BETA


2008/2122(INL) European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON BECSEY Zsolt László (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion FEMM WORTMANN-KOOL Corien (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG TITLEY Gary (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion JURI GILL Neena (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47

Events

2009/10/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/03/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 574 votes to 23, with 12 abstentions, a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on a European initiative for the development of micro-credits in support of growth and employment.

The resolution is in response to a Commission Communication on a European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment.

The Parliament recalls that difficult access to appropriate forms of finance is frequently referred to as a very important barrier to entrepreneurship, and that there is a significant potential demand for micro-credit in the EU that is currently not met.

The Commission's current definition of micro-credit is a loan of EUR 25 000 or less and that a microenterprise is one that employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million. However, those definitions do not seem to be pertinent for all national markets, and do not allow a clear distinction to be drawn between micro-credits and micro-loans to microenterprises, micro-credit for non-bankable borrowers and micro-credit for bankable microenterprises.

MEPs note that the Commission has not taken forward the request made in Parliament's resolution of 11 July 2007 to draw up an action plan for micro-financing. They consider that the current financial crisis and its possible repercussions in the economy as a whole demonstrate the disadvantages of complex financial products and the need for considering ways of enhancing efficiency and having in place all possible channels for providing financing when businesses have reduced access to capital due to liquidity crunch, in particular in economically and socially disadvantages regions.

In the light of these observations, the Commission is called upon to submit to Parliament a legislative proposal or proposals covering the matters dealt with in the detailed recommendations below:

Recommendation 1: on awareness-raising as regards micro-credit :

the introduction of the concept of micro-credit in relevant statistics and legislation on financial institutions; invite the Member States to standardise the statistical presentation of micro-credits (including the collection and analysis of data broken down according to gender, age and ethnic origin); develop a communication strategy with a view to promoting self-employment as an alternative to wage earning and, in particular, as a way to escape unemployment for disadvantaged target groups; invite Member States to implement tax incentives for private involvement in the micro-credit business; invite Member States to restrict the application of interest-rate caps to consumer loans; analyse - in the light of the last sub-prime crisis - the advantages and disadvantages of direct micro-credit formats as against securitised credit facilities.

Recommendation 2: on EU funding :

the (co-)financing of projects targeted at promoting the availability of micro-credit for all persons and enterprises without direct access to credit, such as disadvantaged target groups (for example, the Roma society, immigrants, people living in deprived rural areas, people with precarious work situations, and women); the provision by national or EU funds of guarantees for providers of micro-credit; the provision of business support services, to include mandatory targeted training for micro-credit borrowers, which can be financed under the Structural Funds; research and the exchange of best practices in the operational field; the creation of a website where potential recipients of micro-credits can present their projects and of an EU-wide database comprising positive and negative credit data on micro-credit borrowers; the appointment of a single coordination entity where all EU financing activities concerning micro-credit are pooled and the co-)financing of projects only where they can be combined with the retention of social security entitlements, such as unemployment benefit and income support.

Recommendation 3: on a harmonised EU framework for bank and non-bank microfinance institutions (MFIs) : the non-bank MFIs framework should include: a clear definition of micro-credit providers; the ability to conduct credit-only activities and to on-lend; harmonised, risk-based rules as regards authorisation, registration, reporting and prudential supervision.

Recommendation 4: on Directive 2005/60/EC : the Commission should, while reviewing this Directive, ensure that the provisions laid down do not constitute obstacles preventing people who have no permanent address or personal identification documents from accessing micro-credit.

Recommendation 5: on competition rules :

provide for, inter alia, while reviewing the de minimis rules, a reduction of the administrative burden if the aid is granted in connection with micro-credit; specify that the role of micro-credit providers and, if applicable, the public support that such institutions receive are in line with the EU competition rules; implement rules that allow for a preferential treatment of goods and services provided by micro-credit borrowers in public procurement procedures.

Documents
2009/03/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/01/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/01/29
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2009/01/20
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own- initiative report by Zsolt László BECSEY (EPP-ED, HU) with recommendations to the Commission on a European initiative for the development of micro-credits in support of growth and employment (Initiative – Rule 39 of the Rules of Procedure). The report follows a Commission Communication on a European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment.

The committee recalls that the Commission's current definition of micro-credit is a loan of EUR 25 000 or less and that Recommendation 2003/361/EC provides that a microenterprise is one that employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million. However, those definitions do not seem to be pertinent for all national markets, and do not allow a clear distinction to be drawn between micro-credits and micro-loans to microenterprises, micro-credit for non-bankable borrowers and micro-credit for bankable microenterprises.

MEPs note that the Commission has not taken forward the request made in Parliament's resolution of 11 July 2007 to draw up an action plan for micro-financing, to coordinate different policy measures, and to make optimal use of best practices in and outside the EU. Moreover, they recall that, in 2008, for the second successive year, Parliament approved appropriations to fund a pilot project entitled ‘Promoting a more favourable environment for micro-credit in Europe’, appropriations that might usefully be earmarked for the formation of own capital which can serve as start-up capital.

Difficult access to appropriate forms of finance is frequently referred to as a very important barrier to entrepreneurship, and there is a significant potential demand for micro-credit in the EU that is currently not met.

MEPs consider that the current financial crisis and its possible repercussions in the economy as a whole demonstrate the need for considering ways of enhancing efficiency and having in place all possible channels for providing financing when businesses have reduced access to capital due to liquidity crunch, in particular in economically and socially disadvantages regions.

In the light of these observations, the Commission is called upon to submit to Parliament a legislative proposal or proposals covering the matters dealt with in the detailed recommendations below:

Recommendation 1: on awareness-raising as regards micro-credit :

the introduction of the concept of micro-credit in relevant statistics and legislation on financial institutions; invite the Member States to standardise the statistical presentation of micro-credits (including the collection and analysis of data broken down according to gender, age and ethnic origin); develop a communication strategy with a view to promoting self-employment as an alternative to wage earning and, in particular, as a way to escape unemployment for disadvantaged target groups; invite Member States to implement tax incentives for private involvement in the micro-credit business; invite Member States to restrict the application of interest-rate caps to consumer loans; analyse - in the light of the last sub-prime crisis - the advantages and disadvantages of direct micro-credit formats as against securitised credit facilities.

Recommendation 2: on EU funding :

the (co-)financing of projects targeted at promoting the availability of micro-credit for all persons and enterprises without direct access to credit, such as disadvantaged target groups (for example, the Roma society, immigrants, people living in deprived rural areas, people with precarious work situations, and women); the provision by national or EU funds of guarantees for providers of micro-credit; the provision of business support services, to include mandatory targeted training for micro-credit borrowers, which can be financed under the Structural Funds; research and the exchange of best practices in the operational field; the creation of a website where potential recipients of micro-credits can present their projects and of an EU-wide database comprising positive and negative credit data on micro-credit borrowers; the appointment of a single coordination entity where all EU financing activities concerning micro-credit are pooled and the co-)financing of projects only where they can be combined with the retention of social security entitlements, such as unemployment benefit and income support.

Recommendation 3: on a harmonised EU framework for bank and non-bank microfinance institutions (MFIs) : the non-bank MFIs framework should include: a clear definition of micro-credit providers; the ability to conduct credit-only activities and to on-lend; harmonised, risk-based rules as regards authorisation, registration, reporting and prudential supervision.

Recommendation 4: on Directive 2005/60/EC : the Commission should, while reviewing this Directive, ensure that the provisions laid down do not constitute obstacles preventing people who have no permanent address or personal identification documents from accessing micro-credit.

Recommendation 5: on competition rules :

provide for, inter alia, while reviewing the de minimis rules, a reduction of the administrative burden if the aid is granted in connection with micro-credit; specify that the role of micro-credit providers and, if applicable, the public support that such institutions receive are in line with the EU competition rules; implement rules that allow for a preferential treatment of goods and services provided by micro-credit borrowers in public procurement procedures.

2008/12/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/12/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/11/19
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/10/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/06/25
   EP - GILL Neena (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2008/06/18
   EP - TITLEY Gary (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2008/06/13
   EP - WORTMANN-KOOL Corien (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2008/05/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/12/11
   EP - BECSEY Zsolt László (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2007/11/13
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to reinforce the development of micro-credit in Europe with a view to improving access to finance for small businesses and for socially excluded people, also ethnic minorities, who want to become self-employed.

BACKGROUND: micro-credit has been used very successfully in less developed countries, and there has already been some action in this field in the EU, both at Community and at national level. In the EU, demand for this type of finance – typically, loans averaging around EUR 7 700 – is overwhelmingly from people setting up small companies in the service sector. All indications point to high potential demand from people who, for various reasons, are unable to obtain loans in the traditional banking sector. This initiative is intended to set out a framework to coordinate our efforts at EU level by improving the legal and institutional environment in which micro-credit providers operate, and increasing the availability of capital.

CONTENT: the present communication invites the Member States to adapt as appropriate national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit. The Commission is willing to help the Member States on matters of targeting and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. It also recommends setting up a new European-level facility with staff to provide expertise and support for the development of non-bank micro-finance institutions in Member States . This would equip micro-financers to offer not just a loan, but a service mentoring the borrower to help develop and ensure the success of their business. This kind of accompaniment is the key to the success of micro-credit operations.

Financial support for this facility would come from the existing technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds (European Regional Development Fund - ERDF) managed by the European Commission. In view of the interest expressed by the European Investment Fund in this field, the facility could be managed within the Fund which is also responsible for the JEREMIE initiative to support access to finance to SMEs.

The proposed initiative has four different strands:

1) Improving the legal and institutional environment in the Member States : the institutional framework in the Member States appears to be often ill-suited to the development of micro-credit. Indeed, it is because micro-credit is usually not addressed specifically in the national or Community legislation that the statistics on micro-credit are underdeveloped. What is generally required is a series of actions improving what can be broadly described as the legal and institutional environment for micro-credit. The following highlights seven areas where improvement can be achieved at national level: i) create an environment allowing the development of micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and covering all segments of the clientele; ii) help micro-credit to become sustainable by relaxing interest caps for micro-credit operations; iii) allow MFIs access to borrower databases and facilitate their evaluation of the risks; iv) reduce operating costs applying favourable tax schemes; v) adapt national regulation and supervision to the specificity of micro-finance ; vi) ensure single market rules are applied to micro-credit; vii) incorporate micro-credit into regulation and accounting standards.

2) Further changing the climate in favour of entrepreneurship : actions include: i) improving the institutional framework for self-employment and micro-enterprises; ii) designing solutions to enable unemployed people and welfare recipients to make the transition into self-employment; iii) increasing chances of success of new micro-enterprises through training, mentoring and business development services.

The Commission proposes to promote micro-credit and micro-enterprise development at national level. It invites the Member States to undertake a programme of reform aimed at improving the conditions for micro-credit according to national circumstances and priorities. In view of the focus in the Lisbon strategy improving access to finance, in general, and promoting micro-credit in particular, Member States are encouraged within the context of their National Reform Programmes under the Lisbon strategy to take on board those actions necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit which fall within the national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks. The Commission could also help the Member States by indicating quantitative targets for loans and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices.

3) Promoting the spread of best practices, including training : dissemination of best practices is an important factor in the development of micro-credit which will continue to be fostered by existing resource centres such as the Microfinance Centre for Central and Eastern Europe, the European Microfinance Centre and the banks themselves. The Commission proposes: i) a central body with micro-financial expertise; ii) a micro-credit specific label to better involve EU citizens; iii) the need for a code of conduct for MFIs.

4) Providing additional financial capital for micro-credit institutions : the Commission intends to strengthen its contribution by setting up in the framework of EU cohesion policy a specific micro-credit facility providing funding and technical assistance to new and non-bank MFIs to enhance the supply of micro-credit. This facility would target the most promising non-bank MFIs by means of calls for proposals. Ideally, it would combine the provision of technical assistance with funding mobilised from various sources, such as EU structural funds, the EIB, the EUROFI network, banks and donors. It would aim at helping MFIs becoming self-sustaining and it would contribute improving the use of micro-credit in the EU by conducting market analysis, establishing guidelines and promoting training and learning opportunities that incorporate best practice in the field. In order to set this facility up rapidly and with a cost-effective structure, it is proposed to ask the European Investment Fund (EIF) to create and host a dedicated unit within their JEREMIE department. The funding for the staffing of the unit and the technical assistance work to MFIs would be covered through the technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds managed by the European Commission.

The proposals included in this initiative would provide a base to start concrete actions aimed at developing and implementing micro-credit in the European Union.

Lastly, appropriate communication campaigns must be undertaken in order to boost micro-credit in Europe and contribute to its development in the longer run, and evaluations carried out.

2007/11/12
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to reinforce the development of micro-credit in Europe with a view to improving access to finance for small businesses and for socially excluded people, also ethnic minorities, who want to become self-employed.

BACKGROUND: micro-credit has been used very successfully in less developed countries, and there has already been some action in this field in the EU, both at Community and at national level. In the EU, demand for this type of finance – typically, loans averaging around EUR 7 700 – is overwhelmingly from people setting up small companies in the service sector. All indications point to high potential demand from people who, for various reasons, are unable to obtain loans in the traditional banking sector. This initiative is intended to set out a framework to coordinate our efforts at EU level by improving the legal and institutional environment in which micro-credit providers operate, and increasing the availability of capital.

CONTENT: the present communication invites the Member States to adapt as appropriate national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit. The Commission is willing to help the Member States on matters of targeting and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. It also recommends setting up a new European-level facility with staff to provide expertise and support for the development of non-bank micro-finance institutions in Member States . This would equip micro-financers to offer not just a loan, but a service mentoring the borrower to help develop and ensure the success of their business. This kind of accompaniment is the key to the success of micro-credit operations.

Financial support for this facility would come from the existing technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds (European Regional Development Fund - ERDF) managed by the European Commission. In view of the interest expressed by the European Investment Fund in this field, the facility could be managed within the Fund which is also responsible for the JEREMIE initiative to support access to finance to SMEs.

The proposed initiative has four different strands:

1) Improving the legal and institutional environment in the Member States : the institutional framework in the Member States appears to be often ill-suited to the development of micro-credit. Indeed, it is because micro-credit is usually not addressed specifically in the national or Community legislation that the statistics on micro-credit are underdeveloped. What is generally required is a series of actions improving what can be broadly described as the legal and institutional environment for micro-credit. The following highlights seven areas where improvement can be achieved at national level: i) create an environment allowing the development of micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and covering all segments of the clientele; ii) help micro-credit to become sustainable by relaxing interest caps for micro-credit operations; iii) allow MFIs access to borrower databases and facilitate their evaluation of the risks; iv) reduce operating costs applying favourable tax schemes; v) adapt national regulation and supervision to the specificity of micro-finance ; vi) ensure single market rules are applied to micro-credit; vii) incorporate micro-credit into regulation and accounting standards.

2) Further changing the climate in favour of entrepreneurship : actions include: i) improving the institutional framework for self-employment and micro-enterprises; ii) designing solutions to enable unemployed people and welfare recipients to make the transition into self-employment; iii) increasing chances of success of new micro-enterprises through training, mentoring and business development services.

The Commission proposes to promote micro-credit and micro-enterprise development at national level. It invites the Member States to undertake a programme of reform aimed at improving the conditions for micro-credit according to national circumstances and priorities. In view of the focus in the Lisbon strategy improving access to finance, in general, and promoting micro-credit in particular, Member States are encouraged within the context of their National Reform Programmes under the Lisbon strategy to take on board those actions necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit which fall within the national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks. The Commission could also help the Member States by indicating quantitative targets for loans and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices.

3) Promoting the spread of best practices, including training : dissemination of best practices is an important factor in the development of micro-credit which will continue to be fostered by existing resource centres such as the Microfinance Centre for Central and Eastern Europe, the European Microfinance Centre and the banks themselves. The Commission proposes: i) a central body with micro-financial expertise; ii) a micro-credit specific label to better involve EU citizens; iii) the need for a code of conduct for MFIs.

4) Providing additional financial capital for micro-credit institutions : the Commission intends to strengthen its contribution by setting up in the framework of EU cohesion policy a specific micro-credit facility providing funding and technical assistance to new and non-bank MFIs to enhance the supply of micro-credit. This facility would target the most promising non-bank MFIs by means of calls for proposals. Ideally, it would combine the provision of technical assistance with funding mobilised from various sources, such as EU structural funds, the EIB, the EUROFI network, banks and donors. It would aim at helping MFIs becoming self-sustaining and it would contribute improving the use of micro-credit in the EU by conducting market analysis, establishing guidelines and promoting training and learning opportunities that incorporate best practice in the field. In order to set this facility up rapidly and with a cost-effective structure, it is proposed to ask the European Investment Fund (EIF) to create and host a dedicated unit within their JEREMIE department. The funding for the staffing of the unit and the technical assistance work to MFIs would be covered through the technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds managed by the European Commission.

The proposals included in this initiative would provide a base to start concrete actions aimed at developing and implementing micro-credit in the European Union.

Lastly, appropriate communication campaigns must be undertaken in order to boost micro-credit in Europe and contribute to its development in the longer run, and evaluations carried out.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: TITLEY Gary date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/3
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: TITLEY Gary date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3/rapporteur
  • name: RANSDORF Miloslav date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/4
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: GILL Neena date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/5
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: GILL Neena date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
docs/0
date
2007-11-13T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/2
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.925&secondRef=02 title: PE414.925
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.925&secondRef=02 title: PE414.925
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2008-12-04T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.339&secondRef=02 title: PE412.339
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.925&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-414925_EN.html
docs/4
date
2008-12-04T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.339&secondRef=02 title: PE412.339
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2008-12-11T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.374&secondRef=02 title: PE414.374
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.339&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-412339_EN.html
docs/5
date
2008-12-11T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.374&secondRef=02 title: PE414.374
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2008-12-16T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.045&secondRef=03 title: PE415.045
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.374&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-414374_EN.html
docs/6
date
2008-12-16T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.045&secondRef=03 title: PE415.045
committee
JURI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.045&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-415045_EN.html
docs/7
date
2009-10-08T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2009)3245/3
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/7/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16693&j=0&l=en
docs/8
date
2009-10-08T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2009)3245/3
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2007-11-13T00:00:00
New
2007-11-12T00:00:00
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 47
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 046
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.375
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.375
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.336
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.336
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.925&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.925&secondRef=02
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.339&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.339&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.374&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.374&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.045&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.045&secondRef=03
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0041_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0041_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2009-01-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0041_EN.html title: A6-0041/2009
events/3
date
2009-01-29T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0041_EN.html title: A6-0041/2009
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE
events/6
date
2009-03-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0166_EN.html title: T6-0166/2009
summary
events/6
date
2009-03-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0166_EN.html title: T6-0166/2009
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: BECSEY Zsolt László date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2007-12-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BECSEY Zsolt László group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: TITLEY Gary date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2008-06-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TITLEY Gary group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: RANSDORF Miloslav date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: GILL Neena date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GILL Neena group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2008-06-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-41&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0041_EN.html
docs/7/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-41&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0041_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-166
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0166_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0708/COM_COM(2007)0708(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0708 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52007DC0708:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy Commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: TITLEY Gary body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BECSEY Zsolt László body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: GILL Neena
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: TITLEY Gary body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BECSEY Zsolt László body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: GILL Neena type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-41&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0041/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16693&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-166 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0166/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2007-12-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BECSEY Zsolt László group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2008-06-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PSE name: TITLEY Gary
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2008-06-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TITLEY Gary group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ECON
date
2007-12-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: BECSEY Zsolt László
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RANSDORF Miloslav group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2008-06-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GILL Neena group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2008-06-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2008-06-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: GILL Neena
docs
  • date: 2008-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.375 title: PE414.375 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.336 title: PE415.336 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.925&secondRef=02 title: PE414.925 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.339&secondRef=02 title: PE412.339 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.374&secondRef=02 title: PE414.374 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.045&secondRef=03 title: PE415.045 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-41&language=EN title: A6-0041/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16693&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3245/3 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-11-13T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0708/COM_COM(2007)0708(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0708 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=708 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to reinforce the development of micro-credit in Europe with a view to improving access to finance for small businesses and for socially excluded people, also ethnic minorities, who want to become self-employed. BACKGROUND: micro-credit has been used very successfully in less developed countries, and there has already been some action in this field in the EU, both at Community and at national level. In the EU, demand for this type of finance – typically, loans averaging around EUR 7 700 – is overwhelmingly from people setting up small companies in the service sector. All indications point to high potential demand from people who, for various reasons, are unable to obtain loans in the traditional banking sector. This initiative is intended to set out a framework to coordinate our efforts at EU level by improving the legal and institutional environment in which micro-credit providers operate, and increasing the availability of capital. CONTENT: the present communication invites the Member States to adapt as appropriate national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit. The Commission is willing to help the Member States on matters of targeting and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. It also recommends setting up a new European-level facility with staff to provide expertise and support for the development of non-bank micro-finance institutions in Member States . This would equip micro-financers to offer not just a loan, but a service mentoring the borrower to help develop and ensure the success of their business. This kind of accompaniment is the key to the success of micro-credit operations. Financial support for this facility would come from the existing technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds (European Regional Development Fund - ERDF) managed by the European Commission. In view of the interest expressed by the European Investment Fund in this field, the facility could be managed within the Fund which is also responsible for the JEREMIE initiative to support access to finance to SMEs. The proposed initiative has four different strands: 1) Improving the legal and institutional environment in the Member States : the institutional framework in the Member States appears to be often ill-suited to the development of micro-credit. Indeed, it is because micro-credit is usually not addressed specifically in the national or Community legislation that the statistics on micro-credit are underdeveloped. What is generally required is a series of actions improving what can be broadly described as the legal and institutional environment for micro-credit. The following highlights seven areas where improvement can be achieved at national level: i) create an environment allowing the development of micro-finance institutions (MFIs) and covering all segments of the clientele; ii) help micro-credit to become sustainable by relaxing interest caps for micro-credit operations; iii) allow MFIs access to borrower databases and facilitate their evaluation of the risks; iv) reduce operating costs applying favourable tax schemes; v) adapt national regulation and supervision to the specificity of micro-finance ; vi) ensure single market rules are applied to micro-credit; vii) incorporate micro-credit into regulation and accounting standards. 2) Further changing the climate in favour of entrepreneurship : actions include: i) improving the institutional framework for self-employment and micro-enterprises; ii) designing solutions to enable unemployed people and welfare recipients to make the transition into self-employment; iii) increasing chances of success of new micro-enterprises through training, mentoring and business development services. The Commission proposes to promote micro-credit and micro-enterprise development at national level. It invites the Member States to undertake a programme of reform aimed at improving the conditions for micro-credit according to national circumstances and priorities. In view of the focus in the Lisbon strategy improving access to finance, in general, and promoting micro-credit in particular, Member States are encouraged within the context of their National Reform Programmes under the Lisbon strategy to take on board those actions necessary to promote a more favourable environment for the development of micro-credit which fall within the national institutional, legal and commercial frameworks. The Commission could also help the Member States by indicating quantitative targets for loans and by compiling an inventory of good regulatory practices. 3) Promoting the spread of best practices, including training : dissemination of best practices is an important factor in the development of micro-credit which will continue to be fostered by existing resource centres such as the Microfinance Centre for Central and Eastern Europe, the European Microfinance Centre and the banks themselves. The Commission proposes: i) a central body with micro-financial expertise; ii) a micro-credit specific label to better involve EU citizens; iii) the need for a code of conduct for MFIs. 4) Providing additional financial capital for micro-credit institutions : the Commission intends to strengthen its contribution by setting up in the framework of EU cohesion policy a specific micro-credit facility providing funding and technical assistance to new and non-bank MFIs to enhance the supply of micro-credit. This facility would target the most promising non-bank MFIs by means of calls for proposals. Ideally, it would combine the provision of technical assistance with funding mobilised from various sources, such as EU structural funds, the EIB, the EUROFI network, banks and donors. It would aim at helping MFIs becoming self-sustaining and it would contribute improving the use of micro-credit in the EU by conducting market analysis, establishing guidelines and promoting training and learning opportunities that incorporate best practice in the field. In order to set this facility up rapidly and with a cost-effective structure, it is proposed to ask the European Investment Fund (EIF) to create and host a dedicated unit within their JEREMIE department. The funding for the staffing of the unit and the technical assistance work to MFIs would be covered through the technical assistance budget of the Structural Funds managed by the European Commission. The proposals included in this initiative would provide a base to start concrete actions aimed at developing and implementing micro-credit in the European Union. Lastly, appropriate communication campaigns must be undertaken in order to boost micro-credit in Europe and contribute to its development in the longer run, and evaluations carried out.
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted an own- initiative report by Zsolt László BECSEY (EPP-ED, HU) with recommendations to the Commission on a European initiative for the development of micro-credits in support of growth and employment (Initiative – Rule 39 of the Rules of Procedure). The report follows a Commission Communication on a European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment. The committee recalls that the Commission's current definition of micro-credit is a loan of EUR 25 000 or less and that Recommendation 2003/361/EC provides that a microenterprise is one that employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million. However, those definitions do not seem to be pertinent for all national markets, and do not allow a clear distinction to be drawn between micro-credits and micro-loans to microenterprises, micro-credit for non-bankable borrowers and micro-credit for bankable microenterprises. MEPs note that the Commission has not taken forward the request made in Parliament's resolution of 11 July 2007 to draw up an action plan for micro-financing, to coordinate different policy measures, and to make optimal use of best practices in and outside the EU. Moreover, they recall that, in 2008, for the second successive year, Parliament approved appropriations to fund a pilot project entitled ‘Promoting a more favourable environment for micro-credit in Europe’, appropriations that might usefully be earmarked for the formation of own capital which can serve as start-up capital. Difficult access to appropriate forms of finance is frequently referred to as a very important barrier to entrepreneurship, and there is a significant potential demand for micro-credit in the EU that is currently not met. MEPs consider that the current financial crisis and its possible repercussions in the economy as a whole demonstrate the need for considering ways of enhancing efficiency and having in place all possible channels for providing financing when businesses have reduced access to capital due to liquidity crunch, in particular in economically and socially disadvantages regions. In the light of these observations, the Commission is called upon to submit to Parliament a legislative proposal or proposals covering the matters dealt with in the detailed recommendations below: Recommendation 1: on awareness-raising as regards micro-credit : the introduction of the concept of micro-credit in relevant statistics and legislation on financial institutions; invite the Member States to standardise the statistical presentation of micro-credits (including the collection and analysis of data broken down according to gender, age and ethnic origin); develop a communication strategy with a view to promoting self-employment as an alternative to wage earning and, in particular, as a way to escape unemployment for disadvantaged target groups; invite Member States to implement tax incentives for private involvement in the micro-credit business; invite Member States to restrict the application of interest-rate caps to consumer loans; analyse - in the light of the last sub-prime crisis - the advantages and disadvantages of direct micro-credit formats as against securitised credit facilities. Recommendation 2: on EU funding : the (co-)financing of projects targeted at promoting the availability of micro-credit for all persons and enterprises without direct access to credit, such as disadvantaged target groups (for example, the Roma society, immigrants, people living in deprived rural areas, people with precarious work situations, and women); the provision by national or EU funds of guarantees for providers of micro-credit; the provision of business support services, to include mandatory targeted training for micro-credit borrowers, which can be financed under the Structural Funds; research and the exchange of best practices in the operational field; the creation of a website where potential recipients of micro-credits can present their projects and of an EU-wide database comprising positive and negative credit data on micro-credit borrowers; the appointment of a single coordination entity where all EU financing activities concerning micro-credit are pooled and the co-)financing of projects only where they can be combined with the retention of social security entitlements, such as unemployment benefit and income support. Recommendation 3: on a harmonised EU framework for bank and non-bank microfinance institutions (MFIs) : the non-bank MFIs framework should include: a clear definition of micro-credit providers; the ability to conduct credit-only activities and to on-lend; harmonised, risk-based rules as regards authorisation, registration, reporting and prudential supervision. Recommendation 4: on Directive 2005/60/EC : the Commission should, while reviewing this Directive, ensure that the provisions laid down do not constitute obstacles preventing people who have no permanent address or personal identification documents from accessing micro-credit. Recommendation 5: on competition rules : provide for, inter alia, while reviewing the de minimis rules, a reduction of the administrative burden if the aid is granted in connection with micro-credit; specify that the role of micro-credit providers and, if applicable, the public support that such institutions receive are in line with the EU competition rules; implement rules that allow for a preferential treatment of goods and services provided by micro-credit borrowers in public procurement procedures.
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-41&language=EN title: A6-0041/2009
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16693&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-166 title: T6-0166/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 574 votes to 23, with 12 abstentions, a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on a European initiative for the development of micro-credits in support of growth and employment. The resolution is in response to a Commission Communication on a European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment. The Parliament recalls that difficult access to appropriate forms of finance is frequently referred to as a very important barrier to entrepreneurship, and that there is a significant potential demand for micro-credit in the EU that is currently not met. The Commission's current definition of micro-credit is a loan of EUR 25 000 or less and that a microenterprise is one that employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million. However, those definitions do not seem to be pertinent for all national markets, and do not allow a clear distinction to be drawn between micro-credits and micro-loans to microenterprises, micro-credit for non-bankable borrowers and micro-credit for bankable microenterprises. MEPs note that the Commission has not taken forward the request made in Parliament's resolution of 11 July 2007 to draw up an action plan for micro-financing. They consider that the current financial crisis and its possible repercussions in the economy as a whole demonstrate the disadvantages of complex financial products and the need for considering ways of enhancing efficiency and having in place all possible channels for providing financing when businesses have reduced access to capital due to liquidity crunch, in particular in economically and socially disadvantages regions. In the light of these observations, the Commission is called upon to submit to Parliament a legislative proposal or proposals covering the matters dealt with in the detailed recommendations below: Recommendation 1: on awareness-raising as regards micro-credit : the introduction of the concept of micro-credit in relevant statistics and legislation on financial institutions; invite the Member States to standardise the statistical presentation of micro-credits (including the collection and analysis of data broken down according to gender, age and ethnic origin); develop a communication strategy with a view to promoting self-employment as an alternative to wage earning and, in particular, as a way to escape unemployment for disadvantaged target groups; invite Member States to implement tax incentives for private involvement in the micro-credit business; invite Member States to restrict the application of interest-rate caps to consumer loans; analyse - in the light of the last sub-prime crisis - the advantages and disadvantages of direct micro-credit formats as against securitised credit facilities. Recommendation 2: on EU funding : the (co-)financing of projects targeted at promoting the availability of micro-credit for all persons and enterprises without direct access to credit, such as disadvantaged target groups (for example, the Roma society, immigrants, people living in deprived rural areas, people with precarious work situations, and women); the provision by national or EU funds of guarantees for providers of micro-credit; the provision of business support services, to include mandatory targeted training for micro-credit borrowers, which can be financed under the Structural Funds; research and the exchange of best practices in the operational field; the creation of a website where potential recipients of micro-credits can present their projects and of an EU-wide database comprising positive and negative credit data on micro-credit borrowers; the appointment of a single coordination entity where all EU financing activities concerning micro-credit are pooled and the co-)financing of projects only where they can be combined with the retention of social security entitlements, such as unemployment benefit and income support. Recommendation 3: on a harmonised EU framework for bank and non-bank microfinance institutions (MFIs) : the non-bank MFIs framework should include: a clear definition of micro-credit providers; the ability to conduct credit-only activities and to on-lend; harmonised, risk-based rules as regards authorisation, registration, reporting and prudential supervision. Recommendation 4: on Directive 2005/60/EC : the Commission should, while reviewing this Directive, ensure that the provisions laid down do not constitute obstacles preventing people who have no permanent address or personal identification documents from accessing micro-credit. Recommendation 5: on competition rules : provide for, inter alia, while reviewing the de minimis rules, a reduction of the administrative burden if the aid is granted in connection with micro-credit; specify that the role of micro-credit providers and, if applicable, the public support that such institutions receive are in line with the EU competition rules; implement rules that allow for a preferential treatment of goods and services provided by micro-credit borrowers in public procurement procedures.
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ECON/6/62863
New
  • ECON/6/62863
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 046
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.50.04 Banks and credit
  • 3.45.03 Financial management of undertakings, business loans, accounting
  • 4 Economic, social and territorial cohesion
New
2.50.04
Banks and credit
3.45.03
Financial management of undertakings, business loans, accounting
4
Economic, social and territorial cohesion
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=708
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0708/COM_COM(2007)0708(COR1)_EN.pdf
other/0/dg/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
activities
  • date: 2007-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=708 celexid: CELEX:52007DC0708:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2007)0708 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy Commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
  • date: 2008-05-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: TITLEY Gary body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BECSEY Zsolt László body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: GILL Neena
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: TITLEY Gary body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BECSEY Zsolt László body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: GILL Neena type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-41&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0041/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16693&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-166 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0166/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2008-06-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: TITLEY Gary
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: BECSEY Zsolt László
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2008-06-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: WORTMANN-KOOL Corien
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: RANSDORF Miloslav
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: GILL Neena
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy commissioner: HÜBNER Danuta
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ECON/6/62863
reference
2008/2122(INL)
title
European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Request for legislative proposal
type
INL - Legislative initiative procedure
subject