductions to be achieved through technical means. The report proposes that binding annual emissions targets should be set with effect from 2011 with the objective of promoting technical improvements to vehicles in order to ensure that, by these means alone, average emissions from all passenger cars placed on the EU market in 2015 do not exceed 125g CO2/km. The Commission was invited to present concrete legislative proposals and measures that ensure that emission reductions of at least 10g CO2/km could be achieved by means of the complementary measures taken as part of the integrated approach, in order to reach the overall target value of 120g CO2/km. Parliament further insisted that from 1 January 2020, average emissions should not exceed 95g CO2/km, and believed that the EU should provide support for the necessary promotion of innovation through the Seventh Framework Programme for Research. It stressed the need for intensive promotion of research and development of zero-emission vehicles, such as electrically propelled vehicles. It believed that longer term targets should be confirmed or reviewed by the Commission no later than 2016, following a detailed cost-benefit impact assessment and owing to the post-Kyoto agreement, and anticipated that these targets will possibly require further emissions reductions to 70g CO2/km or less by 2025.

Exceptions : in view of the difficulty that some specialist manufacturers may have in reducing average emissions across the limited range of cars they produce within the timescales envisaged, the report recommends that each manufacturer or importer should have the right to exclude 500 identified vehicles annually from inclusion in the data used to determine average emissions, subject to the emissions and fuel economy of such vehicles being labelled and advertised to consumers in accordance with the usual legal requirements. Furthermore, in view of the difficulty that some low-volume manufacturers (producing up to 300 000 units) and new entrants with a market share of less than 1% may have in reducing average emissions across the limited range of cars they produce within the time-schedule envisaged, the Commission should consider incorporating proposals in the legislation that would provide those specialist manufacturers with ambitious reduction targets.

Sharing the task between manufacturers : Parliament recognised the large variation in consumer preferences regarding passenger cars and the different composition of manufacturers" fleets. It insisted that CO2 reductions must be achieved for all cars placed on the market and therefore some differentiation based on a utility parameter should be allowed. However, this should not neutralise the incentive to shift towards lower emission vehicles or disadvantage early achievers. The report stressed the importance of allowing particular vehicles to exceed emission limits to avoid excessive disruptions to the car market, but sought to provide strong incentives to bring about emission reductions It proposed that the setting of 2012 and 2020 targets for the reduction of average emissions, and interim annual targets, should be achieved by reference to a limit value curve for all vehicles sold by manufacturers and importers that should take, as its starting point, the profile of the new passenger car fleet as of 1 January 2009. The Commission was asked to ensure adequate efforts for all manufacturers and incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions across the vehicle fleet. However, t any future scheme should not reward, either directly or indirectly, manufacturers of historically more polluting vehicles. Vehicles with higher CO2 emissions must also be required to make a greater contribution to reducing CO2, and the scheme should reward the most advanced technologies and alternative fuels according to their greenhouse gas performance (hybrids, hydrogen, electric vehicles or other alternative fuels).

The report proposes the introduction, in 2011, of a new closed market mechanism, the Carbon Allowance Reductions System (CARS), through which manufacturers and importers will be required to pay financial penalties in proportion to any excess over the emission limits per car sold. These penalties might be offset by redeemable credits awarded to newly registered passenger cars of the same manufacturer with emissions below the limit value curve. The penalties/excess g CO2/km should be higher than the rewards. Any system of tradable quotas between vehicle manufacturers should be kept separate from the EU emission trading scheme, or any other outside carbon credit or compensation scheme. The receipts from financial penalties should be used both for research and development for CO2 emissions reduction and for aiding local public transport.

Testing, data monitoring and vehicle specifications : the report insisted that total greenhouse gas emissions per vehicle should be addressed, including emissions attributable to air conditioning systems. It also urged the Commission to make proposals to update test cycles to reflect better real driving conditions. The Commission was encouraged to introduce new measurements and standards that could allow a fixed value to be attached for the purpose of associating CO2 emissions reduction with helpful improvements such as gear shift indicators, use of econometers, high efficiency air conditioning, improved lubricants, "start /stop systems at idle", low rolling resistance tyres and tyre pressure monitoring systems. It also recommends the introduction of technology in vehicles to encourage environmentally aware driver behaviour such as displays showing fuel consumption and its associated cost.

Advertising and labelling: Parliament recommended that mandatory and uniform minimum requirements be set for the display of information relating to the fuel economy (l/100 km) and CO2 emissions (g/km) of new cars in advertising, in all marketing and promotional literature and in showrooms in a conspicuous, user-friendly and possibly colour-coded format for the purposes of comparison. Parliament also suggested that a binding code for advertising be introduced which outlaws false green claims and recommended the introduction of an environmental performance “green star” rating system taking into account all aspects of environmental performance.

Promoting consumer demand: Parliament supported the use of fiscal measures, and encouraged Member States to introduce both purchase and circulation taxes on vehicles with above average emissions. It called for the introduction of economic incentives for retiring old cars and ensuring that part of vehicle taxes was variable depending on CO2 emissions and other pollutants. Members pointed out that, with the gradual introduction of technologies with zero CO2 emissions, the CO2-related tax component should, in the long term, disappear. With a view to preventing the fragmentation of the internal market, the Committee proposes the adoption of EU-wide definitions of CO2 emission values, which can be used by Member States in setting emission-related tax incentives. Lastly, Parliament underlined its support for the CO2-based taxation of cars and alternative fuels so as to create the right incentives for consumers and industry.

Documents
2007/10/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/10/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/09/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/09/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/09/12
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report of Chris DAVIES (ALDE, UK) in response to the Commission’s Communication on the results of the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles.

The main points raised in the report are the following:

Timetable and targets : the report welcomes the Commission's plan to submit an EU legislative framework for CO2 emissions reduction including binding measures for improving the fuel economy of light vehicles by improving engine technology, other technological improvements and the use of biofuels. The Committee insists that the proposed use of ‘complementary measures’ to achieve the previously agreed emissions target of 120g CO2/km by 2012 be made possible through quantifiable standards and believes that legislation should set clear and measurable targets for emissions reductions to be achieved through technical means.

The report proposes that binding annual emissions targets should be set with effect from 1 January 2009 with the objective of promoting technical improvements to vehicles in order to ensure that, by these means alone, average emissions from all passenger cars placed on the EU market from 1 January 2012 do not exceed 120g CO2/km. The Commission is invited to present concrete actions and legislative proposals in order to make sure that 'complementary measures' are put in place and reduce the emissions from passenger cars by an extra 10g CO2/km. From 1 January 2020, average emissions should not exceed 95g CO2/km. Longer-term targets should be decided no later than 2016 and should reduce these emissions to 70g CO2/km or less by 2025.

Exceptions : in view of the difficulty that some specialist manufacturers may have in reducing average emissions across the limited range of cars they produce within the timescales envisaged, the report recommends that each manufacturer or importer should have the right to exclude 500 identified vehicles annually from inclusion in the data used to determine average emissions, subject to the emissions and fuel economy of such vehicles being labelled and advertised to consumers in accordance with the usual legal requirements.

Sharing the task between manufacturers : the report stresses the importance of allowing particular vehicles to exceed emission limits to avoid excessive disruptions to the car market. The Commission should ensure adequate efforts for all manufacturers and incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions across the vehicle fleet. However, the Committee considers that any future scheme should not reward, either directly or indirectly, manufacturers of historically more polluting vehicles, that vehicles with higher CO2 emissions must also be required to make a greater contribution to reducing CO2, and that the scheme should reward the most advanced technologies and alternative fuels according to their greenhouse gas performance (hybrids, hydrogen, electric vehicles or other alternative fuels);

Carbon allowances: the report proposes the introduction, in 2011, of a new closed market mechanism, the Carbon Allowance Reductions System (CARS), through which manufacturers and importers will be required to pay financial penalties in proportion to any excess over the emission limits per car sold. These penalties may be offset by redeemable credits awarded to newly registered passenger cars of the same manufacturer with emissions below the limit values. Furthermore, according to the Committee, the information on emission performance per vehicle and per manufacturer should be made available to the public.

Testing, data monitoring and vehicle specifications: the report insists that total greenhouse gas emissions per vehicle should be addressed, including emissions attributable to air conditioning systems. It also urges the Commission to make proposals to update test cycles to reflect better real driving conditions. The Commission is encouraged to introduce new measurements and standards that can allow a fixed value to be attached for the purpose of associating CO2 emissions reduction with helpful improvements such as gear shift indicators, use of econometers, high efficiency air conditioning, improved lubricants, "start /stop systems at idle", low rolling resistance tyres and tyre pressure monitoring systems. It also recommends the introduction of technology in vehicles to encourage environmentally aware driver behaviour such as displays showing fuel consumption and its associated cost.

Advertising and labelling: the report r ecommends that mandatory and uniform minimum requirements be set for the display of information relating to the fuel economy (l/100 km) and CO2 emissions (g/km) of new cars in advertising, in all marketing and promotional literature and in showrooms in a conspicuous, user-friendly and understandable format for consumers. The Committee also suggests that a binding code for advertising be introduced which outlaws false green claims and recommends the introduction of an environmental performance “green star” rating system taking into account all aspects of environmental performance.

Promoting consumer demand: The Committee supports the use of fiscal measures, and encourages Member States to introduce both purchase and circulation taxes on vehicles with above average emissions. With a view to preventing the fragmentation of the internal market, the Committee proposes the adoption of EU-wide definitions of CO2 emission values, which can be used by Member States in setting emission-related tax incentives. Lastly, the Committee underlines its support for the CO2-based taxation of cars and alternative fuels so as to create the right incentives for consumers and industry.

2007/07/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/07/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/07/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/06/28
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2007/06/28
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/06/21
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2007/06/08
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/06/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/06/04
   EP - BULFON Wolfgang (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2007/04/12
   EP - HARMS Rebecca (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2007/03/06
   EP - DAVIES Chris (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2007/02/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/02/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/02/07
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication regarding the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles.

CONTENT: this communication provides the basis for exchanges with other European Institutions and all interested parties on implementing a next stage in the Community strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions and improve fuel efficiency from light-duty vehicles with a view to reaching the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km by 2012. On the basis of the conclusions drawn from these discussions, the Commission will propose if possible in 2007 and at the latest by mid 2008 a legislative framework to the Council and European Parliament in order to reach this objective.

The Commission points out that the voluntary commitments undertaken by the European, Japanese and Korean car manufacturers associations relate to a target of 140 g CO 2 /km by 2008 or 2009. In view of growing concerns regarding the progress made by the industry under this voluntary approach, the Commission has repeatedly underlined its readiness to consider legislative measures.

Car usage has significant impacts on climate change, with about 12% of the overall EU emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the main greenhouse gas, coming from the fuel consumed by passenger cars. Even though there have been significant improvements in vehicle technology – in particular in fuel efficiency which also means lower CO 2 emissions - this has not been enough to neutralise the effect of increased traffic and car size. While the EU as a whole has reduced its emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by just under 5% over the 1990-2004 period, the CO 2 emissions from road transport have increased by 26%. In the absence of effective action, the growth in emissions from passenger road transport will continue in the years to come.

A number of issues can be highlighted based on the experience gained in the implementation of the current strategy:

- emissions from the average new car sold reached 163 g CO 2 /km in 2004, 12.4% below the 1995 starting point of 186 g CO2/km. Over the same period, new cars sold in the EU have become significantly bigger and more powerful, while prices increased less than inflation.

- investigations on the impact of the limited measures adopted so far by Member States on the demand side have shown that improvements in car technology have delivered the bulk of the reductions.

- the progress achieved so far goes some way towards the 140 g CO 2 /km target by 2008/2009, but in the absence of additional measures, the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km will not be met at a 2012 horizon. As the voluntary agreement did not succeed, the Commission considers necessary to resort to a legislative approach and underlines that in addition to the proposed legislation urgent action should also be taken by the public authorities to keep the emission reductions on track, also towards 2008/2009, for instance through fiscal incentives and green public procurement.

The Commission goes on to discuss its proposed measures.

Supply oriented measures: the Commission will pursue its integrated approach with a view to reaching the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km by 2012 and will propose a legislative framework , if possible in 2007 and at the latest by mid 2008, to achieve the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km, focusing on mandatory reductions of the emissions of CO 2 to reach the objective of 130 g CO 2 /km for the average new car fleet by means of improvements in vehicle motor technology, and a further reduction of 10 g CO 2 /km, or equivalent if technically necessary, by other technological improvements and by an increased use of biofuels, specifically:

- setting minimum efficiency requirements for air-conditioning systems;

- the compulsory fitting of accurate tyre pressure monitoring systems;

- setting maximum tyre rolling resistance limits in the EU for tyres fitted on passenger cars and light commercial vehicles;

- the use of gear shift indicators, taking into account the extent to which such devices are used by consumers in real driving conditions;

- fuel efficiency progress in light-commercial vehicles (vans) with the objective of reaching 175 g/km CO2 by 2012 and 160 g/km CO2 by 2015;

- increased use of bio fuels maximizing environmental performance.

Demand/behaviour oriented measures: beyond the legislative framework, the Commission strategy should encourage additional efforts by other means of road transport (heavy duty vehicles, etc.), by the Member States (CO 2 related taxation and other fiscal incentives, use of public procurement, traffic management, infrastructure, etc.) and by the consumers (informed choice as a buyer, responsible driving behaviour). Car taxation is a powerful instrument to influence the purchase decisions of consumers. The Commission has made a proposal for a Council Directive on passenger car taxation (COM(2005)0261) and it urged Member States to adopt this proposal as soon as possible and to adapt their car taxation policies so as to promote the purchase of fuel efficient cars throughout the EU. Taxes differentiated over the whole range of cars on the market, so as to gradually induce a switch towards relatively less emitting cars, would be an efficient way to reduce compliance costs for manufacturers.

Fiscal incentives would also be a powerful way of encouraging the cleanest light-duty vehicle classes into the market. Such incentives should refer to a common EU definition applied across the Community, to avoid a fragmentation of the internal market, and cover all relevant emissions taking into account both air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions requirements. For this purpose, a Light-duty Environmentally Enhanced Vehicle (LEEV) should be defined as a vehicle that both meets the next stage of pollutant emission limit values as laid down in the relevant legislation, and stays below a certain level of CO 2 emissions. At present, this level should be the Community objective of 120 g CO 2 /km.

On consumer information, the Commission will adopt in 2007 an amending proposal to improve the effectiveness of the fuel efficiency labelling directive 1999/94/EC. This proposal will aim at extending the scope of the labelling scheme to light-commercial vehicles (N1), harmonising the design of the label and at introducing energy efficiency classes in order to better raise consumer awareness at the time of car purchase. Attention will also be paid to the definition of the LEEV and to the possibility of indicating on the label annual running costs and vehicle tax levels as a function of CO 2 emissions and fuel consumption.

In addition to consumer information, the way in which cars are marketed may also need to be adapted, so as to focus less on the dynamic performances of vehicles. Car manufacturers are invited to sign up before mid 2007 to a voluntary agreement on an EU wide code of good practice regarding car marketing and advertising aimed at the promotion of sustainable consumption patterns.

The Commission supports eco-driving dissemination through various projects and it may consider the inclusion of eco-driving requirements in future revisions of the driving licence Directive. However, eco-driving is a downstream measure subject to high uncertainties regarding its actual CO 2 savings potential. Member States are nonetheless invited to further promote eco-driving as a means to raise awareness about climate change impacts of car use.

Lastly , with a view to analysing the possibility of setting more ambitious objectives beyond the current Community target of 120 g CO 2 /km at a later stage, research and development will be further promoted towards the development and demonstration of advanced CO 2 reduction technologies. The Commission will support research efforts towards reaching the European Road Transport Research Advisory Council (ERTRAC) research target of improvements in vehicle efficiency that will deliver as much as a 40% reduction in CO 2 emissions for passenger cars for the new vehicle fleet in 2020”. This would correspond to a new car fleet average of 95 g CO 2 /km.

2007/02/06
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication regarding the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles.

CONTENT: this communication provides the basis for exchanges with other European Institutions and all interested parties on implementing a next stage in the Community strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions and improve fuel efficiency from light-duty vehicles with a view to reaching the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km by 2012. On the basis of the conclusions drawn from these discussions, the Commission will propose if possible in 2007 and at the latest by mid 2008 a legislative framework to the Council and European Parliament in order to reach this objective.

The Commission points out that the voluntary commitments undertaken by the European, Japanese and Korean car manufacturers associations relate to a target of 140 g CO 2 /km by 2008 or 2009. In view of growing concerns regarding the progress made by the industry under this voluntary approach, the Commission has repeatedly underlined its readiness to consider legislative measures.

Car usage has significant impacts on climate change, with about 12% of the overall EU emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the main greenhouse gas, coming from the fuel consumed by passenger cars. Even though there have been significant improvements in vehicle technology – in particular in fuel efficiency which also means lower CO 2 emissions - this has not been enough to neutralise the effect of increased traffic and car size. While the EU as a whole has reduced its emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by just under 5% over the 1990-2004 period, the CO 2 emissions from road transport have increased by 26%. In the absence of effective action, the growth in emissions from passenger road transport will continue in the years to come.

A number of issues can be highlighted based on the experience gained in the implementation of the current strategy:

- emissions from the average new car sold reached 163 g CO 2 /km in 2004, 12.4% below the 1995 starting point of 186 g CO2/km. Over the same period, new cars sold in the EU have become significantly bigger and more powerful, while prices increased less than inflation.

- investigations on the impact of the limited measures adopted so far by Member States on the demand side have shown that improvements in car technology have delivered the bulk of the reductions.

- the progress achieved so far goes some way towards the 140 g CO 2 /km target by 2008/2009, but in the absence of additional measures, the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km will not be met at a 2012 horizon. As the voluntary agreement did not succeed, the Commission considers necessary to resort to a legislative approach and underlines that in addition to the proposed legislation urgent action should also be taken by the public authorities to keep the emission reductions on track, also towards 2008/2009, for instance through fiscal incentives and green public procurement.

The Commission goes on to discuss its proposed measures.

Supply oriented measures: the Commission will pursue its integrated approach with a view to reaching the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km by 2012 and will propose a legislative framework , if possible in 2007 and at the latest by mid 2008, to achieve the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km, focusing on mandatory reductions of the emissions of CO 2 to reach the objective of 130 g CO 2 /km for the average new car fleet by means of improvements in vehicle motor technology, and a further reduction of 10 g CO 2 /km, or equivalent if technically necessary, by other technological improvements and by an increased use of biofuels, specifically:

- setting minimum efficiency requirements for air-conditioning systems;

- the compulsory fitting of accurate tyre pressure monitoring systems;

- setting maximum tyre rolling resistance limits in the EU for tyres fitted on passenger cars and light commercial vehicles;

- the use of gear shift indicators, taking into account the extent to which such devices are used by consumers in real driving conditions;

- fuel efficiency progress in light-commercial vehicles (vans) with the objective of reaching 175 g/km CO2 by 2012 and 160 g/km CO2 by 2015;

- increased use of bio fuels maximizing environmental performance.

Demand/behaviour oriented measures: beyond the legislative framework, the Commission strategy should encourage additional efforts by other means of road transport (heavy duty vehicles, etc.), by the Member States (CO 2 related taxation and other fiscal incentives, use of public procurement, traffic management, infrastructure, etc.) and by the consumers (informed choice as a buyer, responsible driving behaviour). Car taxation is a powerful instrument to influence the purchase decisions of consumers. The Commission has made a proposal for a Council Directive on passenger car taxation (COM(2005)0261) and it urged Member States to adopt this proposal as soon as possible and to adapt their car taxation policies so as to promote the purchase of fuel efficient cars throughout the EU. Taxes differentiated over the whole range of cars on the market, so as to gradually induce a switch towards relatively less emitting cars, would be an efficient way to reduce compliance costs for manufacturers.

Fiscal incentives would also be a powerful way of encouraging the cleanest light-duty vehicle classes into the market. Such incentives should refer to a common EU definition applied across the Community, to avoid a fragmentation of the internal market, and cover all relevant emissions taking into account both air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions requirements. For this purpose, a Light-duty Environmentally Enhanced Vehicle (LEEV) should be defined as a vehicle that both meets the next stage of pollutant emission limit values as laid down in the relevant legislation, and stays below a certain level of CO 2 emissions. At present, this level should be the Community objective of 120 g CO 2 /km.

On consumer information, the Commission will adopt in 2007 an amending proposal to improve the effectiveness of the fuel efficiency labelling directive 1999/94/EC. This proposal will aim at extending the scope of the labelling scheme to light-commercial vehicles (N1), harmonising the design of the label and at introducing energy efficiency classes in order to better raise consumer awareness at the time of car purchase. Attention will also be paid to the definition of the LEEV and to the possibility of indicating on the label annual running costs and vehicle tax levels as a function of CO 2 emissions and fuel consumption.

In addition to consumer information, the way in which cars are marketed may also need to be adapted, so as to focus less on the dynamic performances of vehicles. Car manufacturers are invited to sign up before mid 2007 to a voluntary agreement on an EU wide code of good practice regarding car marketing and advertising aimed at the promotion of sustainable consumption patterns.

The Commission supports eco-driving dissemination through various projects and it may consider the inclusion of eco-driving requirements in future revisions of the driving licence Directive. However, eco-driving is a downstream measure subject to high uncertainties regarding its actual CO 2 savings potential. Member States are nonetheless invited to further promote eco-driving as a means to raise awareness about climate change impacts of car use.

Lastly , with a view to analysing the possibility of setting more ambitious objectives beyond the current Community target of 120 g CO 2 /km at a later stage, research and development will be further promoted towards the development and demonstration of advanced CO 2 reduction technologies. The Commission will support research efforts towards reaching the European Road Transport Research Advisory Council (ERTRAC) research target of improvements in vehicle efficiency that will deliver as much as a 40% reduction in CO 2 emissions for passenger cars for the new vehicle fleet in 2020”. This would correspond to a new car fleet average of 95 g CO 2 /km.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 42+52/rév. #

2007/10/24 Outcome: +: 397, -: 269, 0: 20
PL IT RO CZ DE LT BE GB ES IE HU LV SI LU SK BG CY EL EE FI MT ?? SE PT DK NL FR AT
Total
50
62
30
21
90
13
23
64
46
11
23
8
6
6
12
13
5
21
5
14
4
1
14
23
14
23
69
15
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
242
2

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
4

Malta PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
94

Spain ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3
4

Austria ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
42

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
19

Italy ITS

Against (1)

2

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
8

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

Poland IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2
icon: PSE PSE
187

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Finland PSE

3

Malta PSE

2

PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 10 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 501, +: 150, 0: 5
PL CZ SK ?? SI LU CY EE MT LV LT FI EL IE DK BG RO HU SE PT BE DE AT NL IT ES FR GB
Total
47
21
11
1
6
6
5
5
3
8
12
13
11
12
13
11
30
22
13
22
23
88
16
23
57
45
69
63
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
19

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1
2
icon: NI NI
9

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
92

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

4

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

2
4

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria PPE-DE

3

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Austria PPE-DE

4
icon: PSE PSE
176

Czechia PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 43/1 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 388, +: 270, 0: 6
DK PT NL EL AT SE ES FR ?? IE MT LV FI CY EE BG SI LU BE HU SK DE LT RO CZ IT PL GB
Total
14
22
23
20
16
14
45
69
1
12
4
7
12
4
4
13
5
6
23
21
12
89
13
29
21
54
48
63
icon: PSE PSE
178

PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
8

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ITS ITS
19

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

3

Italy ITS

2
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
92
4

Netherlands ALDE

4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
236

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

4

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 43/2 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 584, +: 62, 0: 9
LV ?? IE CY SI LU MT DK EE AT SK FI BG EL SE NL LT BE PT HU CZ RO ES PL GB IT FR DE
Total
7
1
12
5
6
6
4
13
5
16
14
13
11
18
14
18
13
23
20
21
22
28
44
49
63
60
64
85
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2
icon: NI NI
9

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
39

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ITS ITS
19

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

3

Italy ITS

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
91

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Netherlands ALDE

3

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
169

PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Finland PSE

2
3

Sweden PSE

3

Netherlands PSE

4

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
237

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 27 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 396, +: 270, 0: 10
PL HU LV EL CY DE SI MT LU CZ IE ?? EE SK LT ES PT FI BG AT SE NL IT BE DK GB RO FR
Total
50
23
8
20
5
90
6
4
6
21
12
1
4
11
13
43
20
12
12
16
14
23
64
23
14
63
29
69
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
240

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2
4

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
42

Ireland UEN

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
8

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Poland IND/DEM

3

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

2
icon: ITS ITS
19

Austria ITS

Abstain (1)

1

Italy ITS

2

Belgium ITS

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
94

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Netherlands ALDE

4
icon: PSE PSE
179

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Sweden PSE

3

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 12 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 621, +: 59, 0: 4
?? MT LV LU CY EE SI DK BG SE SK IE LT FI CZ AT EL HU PT NL BE RO DE PL ES IT GB FR
Total
1
4
8
6
5
5
6
14
13
14
14
12
13
13
21
16
19
22
21
23
23
29
90
49
46
64
64
69
icon: NI NI
9

Slovakia NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: ITS ITS
19

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

Against (1)

3

Italy ITS

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
42

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
93

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2
4

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

4

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
181

PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
244

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Austria PPE-DE

4

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 47 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 411, +: 257, 0: 6
DK AT SE PT FR NL EL ?? IE MT LV ES EE BE LU CY BG FI SI SK LT DE CZ HU RO IT GB PL
Total
12
16
13
21
69
20
21
1
10
4
8
45
5
21
6
5
13
14
6
14
12
89
21
23
30
62
64
49
icon: PSE PSE
175

Netherlands PSE

3

PSE

1

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

2

Czechia PSE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
9

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Poland NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3
icon: ITS ITS
17

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

Abstain (1)

1

Italy ITS

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
42

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
94
4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Netherlands ALDE

4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
243

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

4

Sweden PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Rapport Davies A6-0343/2007 - am. 40 #

2007/10/24 Outcome: -: 355, +: 326, 0: 8
PL IT SK IE LV EL HU MT DE CY SI LU FR RO ?? CZ LT ES EE FI PT BG BE AT SE NL DK GB
Total
50
64
14
12
8
21
22
4
91
5
6
6
70
29
1
21
13
45
5
14
21
13
23
16
14
23
13
65
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
244

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
42

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
19
2

Belgium ITS

3

Austria ITS

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
9

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
95

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Netherlands ALDE

4
icon: PSE PSE
184

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Finland PSE

3

Sweden PSE

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/4
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
docs/0
date
2007-02-21T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2007-02-07T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2007-02-21T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0060/COM_SEC(2007)0060_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0060/COM_SEC(2007)0060_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2007-07-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE388.577&secondRef=02 title: PE388.577
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2007-07-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE388.577&secondRef=02 title: PE388.577
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE388.577&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-388577_EN.html
docs/5
date
2007-07-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE390.568&secondRef=02 title: PE390.568
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
2007-07-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE390.568&secondRef=02 title: PE390.568
committee
IMCO
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE390.568&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-390568_EN.html
docs/7
date
2007-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)6028
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8
date
2007-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)6028
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14042&j=0&l=en
events/0
date
2007-02-06T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2007-02-07T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0061/COM_SEC(2007)0061_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0061/COM_SEC(2007)0061_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.556
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE390.556
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE388.577&secondRef=02
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE388.577&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE392.150
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE392.150
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.568&secondRef=02
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE390.568&secondRef=02
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0343_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0343_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14042&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/5
date
2007-09-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0343_EN.html title: A6-0343/2007
events/5
date
2007-09-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0343_EN.html title: A6-0343/2007
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE
events/8
date
2007-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0469_EN.html title: T6-0469/2007
summary
events/8
date
2007-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0469_EN.html title: T6-0469/2007
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: DAVIES Chris date: 2007-03-06T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2007-03-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAVIES Chris group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2007-04-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: BULFON Wolfgang date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2007-06-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BULFON Wolfgang group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0060/COM_SEC(2007)0060_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0060/COM_SEC(2007)0060_EN.pdf
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-343&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0343_EN.html
docs/7/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0019/COM_COM(2007)0019_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0019/COM_COM(2007)0019_EN.pdf
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-343&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0343_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-469
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0469_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0019/COM_COM(2007)0019_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0019 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52007DC0019:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: DIMAS Stavros type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2007-03-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DAVIES Chris body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: BULFON Wolfgang body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2007-06-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
  • date: 2007-06-28T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 2812
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2007-03-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DAVIES Chris body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: BULFON Wolfgang body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-343&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0343/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14042&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-469 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0469/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2007-03-06T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DAVIES Chris group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2007-03-06T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: DAVIES Chris
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2007-04-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HARMS Rebecca group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2007-06-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BULFON Wolfgang
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2007-06-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BULFON Wolfgang group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2007-04-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 2812 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2812*&MEET_DATE=28/06/2007 date: 2007-06-28T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0060/COM_SEC(2007)0060_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)0060 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=60 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-02-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0061/COM_SEC(2007)0061_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)0061 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=61 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.556 title: PE390.556 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE388.577&secondRef=02 title: PE388.577 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE392.150 title: PE392.150 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.568&secondRef=02 title: PE390.568 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-343&language=EN title: A6-0343/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14042&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)6028 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-02-07T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0019/COM_COM(2007)0019_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0019 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=19 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present a Commission communication regarding the review of the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles. CONTENT: this communication provides the basis for exchanges with other European Institutions and all interested parties on implementing a next stage in the Community strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions and improve fuel efficiency from light-duty vehicles with a view to reaching the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km by 2012. On the basis of the conclusions drawn from these discussions, the Commission will propose if possible in 2007 and at the latest by mid 2008 a legislative framework to the Council and European Parliament in order to reach this objective. The Commission points out that the voluntary commitments undertaken by the European, Japanese and Korean car manufacturers associations relate to a target of 140 g CO 2 /km by 2008 or 2009. In view of growing concerns regarding the progress made by the industry under this voluntary approach, the Commission has repeatedly underlined its readiness to consider legislative measures. Car usage has significant impacts on climate change, with about 12% of the overall EU emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the main greenhouse gas, coming from the fuel consumed by passenger cars. Even though there have been significant improvements in vehicle technology – in particular in fuel efficiency which also means lower CO 2 emissions - this has not been enough to neutralise the effect of increased traffic and car size. While the EU as a whole has reduced its emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by just under 5% over the 1990-2004 period, the CO 2 emissions from road transport have increased by 26%. In the absence of effective action, the growth in emissions from passenger road transport will continue in the years to come. A number of issues can be highlighted based on the experience gained in the implementation of the current strategy: - emissions from the average new car sold reached 163 g CO 2 /km in 2004, 12.4% below the 1995 starting point of 186 g CO2/km. Over the same period, new cars sold in the EU have become significantly bigger and more powerful, while prices increased less than inflation. - investigations on the impact of the limited measures adopted so far by Member States on the demand side have shown that improvements in car technology have delivered the bulk of the reductions. - the progress achieved so far goes some way towards the 140 g CO 2 /km target by 2008/2009, but in the absence of additional measures, the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km will not be met at a 2012 horizon. As the voluntary agreement did not succeed, the Commission considers necessary to resort to a legislative approach and underlines that in addition to the proposed legislation urgent action should also be taken by the public authorities to keep the emission reductions on track, also towards 2008/2009, for instance through fiscal incentives and green public procurement. The Commission goes on to discuss its proposed measures. Supply oriented measures: the Commission will pursue its integrated approach with a view to reaching the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km by 2012 and will propose a legislative framework , if possible in 2007 and at the latest by mid 2008, to achieve the EU objective of 120 g CO 2 /km, focusing on mandatory reductions of the emissions of CO 2 to reach the objective of 130 g CO 2 /km for the average new car fleet by means of improvements in vehicle motor technology, and a further reduction of 10 g CO 2 /km, or equivalent if technically necessary, by other technological improvements and by an increased use of biofuels, specifically: - setting minimum efficiency requirements for air-conditioning systems; - the compulsory fitting of accurate tyre pressure monitoring systems; - setting maximum tyre rolling resistance limits in the EU for tyres fitted on passenger cars and light commercial vehicles; - the use of gear shift indicators, taking into account the extent to which such devices are used by consumers in real driving conditions; - fuel efficiency progress in light-commercial vehicles (vans) with the objective of reaching 175 g/km CO2 by 2012 and 160 g/km CO2 by 2015; - increased use of bio fuels maximizing environmental performance. Demand/behaviour oriented measures: beyond the legislative framework, the Commission strategy should encourage additional efforts by other means of road transport (heavy duty vehicles, etc.), by the Member States (CO 2 related taxation and other fiscal incentives, use of public procurement, traffic management, infrastructure, etc.) and by the consumers (informed choice as a buyer, responsible driving behaviour). Car taxation is a powerful instrument to influence the purchase decisions of consumers. The Commission has made a proposal for a Council Directive on passenger car taxation (COM(2005)0261) and it urged Member States to adopt this proposal as soon as possible and to adapt their car taxation policies so as to promote the purchase of fuel efficient cars throughout the EU. Taxes differentiated over the whole range of cars on the market, so as to gradually induce a switch towards relatively less emitting cars, would be an efficient way to reduce compliance costs for manufacturers. Fiscal incentives would also be a powerful way of encouraging the cleanest light-duty vehicle classes into the market. Such incentives should refer to a common EU definition applied across the Community, to avoid a fragmentation of the internal market, and cover all relevant emissions taking into account both air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions requirements. For this purpose, a Light-duty Environmentally Enhanced Vehicle (LEEV) should be defined as a vehicle that both meets the next stage of pollutant emission limit values as laid down in the relevant legislation, and stays below a certain level of CO 2 emissions. At present, this level should be the Community objective of 120 g CO 2 /km. On consumer information, the Commission will adopt in 2007 an amending proposal to improve the effectiveness of the fuel efficiency labelling directive 1999/94/EC. This proposal will aim at extending the scope of the labelling scheme to light-commercial vehicles (N1), harmonising the design of the label and at introducing energy efficiency classes in order to better raise consumer awareness at the time of car purchase. Attention will also be paid to the definition of the LEEV and to the possibility of indicating on the label annual running costs and vehicle tax levels as a function of CO 2 emissions and fuel consumption. In addition to consumer information, the way in which cars are marketed may also need to be adapted, so as to focus less on the dynamic performances of vehicles. Car manufacturers are invited to sign up before mid 2007 to a voluntary agreement on an EU wide code of good practice regarding car marketing and advertising aimed at the promotion of sustainable consumption patterns. The Commission supports eco-driving dissemination through various projects and it may consider the inclusion of eco-driving requirements in future revisions of the driving licence Directive. However, eco-driving is a downstream measure subject to high uncertainties regarding its actual CO 2 savings potential. Member States are nonetheless invited to further promote eco-driving as a means to raise awareness about climate change impacts of car use. Lastly , with a view to analysing the possibility of setting more ambitious objectives beyond the current Community target of 120 g CO 2 /km at a later stage, research and development will be further promoted towards the development and demonstration of advanced CO 2 reduction technologies. The Commission will support research efforts towards reaching the European Road Transport Research Advisory Council (ERTRAC) research target of improvements in vehicle efficiency that will deliver as much as a 40% reduction in CO 2 emissions for passenger cars for the new vehicle fleet in 2020”. This would correspond to a new car fleet average of 95 g CO 2 /km.
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-06-21T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2007-06-28T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report of Chris DAVIES (ALDE, UK) in response to the Commission’s Communication on the results of the Community Strategy to reduce CO 2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles. The main points raised in the report are the following: Timetable and targets : the report welcomes the Commission's plan to submit an EU legislative framework for CO2 emissions reduction including binding measures for improving the fuel economy of light vehicles by improving engine technology, other technological improvements and the use of biofuels. The Committee insists that the proposed use of ‘complementary measures’ to achieve the previously agreed emissions target of 120g CO2/km by 2012 be made possible through quantifiable standards and believes that legislation should set clear and measurable targets for emissions reductions to be achieved through technical means. The report proposes that binding annual emissions targets should be set with effect from 1 January 2009 with the objective of promoting technical improvements to vehicles in order to ensure that, by these means alone, average emissions from all passenger cars placed on the EU market from 1 January 2012 do not exceed 120g CO2/km. The Commission is invited to present concrete actions and legislative proposals in order to make sure that 'complementary measures' are put in place and reduce the emissions from passenger cars by an extra 10g CO2/km. From 1 January 2020, average emissions should not exceed 95g CO2/km. Longer-term targets should be decided no later than 2016 and should reduce these emissions to 70g CO2/km or less by 2025. Exceptions : in view of the difficulty that some specialist manufacturers may have in reducing average emissions across the limited range of cars they produce within the timescales envisaged, the report recommends that each manufacturer or importer should have the right to exclude 500 identified vehicles annually from inclusion in the data used to determine average emissions, subject to the emissions and fuel economy of such vehicles being labelled and advertised to consumers in accordance with the usual legal requirements. Sharing the task between manufacturers : the report stresses the importance of allowing particular vehicles to exceed emission limits to avoid excessive disruptions to the car market. The Commission should ensure adequate efforts for all manufacturers and incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions across the vehicle fleet. However, the Committee considers that any future scheme should not reward, either directly or indirectly, manufacturers of historically more polluting vehicles, that vehicles with higher CO2 emissions must also be required to make a greater contribution to reducing CO2, and that the scheme should reward the most advanced technologies and alternative fuels according to their greenhouse gas performance (hybrids, hydrogen, electric vehicles or other alternative fuels); Carbon allowances: the report proposes the introduction, in 2011, of a new closed market mechanism, the Carbon Allowance Reductions System (CARS), through which manufacturers and importers will be required to pay financial penalties in proportion to any excess over the emission limits per car sold. These penalties may be offset by redeemable credits awarded to newly registered passenger cars of the same manufacturer with emissions below the limit values. Furthermore, according to the Committee, the information on emission performance per vehicle and per manufacturer should be made available to the public. Testing, data monitoring and vehicle specifications: the report insists that total greenhouse gas emissions per vehicle should be addressed, including emissions attributable to air conditioning systems. It also urges the Commission to make proposals to update test cycles to reflect better real driving conditions. The Commission is encouraged to introduce new measurements and standards that can allow a fixed value to be attached for the purpose of associating CO2 emissions reduction with helpful improvements such as gear shift indicators, use of econometers, high efficiency air conditioning, improved lubricants, "start /stop systems at idle", low rolling resistance tyres and tyre pressure monitoring systems. It also recommends the introduction of technology in vehicles to encourage environmentally aware driver behaviour such as displays showing fuel consumption and its associated cost. Advertising and labelling: the report r ecommends that mandatory and uniform minimum requirements be set for the display of information relating to the fuel economy (l/100 km) and CO2 emissions (g/km) of new cars in advertising, in all marketing and promotional literature and in showrooms in a conspicuous, user-friendly and understandable format for consumers. The Committee also suggests that a binding code for advertising be introduced which outlaws false green claims and recommends the introduction of an environmental performance “green star” rating system taking into account all aspects of environmental performance. Promoting consumer demand: The Committee supports the use of fiscal measures, and encourages Member States to introduce both purchase and circulation taxes on vehicles with above average emissions. With a view to preventing the fragmentation of the internal market, the Committee proposes the adoption of EU-wide definitions of CO2 emission values, which can be used by Member States in setting emission-related tax incentives. Lastly, the Committee underlines its support for the CO2-based taxation of cars and alternative fuels so as to create the right incentives for consumers and industry.
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-343&language=EN title: A6-0343/2007
  • date: 2007-10-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14042&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-469 title: T6-0469/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report of Chris DAVIES (ALDE, UK) in response to the Commission’s Communication on the results of the Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles. The main points are the following: Timetable and targets : the report welcomed the Commission's plan to submit an EU legislative framework for CO2 emissions reduction including binding measures for improving the fuel economy of light vehicles by improving engine technology, other technological improvements and the use of biofuels. Parliament insisted that the proposed use of "complementary measures" to achieve the previously agreed emissions target of 120g CO2/km be made possible through quantifiable standards and believed that legislation should set clear and measurable targets for emissions reductions to be achieved through technical means. The report proposes that binding annual emissions targets should be set with effect from 2011 with the objective of promoting technical improvements to vehicles in order to ensure that, by these means alone, average emissions from all passenger cars placed on the EU market in 2015 do not exceed 125g CO2/km. The Commission was invited to present concrete legislative proposals and measures that ensure that emission reductions of at least 10g CO2/km could be achieved by means of the complementary measures taken as part of the integrated approach, in order to reach the overall target value of 120g CO2/km. Parliament further insisted that from 1 January 2020, average emissions should not exceed 95g CO2/km, and believed that the EU should provide support for the necessary promotion of innovation through the Seventh Framework Programme for Research. It stressed the need for intensive promotion of research and development of zero-emission vehicles, such as electrically propelled vehicles. It believed that longer term targets should be confirmed or reviewed by the Commission no later than 2016, following a detailed cost-benefit impact assessment and owing to the post-Kyoto agreement, and anticipated that these targets will possibly require further emissions reductions to 70g CO2/km or less by 2025. Exceptions : in view of the difficulty that some specialist manufacturers may have in reducing average emissions across the limited range of cars they produce within the timescales envisaged, the report recommends that each manufacturer or importer should have the right to exclude 500 identified vehicles annually from inclusion in the data used to determine average emissions, subject to the emissions and fuel economy of such vehicles being labelled and advertised to consumers in accordance with the usual legal requirements. Furthermore, in view of the difficulty that some low-volume manufacturers (producing up to 300 000 units) and new entrants with a market share of less than 1% may have in reducing average emissions across the limited range of cars they produce within the time-schedule envisaged, the Commission should consider incorporating proposals in the legislation that would provide those specialist manufacturers with ambitious reduction targets. Sharing the task between manufacturers : Parliament recognised the large variation in consumer preferences regarding passenger cars and the different composition of manufacturers" fleets. It insisted that CO2 reductions must be achieved for all cars placed on the market and therefore some differentiation based on a utility parameter should be allowed. However, this should not neutralise the incentive to shift towards lower emission vehicles or disadvantage early achievers. The report stressed the importance of allowing particular vehicles to exceed emission limits to avoid excessive disruptions to the car market, but sought to provide strong incentives to bring about emission reductions It proposed that the setting of 2012 and 2020 targets for the reduction of average emissions, and interim annual targets, should be achieved by reference to a limit value curve for all vehicles sold by manufacturers and importers that should take, as its starting point, the profile of the new passenger car fleet as of 1 January 2009. The Commission was asked to ensure adequate efforts for all manufacturers and incentives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions across the vehicle fleet. However, t any future scheme should not reward, either directly or indirectly, manufacturers of historically more polluting vehicles. Vehicles with higher CO2 emissions must also be required to make a greater contribution to reducing CO2, and the scheme should reward the most advanced technologies and alternative fuels according to their greenhouse gas performance (hybrids, hydrogen, electric vehicles or other alternative fuels). The report proposes the introduction, in 2011, of a new closed market mechanism, the Carbon Allowance Reductions System (CARS), through which manufacturers and importers will be required to pay financial penalties in proportion to any excess over the emission limits per car sold. These penalties might be offset by redeemable credits awarded to newly registered passenger cars of the same manufacturer with emissions below the limit value curve. The penalties/excess g CO2/km should be higher than the rewards. Any system of tradable quotas between vehicle manufacturers should be kept separate from the EU emission trading scheme, or any other outside carbon credit or compensation scheme. The receipts from financial penalties should be used both for research and development for CO2 emissions reduction and for aiding local public transport. Testing, data monitoring and vehicle specifications : the report insisted that total greenhouse gas emissions per vehicle should be addressed, including emissions attributable to air conditioning systems. It also urged the Commission to make proposals to update test cycles to reflect better real driving conditions. The Commission was encouraged to introduce new measurements and standards that could allow a fixed value to be attached for the purpose of associating CO2 emissions reduction with helpful improvements such as gear shift indicators, use of econometers, high efficiency air conditioning, improved lubricants, "start /stop systems at idle", low rolling resistance tyres and tyre pressure monitoring systems. It also recommends the introduction of technology in vehicles to encourage environmentally aware driver behaviour such as displays showing fuel consumption and its associated cost. Advertising and labelling: Parliament recommended that mandatory and uniform minimum requirements be set for the display of information relating to the fuel economy (l/100 km) and CO2 emissions (g/km) of new cars in advertising, in all marketing and promotional literature and in showrooms in a conspicuous, user-friendly and possibly colour-coded format for the purposes of comparison. Parliament also suggested that a binding code for advertising be introduced which outlaws false green claims and recommended the introduction of an environmental performance “green star” rating system taking into account all aspects of environmental performance. Promoting consumer demand: Parliament supported the use of fiscal measures, and encouraged Member States to introduce both purchase and circulation taxes on vehicles with above average emissions. It called for the introduction of economic incentives for retiring old cars and ensuring that part of vehicle taxes was variable depending on CO2 emissions and other pollutants. Members pointed out that, with the gradual introduction of technologies with zero CO2 emissions, the CO2-related tax component should, in the long term, disappear. With a view to preventing the fragmentation of the internal market, the Committee proposes the adoption of EU-wide definitions of CO2 emission values, which can be used by Member States in setting emission-related tax incentives. Lastly, Parliament underlined its support for the CO2-based taxation of cars and alternative fuels so as to create the right incentives for consumers and industry.
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/6/46437
New
  • ENVI/6/46437
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.03 Motor industry, cycle and motorcycle, commercial and agricultural vehicles
  • 3.60.02 Oil industry, motor fuels
  • 3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
New
3.40.03
Motor industry, cycle and motorcycle, commercial and agricultural vehicles
3.60.02
Oil industry, motor fuels
3.70.02
Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
procedure/title
Old
Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles
New
Community strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles
activities
  • date: 2007-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0019/COM_COM(2007)0019_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0019 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52007DC0019:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: DIMAS Stavros type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2007-03-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DAVIES Chris body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: BULFON Wolfgang body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2007-06-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
  • date: 2007-06-28T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 2812
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2007-03-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DAVIES Chris body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: BULFON Wolfgang body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-343&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0343/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14042&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-469 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0469/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2007-03-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DAVIES Chris
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2007-06-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: BULFON Wolfgang
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2007-04-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: HARMS Rebecca
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/6/46437
reference
2007/2119(INI)
title
Community Strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject